Skip to main content
Log in

Implications of Recent Research on Eastern European Adoptees for Social Work Practice

  • Published:
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social workers engaged in preparing and supporting families that adopt non-infants and sibling groups from Russia and other Eastern European countries need to be well-versed in: (1) the issues that affect this population of adoptees and adopters; and (2) the recent research on both. They also need to expand the model of adoptive families that drives their work. The authors identify three areas of risk to successful older-child adoptee and adoptive family functioning, explore the consequences of detrimental adoption policies and practices on the micro and macro-levels, and make recommendations for needed changes. The changes the authors identify are framed through an investigation of recent research on international adoptees and their adoptive families. The authors use adoptive parents’ own words to make the issues they discuss more concrete. Implications for social worker training and practice, and expanded roles for social workers, are identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Phase I questionnaire consisted of 44 open- and closed-ended questions and statements, some with contingency questions. The questions were organized into five sections: I. Information about the adoptees. II. Information about the agency or facilitator respondents used. III. Respondents’ adoption experiences. IV. Respondents’ views about the involvement of state and federal governments in regulating agencies engaged in international adoption. V. Background questions about the respondents. Her research is designed as a longitudinal investigation, in which as many as possible of the original respondents are questioned again over time.

  2. The data reported in this section are drawn from tables compiled by the Immigration and Naturalization Service, Statistics Branch, Selected Un-Numbered and Numbered Tables and Varying Titles, listed here from earliest to most recent: Table 6D. Immigrants Admitted Under the Act of September 11, 1957 by Class of Admission and Country or Region of Birth: September 11, 1957–June 30, 1963; Immigrant Orphans Admitted to the United States by Country or Region of Birth: Years Ended June 30, 1964, June 30, 1965, June 30, 1966, June 30, 1967, June 30, 1968, and June 30, 1969; Immigrant Orphans Admitted to the United States, By Country or Region of Birth, Years Ended June 30, 1970, June 30, 1971, June 30, 1972, June 30, 1973, June 30, 1974, and June 30, 1975; Table 12. Immigrant Orphans Admitted to the United States by Country or Region of Birth, Year Ended June 30, 1965, July-through September 1976, and September 30, 1977–1980; IMM 2.5. Immigrant Orphans Admitted to the United States by Country or Region of Birth, Fiscal Years 1981–1985; Table(s) 14. Immigrants Admitted as Orphans by Sex, Age, and Region from Selected Countries of Birth, Fiscal Years 1986–1991; Table 15. Immigrant-Orphans Adopted by US Citizens by Sex, Age, Region and Selected Country of Birth, Fiscal Years 1992–2001; Table 12. Immigrant-Orphans Adopted by US Citizens by Gender, Age, and Region and Country of Birth, Fiscal Year 2002, 2005–2008; and Table 10. Immigrant Orphans Adopted by US Citizens by Gender, Age, and Region and Country of Birth, Fiscal Year 2003–2004.

  3. Other Easterm European “sending countries” of adptees to the United States include, but may not be limited to, Albania, Armenia, Azerbajian, Belarus, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, and Poland.

  4. Ruggiero began her research by making contacts and distributing questionnaires at a major adoption conference that I had been attending for several years. Subsequently, she attended other adoption conferences and sought opportunities to locate potential respondents at, or through, these events. She also publicized her research in two newsletters and on the web sites of groups likely to have members in the targeted categories. A colleague, Richard Elkington (now retired), assisted her in creating a web page at Providence College so that potential respondents could find out about her research online and could contact her either by email or telephone. Ruggiero also contacted the Editor of Adoptive Families of America Magazine asking her to include a brief note about the research at the end of a “Letter to the Editor” Ruggiero wrote. In addition, Ruggiero asked respondents who participated in her study for referrals to other adoptive parents whom they knew and who might also be interested in participating. Many respondents contacted her. A sizeable number of those who completed the questionnaire were also willing to provide the names and addresses of possible participants. Others said that they would pass on information about my study directly to friends and acquaintances.

  5. See Intercountry Adoption. Office of Children’s Issues. United States Department of State. Convention Countries http://adoption.state.gov/hague/overview/countries.html#, retrieved on July 31, 2009.

