Skip to main content
Log in

Randomized comparison of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with permanent polymer coatings assessed by optical coherence tomography

  • Original paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We sought to compare the healing patterns of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer (BP-BES, Nobori) versus everolimus-eluting stents with permanent polymer (PP-EES, Xience) using intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT). A total of 34 patients undergoing treatment of de novo coronary lesions were randomly assigned to receive BP-BES (n = 15) or PP-EES (n = 19). Stent tissue coverage and apposition as well as the incidence of peri-strut low intensity area (PLIA) were assessed by OCT at 6–8 months. Generalized linear mixed models were used to account for clustered data. OCT imaging was available for 17 lesions with 2,805 struts in the BP-BES group and 22 lesions with 3,890 struts in the PP-EES group. BP-BES as compared to PP-EES showed similar rates of uncovered struts (479 vs. 588, odds ratio (OR) 1.54 (95 % CI 0.63–3.79), P = 0.34) and malapposed struts (46 vs. 32 struts, OR 1.64 [95 % CI 0.21–12.5], P = 0.64). Three lesions with BP-BES (17.6 %) versus 5 lesions with PP-EES (22.7 %) had >30 % uncovered struts (P = 0.78). The proportion of patients with PLIA was similar in both groups (BP-BES 41.2 % vs. PP-EES 36.4 %, OR 1.11 [95 % CI 0.43–2.87], P = 0.83). New generation BP-BES as compared to PP-EES showed similar stent coverage and apposition as assessed by OCT at 6–8 months. In addition, PLIA—possible markers of delayed arterial healing—were observed with similar frequency in both groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Byrne RA, Sarafoff N, Kastrati A, Schomig A (2009) Drug-eluting stents in percutaneous coronary intervention: a benefit-risk assessment. Drug Saf 32(9):749–770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Joner M, Finn AV, Farb A, Mont EK, Kolodgie FD, Ladich E, Kutys R, Skorija K, Gold HK, Virmani R (2006) Pathology of drug-eluting stents in humans: delayed healing and late thrombotic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 48(1):193–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Joner M, Nakazawa G, Finn AV, Quee SC, Coleman L, Acampado E, Wilson PS, Skorija K, Cheng Q, Xu X, Gold HK, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R (2008) Endothelial cell recovery between comparator polymer-based drug-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(5):333–342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Byrne RA, Joner M, Kastrati A (2009) Polymer coatings and delayed arterial healing following drug-eluting stent implantation. Minerva Cardioangiol 57(5):567–584

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barlis P, Regar E, Serruys PW, Dimopoulos K, van der Giessen WJ, van Geuns RJ, Ferrante G, Wandel S, Windecker S, van Es GA, Eerdmans P, Juni P, di Mario C (2010) An optical coherence tomography study of a biodegradable vs. durable polymer-coated limus-eluting stent: a LEADERS trial sub-study. Eur Heart J 31(2):165–176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stefanini GG, Kalesan B, Serruys PW, Heg D, Buszman P, Linke A, Ischinger T, Klauss V, Eberli F, Wijns W, Morice MC, Di Mario C, Corti R, Antoni D, Sohn HY, Eerdmans P, van Es GA, Meier B, Windecker S, Juni P (2011) Long-term clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease (LEADERS): 4 year follow-up of a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 378(9807):1940–1948

