Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction: The Clinical Significance of Small Dense LDL
Diabetic dyslipidemia usually includes elevated triglyceride levels, reduced high-density lipoproteins (HDL) cholesterol levels and increased levels of small dense (sd) low-density lipoproteins (LDL) [1]. These alterations can be seen despite normal or near-normal levels of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) [2], which means that patients with type-2 diabetes (T2DM) have profound changes in the quality rather than the quantity of LDL [3]. As highlighted by a European Panel of experts who have reviewed the pathophysiology, atherogenicity and clinical significance of LDL Subclasses, LDL are very heterogeneous particles, differing in physico-chemical composition, metabolic behaviour, oxidative susceptibility and atherogenic potential; up to seven distinct LDL subclasses can be distinguished [4].
Smaller, more dense LDL are those more strongly associated with cardiovascular risk, as shown in the last years in more than a hundred studies, including epidemiological and cross-sectional studies, clinical intervention trials as well as angiographic studies [5]. Recently, Hoogeveen et al. [6] have measured sdLDL-cholesterol in 11,419 men and women of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. These participants were followed up for a period of 11 years during which the incidence of CHD was measured. The authors have confirmed that sdLDL are higher in subjects with T2DM compared with non-diabetics; further, sdLDL-C significantly predicted the risk for CHD, even in individuals considered to be at low cardiovascular risk based on their LDL-C concentrations. This is in line with a number of previous observations, highlighting the role of sdLDL in predicting cardiovascular risk in a better fashion than standard lipids, including plasma LDL-C concentrations [4].
Since a large residual cardiovascular risk is usually seen in large clinical intervention trials, it has been proposed that there is more to predicting vascular disease than just established risk factors [7], highlighting the role of the quality vs. the quantity of atherogenic lipoproteins, including sdLDL. Therefore, in the last two decades a number of clinical studies have assessed the role of cardiovascular medications, particularly lipid-lowering agents, in modulating distinct LDL subclasses. Overall, statins and fibrates have shown strong and significant effects in reducing sdLDL [4], and this is of importance for patients with T2DM, where a predominance of sdLDL is usually present [1].
The Effects of Anti-Diabetic Therapies on LDL Subclasses
Traditional anti-diabetic therapies, such as insulin and metformin, have no significant impact on sdLDL, but data is very limited. For example, in a study on patients with T2DM who were treated with high doses of sulfonylureas, intensive insulin therapy decreased sdLDL although these changes were associated with those in plasma triglyceride concentrations [8]. In contrast, metformin did not affect LDL size [9]. Regarding thiazolidinediones, pioglitazone overall has more positive effects on plasma lipids and sdLDL compared with rosiglitazone [10]; this differential effect of the two drugs may help to explain the adverse cardiovascular risk profile of rosiglitazone [11]. The most interesting data are available from comparative studies using these two drugs: in a study performed in patients with diabetes and dyslipidemia [12], pioglitazone resulted in a more pronounced increase in LDL size compared with rosiglitazone, whereas LDL particle concentration was reduced with pioglitazone and increased with rosiglitazone. Similarly, in a much smaller study [13], pioglitazone induced significant reductions in sdLDL while rosiglitazone did not.
Interesting data are coming from the novel incretin-based therapies. Under physiological conditions in response to oral food ingestion, humans produce two hormones called “incretins” in the gastro-intestinal tract, in order to help to maintain glucose homeostasis through their coordinated effects on pancreatic islet cells; these two hormones are named the glucagon-like polypeptide (GLP-1) and the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) [14]. Yet, the effect induced by the incretins is diminished or lost in T2DM patients and therefore novel therapies have been developed. Two different class of drugs are present in the market, the incretin glucagon-like polypeptide (GLP-1) receptor agonists, mimicking the action of the endogenous GLP-1, and the dipeptyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, that inhibit the activity of the enzyme that degrades GLP-1. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first GLP-1 receptor analog, exenatide, as adjunctive therapy for T2DM patients in 2005; 1 year later, the FDA approved the first DPP-4-inhibitor, sitagliptin, as monotherapy or in combination with metformin or thiazolidinediones. Since then, a large number of GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors have been developed, some of which have already been introduced in the market.
These new drugs have shown important glycemic and non-glycemic effects, including those on cardiovascular risk factors as well as on clinical and subclinical atherosclerosis [15, 16]. Incretin-based therapies can also favorably manage diabetic dyslipidemia, reducing the plasma concentrations of triglycerides, total cholesterol and LDL-C, with a concomitant increase in plasma HDL-cholesterol levels [14, 17]. Preliminary data also suggest that these novel anti-diabetic drugs may favourably modulate LDL subclasses, since both vildagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, and exenatide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, seems to be able to reduce sdLDL [18, 19]. Yet, this promising data from these studies need to be confirmed in much larger cohorts, as well as with the use of the other incretin-based agents.
In this context, interesting data are available for colesevelam, a bile acid sequestrant, since this drug has been shown to improve both glycemic and lipid parameters in patients with T2DM when added to metformin, sulfonylureas or insulin [20]. Notably, in T2DM subjects colesevelam can also reduce sdLDL in combination with metformin and/or sulfonylureas [21, 22] as well as in monotherapy, as shown by Rosenson et al. in this issue of Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy [23]. It therefore seems to be a promising approach to simultaneous glycemic and lipid control.