  6. Beginning in the mid 1990s, problems in the handling of international adoptions and of the some children placed with unprepared families caught the attention of both the printed and televised media. Coverage in the printed media included stories about the unethical or questionable practices of some private agencies (Frankel 1996; “Judge Suspends...” 1997; Saul 1997a, b, c; Halsne 2002), problems which children had or which agencies did not disclose to adoptive parents prior to the adoption (Elias 1994; Ochs 1994; Adoptees 1995; Whitford 1995; Acord 1996; Cimons 1996; Jay 1996; Nakashima 1996; Deane 1997; Hart 1997; Hart and Staff 1997; King and Hamilton 1997; Lash 2000a; Kendrick et al. 2001), about disrupted or troubled adoptions (Donahue 1996; Lash 2000b, c), reported cruelty (Seelye 1997; Prendergast 2001), charges of attempted child selling (Fragin 2000), and at least 12 deaths of Russian adoptees charged against adoptive parents to date (Romano 1996; Horn 1997; Peterson 2003; Mother 2003; Working and Madhani 2003; Working 2004; Working and Rodriguez 2004). Television specials on problems with international adoptions began to air in late 1995, beginning with a Dateline Special. Other special reports have followed: When Adoptions Go Wrong (May 29, 1996); Romania: What Happened to the Children? (January 16, 1997 ); Unlocking the Mysteries of the Brain: Emotionally Scarred Adopted from Eastern Europe (July 22, 1997); McGann and Lewarne (October 14, 1997); The Perfect Child (February 10, 2000), and a recent Dateline Special about the troubles experienced by a couple who adopted a boy from Romania when he was about 1½ years old. The special documented the approach they used and support they needed to help their son “rewire his brain” (June 29, 2003). At the time this program aired the boy was about 12 years. Over time, his behavior had become increasingly out of control.

  7. Empirical research on special-needs adoptions has been in evident in the literature since the 1980s. See for example, Partridge et al. 1986, Rosenthal et al. 1988, Barth and Berry 1988, Verhulst et al. January 1990a, b, May 1990, May 1992, Rosenthal and Groze 1990, Marcovitch et al. 1995, Rutter et al. 1998, 2001, Johnson 1997, Miller et al. 1995, Mainemer et al. 1998, Leung and Erich 2002 and Groza and Ryan 2002. These researchers have investigated and identified some of the important factors involved in successful and at-risk placements of special needs adoptees.

  8. Sociologists have conducted research on Romanian adoptees and their new families (Goldberg 1997, 2001), on Chinese adoptees (Tessler et al. 1999), and on children typically adopted beyond infancy and in sibling sets/groups primarily from Russia and other Eastern European countries (Ruggiero and Johnson 2001; Ruggiero 2001, 2003, 2004, 2007).

References

  • Acord, D. (1996, February 18). Overseas adoption brings joy to some parents, sorrow to others. The Buffalo News, News, p. 10A.

  • Adoptees come to the US with medical problems. (1995, February 7). The Washington Post, Health, p. Z05.

  • Ames, M. D. E., Morison, S. J., Fisher, L., & Chisolm, K. (2000). Some recommendations from a study of Romanian orphans adopted to British Columbia. In T. Tepper, L. Hannon, & D. Sandstrom, (Eds.), International Adoption: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 33–39).

  • Barth, R. P., & Berry, M. (1988). Adoption and disruption: Risks, rates, and responses. New York: Aldine DeGruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimons, M. (1996, March 17). Past traumas afflict many former East Bloc orphans. Los Angeles Times.

  • Deane, B. (1997, April 22). International adoptions: Can love beat the odds? Woman’s Day (pp. 95–98).

  • Donahue, P. C. (1996, July/August/September). Putting glue in their hearts is not enough. Roots and Wings, 32–33.

  • Elias, M. (1994, March 1). Romanian adoptees may bring problems to new homes. USA Today, p. 4D.

  • Fragin, S. (2000, May). Did she try to sell her child? Redbook www.redbookmag.com.

  • Frankel, M. (1996, September 23). One year in adoption hell. New York Magazine, 41-45.

  • Goldberg, R. (1997). Adopting Romanian children: Making choices, taking risks. Marriage and Family Review, 25(1/2), 79–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, R. (2001). The social construction of adoptive families: A follow-up study of adopting Romanian children. International Review of Sociology, 11(1), 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groza, V., & Ryan, S. D. (2002). Pre-adoption stress and its association with child behavior in domestic special needs and international adoptions. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 27(2), 181–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halsne, C. (2002). Adoption agency shops children from stranger to stranger kirotv.com.wysiwyg://1/http://www.kirotv.com/investigations/1868716/detail.html.

  • Hart, J. (1997, May 14). For adoptive families, love is not always enough. The Boston Globe, Metro/Region, p. A1.

  • Hart, J., & Staff, G. (1997, September 29). Forum explores hidden problems in overseas adoption; parents say traumas often not disclosed. The Boston Globe, Metro/Region, p. B3.

  • Horn, M. (1997, July 14). A dead child, a troubling defense. US News and World Report, 24–26, 28.

  • Jay, S. (1996, July 23). When children adopted abroad come with too many troubles. New York Times.

  • Johnson, D. (1997, January–February). Adopting an institutionalized child: What are the risks? The Post, Issue #9, 1–3.

  • Judge Suspends Adoption Agency. (1997, March 20). Newsday, p. A31.

  • Kendrick, B., & staff. (2001, February 11). Foreign adoption: Bringing heartache home. The Adoption Guide http://www.theadoptionguide.com.News/LoisHannon.html.

  • King, P., & Hamilton, K. (1997, June 16). Bringing kids all the way home. Newsweek, 60–65.

  • Lash, C. (2000a, August 13). Corruption, lack of regulations have resulted in troubled orphans: More US adoptions of Russians fail. Post Gazette, online.

  • Lash, C. (2000b, August 13). The boy they couldn’t raise. The Post Gazette, online.

  • Lash, C. (2000c, August 14). Overwhelmed families dissolve adoptions: More American parents find they can’t cope with ‘troubled children.’ The Post Gazette, online.

  • Leung, P., & Erich, S. (2002). Family functioning of adoptive children with special needs: Implications of familial supports and child characteristics. Children and Youth Services Review, 24(11), 799–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainemer, H., Gilman, L. C., & Ames, E. W. (1998). Parenting stress in families adopting children from Romanian orphanages. The Journal of Family Issues, 19(2), 164–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcovitch, S., Cesaroni, L., Roberts, W., & Swanson, C. (1995). Romanian adoption: Parents’ dreams, nightmares, and realities. Child Welfare, 74(Sept/Oct), 993–1017.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGann, M. A., & Lewarne, P. (1997, October 14). International adoption. CNN World Review. Transcript #97101405V18.

  • Miller, M. D. L. C., Kiernan, M. T., Mathers, M. I., & Klein-Gitelman, M. (1995). Developmental and nutritional status of internationally adopted children. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 149, No. 1 (January), 40-44.

  • Mother Charged in Death of Adopted Son. (2003, December 23). USA Today. P. 3A.

  • Nakashima, E. (1996, June 18). Untold disabilities: US parents encounter new problems after adoptions in Russia, Romania. The Washington Post, A Section, p. A01.

  • Ochs, R. (1994, Sunday, November 27). The lost children. Newsday, p. A26–27.

  • Partridge, S., Hornby, H., & McDonald, T. (1986). Legacies of loss, visions of gain: An inside look at adoption disruption. Portland: University of Southern Maine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, E. (2003, December 23). Adoptive mother’s bond at 3 million. Daily Herald.

  • Prendergast, K. (2001, July 23). Couple accused of cruelty to adopted teenager. MediaNews Group Inc.

  • Romania: What happened to the children? (1997, January 16). Turning Point.

  • Romano, M. (1996, February 13). Mother arrested in death of child. Rocky Mountain News.

  • Rosenthal, J. A., & Groze, V. (1990). Special needs adoption: Study of intact families. Social Service Review, (September), 475-505.

  • Rosenthal, J. A., Schmidt, D., & Conner, J. (1988). Predictors of special needs adoption disruption: An exploratory study. Children and Youth Services, 10, 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, J. A. (2001, August). Parents speak: Policy issues and implications of an empirical investigation of children and sibling groups adopted from Russia and Eastern Europe. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Meeting, Anaheim, CA.