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stefanini GG, Byrne RA, Serruys PW, de Waha A, Meier B, Massberg S, Juni P, Schomig A, Windecker S, Kastrati A (2012) Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents reduce the risk of stent thrombosis at 4 years in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from the ISAR-TEST 3, ISAR-TEST 4, and LEADERS randomized trials. Eur Heart J 33(10):1214–1222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de Waha A, Dibra A, Byrne RA, Ndrepepa G, Mehilli J, Fusaro M, Laugwitz KL, Massberg S, Schomig A, Kastrati A (2011) Everolimus-eluting versus sirolimus-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 4(4):371–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Palmerini T, Biondi-Zoccai G, Della Riva D, Stettler C, Sangiorgi D, D’Ascenzo F, Kimura T, Briguori C, Sabate M, Kim HS, De Waha A, Kedhi E, Smits PC, Kaiser C, Sardella G, Marullo A, Kirtane AJ, Leon MB, Stone GW (2012) Stent thrombosis with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis. Lancet 379(9824):1393–1402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chevalier B, Silber S, Park SJ, Garcia E, Schuler G, Suryapranata H, Koolen J, Hauptmann KE, Wijns W, Morice MC, Carrie D, van Es GA, Nagai H, Detiege D, Paunovic D, Serruys PW (2009) Randomized comparison of the Nobori Biolimus A9-eluting coronary stent with the Taxus Liberte paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent in patients with stenosis in native coronary arteries: the NOBORI 1 trial–Phase 2. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2(3):188–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tada T, Byrne RA, Schuster T, Cuni R, Kitabata H, Tiroch K, Dirninger A, Gratze F, Kaspar K, Zenker G, Joner M, Schomig A, Kastrati A (2013) Early vascular healing with rapid breakdown biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents assessed by optical coherence tomography. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 14(2):84–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gonzalo N, Garcia-Garcia HM, Serruys PW, Commissaris KH, Bezerra H, Gobbens P, Costa M, Regar E (2009) Reproducibility of quantitative optical coherence tomography for stent analysis. EuroIntervention 5(2):224–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Teramoto T, Ikeno F, Otake H, Lyons JK, van Beusekom HM, Fearon WF, Yeung AC (2010) Intriguing peri-strut low-intensity area detected by optical coherence tomography after coronary stent deployment. Circ J 74(6):1257–1259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Otake H, Shite J, Ikeno F, Shinke T, Teramoto T, Miyoshi N, Ako J, Honda Y, Fitzgerald PJ, Hirata KI (2010) Evaluation of the peri-strut low intensity area following sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents implantation: insights from an optical coherence tomography study in humans. Int J Cardiol. doi:S0167-5273(10)01010-7

    Google Scholar 

  15. Natsuaki M, Kozuma K, Morimoto T, Kadota K, Muramatsu T, Nakagawa Y, Akasaka T, Igarashi K, Tanabe K, Morino Y, Ishikawa T, Nishikawa H, Awata M, Abe M, Okada H, Takatsu Y, Ogata N, Kimura K, Urasawa K, Tarutani Y, Shiode N, Kimura T (2013) Biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 62(3):181–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brugaletta S, Garcia-Garcia HM, Gomez-Lara J, Radu MD, Pawar R, Khachabi J, Bruining N, Sabate M, Serruys PW (2012) Reproducibility of qualitative assessment of stent struts coverage by optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. doi:10.1007/s10554-012-0030-8

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gutierrez-Chico JL, van Geuns RJ, Regar E, van der Giessen WJ, Kelbaek H, Saunamaki K, Escaned J, Gonzalo N, di Mario C, Borgia F, Nuesch E, Garcia-Garcia HM, Silber S, Windecker S, Serruys PW (2011) Tissue coverage of a hydrophilic polymer-coated zotarolimus-eluting stent vs. a fluoropolymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent at 13-month follow-up: an optical coherence tomography substudy from the RESOLUTE All Comers trial. Eur Heart J 32(19):2454–2463

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gutierrez-Chico JL, Juni P, Garcia-Garcia HM, Regar E, Nuesch E, Borgia F, van der Giessen WJ, Davies S, van Geuns RJ, Secco GG, Meis S, Windecker S, Serruys PW, di Mario C (2011) Long-term tissue coverage of a biodegradable polylactide polymer-coated biolimus-eluting stent: comparative sequential assessment with optical coherence tomography until complete resorption of the polymer. Am Heart J 162(5):922–931

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Imai M, Kadota K, Goto T, Fujii S, Yamamoto H, Fuku Y, Hosogi S, Hirono A, Tanaka H, Tada T, Morimoto T, Shiomi H, Kozuma K, Inoue K, Suzuki N, Kimura T, Mitsudo K (2011) Incidence, risk factors, and clinical sequelae of angiographic peri-stent contrast staining after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Circulation 123(21):2382–2391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cook S, Eshtehardi P, Kalesan B, Raber L, Wenaweser P, Togni M, Moschovitis A, Vogel R, Seiler C, Eberli FR, Luscher T, Meier B, Juni P, Windecker S (2012) Impact of incomplete stent apposition on long-term clinical outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation. Eur Heart J 33(11):1334–1343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was founted by the European Commission under the Seventh Framework Program (PRESTIGE project grant 260309) and supported by a research Grant for supplying OCT catheters from Terumo Europe.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Kastrati reports received lecture fees from Abbott, Astra-Zeneca, Biotronik, Biosensors, MSD, The Medicines and St. Jude Medical. Dr. Mehilli reports received lecture fees form Abbott, Biotronik and Terumo. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomohisa Tada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tada, T., Kastrati, A., Byrne, R.A. et al. Randomized comparison of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with permanent polymer coatings assessed by optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 30, 495–504 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0376-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0376-1

Keywords

Navigation