Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identify factors for insufficient (> 2 yr) mammogram screening among Oregonian women

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Women with breast cancer diagnosed from mammogram screenings have a lower mortality risk than women diagnosed from symptoms. Currently, the U.S Preventive Services Task Force recommends biannual screening for women aged 50–74 years old. In this study, we aimed to identify factors associated with inadequate screening defined as “no mammogram screening within past 2 years” to guide cancer prevention and early detection efforts.

Methods

This study utilized area-based probabilistic sampling survey data, collected across Oregon in 2019. Dataset weights were calculated using a raking approach. Demographic and behavior information were collected with existing validated questionnaire items from national surveys. Weighted multivariable logistic regression analyses with missing-value imputations were conducted to identify factors associated with inadequate mammogram screening.

Results

The study included 254 women 50–74 years old without previous breast or ovarian cancer history. 19.29% of the sample reported no mammogram within two years, including 1.57% with no previous mammograms. Following unadjusted analyses, the significant factors included education, occupation status, health insurance and smoking and were therefore included into the adjusted model. In the multivariate adjusted model education remained significant while occupation status, health insurance and smoking were no longer significant. Compared to women with a college graduate degree, women with less than college graduate degree were at higher risk of inadequate screening [OR (95% CI) = 3.23 (1.54, 6.74)].

Conclusions

Lack of education was significantly associated with inadequate mammogram screening even after adjusting for occupation status, health insurance and smoking, which should prompt further outreach and education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset analyzed and code used are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ACR:

American College of Radiology

ACS:

American Cancer Society

USPSTF:

United States Preventive Service Task Force

BMI:

Body Mass Index

BRFSS:

Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

CDC:

Center for Disease Control

95% CI:

95% Confidence Interval

NCI:

National Cancer Institute

NHIS:

National Health Interview Survey

OHSU:

Oregon Health & Science University

OR:

Odds Ratio

U-Can Oregon:

Understanding Cancer in Oregon

References

  1. DeSantis CE, Ma J, Gaudet MM et al (2019) Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 69:438–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nelson HD, Fu R, Cantor A, Pappas M, Daeges M, Humphrey L (2016) Effectiveness of breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis to update the 2009 U.S. preventive services task force recommendation. Ann Intern Med 164:244–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lawrenson R, Lao C, Jacobson G et al (2019) Outcomes in different ethnic groups of New Zealand patients with screen-detected vs. non-screen-detected breast cancer. J Med Screen 26:197–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Massat NJ, Dibden A, Parmar D, Cuzick J, Sasieni PD, Duffy SW (2016) Impact of screening on breast cancer mortality: The UK Program 20 Years on. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 25:455–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Narayan AK, Lee CI, Lehman CD (2020) Screening for breast cancer. Med Clin North Am 104:1007–1021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sabatino SA, Thompson TD, White MC et al (2021) Cancer screening test receipt—United States, 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 70:29–35

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Palmer JR, Gerlovin H, Bethea TN et al (2016) Predicted 25-hydroxyvitamin D in relation to incidence of breast cancer in a large cohort of African American women. Breast Cancer Res 18:86

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Feldstein AC, Perrin N, Rosales AG, Schneider J, Rix MM, Glasgow RE (2011) Patient barriers to mammography identified during a reminder program. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 20:421–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Plescia M, White MC (2013) The National Prevention Strategy and breast cancer screening: scientific evidence for public health action. Am J Public Health 103:1545–1548

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Alexandraki I, Mooradian AD (2010) Barriers related to mammography use for breast cancer screening among minority women. J Natl Med Assoc 102:206–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nazzal Z, Sholi H, Sholi SB, Sholi MB, Lahaseh R (2018) Motivators and barriers to mammography screening uptake by female health-care workers in primary health-care centres: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 391(Suppl 2):S51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Andrews C (2006) Modesty and healthcare for women: understanding cultural sensitivities. Community Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1548-5315(11)70732-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 2018 BRFSS Survey Data is the source for this data collected by the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

  14. Thangarajan EP, Balasubramanian G. (2018) Missing Data Imputation and Its Effect on the Accuracy of Classification. PhUSE US Connect 2018.

  15. Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA, Lynch JW, Davey SG (2006) Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 2). J Epidemiol Community Health 60:95–101

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA, Lynch JW, Davey SG (2006) Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J Epidemiol Community Health 60:7–12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Shavers VL (2007) Measurement of socioeconomic status in health disparities research. J Natl Med Assoc 99:1013–1023

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. McElrath K, MMartin M. (2021) Bachelor’s Degree Attainment in the United States: 2005 to 2019. American Community Survey Brief.

  19. Damiani G, Basso D, Acampora A et al (2015) The impact of level of education on adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med 81:281–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tomioka K, Kurumatani N, Saeki K (2020) The association between education and smoking prevalence, independent of occupation: a nationally representative survey in Japan. J Epidemiol 30:136–142

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Droomers M, Schrijvers CT, Mackenbach JP (2001) Educational level and decreases in leisure time physical activity: predictors from the longitudinal GLOBE study. J Epidemiol Community Health 55:562–568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Cohen AK, Rai M, Rehkopf DH, Abrams B (2013) Educational attainment and obesity: a systematic review. Obes Rev 14:989–1005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Rundle A, Iles S, Matheson K et al (2020) Women’s views about breast cancer prevention at mammography screening units and well women’s clinics. Curr Oncol 27:e336–e342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Heck KE, Pamuk ER (1997) Explaining the relation between education and postmenopausal breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 145:366–372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hussain SK, Altieri A, Sundquist J, Hemminki K (2008) Influence of education level on breast cancer risk and survival in Sweden between 1990 and 2004. Int J Cancer 122:165–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Menvielle G, Kunst AE, van Gils CH et al (2011) The contribution of risk factors to the higher incidence of invasive and in situ breast cancers in women with higher levels of education in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Am J Epidemiol 173:26–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Arpey NC, Gaglioti AH, Rosenbaum ME (2017) How Socioeconomic Status Affects Patient Perceptions of Health Care: A Qualitative Study. J Prim Care Community Health 8:169–175

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Bernheim SM, Ross JS, Krumholz HM, Bradley EH (2008) Influence of patients’ socioeconomic status on clinical management decisions: a qualitative study. Ann Fam Med 6:53–59

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Chapman EN, Kaatz A, Carnes M (2013) Physicians and implicit bias: how doctors may unwittingly perpetuate health care disparities. J Gen Intern Med 28:1504–1510

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Pagan JA, Asch DA, Brown CJ, Guerra CE, Armstrong K (2008) Lack of community insurance and mammography screening rates among insured and uninsured women. J Clin Oncol 26:1865–1870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bryant H, Mah Z (1992) Breast cancer screening attitudes and behaviors of rural and urban women. Prev Med 21:405–418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nuno T, Gerald JK, Harris R, Martinez ME, Estrada A, Garcia F (2012) Comparison of breast and cervical cancer screening utilization among rural and urban Hispanic and American Indian women in the Southwestern United States. Cancer Causes Control 23:1333–1341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lor M, Khang PY, Xiong P, Moua KF, Lauver D (2013) Understanding Hmong women’s beliefs, feelings, norms, and external conditions about breast and cervical cancer screening. Public Health Nurs 30:420–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lawal O, Murphy F, Hogg P, Nightingale J (2017) Health behavioural theories and their application to women’s participation in mammography screening. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 48:122–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Denise R. Sackett DO, Tala Dajani MM. (2019) Fat Shaming in Medicine: Overview of Alternative Patient Strategies. Osteopathic Family Physician. 11.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank ICF International for providing statistical support and the Marketing Survey Group for providing our probabilistic sample and consulting on the sampling design. We also thank Dr. Motomi Mori for providing statistical support.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number P30CA069533 (B. Druker), its supplemental Population Health P30 (B. Druker/J. Shannon) and the Office of Research on Women’s Health and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development K12HD043488 (Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women’s Health, BIRCWH) (Z. Zhang). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZZ was the primary investigator of the current analysis study; she conducted the primary analyses. JYL reviewed and revised the analyses. ZZ, GC, KX together wrote the first draft of the manuscript. JS, PEF, and ZZ obtained funding and performed administrative, technical, or material support of the original parental study. All authors have interpreted the results and critically revised the manuscript for valuable intellectual content.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenzhen Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors reported no potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Our study has not been published elsewhere nor has it been submitted simultaneously for publication elsewhere.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Z., Curran, G., Xu, K. et al. Identify factors for insufficient (> 2 yr) mammogram screening among Oregonian women. Cancer Causes Control 33, 293–301 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-021-01529-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-021-01529-8

Keywords

Navigation