Conclusions
Clearly, more studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of incretin-based therapies, as well as of colesevelam on lipoprotein subclasses, including sdLDL. Such studies should also investigate whether the reduction of atherogenic lipoproteins by such agents would result in a reduction of cardiovascular outcome in T2DM patients. Clinicians need novel agents able to manage T2DM as well as the associated cardiovascular risk. This is in line with the FDA 2008 guidance that all drugs approved for T2DM should undergo post-approval studies to demonstrate cardiovascular safety [24]. Further, HDL are also heterogeneous particles and it seems that the presence of dysfunctional HDL particles represents a novel important diagnostic and therapeutic target in cardiovascular disease [25]. This may be related to the subclasses of HDL like for sdLDL.
References
Krauss RM. Lipids and lipoproteins in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(6):1496–504.
Mora S, Otvos JD, Rosenson RS, Pradhan A, Buring JE, Ridker PM. Lipoprotein particle size and concentration by nuclear magnetic resonance and incident type 2 diabetes in women. Diabetes. 2010;59(5):1153–60.
Rizzo M, Berneis K, Koulouris S, Pastromas S, Rini GB, Sakellariou D, et al. Should we measure routinely oxidized and small dense low-density lipoproteins in subjects with type 2 diabetes? Int J Clin Pract. 2010;64:1632–42.
Mikhailidis DP, Elisaf MS, Rizzo M, Berneis K, Griffin B, Zambon A, et al. “European Panel on Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Subclasses”: a statement on the pathophysiology, atherogenicity and clinical significance of LDL subclasses. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2011;9:533–71.
Nikolic D, Katsiki N, Montalto G, Isenovic ER, Mikhailidis DP, Rizzo M. Lipoprotein subfractions in metabolic syndrome and obesity: clinical significance and therapeutic approaches. Nutrients. 2013;5:928–48.
Hoogeveen RC, Gaubatz JW, Sun W, Dodge RC, Crosby JR, Jiang J, et al. Small dense low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol concentrations predict risk for coronary heart disease: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34:1069–77.
Rizzo M, Mikhailidis DP. There is more to predicting vascular disease than just established risk factors. Curr Pharm Des. 2011;17:3608–10.
Hayashi T, Hirano T, Yamamoto T, Ito Y, Adachi M. Intensive insulin therapy reduces small dense low-density lipoprotein particles in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: relationship to triglyceride-rich lipoprotein subspecies. Metabolism. 2006;55:879–84.
Chu NV, Kong AP, Kim DD, et al. Differential effects of metformin and troglitazone on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:542–9.
Rizzo M, Avogaro A, Montalto G, Rizvi AA. Non-glycemic effects of pioglitazone and incretin-based therapies. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2013;17:739–42.
Nissen SE, Wolski K. Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2457–71.
Goldberg RB, Kendall DM, Deeg MA, et al. A comparison of lipid and glycemic effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1547–54.
Berneis K, Rizzo M, Stettler C, et al. Comparative effects of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone on fasting and postprandial low density lipoprotein size and subclasses in patients with type 2 diabetes. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008;9:343–9.
Rizzo M, Rizvi AA, Spinas GA, et al. Glucose lowering and anti-atherogenic effects of incretin-based therapies: GLP-1 analogues and DPP4-inhibitors. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2009;18:1495–503.
Dhindsa S, Jialal I. Potential anti-atherosclerotic effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Diab Rep. 2014;14:463.
Rizzo M, Chandalia M, Patti AM, Di Bartolo V, Rizvi AA, Montalto G. Liraglutide decreases carotid intima-media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes: 8-month prospective pilot study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014;13:49.
Rizzo M, Nikolic D, Banach M, et al. The effects of liraglutide on glucose, inflammatory markers and lipoprotein metabolism: current knowledge and future perspectives. Clin Lipidol. 2013;8:173–81.
Matikainen N, Taskinen MR. The effect of vildagliptin therapy on atherogenic postprandial remnant particles and LDL particle size in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2013;30:756–7.
Chiquette E, Toth PP, Ramirez G, Cobble M, Chilton R. Treatment with exenatide once weekly or twice daily for 30 weeks is associated with changes in several cardiovascular risk markers. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2012;8:621–9.
Ooi CP, Loke SC. Colesevelam for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12, CD009361.
Rosenson RS, Abby SL, Jones MR. Colesevelam HCl effects on atherogenic lipoprotein subclasses in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Atherosclerosis. 2009;204(2):342–4.
Goldberg RB, Rosenson RS, Hernandez-Triana E, Misir S, Jones MR. Initial combination therapy with metformin plus colesevelam improves lipoprotein particles in patients with early type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Lipidol. 2012;6(4):318–24.
Rosenson RS, Rigby SP, Jones MR, Chou HS. Effect of colesevelam HCl monotherapy on lipid particles in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2014;28. doi:10.1007/s10557-014-6516-y
Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: diabetes mellitus—evaluating cardiovascular risk in new antidiabetic therapies to treat type 2 diabetes. Silver Spring: Food and Drug Administration; 2008.
Otocka-Kmiecik A, Mikhailidis DP, Nicholls SJ, Davidson M, Rysz J, Banach M. Dysfunctional HDL: a novel important diagnostic and therapeutic target in cardiovascular disease? Prog Lipid Res. 2012;51(4):314–24.
Declaration of interest
This review was written independently. The authors did not receive financial or professional help with the preparation of the manuscript. The authors have given talks, attended conferences and participated in advisory boards and trials sponsored by various pharmaceutical companies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rizzo, M., Mikhailidis, D.P. & Al-Rasadi, K. The Effects of Anti-Diabetic Drugs on LDL Subclasses: Any Role for Colesevelam?. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 28, 205–207 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-014-6521-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-014-6521-1