Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Over the past years, myocardial perfusion imaging has been established as the reference standard for prognosis and clinical decision making of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Myocardial perfusion has predominantly been assessed by single photon emission tomography (SPECT) [1–7] and, more recently, by positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [8–16].
Amongst the advanced cardiac imaging modalities, multi detector computed tomography (CT) angiography has emerged as a reliable non-invasive method for the assessment of coronary anatomy, CAD, and cardiac function [17–22]. Multiple studies involving over several thousands of patients have established that CT angiography is highly accurate for delineation of the presence and severity of coronary atherosclerosis [23–30]. CT angiography may also reveal the total plaque burden, i.e. both calcified and non-calcified components, for individual patients with coronary atherosclerosis [31–40].
The advent of prospectively gated acquisition techniques for 64-slice CT angiography has allowed a significant reduction in dose exposure. Consequently, a combined approach of CT coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging with CT angiography might potentially become feasible at a total radiation dose of less than 10 mSv, particularly for the assessment of patients with established CAD, who are likely to have diffuse calcification [40–47].
Since myocardial perfusion by CT angiography is based on myocardial signal density, it is crucial to determine the normal values of myocardial signal density and to identify potential mechanisms of misinterpretation of perfusion defects. In routine CT angiography acquisitions, there might be a considerable signal density drop at the posterobasal wall resembling perfusion defects possibly being attributed to beam hardening artifacts.
In the current issue of the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Rodríguez-Granillo et al. [48] investigated normal myocardial signal density levels during CT angiography and evaluated the impact of artifacts due to beam hardening. A group of 36 consecutive asymptomatic patients with a low probability of CAD were referred for CT angiography because of inconclusive or discordant functional tests. Perfusion defects were defined as a myocardial segment having a signal density two standard deviations below the average myocardial signal density for the 16 left ventricular American Heart Association (AHA) segments. Signal density was evaluated in 576 American Heart Association (AHA) segments and 36 posterobasal segments. The mean myocardial signal density at the posterobasal segment was 53.5 ± 35.1 Hounsfield Units, whereas the mean myocardial signal density at the basal, mid and apical myocardium was 97.4 ± 17.3 Hounsfield Units, with significant differences between posterobasal and all AHA segments. Posterobasal perfusion defects were identified in 26 (72%) patients. The only variable associated to the presence of posterobasal perfusion defect was heart rate, whereas body mass index, blood signal density of the left and right ventricles, contrast-to-noise ratio, and the extent of atherosclerosis were not related to the presence of perfusion defects. The main findings of the study were that (1) beam hardening artifacts are a common finding at CT angiography of asymptomatic patients affecting predominantly the posterobasal wall, (2) perfusion defects at the short axis plane including the mitral valve and the left ventricular outflow tract are not related to technical issues whereas heart rate may be associated with this finding, (3) perfusion defects can be also identified at the inferior and anteroapical segments but this occurs less often.
Occurrence of attenuation artifacts during radionuclide SPECT perfusion imaging has been considered an important limitation of the technique [49–51]. Apical thinning due to the overlying diaphragm and the occurrence of anteroseptal defects as a result of breast attenuation are very common causes for unwanted perfusion deficits, leading to image misinterpretation and potentially a wrong diagnosis. The present study [48] indicates that perfusion artifacts also occur at CT perfusion angiography and could therefore be a reason for misinterpretation. These perfusion defects can largely be ascribed to beam hardening artifacts most likely from the spine for posterobasal segments and from the sternum for anteroapical segments.
In radionuclide myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging, successful attenuation correction programs have been developed in order to discriminate between true and false perfusion defects [52–55]. Similarly, correction algorithms are currently being designed for CT angiography with the same purpose. Recently, So et al. [56] designed phantoms to simulate the beam hardening artifacts encountered in cardiac CT perfusion studies of humans and animals. These phantoms were used to investigate whether beam hardening artifacts could be reduced with this approach and to determine the optimal settings of the correction algorithm for patient and animal studies, which depend upon the anatomy of the scanned subject. The correction algorithm was also applied to correct beam hardening in a clinical study to further demonstrate the effectiveness of this technique.
To summarize, the study by Rodríguez-Granillo et al. [48] convincingly shows that in an asymptomatic population with no history of CAD, who undergo CT perfusion angiography, artifacts in the posterobasal wall are a common finding in more than two-thirds of patients. This phenomenon of pseudo-perfusion defects may considerably affect proper image interpretation and should be taken into account in the judgment of CT perfusion images. In the near future, correction algorithms for CT perfusion angiography will assist in identifying the true nature of the defects in order to establish the correct diagnosis.
References
Bavelaar-Croon CD, Pauwels EK, van der Wall EE (2001) Gated single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial imaging: a new tool in clinical cardiology. Am Heart J 141:383–390
van der Wall EE, Heidendal GA, den Hollander W, Westera G, Roos JP (1980) I-123 labeled hexadecenoic acid in comparison with thallium-201 for myocardial imaging in coronary heart disease. A preliminary study. Eur J Nucl Med 5:401–405
Bax JJ, Lamb H, Dibbets P, Pelikan H et al (2000) Comparison of gated single-photon emission computed tomography with magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of left ventricular function in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 86:1299–1305
Chamuleau SA, van Eck-Smit BL, Meuwissen M et al (2007) Long-term prognostic value of CFVR and FFR versus perfusion scintigraphy in patients with multivessel disease. Neth Heart J 15:369–374
Bavelaar-Croon CD, Kayser HW, van der Wall EE et al (2000) Left ventricular function: correlation of quantitative gated SPECT and MR imaging over a wide range of values. Radiology 217:572–575
van der Wall EE, den Hollander W, Heidendal GA, Westera G, Majid PA, Roos JP (1981) Dynamic myocardial scintigraphy with 123I-labeled free fatty acids in patients with myocardial infarction. Eur J Nucl Med 6:383–389
Kurvers MJ, Braam RL, Verzijlbergen JF, Heestermans AA, Ten Berg JM (2007) Myocardial salvage in STEMI patients treated with primary coronary angioplasty as demonstrated by myocardial SPECT. Neth Heart J 15:422–423
van der Wall EE, van Dijkman PR, de Roos A et al (1990) Diagnostic significance of gadolinium-DTPA (diethylene-triamine penta-acetic acid) enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in thrombolytic treatment for acute myocardial infarction: its potential in assessing reperfusion. Br Heart J 63:12–17
van Dijkman PR, van der Wall EE, de Roos A et al (1991) Acute, subacute, and chronic myocardial infarction: quantitative analysis of gadolinium-enhanced MR images. Radiology 180:147–151
de Roos A, Matheijssen NA, Doornbos J, van Dijkman PR, van Voorthuisen AE, van der Wall EE (1990) Myocardial infarct size after reperfusion therapy: assessment with Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 176:517–521
van de Wal RM, van Werkum JW, le Cocq d’Armandville MC et al (2007) Giant aneurysm of an aortocoronary venous bypass graft compressing the right ventricle. Neth Heart J 15:252–254
Niezen RA, Helbing WA, van der Wall EE, van der Geest RJ, Rebergen SA, de Roos A (1996) Biventricular systolic function and mass studied with MR imaging in children with pulmonary regurgitation after repair for tetralogy of Fallot. Radiology 201:135–140
Pluim BM, Lamb HJ, Kayser HW et al (1998) Functional and metabolic evaluation of the athlete’s heart by magnetic resonance imaging and dobutamine stress magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Circulation 97:666–672
Vliegen HW, Doornbos J, de Roos A, Jukema JW, Bekedam MA, van der Wall EE (1997) Value of fast gradient echo magnetic resonance angiography as an adjunct to coronary arteriography in detecting and confirming the course of clinically significant coronary artery anomalies. Am J Cardiol 79:773–776
Hoogendoorn LI, Pattynama PM, Buis B, van der Geest RJ, van der Wall EE, de Roos A (1995) Noninvasive evaluation of aortocoronary bypass grafts with magnetic resonance flow mapping. Am J Cardiol 75:845–848
Holman ER, Buller VG, de Roos A et al (1997) Detection and quantification of dysfunctional myocardium by magnetic resonance imaging. A new three-dimensional method for quantitative wall-thickening analysis. Circulation 95:924–931
Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, van der Wall EE (2007) Anatomical and functional imaging techniques: basically similar or fundamentally different? Neth Heart J 15:43–44
van Werkhoven JM, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW et al (2008) Anatomic correlates of a normal perfusion scan using 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 101:40–45
Scholte AJ, Bax JJ, Wackers FJ (2006) Screening of asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus for silent coronary artery disease: combined use of stress myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary calcium scoring. J Nucl Cardiol 13:11–18
Wijpkema JS, Dorgelo J, Willems TP et al (2007) Discordance between anatomical and functional coronary stenosis severity. Neth Heart J 15:5–11
Molhoek SG, Bax JJ, Bleeker GB et al (2004) Comparison of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with sinus rhythm versus chronic atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 94:1506–1509
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD (2007) Universal definition of myocardial infarction; Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. Eur Heart J 28:2525–2538
van Lennep JE, Westerveld HT, van Lennep HW, Zwinderman AH, Erkelens DW, van der Wall EE (2000) Apolipoprotein concentrations during treatment and recurrent coronary artery disease events. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20:2408–2413
Chamuleau SA, Vrijsen KR, Rokosh DG, Tang XL, Piek JJ, Bolli R (2009) Cell therapy for ischaemic heart disease: focus on the role of resident cardiac stem cells. Neth Heart J 17:199–207
de Leeuw JG, Wardeh A, Sramek A, van der Wall EE (2007) Pseudo-aortic dissection after primary PCI. Neth Heart J 15:265–266
Braun S, van der Wall EE, Emanuelsson S, Kobrin I (1996) Effects of a new calcium antagonist, mibefradil (Ro 40–5967), on silent ischemia in patients with stable chronic angina pectoris: a multicenter placebo-controlled study. The mibefradil international study group. J Am Coll Cardiol 27:317–322
Portegies MC, Schmitt R, Kraaij CJ et al (1991) Lack of negative inotropic effects of the new calcium antagonist Ro 40–5967 in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 18:746–751
ten Kate GJ, Wuestink AC, de Feyter PJ (2008) Coronary artery anomalies detected by MSCT-angiography in the adult. Neth Heart J 16:369–375
Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, van der Wall EE, Bax JJ (2007) Multi-slice computed tomography in the evaluation of patients with acute chest pain. Acute Card Care 9:214–221
Groen JM, Greuter MJ, Vliegenthart R et al (2008) Calcium scoring using 64-slice MDCT, dual source CT and EBT: a comparative phantom study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:547–556
Bakx AL, van der Wall EE, Braun S, Emanuelsson H, Bruschke AV, Kobrin I (1995) Effects of the new calcium antagonist mibefradil (Ro 40–5967) on exercise duration in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris: a multicenter, placebo-controlled study. Ro 40–5967 International Study Group. Am Heart J 130:748–757
Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, Jukema JW et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography in the noninvasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 98:145–148
Jongbloed MR, Lamb HJ, Bax JJ et al (2005) Noninvasive visualization of the cardiac venous system using multislice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:749–753
Schuijf JD, Wijns W, Jukema JW et al (2006) Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:2508–2514
Pundziute G, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW et al (2007) Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:62–70
Henneman MM, Schuijf JD, Pundziute G et al (2008) Noninvasive evaluation with multislice computed tomography in suspected acute coronary syndrome: plaque morphology on multislice computed tomography versus coronary calcium score. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:216–222
de Nooijer R, Verkleij CJ, von der Thüsen JH et al (2006) Lesional overexpression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 promotes intraplaque hemorrhage in advanced lesions but not at earlier stages of atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 26:340–346
