Abstract
The aim of this article is to report on the findings of an evaluation of a youth in foster care mentoring pilot program and the difficulty that arises when a program is not well implemented. The pilot program and evaluation of its effectiveness were mandated by the Texas 80th Legislature through the passing of HB 3008. Big Brothers Big Sisters of North Texas implemented the pilot to match youth in foster care age 14 years and older, who participate on a voluntary basis and who have been screened for participation by the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) with an adult mentor. As part of the pilot, youth were to receive 8 h of face-to-face time, and at least 1 h of phone, email, or text contact with their mentor. Though there were problems with implementation of the mentoring pilot, responses on the confidential youth survey suggest that those who did participate had positive experiences. Based on responses on the survey from the youth and based on the existing empirical literature on the benefits of mentoring programs for trouble youth and following the recommendations presented in this article the mentoring programs should be encouraged for youth aging out of foster care.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antle, B. F., Johnson, L., Barbee, A., & Sullivan, D. (2009). Fostering interdependent versus independent living in youth aging out of care through healthy relationships. Families in Society, 90(3), 309–315.
Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.
DuBois, D. L., Doolittle, F., Yates, B. T., Silverthorn, N., & Tebes, J. K. (2006). Research methodology and youth mentoring. Journal of Community Psychology, 34(6), 657–676.
DuBois, D. L., Holloway, B. E., Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. (2002). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(2), 157–197.
Grossman, J. B., & Rhodes, J. E. (2002). The test of time: Predictors and effects of duration in youth mentoring relationships. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(2), 199–219.
Osterling, K. L., & Hines, A. M. (2006). Mentoring adolescent foster youth: Promoting resilience during developmental transitions. Child and Family Social Work, 11(2), 42–253.
Rhodes, J. E., & Dubois, D. L. (2008). Mentoring relationships and programs for youth. Association for Psychological Science, 17(4), 254–258.
Rhodes, J. E., Haight, W. L., & Briggs, E. C. (2000). The influence of mentoring on the peer relationships of foster youth in relative and nonrelative care. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 9(2), 185–201.
Rhodes, J. E., & Lowe, S. R. (2008). Youth mentoring and resilience: Implications for practice. Child Care in Practice, 14(1), 9–17.
Shanahan, M. J. (2000). Pathways to adulthood in changing societies: Variability and mechanisms in life course perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 667–692.
Spencer, R., Collins, M. E., Ward, R., & Smashnaya, S. (2010). Mentoring for young people leaving foster care: Promise and potential pitfalls. Social Work, 55(3), 225–234.
Tierney, J. P., Grossman, J. B., & Resch, N. L. (2009). Making a difference: An impact study of Big Brothers Big Sisters. Philadelphia: A publication of Public/Private Ventures.
United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2003). The AFCARS report #7: Interim FY 2000 estimates. Retrieved 14 Mar 2010 from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb.
United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2010). The AFCARS report. Retrieved 14 Mar 2010 from http://acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb.
Wandersman, A., Clary, E. G., Farbush, J., Weinberger, S. G., Coyne, S. M., & Duffy, J. L. (2006). Community organizing and advocacy: Increasing the quality and quantity of mentoring programs. Journal of Community Psychology, 34(6), 781–799.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scannapieco, M., Painter, K.R. Barriers to Implementing a Mentoring Program for Youth in Foster Care: Implications for Practice and Policy Innovation. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 31, 163–180 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-013-0315-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-013-0315-3