Skip to main content
Log in

On the approximation ratio threshold for the reoptimization of the maximum number of satisfied equations in linear systems over a finite field

  • Published:
Cybernetics and Systems Analysis Aims and scope

Abstract

When an arbitrary equation is inserted into a linear system over the field GF(2) that contains exactly 3 variables from the set of n variables in each equation, the problem of the maximum number of satisfied equations is reoptimized with approximation ratio 3/2. This approximation ratio is a threshold. A similar result holds for systems that contain k variables in each equation when k = O(log n).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Arora, C. Lund, R. Motwani, M. Sudan, and M. Szegedy, “Proof verification and intractability of approximation problems,” J. of the ACM, 45, No. 3, 501–555 (1998).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. O. Goldreich, S. Goldwasser, and D. Ron, “Property testing and its connection to learning and approximation abstract,” J. of the ACM, 45, No. 4, 653–750 (1998).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. O. Goldreich and M. Sudan, “Locally testable codes and PCPs of almost-linear length,” J. of the ACM, 53, No. 4, 558–655 (2006).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Hastad, “Some optimal inapproximability results,” J. of the ACM, 48, No. 4, 798–859 (2001).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Hastad, Complexity Theory, Proofs, and Approximation, European Congress of Mathematics, Stockholm, Sweden (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Ausiello, B. Escoffier, J. Monnot, and V. Th. Paschos, “Reoptimization of minimum and maximum traveling salesman’s tours,” in: Algorithmic Theory – SWAT 2006, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 4059, 196–207, Springer, Berlin (2006).

  7. H. J. Bockenhauer, L. Forlizzi, J. Hromkovic, et al., “On the approximability of TSP on local modifications of optimal solved instances,” Algorithmic Oper. Res., 2, No. 2, 83–93 (2007).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. H. J. Bockenhauer, J. Hromkovic, T. Momke, and P. Widmayer, “On the hardness of reoptimization,” in: Proc. 34th Intern. Conf. on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Computer Science (SOF- SEM 2008), Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 4910, 50–65, Springer, Berlin (2008).

  9. B. Escoffier, M. Milanic, and V. Paschos, “Simple and fast reoptimizations for the Steiner tree problem (Techn. Rep.),” Algorithmic Oper. Res., 4, No. 2, 86–94 (2009).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Archetti, L. Bertazzi, and M. G. Speranza, “Reoptimizing the traveling salesman problem,” Networks, 42, No. 3, 154–159 (2003).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. C. Archetti, L. Bertazzi, and M. G. Speranza, “Reoptimizing the 0–1 knapsack problem,” Discrete Applied Mathematics, 158 (17), 1879–1887 (2010).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Ausiello, V. Bonifaci, and B. Escoffier, “Complexity and approximation in reoptimization,” in: Computability in Context: Computation and Logic in the Real World, Imperial College Press, CiE-CS: CiE 2007 (2007), pp. 24–33.

  13. V. A. Mikhailyuk, “Reoptimization of set covering problems,” Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 46, No. 6, 879–883 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. V. A. Mikhailyuk, “General approach to estimating the complexity of postoptimality analysis for discrete optimization problems,” Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 46, No. 2, 290–295 (2010).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. R. O’Donnel, “Some topics in analysis of Boolean functions,” Electronic Colloquium on Comput. Complexity, Rep. No. 55 (2008).

  16. S. Khot, “Inapproximability of NP-complete problems, discrete Fourier analysis, and geometry,” in: Proc. Intern. Congress of Mathematicians, Hyderabad, India (2010).

  17. R. Raz, “A parallel repetition theorem,” SIAM J. on Computing, 27, No. 3, 763–803 (1998).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. V. V. Vazirani, Approximation Algorithms, Springer, Berlin (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Gary and D. Johnson, Computers and Intractability [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. A. Mikhailyuk.

Additional information

Translated from Kibernetika i Sistemnyi Analiz, No. 3, pp. 18–34, May–June 2012.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mikhailyuk, V.A. On the approximation ratio threshold for the reoptimization of the maximum number of satisfied equations in linear systems over a finite field. Cybern Syst Anal 48, 335–348 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-012-9413-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-012-9413-z

Keywords

Navigation