Case in point

A 59-year-old male with atypical chest pain and intermediate pretest probability underwent dual-source computed tomography angiography (CTA). CTA was performed with 80 ml contrast agent at 6.0 ml/s, 100 kV tube voltage and retrospective ECG-gated protocol (slice thickness, 0.6 mm; overlap, 0.4 mm) with radiation exposure of 12.1 mSv. Multiplanar reconstructions demonstrated a borderline (60% luminal stenosis) mixed plaque in the proximal segment of left anterior descending artery (LAD) and mild atherosclerotic lesions in the left circumflex and right coronary artery with total calcium Agatston score of 678 (Fig. 1a). Cross-sectional images of LAD demonstrated a mixed plaque with low attenuation area proximal to calcium spots and positive remodeling (Fig. 1b–f). Based on patient’s preferences, aggressive medical therapy with a high-dose statin, aspirin and antihypertensive agents was initiated. After 6 months the patient presented with acute anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction caused by thrombotic lesion in the proximal LAD (Fig. 1g, h). Although he underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention of the culprit LAD, NYHA class II heart failure symptoms developed.

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Curved multiplanar reconstruction of a high-risk lesion in the proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) causing future ischemic event. b–f Serial cross sections demonstrating mixed plaque with low attenuation area proximal to calcium spots and positive remodeling. g, h Left coronary angiography showing high-grade thrombotic lesion (arrowheads) in the proximal LAD. LAD left anterior descending artery, LCX left circumflex

Plaque rupture and thrombus formation play key roles in the onset of acute coronary syndrome. Based on previous autopsy studies the majority of culprit lesions are typically nonstenotic, contain a large necrotic core with a thin overlying fibrous cap, and induce expansive remodeling of the vascular segment [1]. Recently, Stone et al. reported the results of a prospective study assessing the relationship between lesion characteristics and new cardiovascular events among previously stented subjects. In conclusion, although frequently angiographically mild most lesions causing future ischemic events were characterized by a large plaque burden (≥70%) and/or small luminal area (≤4.0 mm2) as determined by intravascular ultrasonography [2].

Recently, cardiac CTA has been proposed as a promising noninvasive tool for identification of rupture-prone plaques prior to a subsequent coronary event. Pundziute et al. demonstrated that an increase in coronary segments with detectable non-obstructive plaques was associated with increased mortality. Furthermore, not only total plaque burden but also proximal plaque location was related to future ischemic events [3]. In the only CT study assessing plaque characteristics prior to major cardiovascular events, Motoyama et al. showed that plaques with low CT attenuation and positive remodeling are at particularly high-risk for rupture [4]. Indeed, in our case, the presence of mixed plaque with positive remodeling in the proximal segment of LAD was associated with development of subsequent acute coronary syndrome. Interestingly, we identify a specific type of vulnerable plaque distribution characterized by low attenuation area proximal to multiple calcium spots.

Certainly, with the widespread application of CTA and the advent of new low radiation CT scanners, noninvasive identification of rupture-prone plaques becomes technically feasible. However, the inclusion of “noninvasive fortune-telling” in future CTA Appropriateness Criteria would require conducting clinical trials focused on the development of tailored medical interventions for the prevention of plaque rupture. Currently, preventive or therapeutic management may include minimizing risk factors using life style changes, systemic drug therapy, or mechanical plaque sealing by coronary stenting. In our case, aggressive medical therapy did not prove beneficial in preventing future ischemic event, suggesting that conservative management is not always the right choice.