Aguilera, R. V., Desender, K., Bednar, M. K., & Lee, J. H. (2015). Connecting the dots: Bringing external corporate governance into the corporate governance puzzle. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 483–573.
Google Scholar
André, R. (2012). Assessing the accountability of the benefit corporation: Will this new gray sector organization enhance corporate social responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics, 110(1), 133–150.
Google Scholar
Auvray, T., Dallery, T., & Rigot, S. (2016). L’entreprise liquidée. Michalon, Paris: La finance contre l’investissement.
Google Scholar
Bainbridge, S. M. (1992). Interpreting nonshareholder constituency statutes. Pepperdine Law Review, 19, 991–1025.
Google Scholar
Barthet, E. (2018). Le gouvernement lance le chantier du statut de l’entreprise. Le Monde. Paris. Retrieved from https://www.lemonde.fr/economie/article/2018/01/06/le-gouvernement-lance-le-chantier-du-statut-de-l-entreprise_5238266_3234.html.
Bercy. (2017). PACTE: Restitution des travaux conduits par les parlementaires et les chefs d’entreprise. Retrieved from https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/directions_services/politique-et-enjeux/entrepreneuriat/dossier-presse-plan-daction-croissance-et-transformation-des-entreprises-PACTE-dec2017.pdf
Berle, A., & Means, G. (1932). The modern corporation and private property (Reed 1991). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Google Scholar
Biondi, Y., Canziani, A., & Kirat, T. (Eds.). (2007). The firm as an entity: Implications for economics, accounting, and the law. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Bisconti, A. (2009). The double bottom line: Can constituency statutes protect socially responsible corporations stuck in Revlon land? Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 42, 765–806.
Google Scholar
Blair, M. M., & Stout, L. A. (1999). A team production theory of corporate law? Journal of Corporation Law, 24(4), 751–807.
Google Scholar
Bratton, W. W. (1989). The new economic theory of the firm: Critical perspectives from history. Faculty Scholarship. University of Pennsylvania Law School, paper 333.
Chandler, A. D. (1977). The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press.
Google Scholar
Chandler, A. D. (1990). Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Ciepley, D. (2018). Can corporations be held to the public interest, or even to the law? Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3894-2.
Article
Google Scholar
Clark, W. H., & Babson, E. K. (2012). How benefit corporations are redefining the purpose of business corporations. William Mitchell Law Review, 38(2), 817–851.
Google Scholar
Clarke, T., O’Brien, J., & O’Kelley, C. R. T. (Eds.). (2019). The Oxford handbook of the corporation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Club des Juristes. (2018). Le rôle sociétal de l’entreprise. Éléments de réflexion pour une réforme. Retrieved from https://www.leclubdesjuristes.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/cdj_rapport_role-societal-entreprise_avril-2018.pdf
Deakin, S. (2009). Legal origin, juridical form and industrialization in historical perspective: The case of the employment contract and the joint-stock company. Socio-Economic Review, 7, 35–65.
Google Scholar
Deakin, S. (2017). Tony Lawson’s theory of the corporation: Towards a social ontology of law. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(5), 1505–1523. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bex044.
Article
Google Scholar
Deakin, S., Gindis, D., Hodgson, G. M., Huang, K., & Pistor, K. (2017). Legal institutionalism: Capitalism and the constitutive role of law. Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(1), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2016.04.005.
Article
Google Scholar
Deskins, B. M. R. (2012). Benefit corporation legislation, version 1.0: A breakthough in stakeholder rights? Lewis & Clark Law Review, 15(4), 1047–1077.
Google Scholar
Dine, J. (2000). The Governance of Corporate Groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Djelic, M.-L. (2013). When limited liability was (still) an issue: Mobilization and politics of signification in 19th-century England. Organization Studies, 34(5–6), 595–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613479223.
Article
Google Scholar
Dodd, E. M. J. (1932). For whom are corporate managers trustees? Harvard Law Review, 45, 1145–1162.
Google Scholar
Favereau, O. (2014). Entreprises: La grande déformation. Collège des Bernardins, Paris: Parole et Silence.