van der Laarse A, Kerkhof PL, Vermeer F et al (1988) Relation between infarct size and left ventricular performance assessed in patients with first acute myocardial infarction randomized to intracoronary thrombolytic therapy or to conventional treatment. Am J Cardiol 61:1–7
van der Hoeven BL, Pires NM, Warda HM et al (2005) Drug-eluting stents: results, promises and problems. Int J Cardiol 99:9–17
Ertaş G, van Beusekom HM, van der Giessen WJ (2009) Late stent thrombosis, endothelialisation and drug-eluting stents. Neth Heart J 17:177–180
Scholte AJ, Schuijf JD, Kharagjitsingh AV et al (2008) Different manifestations of coronary artery disease by stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging, coronary calcium scoring, and multislice CT coronary angiography in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Nucl Cardiol 15:503–509
Juwana YB, Wirianta J, Suryapranata H, de Boer MJ (2007) Left main coronary artery stenosis undetected by 64-slice computed tomography: a word of caution. Neth Heart J 15:255–256
Scholte AJ, Schuijf JD, Kharagjitsingh AV et al (2008) Prevalence of coronary artery disease and plaque morphology assessed by multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography and calcium scoring in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes. Heart 94:290–295
Akram K, Voros S (2008) Absolute coronary artery calcium scores are superior to MESA percentile rank in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:743–749
Tops LF, Bax JJ, Zeppenfeld K et al (2005) Fusion of multislice computed tomography imaging with three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping to guide radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures. Heart Rhythm 2:1076–1081
Sirineni GK, Raggi P, Shaw LJ, Stillman AE (2008) Calculation of coronary age using calcium scores in multiple ethnicities. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:107–111
Marques KM, Westerhof N (2008) Characteristics of the flow velocity-pressure gradient relation in the assessment of stenoses: an in vitro study. Neth Heart J 16:156–162
Rodríguez-Granillo GA, Rosales MA, Degrossi E, Rodriguez AE (2009) Signal density of left ventricular myocardial segments and impact of beam hardening artifact: implications for myocardial perfusion assessment by multidetector CT coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. [Epub ahead of print]
Morita K, Tsukamoto E, Tamaki N (2002) Perfusion-BMIPP mismatch: specific finding or artifact? Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 18:279–282
America YG, Bax JJ, Dibbets-Schneider P, Pauwels EK, Van der Wall EE (2005) Evaluation of the Quantitative Gated SPECT (QGS) software program in the presence of large perfusion defects. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 21:519–529
Purser NJ, Armstrong IS, Williams HA, Tonge CM, Lawson RS (2008) Apical thinning: real or artefact? Nucl Med Commun 29:382–389
Stinis CT, Lizotte PE, Movahed MR (2006) Impaired myocardial SPECT imaging secondary to silicon- and saline-containing breast implants. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 22:449–455
Verburg FA, Romijn RL, Nekolla S, Verzijlbergen JF (2009) A phantom assessment of cold stomach-related artifacts in myocardial perfusion imaging. Nucl Med Commun 30:569–573
Kovalski G, Keidar Z, Frenkel A, Israel O, Azhari H (2009) Correction for respiration artefacts in myocardial perfusion SPECT is more effective when reconstructions supporting collimator detector response compensation are applied. J Nucl Cardiol 16:949–955
Ali I, Ruddy TD, Almgrahi A, Anstett FG, Wells RG (2009) Half-time SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging with attenuation correction. J Nucl Med 50:554–562
So A, Hsieh J, Li JY, Lee TY (2009) Beam hardening correction in CT myocardial perfusion measurement. Phys Med Biol 21:3031–3050
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editorial comment on the article of Rodríguez-Granillo et al. (doi: 10.1007/s10554-009-9531-5).
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
van der Wall, E.E., Schuijf, J.D., Bax, J.J. et al. CT perfusion angiography; beware of artifacts!. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26, 355–358 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-009-9559-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-009-9559-6