Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A practical guide to reading CT coronary angiograms—How to avoid mistakes when assessing for coronary stenoses

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are now many physicians, both radiologists and cardiologists who are reporting CT coronary angiography (CTCA) scans who may not be aware that there are many pitfalls present. For the inexperienced reader a significant stenosis in a coronary artery can be easily missed or a moderate stenosis overcalled as significant. Artifacts can also be misinterpreted as representing a significant lesion. It is important that the studies are correctly interpreted, especially as the reported high negative predictive value of CTCA scans is a major strength of this imaging technique. The learning curve of reading these scans is steep and access to conventional coronary catheterisation results is essential for feedback and to improve the readers results. We have developed some rules to aid beginners avoid some of the pitfalls that can occur as these studies are not as easy to read as they may appear initially.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stein PD, Beemath A, Kayali F et al. (2006) Multidetector computed tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Am J Med 119:203–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Garcia MJ, Lessick J, Hoffmann MHK (2006) Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA 296:403–411

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoffman MH, Shi H, Schmitz BL et al. (2005) Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA 293:2471–2478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Raff GL, Gallager MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of non invasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ehara M, Surmely JF, Kawai M et al. (2006). Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography fro detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J 70:564–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Becker CR (2005) Coronary CT angiography in symptomatic patients. Eur Radiol l 15(Suppl 2):B33–B41

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ohnesorge BM, Hofmann LK, Flohr TG, Schoef UJ (2005) CT for imaging of coronary artery disease: defining the paradigm for its application. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 21:85–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM et al. (2006) ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:1475–1497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hyun SC, Choi BW, Choe KO et al. (2004) Pitfalls, artifacts and remedies in multi-detector row CT coronary angiography. Radiographics 24:787–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakanishi TN, Kayashima Y, Inoue R, Sumii K, Gomyo Y (2005) Pitfalls in 16-detector row CT of the coronary arteries. Radiographics 25:425–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Oijen PMA, Ho KY, Dorgelo J, Oudkerk M (2003) Coronary artery imaging with multidetector CT: visualisation issues. Radiographics 23:16e. Published online as 10.1148/rg.e16

  12. Achenbach S (2005) Coronary CT angiography: a cardiologist’s perspective. Appl Radiol (Supplement):22–23

  13. Lawler LP, Pannu HK, Fishman EK. (2005) MDCT evaluation of the coronary arteries, 2004: how we do it-data acquisition, postprocessing, display and interpretation. AJR 184:1402–1412

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoffman U, Ferencik M, Cury RC et al. (2006) Coronary CT angiography. J Nucl Med 47:797–806

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gerber TC, Breen JF, Kuzo RS et al. (2006) Computed tomographic angiography of the coronary arteries: techniques and applications. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 27:42–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Leber AW, Becker A, Knez A et al. (2006) Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:672–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Ruriza G et al. (2005). Influence of intracoronary attenuation on coronary plaque measurements using multislice computed tomography: observations in an ex-vivo model of coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Radiol 15:1426–1431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ota H, Takase K, Rikimaru H et al. (2005) Quantitative vascular measurements in arterial occlusive disease. Radiographics 25:1141–1158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cury RC, Ferencik M, Achenbach S et al. (2006) Accuracy of 16-slice Multidetector CT to quantify the degree of coronary artery stenosis: assessment of cross sectional and longitudinal vessel reconstructions. Eur Radiol 57:345–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cury RC, Pomerantsev H, Ferencik M et al. (2005) Comparison of the degree of coronary stenoses by multidetector computed tomography versus by quantitative coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 96:784–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Glagov S, Wisenberg E, Zarins CK et al. (1987) Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. NEJM 316:1371–1375

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dewey M, Schnapauff D, Laule M et al. (2004) Multislice CT coronary angiography: evaluation of an automatic vessel detection tool. Fortschr Rontgenstr 176:478–483

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Khan MF, Wesarg S, Gurung J et al. (2006) Facilitating coronary artery evaluation in MDCT using a 3D automatic vessel segmentation tool. Eur Radiol 16:1789–1795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Achenbach S, Rerencik M, Ropers D et al. (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of image postprocesing methods for the detection of coronary artery stenoses by multi-detector computed tomography. ESC Congress 2005. Abstract P1016

  25. Becker CR, Hong C, Knez A et al. (2003) Optimal contrast application for cardiac 4 detector row computed tomography. Invest Radiol 38:690–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Lemos P et al. (2006) Higher intracoronary attenuation improves diagnostic accuracy in MDCT coronary angiography. AJR 187:W430–W433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jacobs JE, Boxt LM, Desjardins B et al. (2006) ACR practice guideline for the performance & interpretation of cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Radiol 3:677–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rumberger JA (2006) Noncardiac abnormalities in diagnostic cardiac computed tomography: within normal limits or we never looked! J Am Coll Cardiol 48:407–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medi-Rad Associates Ltd, CT Centre, Mt Elizabeth Hospital, 3 Mt Elizabeth, Singapore, 288185, Singapore

    John W. M. Hoe & Kok Hong Toh

Authors
  1. John W. M. Hoe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kok Hong Toh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John W. M. Hoe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoe, J.W.M., Toh, K.H. A practical guide to reading CT coronary angiograms—How to avoid mistakes when assessing for coronary stenoses. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 23, 617–633 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-006-9173-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-006-9173-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation