Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

CT coronary angiography of chronic total occlusions of the coronary arteries: how to recognize and evaluate and usefulness for planning percutaneous coronary interventions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chronic total occlusions (CTO) of the coronary arteries are a common finding. A CTO can be underdiagnosed on CT coronary angiography (CTCA) as a high grade stenosis, because of the presence of retrograde collaterals which allow opacification of the vessel distal to the stenosis, or can be missed completely, especially if another adjacent opacified artery is mistaken for occluded artery. CTOs are considered as Type C or high risk lesions with a higher restenosis rate and increased technical failure rate by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). CTCA can help identify features that most influence current success rates of PCI such as marked calcifications at the stump, severe tortuosity of the proximal vessel, long length of the occluded segment as well location of the vessel distal to the occlusion, which often may not be well seen on conventional angiography. Identification of these features and displaying the 3D information as the best angiographic projection that demonstrates the length and orientation of the CTO, either as hard copy images or transmitted direct to the angiographic catheter lab for data fusion, allows strategic preprocedural planning and scheduling of the PCI. Myocardial viability of the affected area of the occluded segment is a major factor that influences whether PCI for CTO is attempted but is not currently readily available by cardiac CT. Contrast enhanced cardiac MR imaging is still the gold standard for this and may need to be performed prior to PCI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CAG:

Conventional coronary angiography

CTCA:

CT coronary angiography

CTO:

Chronic total occlusion

DES:

Drug eluting stent

IVUS:

Intravascular ultrasound

LAD:

Left anterior descending artery

MACE:

Major adverse coronary event

MI:

Myocardial infarction

MPR:

Multiplanar reconstructions

MIP:

Maximum intensity projection

RCA:

Right coronary artery

PCI:

Percutaneous coronary intervention

QCA:

Quantitative coronary angiography

TIMI:

thrombolysis in myocardial infarction

References

  1. Achenbach S (2007) Cardiac CT: state of the art for the detection of coronary arterial stenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomog 1:3–20. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2007.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdulla J, Abildstrom SZ, Gotzsche O et al (2007) 64-Multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 28(24):3042–3050. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Malagutti P et al (2006) Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 48(9):1896–1910. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F et al (2005) Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(1):147–154. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.03.071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dewey M, Rutsch W, Schnapauff D et al (2007) Coronary artery stenosis quantification using multislice computed tomography. Invest Radiol 42(2):78–84. doi:10.1097/01.rli.0000251569.01317.60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cury RC, Pomerantsev EV, Ferencik M et al (2005) Comparison of the degree of coronary stenoses by multidetector computed tomography versus by quantitative coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 96(6):784–787. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.05.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng V, Gutstein A, Wolak A et al (2008) Moving beyond binary grading of coronary arterial stenoses on coronary computed tomographic angiography-insights for the imager and referring clinician. J Am Coll Cardiol Imaging 1:460–471

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yokoyama N, Yamamoto Y, Suzuki S et al (2006) Impact of 16 slice computed tomography in percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 68(1):1–7. doi:10.1002/ccd.20734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kahn JK (1993) Angiographic suitability for catheter revascularization of total coronary occlusions in patients from a community hospital setting. Am Heart J 126:561–564. doi:10.1016/0002-8703(93)90404-W

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Christofferson RD, Lehmann KG, Martin GV et al (2005) Effect of chronic total coronary occlusion on treatment strategy. Am J Cardiol 95(9):1088–1091. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.12.065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen HA, Williams DO, Holmes DR Jr et al (2003) Impact of age on procedural and 1-year outcome in percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: a report from the NHLBI Dynamic Registry. Am Heart J 146(3):513–519. doi:10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00259-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stone GW, Kandzari DE, Mehran R et al (2005) Percutaneous recanalization of chronically occluded coronary arteries: a consensus document: part I. Circulation 112(15):2364–2372. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.481283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stone GW, Reifart NJ, Moussa I et al (2005) Percutaneous recanalization of chronically occluded coronary arteries: a consensus document: part II. Circulation 112(16):2530–2537. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.583716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng ASH, Selvanayagam JB, Jerosch-Herold M et al (2008) Percutaneous treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions improves regional hyperemic myocardial blood flow and contractility: insights from quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 1:44–53

    Google Scholar 

  15. Prasad A, Rihal CS, Lennon RJ et al (2007) Trends in outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions: a 25-year experience from the Mayo clinic. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(15):1611–1618. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.12.040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Olivari Z, Rubartelli P, Piscione F et al (2003) Immediate results and one-year clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary interventions in chronic total occlusions: data from a multicenter, prospective, observational study (TOAST-GISE). J Am Coll Cardiol 41(10):1672–1678. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00312-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Suero JA, Marso SP, Jones PG et al (2001) Procedural outcomes and long-term survival among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of a chronic total occlusion in native coronary arteries: a 20-year experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 38(2):409–414. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01349-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoye A, van Domburg RT, Sonnenschein K et al (2005) Percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions: the thoraxcenter experience 1992–2002. Eur Heart J 26(24):2630–2636. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Serruys PW, van Geuns RJ (2008) Arguments for recanalization of chronic total occlusions. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 1:54–55

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hoe JW, Toh KH (2007) A practical guide to reading CT coronary angiograms—how to avoid mistakes when assessing for coronary stenosis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 23(5):617–633. doi:10.1007/s10554-006-9173-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Pflederer T, et al (2007) Differentiation of total occlusion and high-grade stenosis in coronary CT angiography. In: Abstracts of the 2nd annual scientific meeting of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography, July 5–July 8, 2007. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 1(suppl):S10–S12. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2007.05.034