Google Scholar
Favereau, O., & Roger, B. (2015). Penser l’entreprise. Collège des Bernardins, Paris: Nouvel horizon du politique. Parole et Silence.
Google Scholar
Filatotchev, I., & Nakajima, C. (2014). Corporate governance, responsible managerial behavior, and corporate social responsibility: Organizational efficiency versus organizational legitimacy? Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(3), 289–306.
Google Scholar
Grandori, A. (2010). Asset commitment, constitutional governance and the nature of the firm. Journal of Institutional Economics, 6(3), 351–375.
Google Scholar
Grandori, A. (2019). The firm in search of its nature. European Management Review, 16(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12178.
Article
Google Scholar
Grinbaum, A., & Groves, C. (2013). What is ‘responsible’ about responsible innovation? Understanding the ethical issues. In: R. Owen, J. Bessant, & M. Heintz (eds.), Responsible innovation. London: Wiley.
Google Scholar
Guinnane, T., Harris, R., Lamoreaux, N. R., & Rosenthal, J.-L. (2007). Putting the corporation in its place. Enterprise & Society, 8(3), 687–729.
Google Scholar
Guinnane, T. W., Harris, R., & Lamoreaux, N. R. (2017). Contractual freedom and corporate governance in Britain in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Business History Review, 91(2), 227–277.
Google Scholar
Hansmann, H., & Kraakman, R. (2000). Organizational law as asset partitioning. European Economic Review, 44(4–6), 807–817.
Google Scholar
Hemphill, T. A., & Cullari, F. (2014). The benefit corporation: Corporate governance and the for-profit social entrepreneur. Business & Society Review, 119(4), 519–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12044.
Article
Google Scholar
Hiller, J. S. (2013). The benefit corporation and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1580-3.
Article
Google Scholar
Ireland, P. (2010). Limited liability, shareholder rights and the problem of corporate irresponsibility. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(5), 837–856. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ben040.
Article
Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency coss and ownerships structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.94043.
Article
Google Scholar
Kaufman, A., & Englander, E. (2005). A team production model of corporate governance. Academy of Management Executive, 19(3), 9–24.
Google Scholar
Keay, A. (2007). Tackling the issue of the corporate objective: An analysis of the United Kingdom’s ‘enlightened shareholder value approach’. Sydney Law Review, 29, 577–612.
Google Scholar
Lan, L. L., & Heracleous, L. (2010). Rethinking agency theory: The view from law. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 294–314.
Google Scholar
Lazonick, W. (2014). Profits without prosperity. Harvard Business Review, 92(9), 46–55.
Google Scholar
Lefebvre-Teillard, A. (1985). La Société anonyme au 19ème. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Google Scholar
Levillain, K. (2017). Les entreprises à mission. Vuibert, Paris: Un modèle de gouvernance pour l'innovation dans l'intérêt commun.
Google Scholar
Mac Cormac, S. H., & Haney, H. (2012). New corporate forms: One viable solution to advancing environmental sustainability. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 24(12), 1–8.
Google Scholar
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.
Google Scholar
Mayer, C. (2013). Firm commitment: Why the corporation is failing us and how to restore trust in it?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
McMullen, J. S., & Warnick, B. J. (2016). Should we require every new venture to be a hybrid organization? Journal of Management Studies, 53(4), 630–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12150.
Article
Google Scholar
Metcalf, L., & Benn, S. (2012). The corporation is ailing social technology: Creating a ‘fit for purpose’ design for sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1201-1.
Article
Google Scholar
Michelle, C. (2017). Benefit corporations in the United States and community interest companies in the United Kingdom: Does social enterprise actually work? Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 37(1), 149–172.
Google Scholar
Millon, D. (1990). Theories of the corporation. Duke Law Journal, 2, 201.
Google Scholar
Millon, D. (2007). Piercing the corporate veil, financial responsibility, and the limits of limited liability. Emory Law Journal, 56(5), 1308–1382.
Google Scholar
Mulgan, T. (2018). Corporate agency and possible futures. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3887-1.