  • Ruggiero, J. A. (2003, October). Entering the discourse and beyond: Roles for applied sociologists in the arena of adoption policies and practices in the 21st century. Paper presented at the 21st Annual Meeting of the Society for Applied Sociology, New Orleans, LA.

  • Ruggiero, J. A. (2004, August). The “public sociology” of adoptive family functioning: An examination of factors related to the formation of successful and at-risk families. Paper accepted at the American Sociological Association Meeting, San Francisco, CA.

  • Ruggiero, J. A. (2007). Eastern European adoption: Policies, practice, and strategies for change. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

  • Ruggiero, J. A., & Johnson, K. (2001, August). Private troubles and public issues: Shining a spotlight on policy practice issues in international adoption. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Society for Applied Sociology, Anaheim, CA.

  • Rutter, M. L., Kreppner, J. M., & O’Connor, T. G. (2001). Specificity and heterogeneity in children’s responses to profound institutional privation. British Journal of Psychiatry, 179, 97–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M. L., & Others on the English and Romanian Adoptees Study Team. (1998). Developmental catch-up, and deficit, following adoption after severe early global privation. Journal of Child Psychology-Psychiatry, 39(4), 465–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saul, S. (1997a, January 2). Broken dreams: In some foreign adoptions, hope fades to hard reality. News Day, p. A05.

  • Saul, S. (1997b, January 3). Agony not joy: Greatly torn, some give up adoptees they can’t handle. News Day, p. A06.

  • Saul, S. (1997c, January 5). Couples wait Wwth empty cradles as adoptions stall, agencies taken to court. News Day, p. A08.

  • Seelye, K. Q. (1997, November 2). Couple accused of beating daughters tell of adoption ordeal. The New York Times, Sect. 1, p. 37.

  • Tessler, R., Gamache, G., & Liu, L. (1999). West meets east: Americans adopt Chinese children. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • The perfect child. (2000, February 10). CBS 48 Hours.

  • Troubled adoptions. (1995, Fall) and (2003, June 29). Dateline Specials.

  • Unlocking the mysteries of the brain: Emotionally scarred adopted from Eastern Europe. (1997, July 22). ABC Nightline.

  • Verhulst, M. D. F., Althaus, C. M., & Versluis-Den Bieman, H. J. M. (1990a). Problem behavior in international adoptees: I. An epidemiological study. The Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 29(1), 94–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhulst, M. D. F., Althaus, C. M., & Versluis-Den Bieman, H. J. M. (1990b). Problem behavior in international adoptees: II. Age at placement. The Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 29(1), 104–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhulst, M. D. F., Althaus, C. M., & Versluis-Den Bieman, H. J. M. (1990c). Problem behavior in international adoptees: III. Diagnosis of child psychiatric disorders. The Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 29(3), 420–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhulst, M. D. F., Althaus, C. M., & Versluis-Den Bieman, H. J. M. (1992). Damaging backgrounds: Later adjustment of international adoptees. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 31(3), 518–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallwork-Winnik, L. (2001, January 28). Russia in crisis. Parade Magazine, 6.

  • When adoptions go wrong. (1996, May 29). The Leeza Gibbons Show.

  • Whitford, E. (1995, May 28). A long trip, a hard road: Desperate to help troubled children, parents band together. The Atlanta Journal/The Atlanta Constitution, C4.

  • Working, R. (2004, May 21). 12 Russian cases troubling, puzzling. The Chicago Times.

  • Working, R., & Madhani, A. (2003, December 28). Parents often not ready for needy foreign kids. The Chicago Times.

  • Working, R., & Rodriguez, A. (2004, May 21). Rescue of boy ends in tragedy. The Chicago Times.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Transaction Publishers for permission to use previously published material. They also wish to thank the following people for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper: Helmut E. Reinhardt, Tanya Sheikh, Dr. Thomas Kenemore, and the anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josephine A. Ruggiero.

