Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging using 128-slice dual-source CT in patients with normal body mass indices: effect of tube voltage, tube current, and iodine concentration on image quality and radiation dose

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the image quality and radiation dose in adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) imaging using different tube voltages, tube current settings, and contrast materials containing different iodine concentrations in subjects with normal body mass indices (BMI). We included 92 patients (BMI range, 18.5–24.8) who underwent dynamic CTP for the evaluation of coronary artery disease using a 128-slice dual-source computed tomography. The protocols employed the following dynamic scan parameters: protocol I with 100 kV, fixed tube current (FTC), and medium-concentration contrast material (MC, 350 mg iodine/mL); protocol II with 100 kV, automatic tube current modulation (ATCM), and MC; protocol III with 100 kV, ATCM, and high-concentration contrast material (HC, 400 mg iodine/mL); protocol IV with 80 kV, adopted FTC, and HC. Subjective image quality on a 1–3 point scale and objective image quality with respect to the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were assessed. Protocol IV showed higher CNR and SNR than the other protocols (P < 0.01), while the CNR and SNR values did not significantly differ among the other three protocols. There was no significant difference in subjective image quality among the protocols. The radiation dose in protocol IV was the lowest among the protocols (P < 0.01), while protocol IV resulted in a 54 % overall reduction in mean effective radiation dose compared with protocol I. Dynamic myocardial CTP performed at 80 kV with adapted FTC provided high CNR and SNR while preserving subjective image quality and reducing radiation exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ATCM:

Automatic tube current modulation

BMI:

Body mass index

CCTA:

Coronary CT angiography

CNR:

Contrast-to-noise ratio

CTP:

CT perfusion

ECG:

Electrocardiogram

FTC:

Fixed tube current

NI:

Noise index

SNR:

Signal-to-noise ratio

References

  1. Kurata A, Mochizuki T, Koyama Y, Haraikawa T, Suzuki J, Shigematsu Y, Higaki J (2005) Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine triphosphate stress multi-slice spiral computed tomography: alternative to stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Circ J 69(5):550–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tamarappoo BK, Dey D, Nakazato R, Shmilovich H, Smith T, Cheng VY, Thomson LE, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Germano G, Slomka PJ, Berman DS (2010) Comparison of the extent and severity of myocardial perfusion defects measured by CT coronary angiography and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3(10):1010–1019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bettencourt N, Chiribiri A, Schuster A, Ferreira N, Sampaio F, Pires-Morais G, Santos L, Melica B, Rodrigues A, Braga P, Azevedo L, Teixeira M, Leite-Moreira A, Silva-Cardoso J, Nagel E, Gama V (2013) Direct comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance and multidetector computed tomography stress-rest perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 61(10):1099–1107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hulten EA, Bittencourt MS, Ghoshhajra B, Blankstein R (2012) Stress CT perfusion: coupling coronary anatomy with physiology. J Nucl Cardiol 19(3):588–600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Feuchtner G, Goetti R, Plass A, Wieser M, Scheffel H, Wyss C, Stolzmann P, Donati O, Schnabl J, Falk V, Alkadhi H, Leschka S, Cury RC (2011) Adenosine stress high-pitch 128-slice dual-source myocardial computed tomography perfusion for imaging of reversible myocardial ischemia: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 4(5):540–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ho KT, Chua KC, Klotz E, Panknin C (2010) Stress and rest dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by evaluation of complete time-attenuation curves with dual-source CT. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3(8):811–820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bamberg F, Becker A, Schwarz F, Marcus RP, Greif M, von Ziegler F, Blankstein R, Hoffmann U, Sommer WH, Hoffmann VS, Johnson TR, Becker HC, Wintersperger BJ, Reiser MF, Nikolaou K (2011) Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology 260(3):689–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mayo JR, Leipsic JA (2009) Radiation dose in cardiac CT. AJR 192(3):646–653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gramer BM, Muenzel D, Leber V, von Thaden AK, Feussner H, Schneider A, Vembar M, Soni N, Rummeny EJ, Huber AM (2012) Impact of iterative reconstruction on CNR and SNR in dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging in an animal model. Eur Radiol 22(12):2654–2661

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim SM, Kim YN, Choe YH (2013) Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging using 128-slice dual-source CT: optimization of the CT protocol to reduce the radiation dose. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29(4):875–884

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M (2006) National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 79(948):968–980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hausleiter J, Martinoff S, Hadamitzky M, Martuscelli E, Pschierer I, Feuchtner GM, Catalan-Sanz P, Czermak B, Meyer TS, Hein F, Bischoff B, Kuse M, Schomig A, Achenbach S (2010) Image quality and radiation exposure with a low tube voltage protocol for coronary CT angiography results of the PROTECTION II trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3(11):1113–1123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid FT, Scheffel H, Stinn B, Marincek B, Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S (2008) Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur Radiol 18(9):1809–1817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stolzmann P, Leschka S, Scheffel H, Krauss T, Desbiolles L, Plass A, Genoni M, Flohr TG, Wildermuth S, Marincek B, Alkadhi H (2008) Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose. Radiology 249(1):71–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pflederer T, Rudofsky L, Ropers D, Bachmann S, Marwan M, Daniel WG, Achenbach S (2009) Image quality in a low radiation exposure protocol for retrospectively ECG-gated coronary CT angiography. AJR 192(4):1045–1050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pflederer T, Jakstat J, Marwan M, Schepis T, Bachmann S, Kuettner A, Anders K, Lell M, Muschiol G, Ropers D, Daniel WG, Achenbach S (2010) Radiation exposure and image quality in staged low-dose protocols for coronary dual-source CT angiography: a randomized comparison. Eur Radiol 20(5):1197–1206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Blankstein R, Bolen MA, Pale R, Murphy MK, Shah AB, Bezerra HG, Sarwar A, Rogers IS, Hoffmann U, Abbara S, Cury RC, Brady TJ (2011) Use of 100 kV versus 120 kV in cardiac dual source computed tomography: effect on radiation dose and image quality. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27(4):579–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Abada HT, Larchez C, Daoud B, Sigal-Cinqualbre A, Paul JF (2006) MDCT of the coronary arteries: feasibility of low-dose CT with ECG-pulsed tube current modulation to reduce radiation dose. AJR 186(6 Suppl 2):S387–S390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jun BR, Yong HS, Kang EY, Woo OH, Choi EJ (2012) 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography using low tube voltage of 80 kV in subjects with normal body mass indices: comparative study using 120 kV. Acta Radiol 53(10):1099–1106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Becker CR, Vanzulli A, Fink C, de Faveri D, Fedeli S, Dore R, Biondetti P, Kuettner A, Krix M, Ascenti G (2011) Multicenter comparison of high concentration contrast agent iomeprol-400 with iso-osmolar iodixanol-320: contrast enhancement and heart rate variation in coronary dual-source computed tomographic angiography. Invest Radiol 46(7):457–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology and Cardiovascular Imaging Center, Cardiac and Vascular Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Ilwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, Korea

    Sung Mok Kim & Yeon Hyeon Choe

  2. Department of Radiology, Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

    Young Kwon Cho

Authors
  1. Sung Mok Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Young Kwon Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yeon Hyeon Choe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yeon Hyeon Choe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, S.M., Cho, Y.K. & Choe, Y.H. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging using 128-slice dual-source CT in patients with normal body mass indices: effect of tube voltage, tube current, and iodine concentration on image quality and radiation dose. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 30 (Suppl 2), 95–103 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0524-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0524-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation