The majority of CVD related deaths are caused by coronary artery disease (CAD) and strokes, both phenotypic expressions from significant underlying atherosclerosis [1]. Despite targeting well known risk factors for atherosclerosis such as aging, sex and other risk factors such as smoking, obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and certainly diabetes still, many of these patient require invasive treatment with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), which comes with the price of device thrombosis and restenosis [2].
The latter, remains a major problem with use of modern stents, especially in patients with diabetes mellitus. Patients with diabetes comprise 25–30% of all patients undergoing coronary revascularization and have a two-threefold increased risk for cardiovascular events to occur. Diabetic patients have much higher clinically indicated TLR rates compared to non-diabetic patients even with use of modern stents: 8.6% vs. 5.1% during 2 years of follow-up [3]. If performed in multiple or more complex lesions (SYNTAX score > 11) these rates are even higher: 9.6% vs 6.5% [4,5,6]. Newly developed devices such as the Cre8 stent and the Abluminus stent promise to overcome this issue but their effectiveness still has to be proven in larger patient populations [7,8,9]. Therefore, optimal medical therapy is pivotal to synergize the effect of successful PCI on long-term patient outcomes and preventing future events from occurring.
Multiple studies on high intensity statin therapy in patients with established cardiovascular disease have shown to reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular events by 50–60% [10, 11]. Not only regarding long-term outcomes but also periprocedural [12]. Moreover, statin therapy has also shown a reduction of plaque burden and plaque regression analysed by IVUS imaging [13,14,15]. The absolute risk reduction in cardiovascular events with LDL-C lowering drugs is greater in patients at higher baseline risk [16]. Serum LDL-C/HDL-C ratio > 2.0 and low Apolipoprotein A1 both seem to be associated with characteristics of vulnerable plaques [17]. In the ATHEROREMO-IVUS study, necrotic core fraction, LCBI and plaque burden are associated with certain elevated molecular lipid serum levels. Fibrous cap thickness was not [18]. Furthermore, the IBIS-4 trial demonstrated regression of coronary atherosclerosis in non-infarct-related arteries in STEMI patients without changes in RF-IVUS defined necrotic core or plaque phenotype after treatment with rosuvastatin 13 months after the index event [19].
For glycemic control, data is a bit less voluminous but a meta-analysis including randomized control trials and registry studies demonstrate a beneficial effect on risk reduction of coronary artery disease [RR 0.89 (95% CI 0.81–0.96)] and nonfatal myocardial infarction [RR 0.84 (95% CI 0.75–0.94)] with intensive glucose lowering therapy [20,21,22]. Imaging data to show plaque regression or changes in plaque morphology in the coronary arteries with aggressive glycemic control is lacking [23]. In this issue, Ueyama et al. report the results of a single-centre retrospective analysis investigating the relationship between serum hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) and plaque characteristics as assessed by optimal coherence tomography in 261 patients with de novo stable CAD undergoing PCI [24]. The authors predefined three tertiles of serum HbA1c-levels to compare findings between groups of equal size (tertile 1: HbA1c < 6.3%, tertile 2: 6.3 ≤ HbA1c < 7.8%, tertile 3: HbA1c ≥ 7.8%, each group n = 87). Besides the rates of diabetes, previous CABG and HDL/triglycerides-levels baseline characteristics were comparable between all three groups. With increasing HbA1c-level authors found (1) Fibrous cap (FCT) to be thinner (beta coefficient − 4.89, 95% confidence interval − 8.40 to − 1.39), (2) the prevalence of thin cap fibroadenoma (TCFA) to be increased following an exponential curve (see Figure 4 article) and (3) Minimal lumen area (MLA) and reference lumen to be decreased. OCT characteristics of vulnerable plaques are large plaque burden > 70%, a small lumen area < 4 mm2 and high lipid content. These characteristics all represent a lesion which has potential low resistance to mechanical stress forces (e.g. non-laminar flow or wall shear stress).
