Skip to main content
Log in

Left atrial expansion index is an independent predictor of diastolic dysfunction in patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function: a three dimensional echocardiography study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the absence of mitral valve disease left atrial (LA) volume is a marker of diastolic dysfunction and its severity. This study investigated the relationship between left ventricular (LV) end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and LA volumes and phasic atrial functions detected by real-time full volume three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE), in a patient population with preserved LV systolic function. Seventy-two (39 female and 33 male; mean age 56.1 ± 9.0 years) stable patients with normal LV ejection fraction (EF) undergoing cardiac catheterization were studied. All patients underwent comprehensive echocardiographic examination just before catheterization and LVEDP was obtained. In addition to conventional echocardiographic measurements and Doppler indices; by using RT3DE LA maximum, minimum and pre-a-wave volumes were measured; LA total, passive and active emptying volumes and fractions were calculated. LV systolic function was assessed by EF and global longitudinal strain by speckle tracking. RT3DE minimum LA volume index, RT3DE active LAEF and LA expansion index (EI) were statistically significant univariate predictors of LVEDP ≥ 16 mmHg. When age and hypertension adjusted multivariate analysis was performed EI [β = −1.741, p = 0.015; OR 0.175; 95 % CI (0.043–0.717)] was an independent predictor of elevated LVEDP. RT3DE evaluation of LA function during entire cardiac cycle has incremental value for the diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction in patients with preserved EF. We suggest that RT3DE evaluation of LA may find clinical application in this field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abhayaratna WP, Seward JB, Appleton CP et al (2006) Left atrial size: physiologic determinants and clinical applications. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:2357–2363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moller JE, Hillis GS, Oh JK et al (2003) Left atrial volume: a powerful predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 107:2207–2212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsang TS, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, Bailey KR, Seward JB (2002) Left atrial volume as a morphophysiologic expression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and relation to cardiovascular risk burden. Am J Cardiol 90:1284–1289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Teo SG, Yang H, Chai P, Yeo TC (2010) Impact of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction on left atrial volume and function: a volumetric analysis. Eur J Echocardiogr 11:38–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boyd AC, Schiller NB, Leung D, Ross DL, Thomas L (2011) Atrial dilation and altered function are mediated by age and diastolic function but not before the eighth decade. J Am Coll Cardiol Imaging 4:234–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hsiao LH, Lin KL, Chiou KR (2012) Comparison of left atrial volume parameters in detecting left ventricular diastolic dysfunction versus tissue Doppler recordings. Am J Cardiol 109:748–755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Appleton CP, Galloway JM, Gonzalez MS, Gaballa M, Basnight MA (1993) Estimation of left ventricular filling pressures using two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography in adult patients with cardiac disease. Additional value of analyzing left atrial size, left atrial ejection fraction and the difference in duration of pulmonary venous and mitral flow velocity at atrial contraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 22:1972–1982

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Miyasaka Y, Tsujimoto S, Maeba H et al (2011) Left atrial volume by three-dimensional echocardiography: validation by 64-slice multidetector computed tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24:680–686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Keller AM, Gopal AS, King DL (2000) Left and right atrial volume by freehand three-dimensional echocardiography: in vivo validation using magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Echocardiogr 1:55–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mor-Avi V, Yodwut C, Jenkins C et al (2012) Real-time 3D echocardiographic quantification of left atrial volume: multicenter study for validation with CMR. J Am Coll Cardiol Imaging 5(8):769–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB et al (2005) Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18:1440–1463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC et al (2009) Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:107–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jenkins C, Chan J, Hanekom L, Marwick TH (2006) Accuracy and feasibility of online 3-dimensional echocardiography for measurement of left ventricular parameters. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 19:1119–1128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Paulus WJ, Tschöpe C, Sanderson JE et al (2007) How to diagnose diastolic heart failure: a consensus statement on the diagnosis of heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction by the Heart Failure and Echocardiography Associations of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 28:2539–2550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aune E, Baekkevar M, Roislien J, Rodevand O, Otterstad JE (2009) Normal reference range for left and right atrial volume indexes and ejection fractions obtained with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 10:738–744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Artang R, Migrino RQ, Harmann L, Bowers M, Woods TD (2009) Left atrial volume measurement with automated border detection by 3-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 7:16–24

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B et al (2013) ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 62:147–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bhatia RS, Tu JV, Lee DS et al (2006) Outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a population-based study. N Engl J Med 355:260–269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ommen SR, Nishimura RA, Appleton CP et al (2000) Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures: a comparative simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study. Circulation 102:1788–1794

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Russo C, Jin Z, Homma S et al (2012) Left atrial minimum volume and reservoir function as correlates of left ventricular diastolic function: impact of left ventricular systolic function. Heart 98:813–820

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Caselli S, Canali E, Foschi ML et al (2010) Long term prognostic significance of three-dimensional echocardiographic parameters of the left ventricle and left atrium. Eur J Echocardiogr 11:250–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fatema K, Barnes ME, Bailey KR et al (2009) Minimum vs. maximum left atrial volume for prediction of first atrial fibrillation or flutter in an elderly cohort: a prospective study. Eur J Echocardiogr 10:282–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu VC, Takeuchi M, Kuwaki H et al (2013) Prognostic value of LA volumes assessed by transthoracic 3D echocardiography: comparison with 2D echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol Imaging 6:1025–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Posina K, McLaughlin J, Rhee P et al (2013) Relationship of phasic left atrial volume and emptying function to left ventricular filling pressure: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15(1):99

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. To AC, Flamm SD, Marwick TH, Klein AL (2011) Clinical utility of multimodality LA imaging: assessment of size, function, and structure. J Am Coll Cardiol Imaging 4(7):788–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Spach MS, Dolber PC (1986) Relating extracellular potentials and their derivatives to anisotropic propagation at a microscopic level in human cardiac muscle: evidence for electrical uncoupling of side-to-side fiber connections with increasing age. Circ Res 58:356–371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Anyukhovsky EP, Sosunov EA, Plotnikov A et al (2002) Cellular electrophysiologic properties of old canine atria provide a substrate for arrhythmogenesis. Cardiovasc Res 54:462–469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Cem Dogan for his help with performing statistical analysis.

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suzan Hatipoglu.

Additional information

The study was conducted in Cardiology Department of Kartal Kosuyolu Heart Education and Research Hospital.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hatipoglu, S., Ozdemir, N., Babur Guler, G. et al. Left atrial expansion index is an independent predictor of diastolic dysfunction in patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function: a three dimensional echocardiography study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 30, 1315–1323 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0476-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0476-y

Keywords

Navigation