Abstract
The expropriation of marginalized women’s labor is a key issue in business ethics in these times of global outsourcing and informal work arrangements. This has led to a transnational advocacy movement for securing the labor rights of homeworkers, who are poor women working on piece-rate contracts out of their homes. Drawing on materialist feminism, our paper critically explores the homeworker network in Pakistan, that was set up as part of a global push by international institutions and networks to localize the issue across geographies. Our focus is the national women’s NGO that leads advocacy efforts on the issue in the country and its relationship with other actors. Through fieldwork spanning 3 years we find that the network employs a top-down ‘us versus them’ approach in advocacy and mobilization. The race-to-the-bottom between the network’s national and district-level actors for donor funding further undermines prospects for developing indigenous narratives of resistance. The network, while mission bound to enhance the collective agency of its constituency, has depoliticized what should have been a class-based feminist struggle. From a materialist perspective, we conclude that the NGOized network rests upon and feeds off of its constituency, creating an additional layer of primitive accumulation over the workers it represents.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A traditional blanket.
Individual names have been anonymized.
References
Alvarez, S. E. (2009). Beyond NGOization? Reflections from Latin America. Development, 52(2), 175–184.
Bakker, I., & Gill, S. (2003). Power, production and social reproduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Baruah, B. (2004). Earning their keep and keeping what they earn: A critique of organizing strategies for South Asian women in the informal sector. Gender, Work and Organization, 11(6), 605–626.
Beneria, L., & Floro, M. (2005). Distribution, gender, and labor market informalization: A conceptual framework with a focus on homeworkers. In N. Kudva & L. Beneria (Eds.), Rethinking informalization: Poverty, precarious jobs and social protection (pp. 9–27). Cornell University Open Access Repository.
Bonner, C., & Carre, F. (2013). Global networking: Informal workers build solidarity, power and representation through networks and alliances. WIEGO working paper no. 31.
Boris, E. (2015). Recognizing the home workplace: Making workers through global labor standards. In B. English, M. Frederickson, & O. Sanmiguel-Valderrama (Eds.), Global women’s work: Perspectives on gender and work in the global economy. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Carswell, G., & De Neve, G. (2013). Labouring for global markets: Conceptualising labor agency in global production networks. Geoforum, 44, 62–70.
Chowdhury, E. (2011). Transnationalism reversed: Women organizing against gendered violence in Bangladesh. Albany: State University of New York (SUNY) Press.
Chowdhury, E. (2016). Development paradoxes: Feminist solidarity, alternative imaginaries and new spaces. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 17(1), 117.
Conaghen, J. (2013). Feminism, law and materialism: Reclaiming the tainted realm. In M. Davies & V. Munro (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to feminist legal theory (pp. 31–50). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? New York: Zed Books.
Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67–85.
Eade, D. (2007). Capacity building: Who builds whose capacity? Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 630–639.
Eduards, M. (1992). Against the rules of the game: On the importance of women’s collective actions. In M. Eduards, I. Elgquivst-Saltzman, E. Lundgren, C. Sjoblad, E. Sundin & U. Wikander (Eds.), Rethinking change: Current Swedish feminist research (pp. 83–104). Uppsala: Swedish Science Press.
Egels-Zanden, N., & Hyllman, P. (2011). Differences in organizing between unions and NGOs: Conflict and cooperation among Swedish unions and NGOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(2), 249–261.
Elson, D., & Pearson, R. (1981). Nimble fingers make cheap workers: An analysis of women’s employment in third world export manufacturing. Feminist Review, 7, 87–107.
Enloe, C. (2014). Bananas, beaches and bases: Making feminist sense of international politics. California: University of California Press.
Feldman, S. (2003). Paradoxes of institutionalisation: The depoliticisation of Bangladeshi NGOs. Development in Practice, 13(1), 5–26.
Fernandes, L. (2018). Feminists rethink the neoliberal state: Inequality, exclusion, and change. New York: New York University Press.
Fouche, C. (2015). Practice research partnerships in social work: Making a difference. Policy Press.
Gammage, S., Kabeer, N., & Rodgers, Y. M. (2016). Voice and agency: Where are we now? Feminist Economics, 22(1), 1–29.
Guenther, K. M. (2011). The possibilities and pitfalls of NGO feminism: Insights from postsocialist Eastern Europe. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 36(4), 863–887.
Hanmer, L., & