Skip to main content
Log in

Mass Transfer Coefficients in Electrochemical Membrane Process of Iron, Magnesium and Manganese Ions Extraction from Technological Solutions Complicated by Concentration Polarization

  • RESEARCH, DESIGN, NUMERICAL ANALYSES, AND OPERATING EXPERIENCE
  • PROCESSES AND EQUIPMENT OF CHEMICAL AND OIL-AND-GAS TECHNOLOGIES
  • Published:
Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Aims and scope

The article presents the results of a study of mass transfer in the process of electrochemical extraction of iron, magnesium and manganese ions from technological solutions. Mathematical expressions are obtained, and numerical values of empirical coefficients are determined for theoretical calculation of specific outflow, retention coefficient, and average mass transfer coefficients of the electrochemical membrane process of separation of technological solutions. The dependence of concentration polarization on solution flow rate, pressure gradient, and concentration is analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Gogina and N. Makisha, “Information technologies in view of complex solution of wastewater problems,” Appl. Mech. Mater., 587–589, 636–639 (2014).

  2. V. A. Kolesnikov, V. I. Il’in, and A. A. Kucherov, “Treatment of wastewaters in metallurgical works,” Ékol. Proizvod., No. 3, 31–36 (2010).

  3. M. Paider, V. Fateev, and K. Bouzek, “Membrane electrolysis — history, current status and perspective,” Electrochim. Acta, 209, 737–756 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Aliano and G. Cicero, “AC Electroosmosis: basics and lab-on-a-chip applications,” Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology, 25–30 (2012).

  5. V. P. Dubyaga and I. B. Besfamil’nyi, “Nanotechnology and membranes,” Krit. Tekhnol. Membrany, No. 3, 11–16 (2005).

  6. S. I. Lazarev, S. V. Kovalev, O. A. Kovaleva, et al., “Flat-chamber electrobaromembrane apparatus with improved characteristics and its calculation method,” Chem. Petrol. Eng., 55, No. 1–2, 114–121 (2019).

  7. S. V. Polyakov, V. D. Volgin, E. D. Maksimov, and Yu. E. Sinyak, “Calculation of concentration polarization in reverse osmosis apparatus with flat-chamber filtering elements,” Khim. i Tekhnol. Vody, 4, No. 3, 299–303 (1982).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. M. Akulinchev, O. A. Abonosimov, and S. I. Lazarev, “Investigation of electrobaromembrane separation of industrial process solutions containing ions of heavy metals Pb, Ca, Fe, etc.” Vestn. Tambov. Gos. Tekhn. Univ., 23, No. 1, 120–128 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. O. A. Kovaleva, S. I. Lazarev, and S. V. Kovalev, “Development and calculation of an electrobaromembrane apparatus for purifying process solutions,” Chem. Petrol. Eng., 53, No. 1, 21–25 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. E. Drioli, A. Criscuoli, and E. Curcio, “Integrated membrane operations for seawater desalination,” Desalination, 147, 77–81 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. О. А. Аbonosimov, S. I. Lazarev, and D. O. Аbonosimov, “Effect of solution flow pattern on mass transfer in baromembrane separation of industrial solutions and effluents,” Khim. Neftegaz. Mashinostr., No. 3, 16–19 (2016).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. A. Abonosimov.

Additional information

Translated from Khimicheskoe i Neftegazovoe Mashinostroenie, Vol. 56, No. 9, pp. 3–7, September, 2020.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abonosimov, O.A., Lazarev, S.I., Arzamastsev, A.A. et al. Mass Transfer Coefficients in Electrochemical Membrane Process of Iron, Magnesium and Manganese Ions Extraction from Technological Solutions Complicated by Concentration Polarization. Chem Petrol Eng 56, 691–698 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10556-021-00829-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10556-021-00829-9

Keywords

Navigation