Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Immediate reperfusion of the infarct-related vessel by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) to limit myocardial injury [1, 2]. Several studies prove a decline in mortality following STEMI during the last decades in parallel with a greater use of primary PCI, modern antithrombotic therapy, and improved secondary prevention. However, mortality rates are still substantial, and the number of patients with post-infarction heart failure is on the rise [3]. Consequently, there is an inevitable need for additional treatment options to reduce post-infarction myocardial and microvascular damage and prevent adverse left ventricular remodeling and heart failure.
Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is one of the most innovative and promising approaches in this regard. Brief cycles of transient ischemia and reperfusion applied to an organ or tissue remote from the heart resulted in reduced myocardial damage in experimental models of acute myocardial infarction [4, 5]. In the clinical setting, the RIC stimuli can be simply delivered by the repetitive inflation and deflation of an upper arm blood pressure cuff, which makes RIC a non-invasive, low-cost adjunct to the established treatment options. However, the powerful cardioprotective effects of RIC in animal studies did not convincingly translate into the expected improvement in clinical outcome. Initial proof-of-concept studies in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were promising with a significant reduction of myocardial injury assessed by biomarker release or cardiac imaging and a reduction of adverse events, mainly post-infarction heart failure, in smaller clinical studies and meta-analyses [4]. In accordance, the randomized RIC-STEMI trial (n = 448 patients) reported reduced rates of cardiac death and hospitalization for heart failure after additional RIC [6], and the long-term results of the LIPSIA CONDITIONING trial (n = 696 STEMI patients) also indicate a prevention of post-infarction heart failure after RIC in combination with ischemic post-conditioning (via repetitive brief interruptions of coronary blood flow immediately after reperfusion) [7, 8]. However, most recently the large international, multicenter, randomized controlled CONDI-2/ERIC-PPCI trial failed to show any beneficial effect of RIC in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI (n = 5401) on clinical outcomes (cardiac death, heart failure rehospitalization) [9]. Differences in the RIC algorithms (e.g., number and duration of limb ischemia/reperfusion cycles or RIC of arm versus leg) and the use of RIC alone rather than multi-targeted approaches such as a combination of RIC with ischemic post-conditioning are among the potential reasons for the failure to translate cardioprotective effects of RIC into superior clinical outcome. Furthermore, animal models of ischemia/reperfusion do not exactly resemble STEMI in a patient and comorbidities (e.g., hypertension or diabetes) and infarct characteristics (e.g., duration of ischemia or extent of ischemic myocardium) might impact the cardioprotective effect of RIC. In addition, adverse interaction with prescribed medications (e.g., aspirin) may dampen or mask the effects of RIC in the clinical setting [10, 11].
In this issue of the journal, Yu Zheng and colleagues present the rationale and design of the intelligent “Internet-Plus”-based full disease cycle remote ischemic conditioning (i-RIC) trial [12]. This clinical trial will randomize 4700 STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI at five hospitals in China to pre-, per-, and post-operative RIC combined with long-term i-RIC after infarction or to conventional treatment. The primary study endpoint is the combined 12-month rate of cardiac death and hospitalization for heart failure. The i-RIC trial is well designed and investigates several novel approaches in the field of RIC. The completely non-invasive conditioning protocol covers the whole disease cycle before, during, and for several weeks after primary PCI. Of note, the terms “pre“, “per,” and “post” in the present study protocol refer to reperfusion of the culprit vessel by primary PCI rather than the beginning of ischemia, which is the predominant reference particularly in experimental studies. Previous large clinical studies used either RIC before primary PCI (CONDI-2/ERIC-PPCI) [9] or post-conditioning by repeated balloon occlusions immediately after reperfusion of the infarct-related coronary artery and before stent implantation (DANAMI-3-iPOST) [13]. Both concepts failed to improve clinical outcome in patients with STEMI [9, 13]. The long-term results of the LIPSIA CONDITIONING trial, however, suggest that the combination of RIC and ischemic post-conditioning may improve clinical outcome by a reduction of heart failure events [8]. Therefore, an extended conditioning protocol covering the time of ischemia, reperfusion, and post-infarction myocardial healing and repair has the potential for additive cardioprotective effects and subsequently an improved clinical outcome. Another innovative aspect of the i-RIC trial is the fully non-invasive conditioning algorithm with an automated cuff inflation/deflation device and real-time monitoring of treatment adherence with a smartphone application during follow-up [12]. In contrast to previous studies, which used manual inflation/deflation of a blood pressure cuff, this approach allows a standardized, operator-independent application of the RIC stimuli. A relevant drawback in the study protocol is the use of clopidogrel rather than prasugrel or ticagrelor, which are the preferred P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with STEMI [1]. Furthermore, an extended follow-up beyond 12 months after infarction might be important since the protective effects regarding heart failure prevention, for example, in LIPSIA CONDITIONING, were observed on the long run several years after the index event [8]. However, the i-RIC trial will definitely add to our knowledge regarding the cardioprotective impact of RIC on structural/functional myocardial damage and clinical outcome following STEMI. Besides, the large study population potentially allows the identification of high-risk subgroups with particular benefits after cardioprotective approaches in addition to state-of-the-art reperfusion and medical treatment.
