Abstract
Although progress has been made to understand the factors for non-responsiveness, fine tuning and comprehensive strategies are needed to make echocardiography the GPS system in cardiac resynchronization. Taking the wrong turn in the labyrinth of dyssynchrony is expensive and time consuming without improving well being of the heart failure patient. Possibly other imaging techniques could help in fine tuning cardiac resynchronization.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Congestive heart failure remains an increasing health problem. This despite advances in medical treatment with antagonist of neurohumoral pathways and afterload reducing agents [1]. Therefore, alternative treatment strategies are more than welcome in these patients. From animal experiments and patients with eccentric activation of the heart we know, that electromechanical dyssynchrony may result in pathological remodelling and ultimately heart failure [2–4]. Several groups have shown that eccentric septal mechanical activation by pacemakers or Wolf Parkinson White syndrome may provoke left ventricular dyssynchrony and left ventricular dysfunction. It has also been shown, that restoring ventricular synchronization by left ventricular or biventricular pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle-branch block acutely enhances systolic function while modestly lowering energy cost [5, 6]. After the pioneering work of Cazeau et al. [6] cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been proven to give clinical improvement in severe heart failure. Later biventricular pacing has been shown to cause reverse remodelling, increase functional capacity, decrease mortality and hospital readmissions for heart failure and therefore CRT has become a class I (level of evidence A) indication for treatment of heart failure in American and European guidelines [7–9]. This for those patients with an left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, a QRS ≥120 ms, who remain symptomatic (NYHA class III-IV) despite optimal treatment [10, 11]. Unfortunately selection of patients with electrocardiographic criteria alone identifies only 70% of responders to therapy [12] .This seems dramatically low, but is equal to or even a better response to therapy than traditional medical heart failure therapy [13]. However, due to the high costs of resynchronization therapy echocardiographic criteria were developed to select patients. Multiple echocardiographic criteria have been proposed, with no consensus as to which parameter better predicts CRT response. In the current issue of the International Journal of Cardiac Imaging Pavolopulos and Nihoyannopulos give a comprehensive review of selection criteria used to select patients for cardiac resynchronisation therapy [14]. Unfortunately there is still a lack of consensus for standard criteria, that should be selected to define non-responders [15, 16]. Patients who are defined as non responder with echocardiographic criteria may have less symptoms clinically [13]. Additionally, symptomatic improvement does not indicate a better prognosis. The authors summarize some factors for non-response such as suboptimal location of the pacing lead, the presence of scarring in the region of the left ventricular lead placement, suboptimal A-V and /or VV optimisation, unsuitable coronary venous system for appropriate lead implantation, suboptimal medical therapy, lead dislodgement and ischemic heart disease [14]. Although progress has been made to understand the factors for non-responsiveness, fine tuning and comprehensive strategies are needed to make echocardiography the GPS system in cardiac resynchronization. Taking the wrong turn in the labyrinth of dyssynchrony is expensive and time consuming without improving well being of the heart failure patient. Possibly other imaging techniques could help in fine tuning cardiac resynchronization [17].
References
Packer M (1996) New concepts in the pathophysiology of heart failure: beneficial and deleterious interaction of endogenous haemodynamic and neurohormonal mechanisms. J Intern Med 239:327–333
Prinzen FW, Hunter WC, Wyman BT, McVeigh ER (1999) Mapping of regional myocardial strain and work during ventricular pacing: experimental study using magnetic resonance imaging tagging. J Am Coll Cardiol 33(6):1735–1742
van Oosterhout MF, Prinzen FW, Arts T, Schreuder JJ, Vanagt WY, Cleutjens JP, Reneman RS (1998) Asynchronous electrical activation induces asymmetrical hypertrophy of the left ventricular wall. Circulation 98(6):588–595
Tomaske M, Janousek J, Rázek V, Gebauer RA, Tomek V, Hindricks G, Knirsch W, Bauersfeld U (2008) Adverse effects of Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome with right septal or posteroseptal accessory pathways on cardiac function. Europace 10(2):181–189
Nelson GS, Berger RD, Fetics BJ, Talbot M, Spinelli JC, Hare JM, Kass DA (2000) Left ventricular or biventricular pacing improves cardiac function at diminished energy cost in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and left bundle-branch block. Circulation 102(25):3053–3059
Cazeau S, Ritter P, Bakdach S, Lazarus A, Limousin M, Henao L, Mundler O, Daubert JC, Mugica J (1994) Four chamber pacing in dilated cardiomyopathy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 17(11 Pt 2):1974–1979
Cazeau S, Leclercq C, Lavergne T, Walker S, Varma C, Linde C, Garrigue S, Kappenberger L, Haywood GA, Santini M, Bailleul C, Daubert JC, Multisite Stimulation in Cardiomyopathies (MUSTIC) Study Investigators (2001) Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay. N Engl J Med 344(12):873–880
Linde C, Leclercq C, Rex S et al (2002) Long-term benefits of biventricular pacing in congestive heart failure: results from the MUltisite STimulation in cardiomyopathy (MUSTIC) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 40:111–118
Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E et al (2005) The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med 352:1539–1549
Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, Feldman AM, Francis GS, Ganiats TG, Jessup M, Konstam MA, Mancini DM, Michl K, Oates JA, Rahko PS, Silver MA, Stevenson LW, Yancy CW, College American, American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association (2009) Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2005 guidelines for the diagnosis and management of heart failure in adults. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Developed in collaboration with the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 53(15):e1–e90
Swedberg K, Cleland J, Dargie H, Drexler H, Follath F, Komajda M, Tavazzi L, Smiseth OA, Gavazzi A, Haverich A, Hoes A, Jaarsma T, Korewicki J, Lévy S, Linde C, Lopez-Sendon JL, Nieminen MS, Piérard L, Remme WJ, Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology (2005) Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure: executive summary (update 2005). Eur Heart J 26(11):1115–1140 (Epub 2005 May 18)
Lafitte S, Reant P, Serri K, Roudaut R (2008) Echocardiographic algorithm for cardiac resynchronization. Echocardiography 25(9):1040–1046
Foley PWX, Leyva F, Frenneaux MP (2009) What is treatment success in cardiac resynchronization therapy? Europace 11:V58–V65
Pavlopoulos H, Nihoyannopoulos P (2009) Recent advances in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Echocardiographic modalities, patient selection, optimization, non-responders. All you need to know for more efficient CRT. Int J Cardiac Imaging doi: 10.1007/s10554-009-9523-5
Gorcsan J 3rd, Abraham T, Agler DA, Bax JJ, Derumeaux G, Grimm RA, Martin R, Steinberg JS, Sutton MS, Yu CM, American Society of Echocardiography Dyssynchrony Writing Group (2008) Echocardiography for cardiac resynchronization therapy: recommendations for performance and reporting—a report from the American Society of Echocardiography Dyssynchrony Writing Group endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 21(3):191–213
Yu CM, Bax JJ, Gorcsan J 3rd (2009) Critical appraisal of methods to assess mechanical dyssynchrony. Curr Opin Cardiol 24(1):18–28
Ypenburg C, Van der Wall EE, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ (2008) Imaging in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Neth Heart J 16:36–40
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editorial comment on the article of Pavlopoulos and Nihoyannopoulos (doi: 10.1007/s10554-009-9523-5).
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Baur, L.H.B. Echocardiography as a guidance in CRT management: the GPS system in a labyrinth?. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26, 193–195 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-009-9555-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-009-9555-x