Additional information

The authors discussed some of the issues included here in a presentation at 23rd Annual Meeting of the Sociological Practice Association, Anaheim, CA, August 20, 2001. Ruggiero further discussed adoption policy and practice issues at the 21st Annual Meeting of the Society for Applied Sociology, New Orleans, LA, October 17, 2003 and at the 99th Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, CA, August 16, 2004. The Ruggiero research cited here was supported, in part, through a Faculty Research grant from Providence College.

Appendices

Appendix A: A Profile of the Parents Who Participated in Ruggiero’s Questionnaire Survey

The typical (modal) respondent was the adoptive mother (84%) who lived in the mainland United States (over 95%), was in her forties at the time she completed the questionnaire (65%), was married (76%) to a spouse who was also in his forties age range (66%) at that time at the time she completed the questionnaire. Respondents were predominantly Caucasian and from no one dominant ethnic background. The same was true of spouses/partners. Most respondents (70%) were childless prior to adopting their first child internationally. They tended to adopt a single child (48%), although adopting two children was almost as likely (41%). If the respondent adopted two or more children simultaneously, the children were likely to be full siblings or half siblings. Typically, respondents adopted their first child internationally in 1997. For those who adopted a second child internationally in a separate adoption, the peak year for these adoptions was 1998. In the early part of the last decade, the peak year for adoptions was 1995. In the later part of the decade, the peak year for adoptions was 1997. In those 2 years alone 38% of these respondents’ children entered their new families.

Appendix B: A Profile of the Children These Respondents Adopted Internationally

The parents who participated in the questionnaire study adopted a total of 208 children. Because no information was provided on the dates that two of the children were adopted, the total number on which percentages are based was 206 children. The children adopted from an eastern European country ranged in age from 3 months (a child from Romania) to 15 years old (a child adopted from Bulgaria). The oldest child adopted by a respondent was 25 years old. She was the last of six East Indian girls adopted by a single mother.

The typical adoptee joined his/her adoptive family between 1990 and 2000 (96%) most likely between 1996 and 2001 (61%), was born in Russia (55%), had lived in his/her adoptive family between 2 and 4 years (52%) at the time his/her parent(s) participated in the questionnaire survey. Most of the children (90%) were adopted from an orphanage and about half (51%) had lived in an orphanage setting for at least 2 years before being adopted. If the child was a single adoptee, that child was likely to be a girl. Girls outnumbered boys by about three to two. If two children were adopted, they were likely to be a girl and a boy (64%). If two or more children were adopted together, they were likely to be siblings. Almost two out of three (65%) of these adoptees were 25 months old or older when they were adopted. Most (56%) adoptees had never lived in the birth home. When an adoptee did live in the birth home prior to entering the orphanage, according to the adoptive parent(s), s/he was likely to have entered the orphanage either because birth parental rights were terminated by the courts due to neglect and/or abuse (61%) or because the child was abandoned (17%).

Most (81%) adoptees were reported to have a problem in at least one of five categories at the time of adoption: physical, behavioral, emotional, psychological, and other. About one in 10 respondents said that some of their children had problems but others did not. About two-thirds of the adoptees were likely to have problems in at least two categories: 16% in two categories, 44% in three categories, and six percent in four or five categories. If an adoptee had a single problem, that problem was likely to be “physical health” (69%). Emotional and behavioral problems ranked next, followed by psychological ones. When parents reported multiple problems, the constellation of problems typically included emotional, behavioral, and psychological issues. Adoptees were more likely than not to still have the problem or problems at the time respondents completed the questionnaire (56%). An additional 13% of respondents said that some of the children they adopted did. Typically, problems DID NOT resolve by themselves. Respondents reported that their child/children needed speech therapy (54%) of the children with this problem, services for “other” problems (53%), special education (45%), psychological or psychiatric services (43%), and language services (32%). Parents said they were generally able to arrange for services their child/children seemed to need. They were most successful in obtaining speech and psychological services (98% for each), followed by “other” services (85%), special education (84%), and language (78%). Just over half (54%) of the respondents reported paying “out-of-pocket” for the services their child/children needed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruggiero, J.A., Johnson, K. Implications of Recent Research on Eastern European Adoptees for Social Work Practice. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 26, 485–504 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-009-0181-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-009-0181-1

Keywords

Navigation