Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prescription rates for commonly used drugs before and after a prostate cancer diagnosis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate differences in prescription rates of commonly used drugs among prostate cancer patients and cancer-free comparisons and between patients diagnosed with localized and non-localized disease.

Methods

We conducted a register-based study including all men aged 50–85 years diagnosed with prostate cancer in Denmark from 1998 to 2015 and an age-matched cancer-free comparison cohort. We calculated the number of new and total prescriptions from three years before to three years after the date of diagnosis of the case for selected drug classes divided by the number of person-months and stratified by stage at diagnosis.

Results

We included 54,286 prostate cancer patients and 249,645 matched comparisons. 30,712 patients were diagnosed with localized disease and 12,884 with non-localized disease. The rates of new prescriptions increased considerably among patients within the year before the diagnosis. Hereafter the rates varied between drug classes. For most drug classes, total prescription rates for patients and comparisons increased similarly in the study period. Total prescription rates varied between men with localized and non-localized disease for all drug classes apart from statins.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that a large proportion of prostate cancer cases are likely diagnosed during medical work-up for other reasons than prostate cancer. Increased rates occur within the last year before diagnosis and future studies on the interaction between drug use and prostate cancer should at least include a one year pre-diagnostic lag-time. Post-diagnostic prescription rates demonstrated an increased use of drugs most likely associated with the consequences of the disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Access to data can be obtained by request to the corresponding authors and the Danish data protection authorities.

Code availability

The code can be obtained by request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Daskivich TJ, Fan KH, Koyama T, Albertsen PC, Goodman M, Hamilton AS, Hoffman RM, Stanford JL, Stroup AM, Litwin MS, Penson DF (2013) Effect of age, tumor risk, and comorbidity on competing risks for survival in a U.S. population-based cohort of men with prostate cancer. Ann Intern Med 158:709–717. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-10-201305210-00005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Loeppenthin K, Dalton SO, Johansen C, Andersen E, Christensen MB, Pappot H, Petersen LN, Thisted LB, Frølich A, Mortensen CE, Lassen U, Ørsted J, Bidstrup PE (2020) Total burden of disease in cancer patients at diagnosis—a Danish nationwide study of multimorbidity and redeemed medication. Br J Cancer 123:1033–1040. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0950-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Gedeborg R, Garmo H, Robinson D, Stattin P (2020) Prescription-based prediction of baseline mortality risk among older men. PLoS ONE 15:e0241439. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241439

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pottegård A, Hallas J (2017) New use of prescription drugs prior to a cancer diagnosis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 26:223–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pedersen CB (2011) The Danish civil registration system. Scand J Public Heal 39:22–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810387965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gjerstorff ML (2011) The Danish cancer registry. Scand J Public Health 39:42–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810393562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kildemoes HW, Sørensen HT, Hallas J (2011) The Danish national prescription registry. Scand J Public Health 39:38–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810394717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Friberg AS, Dalton SO, Larsen SB, Andersen EW, Krøyer A, Helgstrand JT, Røder MA, Johansen C, Brasso K (2019) Risk of depression after radical prostatectomy—a nationwide registry-based study. Eur Urol Oncol 4:6–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2019.06.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu R, Li H (2021) Longitudinal assessment of prevalence and risk factors of anxiety and depression among prostate cancer survivors post-resection. Psychiatr Q 92:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-020-09869-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yiannopoulou KG, Anastasiou AI, Kontoangelos K, Papageorgiou C, Anastasiou IP (2020) Cognitive and psychological impacts of different treatment options for prostate cancer: a critical analysis. Curr Urol 14:169–177. https://doi.org/10.1159/000499242

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Friberg AS, Brasso K, Larsen SB, Andersen EW, Krøyer A, Helgstrand JT, Røder MA, Klemann N, Kessing LV, Johansen C, Dalton SO (2021) Risk of depression after diagnostic prostate cancer workup—a nationwide, registry-based study. Psychooncology. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Røder MA, Brasso K, Berg KD, Thomsen FB, Gruschy L, Rusch E, Iversen P (2013) Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy have a better survival than the background population. Dan Med J 60:4612

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lerhmann-Lerche CS, Larsen SB, Andersen I, Thygesen LC, Kaae Andersen K, Duun-Henriksen AK, Johansen C, Røder MA, Brasso K, Dalton SO (2019) Educational level and first-time PSA testing in general practice. Scand J Urol 53:275–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.2019.1681503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Karlsen RV, Larsen SB, Christensen J, Brasso K, Friis S, Tjonneland A, Dalton SO (2013) PSA testing without clinical indication for prostate cancer in relation to socio-demographic and clinical characteristics in the Danish diet, cancer and health study. Acta Oncol 52:1609–1614. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2013.831474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Larsen SB, Brasso K, Christensen J, Johansen C, Tjønneland A, Friis S, Iversen P, Dalton SO (2017) Socioeconomic position and mortality among patients with prostate cancer: influence of mediating factors. Acta Oncol 56:563–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2016.1260771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sorensen HT (2014) The Danish civil registration system as a tool in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol 29:541–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-014-9930-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pottegård A, Schmidt SAJ, Wallach-Kildemoes H, Sørensen HT, Hallas J, Schmidt M (2017) Data resource profile: the Danish national prescription registry. Int J Epidemiol 46:798. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The present study was funded by research grants from Kirsten and Freddy Johansens Fond and from the Peer Kølendorf Family Foundation. Anne Katrine Duun-Henriksen was funded by a research Grant from the Danish Cancer Society Scientific Committee (R204-A12.653).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study idea and design: SBL, CD, KB, AP, MAR, SF, AKDH. Statistical analyses: CD, AKDH. Writing manuscript: SBL, CS, KB, AKDH. Interpretation and critical review of the manuscript: SBL, CD, CS, SF, AP, MAR, KB, AKDH. All authors had read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Signe Benzon Larsen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Not needed for register-based studies.

Consent to participate

NA

Consent for publication

All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript before submission.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables

Table 2 Definition of clinical stage

2 and

Table 3 List of included drug classes

3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Larsen, S.B., Dehlendorff, C., Skriver, C. et al. Prescription rates for commonly used drugs before and after a prostate cancer diagnosis. Cancer Causes Control 33, 417–428 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-021-01537-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-021-01537-8

Keywords

Navigation