Article
Google Scholar
O’Kelley, C. R. T. (2019). From Berle to the present: The shifting primacies of corporation theory. In T. Clarke, J. O’Brien, & C. R. T. O’Kelley (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the corporation (pp. 119–138). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Orts, E. W. (1992). Beyond shareholders: Interpreting corporate constituency statutes. George Washington Law Review, 14(1), 14–135.
Google Scholar
Perrow, C. (2002). Organizing America. Wealth, power and the origins of corporate capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (2000). The governance of the new entreprise. In: X. Vives (Ed.), Corporate governance. Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Rawhouser, H., Cummings, M., & Crane, A. (2015). Benefit corporation legislation and the emergence of a social hybrid category. California Management Review, 57(3), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.13.
Article
Google Scholar
Robé, J.-P. (1999). L'Entreprise et le Droit. Paris: PUF.
Google Scholar
Robé, J.-P. (2011). The legal structure of the firm. Accounting, Economics, and Law, 1(1), 1–86.
Google Scholar
Roger, B. (Ed.). (2012). L’entreprise, formes de la propriété et responsabilités sociales. Paris: Parole et Silence.
Google Scholar
Roy, W. G. (2019). Socializing capital: The rise of the industrial corporation. In T. Clarke, J. O’Brien, & C. R. T. O’Kelley (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the corporation (pp. 93–117). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Sandberg, J. (2011). Socially responsible investment and fiduciary duty: Putting the freshfields report into perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(1), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0714-8.
Article
Google Scholar
Scherer, A. G., Baumann-Pauly, D., & Schneider, A. (2013). Democratizing corporate governance: Compensating for the democratic deficit of corporate political activity and corporate citizenship. Business & Society, 52(3), 473–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650312446931.
Article
Google Scholar
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.
Google Scholar
Scherer, A. G., & Voegtlin, C. (2017). Corporate governance for responsible innovation: Approaches to corporate governance and their implications for sustainable development. Academy of Management Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0175.
Article
Google Scholar
Segrestin, B., & Hatchuel, A. (2011). Beyond agency theory, a post-crisis view of corporate law. British Journal of Management, 22(3), 484–499.
Google Scholar
Segrestin, B., & Hatchuel, A. (2012). Refonder l'entreprise (La République des Idées). Paris: Le Seuil.
Google Scholar
Segrestin, B., Levillain, K., Vernac, S., & Hatchuel, A. (Eds.). (2015). La Société à Objet Social Etendu: Un nouveau statut pour l'entreprise (Economie Gestion). Paris: Presses des Mines.
Google Scholar
Segrestin, B., & Vernac, S. (2018). Gouvernement, participation et mission de l'entreprise. Paris: Herman.
Google Scholar
Smith, N. C., & Rönnegard, D. (2016). Shareholder primacy, corporate social responsibility, and the role of business schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(3), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2427-x.
Article
Google Scholar
Starbuck, W. H. (2014). Why corporate governance deserves serious and creative thought. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0109.
Article
Google Scholar
Stout, L. (2019). Corporations as sempiternal legal persons. In T. Clarke, J. O’Brien, & C. R. T. O’Kelley (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the corporation (pp. 220–235). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (1988). Enterprise corporatism: New industrial policy and the ‘essence’ of the legal person. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 36(1), 130–155. https://doi.org/10.2307/840187.
Article
Google Scholar
Vernac, S. (2015). Pour une réhabilitation de l'objet social. In B. Segrestin, K. Levillain, S. Vernac, & A. Hatchuel (Eds.), La Société à Objet Social Etendu. Unnouveau statut pour l'entreprise (pp. 61–74). Paris: Presses des Mines.
Google Scholar
Veldman, J. (2018). The separate legal entity and the architecture of the modern corporation. In N. Boeger & C. Villiers (Eds.), Shaping the corporate landscape: Towards corporate reform and enterprise diversity (pp. 61–75). Bloomsbury: Hart Publishing.
Google Scholar
Yosifon, D. G. (2014). The law of corporate purpose. Berkeley Business Law Journal, 10, 181–230.
Google Scholar
Yosifon, D. G. (2017). Opting out of shareholder primacy: Is the public benefit corporation trivial? Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 41(2), 461–508.
Google Scholar