These important findings emphasize the hypothesis that uncontrolled/not well controlled risk factors may contribute significantly to the progression of atherosclerosis with the formation of vulnerable plaques characteristics. Uncontrolled lipid metabolism might contribute to the formation of an unstable lipid core and uncontrolled glycaemic control might further enhance this effect while at the same time also impairing endogenous plaque sealing through decreased FCT with increased prevalence of TCFA induced by pro-inflammatory cascades. Previous studies have already addressed these OCT plaque characteristics (high plaque burden, high amount of lipid core content, thin fibrous cap, and small MLA) to be associated with Major Cardiac Events when left untreated [25,26,27,28,29].
Altogether this report and previous reports emphasize the pivotal importance of optimal medical therapy for secondary prevention after coronary revascularization to prevent future events caused by the formation of vulnerable plaques. We could hypothesize, however, that different risk factors may be more important in different patients. In diabetic patients glycaemic control may outweigh the importance of LDL suppression. For some patients all risk factors may have to be aggressively managed. One could propose here a paradigm shift to individualized secondary prevention after PCI based on risk factors that are present together with plaque characteristics found during intracoronary imaging. For example, in diabetic patients another type of glucose lowering therapy (SGLT-2 in patients with previous CVD and/or heart failure) may be more important in reducing future events than very aggressive of glycaemic control with risk of hypoglycaemia.
Multicentre studies focussing on patient risk assessment, including the presence of atherosclerotic risk factors and plaque characteristics found in intracoronary imaging, accompanied with adequate long-term follow-up in these patients might be the next step to provide a truthful real world risk assessment of plaque vulnerability and its consequences for the patient and treatment regimen. Characteristics found in the plaque should be considered in the context of the risk factors, as these can influence the process of plaque formation. Individual risk factor management might be the holy grail in optimal reduction in risk for future cardiac events following coronary revascularization.
References
Organization WH. Cardiovascular diseases (2017) https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds). Accessed 16 June 2021
Canfield J, Totary-Jain H (2018) 40 years of percutaneous coronary intervention: history and future directions. J Pers Med 8:33
Koskinas KC, Siontis GC, Piccolo R et al (2016) Impact of diabetic status on outcomes after revascularization with drug-eluting stents in relation to coronary artery disease complexity: patient-level pooled analysis of 6081 patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 9:e003255
Head SJ, Milojevic M, Daemen J et al (2018) Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet 391:939–948
Tada T, Kimura T, Morimoto T et al (2011) Comparison of three-year clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation among insulin-treated diabetic, non-insulin-treated diabetic, and non-diabetic patients from j-Cypher registry. Am J Cardiol 107:1155–1162
Thuijs D, Kappetein AP, Serruys PW et al (2019) Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial. Lancet 394:1325–1334
Mehran R, Morice M-C et al. Randomized comparison of abluminus DES+ sirolimus-eluting stents versus everolimus-eluting stents in coronary artery disease patients with diabetes mellitus global—ABILITY diabetes global trial. https://www.cerc-europe.org/ability-diabetes-global/. Accessed 16 June 2021
Romaguera R, Gómez-Hospital JA, Gomez-Lara J et al (2016) A randomized comparison of reservoir-based polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stents versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in patients with diabetes mellitus: the RESERVOIR clinical trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 9:42–50
Carrié D (2016) The use of the Cre8 Stent in patients with diabetes mellitus. Interv Cardiol 11:47–50
Mills EJ, O’Regan C, Eyawo O et al (2011) Intensive statin therapy compared with moderate dosing for prevention of cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis of >40000 patients. Eur Heart J 32:1409–1415
