Abstract
This article discusses judges’ perceptions of court appointed special advocates (CASA) programs in the rural state of Nebraska, as reported in two online surveys. The goal of CASA is “to train and support volunteers in advocating for safe and permanent homes for abused and neglected children” (CASA for Children 2013). One survey investigated the opinions of judges presiding in Nebraska counties that did not yet have a local CASA program; another was administered to judges in counties that did have a CASA program. A total of 36 judges completed a survey. Data from both surveys were analyzed separately and then compared to provide information regarding judges’ satisfaction with local programs and general perceptions of the Nebraska CASA Association. Results offer vital information for program growth and contain a hopeful tone for the Nebraska CASA Association and their goal of providing every child a voice by 2020. Both groups of judges expressed support for CASA programs overall, although judges in counties with CASA programs expressed significantly more support than those in counties without CASA programs. Judges presiding in counties with lower county populations and lower numbers of children in foster care also tended to be more supportive of the CASA program. Additional information was collected from judges regarding readiness for the development of CASA programs in counties not yet utilizing a program and perceived strengths and limitations of existing CASA programs. This study has the capacity to inform CASA programs seeking similar information to guide program growth in other states.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramson, S. (1991). Use of court-appointed advocates to assist in permanency planning for minority children. Child Welfare, 70, 477–487.
Belanger, K., & Stone, W. (2008). The social service divide: Service availability and accessibility in rural versus urban counties and impact on child welfare outcomes. Child Welfare, 87, 791–819.
Caulkins, C. A., & Millar, M. (1999). The effectiveness of court appointed special advocates to assist in permanency planning. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 16, 37–45.
Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) for Children. (2013). Retrieved from www.casaforchildren.org
Kaplan, S. J., Skolnik, L., & Turnbull, A. (2009). Enhancing the empowerment of youth in foster care: Supportive services. Child Welfare, 88, 133–160.
Landsman, J. M. (2002). Rural child welfare practice from an organization-in-environment perspective. Child Welfare League of America, 81, 227–241.
Leung, P. (1996). Is the court-appointed special advocate program effective? A longitudinal analysis of time involvement and case outcomes. Child Welfare, 75, 269–284.
Litzelfelner, P. (2000). The effectiveness of CASAs in achieving positive outcomes for children. Child Welfare, 69, 179–193.
Litzelfelner, P. (2008). Consumer satisfaction with CASAs (court appointed special advocates). Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 173–186.
Nebraska Department of Agriculture. (2013). Nebraska Agriculture. Retrieved from http://www.nda.nebraska.gov/publications/ne_ag_facts_brochure.pdf
Nebraska Appleseed. (2012). Child welfare reform and privatization. Retrieved from http://neappleseed.org/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/02/Fact-Sheet-CW-privatization-reform-final.pdf
Organizational Research Services. (2005). Evaluation of court appointed special advocates/guardians ad litem volunteer impact: Judicial survey. Retrieved from http://nc.casaforchildren.org/files/public/community/judges/Judges_Survey_FullReport_Appendices.pdf
Outley, A. (2006). Overcoming barriers to permanency: Recommendations for juvenile and family courts. Family Court Review, 44, 244–257.
Performance Audit Committee of the Nebraska Legislature. (2011). DHHS privatization of child welfare and juvenile services. Retrieved from http://nebraskalegislature.gov/pdf/reports/audit/privatization2011.pdf
Pitchal, E. S., Freundlich, M. D., & Kendrick, C. (2009). Evaluation of the guardian ad litem system in Nebraska. Retrieved from http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.naccchildlaw.org/resource/resmgr/nebraska/final_nebraska_gal_report_12.pdf
Poertner, J., & Press, A. (1990). Who best represents the interests of the child in court? Child Welfare, 69, 537–549.
U.S. Census. (2013). State & county quickfacts. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. (2013a). The AFCARS report. Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/afcarsreport20.pdf
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. (2013b). Child Maltreatment 2012. Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/cm2012.pdf
Weisz, V., & Thai, N. (2003). The court-appointed special advocate (CASA) program: Bringing information to child abuse & neglect cases. Child Maltreatment, 8, 204–210.
Acknowledgments
Funds for this research were received from the Nebraska CASA Association.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
West, A.C., O’Gara, J.L. & Harder, J. Judges’ Perceptions of the Nebraska CASA Program. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 32, 429–441 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-015-0384-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-015-0384-6