In conclusion, despite sobering results in the most recent RIC studies, RIC should not yet be abandoned and deserves further clinical evaluation. The i-RIC trial pursues some innovative approaches and will provide novel insights into the clinical value of RIC in patients with STEMI. In addition, experimental studies are required to elucidate the underlying mechanism and signal pathways of RIC in order to improve conditioning protocols and patient selection.
References
Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, et al. 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:119–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.
Niccoli G, Montone RA, Ibanez B, Thiele H, Crea F, Heusch G, et al. Optimized treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 2019;125:245–58. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.315344.
Moran AE, Forouzanfar MH, Roth GA, Mensah GA, Ezzati M, Flaxman A, et al. The global burden of ischemic heart disease in 1990 and 2010: the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Circulation. 2014;129:1493–501. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004046.
Heusch G, Botker HE, Przyklenk K, Redington A, Yellon D. Remote ischemic conditioning. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:177–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.10.031.
Birnbaum Y, Hale SL, Kloner RA. Ischemic preconditioning at a distance: reduction of myocardial infarct size by partial reduction of blood supply combined with rapid stimulation of the gastrocnemius muscle in the rabbit. Circulation. 1997;96:1641–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.96.5.1641.
Gaspar A, Lourenco AP, Pereira MA, Azevedo P, Roncon-Albuquerque R Jr, Marques J, et al. Randomized controlled trial of remote ischaemic conditioning in ST-elevation myocardial infarction as adjuvant to primary angioplasty (RIC-STEMI). Basic Res Cardiol. 2018;113:14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00395-018-0672-3.
Eitel I, Stiermaier T, Rommel KP, Fuernau G, Sandri M, Mangner N, et al. Cardioprotection by combined intrahospital remote ischaemic perconditioning and postconditioning in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the randomized LIPSIA CONDITIONING trial. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:3049–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv463.
Stiermaier T, Jensen JO, Rommel KP, de Waha-Thiele S, Fuernau G, Desch S, et al. Combined intrahospital remote ischemic perconditioning and postconditioning improves clinical outcome in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 2019;124:1482–91. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.314500.
Hausenloy DJ, Kharbanda RK, Moller UK, Ramlall M, Aaroe J, Butler R, et al. Effect of remote ischaemic conditioning on clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (CONDI-2/ERIC-PPCI): a single-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394:1415–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32039-2.
Birnbaum GD, Birnbaum I, Ye Y, Birnbaum Y. Statin-induced cardioprotection against ischemia-reperfusion injury: potential drug-drug interactions. Lesson to be learnt by translating results from animal models to the clinical settings. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2015;29:461–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-015-6615-4.
Birnbaum Y, Lin Y, Ye Y, Martinez JD, Huang MH, Lui CY, et al. Aspirin before reperfusion blunts the infarct size limiting effect of atorvastatin. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;292:H2891–7. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.01269.2006.
Zheng Y, Reinhardt JD, Li J, Hu D, Lin S, Wang L, et al. Can clinical and functional outcomes be improved with an intelligent “internet plus”-based full disease cycle remote ischemic conditioning program in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention? Rationale and Design of the i-RIC Trial. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2020;[Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-020-07022-9.
Engstrom T, Kelbaek H, Helqvist S, Hofsten DE, Klovgaard L, Clemmensen P, et al. Effect of ischemic postconditioning during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2:490–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2017.0022.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Stiermaier, T., Birnbaum, Y. & Eitel, I. Is there a Future for Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Acute Myocardial Infarction?. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 36, 197–199 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-020-07074-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-020-07074-x