Navarese EP, Robinson JG, Kowalewski M et al (2018) Association between baseline LDL-C level and total and cardiovascular mortality after LDL-C lowering: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 319:1566–1579
Berwanger O, Santucci EV, de Barros ESPGM et al (2018) Effect of loading dose of atorvastatin prior to planned percutaneous coronary intervention on major adverse cardiovascular events in acute coronary syndrome: the SECURE-PCI randomized clinical trial. JAMA 319:1331–1340
Huded CP, Shah NP, Puri R et al (2020) Association of serum lipoprotein (a) levels and coronary atheroma volume by intravascular ultrasound. J Am Heart Assoc 9:e018023
Li Y, Deng S, Liu B et al (2021) The effects of lipid-lowering therapy on coronary plaque regression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 11:7999
Nicholls SJ, Ballantyne CM, Barter PJ et al (2011) Effect of two intensive statin regimens on progression of coronary disease. N Engl J Med 365:2078–2087
Baigent C, Blackwell L, Emberson J et al (2010) Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet 376:1670–1681
Kim JH, Jeong MH, Hong YJ et al (2012) Low density lipoprotein-cholesterol/high density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio predicts plaque vulnerability in patients with stable angina. Korean Circ J 42:246–251
Cheng JM, Garcia-Garcia HM, de Boer SP et al (2014) In vivo detection of high-risk coronary plaques by radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound and cardiovascular outcome: results of the ATHEROREMO-IVUS study. Eur Heart J 35:639–647
Räber L, Taniwaki M, Zaugg S et al (2015) Effect of high-intensity statin therapy on atherosclerosis in non-infarct-related coronary arteries (IBIS-4): a serial intravascular ultrasonography study. Eur Heart J 36:490–500
Boussageon R, Bejan-Angoulvant T, Saadatian-Elahi M et al (2011) Effect of intensive glucose lowering treatment on all cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and microvascular events in type 2 diabetes: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Bmj 343:d4169
Kelly TN, Bazzano LA, Fonseca VA et al (2009) Systematic review: glucose control and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes. Ann Intern Med 151:394–403
Ray KK, Seshasai SR, Wijesuriya S et al (2009) Effect of intensive control of glucose on cardiovascular outcomes and death in patients with diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet 373:1765–1772
Kataoka Y, Yasuda S, Miyamoto Y et al (2014) Clinical predictors of atheroma progression despite optimal glycemic control in early-stage diabetic patients with coronary artery disease: insight from the DIANA study. J Atheroscler Thromb 21:509–518
Ueyama HY, K.; Okamoto, N.; Vengrenyuk, Y.; Barman, N.; Benhuri, B.; Kapur, V.; Hasan, C.; Sweeny, J.; Sharma, K.; Narula, J.; Kini, A.S.; Baber, U.;. Relationship between hemoglobin A1C and characteristics of plaque vulnerability in stable coronary disease: an optical coherence tomography study. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2021.
Cheng JM, Suoniemi M, Kardys I et al (2015) Plasma concentrations of molecular lipid species in relation to coronary plaque characteristics and cardiovascular outcome: results of the ATHEROREMO-IVUS study. Atherosclerosis 243:560–566
Waksman R, Di Mario C, Torguson R et al (2019) Identification of patients and plaques vulnerable to future coronary events with near-infrared spectroscopy intravascular ultrasound imaging: a prospective, cohort study. Lancet 394:1629–1637
Erlinge D, Maehara A, Ben-Yehuda O et al (2021) Identification of vulnerable plaques and patients by intracoronary near-infrared spectroscopy and ultrasound (PROSPECT II): a prospective natural history study. The Lancet 397:985–995
E.Khedi (2020) Combined Optical Coherence Tomography and Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment to Better Predict Adverse Event Outcomes in DM Patients: COMBINE (OCT–FFR) Trial.
Stone GW, Maehara A, Ali ZA et al (2020) Percutaneous coronary intervention for vulnerable coronary atherosclerotic plaque. J Am Coll Cardiol 76:2289–2301
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wykrzykowska, J.J., Renkens, M.P.L. Risk factor management and OCT characteristics of plaque vulnerability: the Holy Grail of plaque and patient vulnerability. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 38, 715–717 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02320-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02320-1