Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Are measures of left ventricular systolic performance during low dose dobutamine stress echocardiograms repeatable over time?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To establish the test–retest reliability and the normal dose–response relationship of echocardiographic measures of Left Ventricular (LV) contractile function to low dose dobutamine stress in healthy individuals. Thirty healthy volunteers (23 males, 7 females) with an average age of 38 ± 13 years underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) (at successive doses of 0, 5, 10, and 20 mcg/kg/min) on two occasions, separated by 14 days. Ejection fraction (EF) was determined from 2D echocardiographic measures of left ventricular (LV) end diastolic and end systolic volumes. Longitudinal strain (S) and strain rate (SR) were measured using 2D speckle tracking analysis from three consecutive cardiac cycles. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and the Coefficient of Variation (CV) were calculated to assess reliability and variability of the study population’s EF, S, and SR responses to increasing doses of dobutamine. Left ventricular S and EF gradually increased with low doses of dobutamine but reached a plateau between 10 and 20 mcg/kg/min. Strain rate, however, gradually increases with each increasing dose of dobutamine. These responses were replicated on Day 2 with a high degree of reliability as determined from the ICC and low variability as determined from the CV, which fell within acceptable limits (<10 %). Left ventricular EF, S and SR can be measured during DSE with a high degree of test–retest reliability, and may be of clinical value when serial follow up of DSE measures of LV performance is indicated over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sicari R, Nihoyannopoulos P, Evangelista A, Kasprzak J, Lancellotti P, Poldermans D, Voigt JU et al (2009) Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement. European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC). Eur Heart J 30(3):278–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pellikka PA, Nagueh SF, Elhendy AA, Kuehl CA, Sawada SG (2007) American society of echocardiography recommendations for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 20(9):1021–1041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Borow KM, Neumann A, Arensman FW, Yacoub MH (1985) Left ventricular contractility and contractile reserve in humans after cardiac transplantation. Circ. 71(5):866–872

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nesbitt GC, Mankad S, Oh JK (2009) Strain imaging in echocardiography: methods and clinical applications. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25(Suppl 1):9–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aurigemma GP, Douglas PS, Gaasch HW. Quantitative evaluation of left ventricular structure, wall stress and systolic function. In: Otto CM (ed) The practice of clinical echocardiography. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp 65–87

  6. Govind SC, Gadiyaram VK, Quintana M, Ramesh SS, Saha S (2010) Study of left ventricular rotation and torsion in the acute phase of ST-elevation myocardial infarction by speckle tracking echocardiography. Echocardiography 27(1):45–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bansal M, Jeffriess L, Leano R, Mundy J, Marwick TH (2010) Assessment of myocardial viability at dobutamine echocardiography by deformation analysis using tissue velocity and speckle-tracking. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3(2):121–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Paraskevaidis IA, Bistola V, Ikonomidis I et al (2008) Usefulness of dobutamine-induced changes of the two-dimensional longitudinal deformation predict clinical and neurohumoral improvement in men after levosimendan treatment in acutely decompensated chronic heart failure. Am J Cardiol 102(9):1225–1229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vesely MR, Li S, Kop WJ, Reese A, Marshall J, Shorofsky SR, Gottlieb SS et al (2008) Test-retest reliability of assessment for intraventricular dyssynchrony by tissue Doppler imaging echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 101(5):645–650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van Dalen BM, Bosch JG, Kauer F, Soliman OI, Vletter WB, ten Cate FJ et al (2009) Assessment of mitral annular velocities by speckle tracking echocardiography versus tissue Doppler imaging: validation, feasibility, and reproducibility. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22(11):1302–1308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Muiesan ML, de Simone G, Ganau A, Longhini C, Verdecchia P, Mancia G et al (2006) Inappropriate left ventricular mass: reliability and limitations of echocardiographic measurement for risk stratification and follow-up in single patients. J Hypertens 24(11):2293–2298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Whalley GA, Gamble GD, Walsh HJ, Wright SP, Agewall S, Sharpe N et al (2004) Effect of tissue harmonic imaging and contrast upon between observer and test-retest reproducibility of left ventricular ejection fraction measurement in patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 6(1):85–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gottdiener JS, Panza JA, St John Sutton M, Bannon P, Kushner H, Weissman NJ (2002) Testing the test: the reliability of echocardiography in the sequential assessment of valvular regurgitation. Am Heart J 144(1):115–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Roland T, Willers M (2010) Reproducibility of Doppler measures of ventricular function during maximal upright cycling. Cardiol Young 20:676–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bougault V, Nottin S, Doucende G, Obert P (2008) Tissue Doppler imaging reproducibility during exercise. Int J Sports Med 29:395–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Daly AL, Linares OA, Smith MJ, Starling MR, Supiano MA (1997) Dobutamine pharmacokinetics during dobutamine stress echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 79(10):1381–1386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Banks L, Sasson Z, Busato M, Goodman JM (2010) Impaired left and right ventricular function following prolonged exercise in young athletes: influence of exercise intensity and responses to dobutamine stress. J Appl Physiol 108(1):112–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosner A, Bijnens B, Hansen M, How OJ, Aarsaether E, Muller S et al (2009) Left ventricular size determines tissue Doppler-derived longitudinal strain and strain rate. Eur J Echocardiogr 10:271–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mak S, Van Spall HG, Wainstein RV, Sasson Z (2012) Strain, strain rate and the force frequency relationship in patients with and without heart failure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 25(3):341–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ingul CB, Rozis E, Slordahl SA, Marwick TH (2007) Incremental value of strain rate imaging to wall motion analysis for prediction of outcome in patients undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography. Circulation 115:1252–1259

    Google Scholar 

  21. Munk K, Andersen N, Nielsen S, Bibby B, Bøtker H, Nielsen T et al (2011) Global longitudinal strain by speckle tracking for infarct size estimation. Eur J Echocardiogr 12(2):156–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Eroglu E, D’hooge J, Sutherland GR, Marciniak A, Thijs D, Droogne W et al (2008) Quantitative dobutamine stress echocardiography for the early detection of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant recipients. Heart 94:e3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Banks L, Sasson Z, Esfandiari S, Busato GM, Goodman JM (2011) Cardiac function following prolonged exercise: influence of age. J Appl Physiol 110(6):1541–1548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mor-Avi V, Lang RM, Badano LP, Belohlavek M, Cardim NM, Derumeaux G et al (2011) Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24(3):277–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, 600 University Ave, Suite 1602, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada

    Nader H. Elmayergi, Leanna S. Lee & Zion Sasson

  2. Department of Exercise Sciences, University of Toronto, 55 Harbord Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 2W6, Canada

    Jack M. Goodman & Leanna S. Lee

Authors
  1. Nader H. Elmayergi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jack M. Goodman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Leanna S. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zion Sasson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nader H. Elmayergi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elmayergi, N.H., Goodman, J.M., Lee, L.S. et al. Are measures of left ventricular systolic performance during low dose dobutamine stress echocardiograms repeatable over time?. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29, 1281–1286 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-013-0219-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-013-0219-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation