Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating multifactor risks under conceptual uncertainty

  • Systems Analysis
  • Published:
Cybernetics and Systems Analysis Aims and scope

A tool is proposed to evaluate multifactor risks during the operation of an innovation system of technological forecast. A modified BOCR method of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is developed. It allows: integrating the situation and force majeur risk evaluation into an overall structure of decision making with the help of AHP along with evaluating benefits, costs, and opportunities for each alternative; processing expert judgments in the form of fuzzy preference relations; taking into account a time parameter, when decision factors and alternatives may be corrected or fundamentally changed during some period. Indices of the risk of subjective judgment (information risk) evaluation are developed for given point, interval, and fuzzy expert judgments and probability distribution of expert judgments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Z. Zgurovskii and N. D. Pankratova, Systems Analysis: Problems, Methodology, Applications [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kyiv (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Z. Zgurovskii and N. D. Pankratova, Technological Prediction [in Russian], Politekhnika, Kyiv (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. D. Pankratova, “A rational compromise in the system problem of disclosure of conceptual uncertainty,” Cybern. Syst. Analysis, 38, No. 4, 618–631 (2002).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. N. Pankratova and B. Kurilin, “Conceptual foundations of the system analysis of risks in dynamics of control of complex system safety. Part 2. The general problem of the system analysis of risks and the strategy of its solving,” J. Autom. Inform. Sci., 33, No. 4, 1–14 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Th. Saaty, “Theory of the analytic hierarchy process. Part 2.1,” Systemni Doslidzh. Informats. Tekhnologii, No. 1, 48–72 (2003).

  6. Th. Saaty, “Theory of the analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes — examples, Part 2.2,” Systemni Doslidzh. Informats. Tekhnologii, No. 2, 7–34 (2003).

  7. W. E. Stein and P. J. Mizzi, “The harmonic consistency index for the analytic hierarchy process,” Europ. J. Oper. Res., 177, 488–497 (2007).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Aguaron and J. M. Moreno-Jimenez, “The geometric consistency index: Approximated thresholds,” Europ. J. Oper. Res., 147, 137–145 (2003).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. V. G. Totsenko, Decision-Support Methods and Systems. Algorithmic Aspect [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kyiv (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. D. Pankratova and N. I. Nedashkivs’ka, “Complex evaluation of the sensitivity of a solution based on the analytic hierarchy process,” Systemni Doslidzh. Informats. Tekhnologii, No. 3, 7–25 (2006).

  11. N. D. Pankratova and N. I. Nedashkovskaya, “Method for processing fuzzy expert information in prediction problems. Part II,” J. Autom. Inform. Sci., 39, No. 6, 30–44 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. N. D. Pankratova and N. I. Nedashkovskaya, “Method for processing fuzzy expert information in prediction problems. Part I,” J. Autom. Inform. Sci., 39, No. 4, 22–36 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. D. Pankratova.

Additional information

Translated from Kibernetika i Sistemnyi Analiz, No. 2, pp. 72–82, March–April 2009.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pankratova, N.D., Nedashkovskaya, N.I. Evaluating multifactor risks under conceptual uncertainty. Cybern Syst Anal 45, 223–231 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-009-9090-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-009-9090-8

Keywords

Navigation