  22. Herzog C, Zwerner P, Savino G, et al (2006) Use of advanced visualization tools in 64-slice CT coronary angiography and impact on diagnostic accuracy: a comparison to quantitative coronary angiography. In: Abstracts of 92nd scientific assembly and annual meeting, RSNA Nov 2006 Scientific Paper SST06-09

  23. Ferencik M, Ropers D, Abbara S et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of image postprocessing methods for the detection of coronary artery stenoses by using multidetector CT. Radiology 243(3):696–702. doi:10.1148/radiol.2433060080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith SC Jr, Dove JT, Jacobs AK et al (2001) ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines): a report of the American college of cardiology/american heart association task force on practice guidelines (committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the society for cardiac angiography and interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 37(8):2215–2239. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01345-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr et al (2001) ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention-summary article. A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI writing committee to update the 2001 guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention). J Am Coll Cardiol 47:216–235. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Saito S (2008) Different strategies of retrograde approach in coronary angioplasty for chronic total occlusions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 71:8–19. doi:10.1002/ccd.21316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kinoshita I, Katoh O, Nariyama J et al (1995) Coronary angioplasty of chronic total occlusions with bridging collateral vessels: immediate and follow-up outcome from a large single-center experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 26(2):409–415. doi:10.1016/0735-1097(95)80015-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tsuchikane E, Katoh O, Suzuki T et al (2008) Chronic total occlusion. In: Nguyen TN (ed) Practical handbook of advanced interventional cardiology tips and tricks, 3rd edn. Blackwell Publishing, Malden Oxford, pp 173–204

    Google Scholar 

  29. Holmes DR Jr, Williams DO (2008) Catheter-based treatment of coronary artery disease. Past, present, and future. Cir Cardiovasc Interv 1:60–73. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.783134

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stone GW, Reifart NJ, Moussa I et al (2005) Percutaneous recanalization of chronically occluded coronary arteries: a consensus document: part II. Circulation 112(16):2530–2537. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.583716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Puma JA, Sketch MH Jr, Tcheng JE et al (1995) Percutaneous revascularizations of chronic total occlusions: an overview. J Am Coll Cardiol 26(1):1–11. doi:10.1016/0735-1097(95)00156-T

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tan KH, Sulke N, Taub NA et al (1993) Determinants of success of coronary angioplasty in patients with a chronic total occlusion: a multiple logistic regression model to improve selection of patients. Br Heart J 70(2):126–131. doi:10.1136/hrt.70.2.126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mollet NR, Hoye A, Lemos PA et al (2005) Value of preprocedure multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography to predict the outcome of percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusions. Am J Cardiol 95(2):240–243. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.09.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hecht HS (2008) Applications of multislice coronary computed tomographic angiography to percutaneous coronary intervention: how did we ever do without it? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 71:490–503. doi:10.1002/ccd.21427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ohanessian A, Lefevre T, Sastry S, et al (2008) Impact of 64-slice computed tomography before percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusion. In: Abstracts of ESC Congress 2008. Eur Heart J, Munich, August 30–September 3, 2008. 29 (Abstract supplement), 618

  36. Mollet NR, Van Pelt N, Sianos G et al (2007) Multislice computed tomography coronary angiography before percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusions. Heart Metab 34:30–32

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ehara M, Kawai M, Matsubara T, et al (2007) Potential of multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography to predict procedural outcome of percutaneous revascularisation for chronic total occlusions. In: Abstracts of 93rd scientific assembly and annual meeting, RSNA November 2007 scientific paper SSJ22-05 p462

  38. Yokohama N, Konno K, Suzuki S, et al (2007) Noninvasive evaluation of severity of calcification within chronic total occlusion prior to percutaneous recanalisation by multislice computed tomography: comparison with coronary angiography and 3D-IVUS. In: Abstracts of the 2nd Annual scientific meeting of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography, July 5–July 8, 2007. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomog 1(suppl):S17–S23. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2007.05.053

  39. Otsuka M, Sugahara S, Umeda K et al (2008) Utility of multislice computed tomography as a strategic tool for complex percutaneous coronary intervention. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24(2):201–210. doi:10.1007/s10554-007-9239-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Riber J, Sheth T, Mooyaart EAQ, et al (2006) Computed tomographic angiography for grading of collaterals in total occlusions. In: Abstracts of world congress of cardiology, Barcelona, p 889

  41. Colombo A, Chieffo A (2007) Drug-eluting stent update 2007: part III: technique and unapproved/unsettled indications (left main, bifurcations, chronic total occlusions, small vessels and long lesions, saphenous vein grafts, acute myocardial infarctions, and multivessel disease). Circulation 116(12):1424–1432. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.621359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mahnken AH, Mühlenbruch G, Günther RW et al (2007) Cardiac CT: coronary arteries and beyond. Eur Radiol 17(4):994–1008. doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0433-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Krombach GA, Niendorf T, Günther RW et al (2007) Characterization of myocardial viability using MR and CT imaging. Eur Radiol 17(6):1433–1444. doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0531-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Tsai IC, Lee WL, Tsao CR et al (2008) Comprehensive evaluation of ischemic heart disease using MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(1):64–72. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.3484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. George RT, Silva C, Cordeiro MA et al (2006) Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress. J Am Coll Cardiol 48(1):153–160. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medi-Rad Associates Ltd, CT Centre, Mt Elizabeth Hospital, 3 Mt Elizabeth, 228510, Singapore, Singapore

    John Hoe

Authors
  1. John Hoe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Hoe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoe, J. CT coronary angiography of chronic total occlusions of the coronary arteries: how to recognize and evaluate and usefulness for planning percutaneous coronary interventions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25 (Suppl 1), 43–54 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-009-9424-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-009-9424-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation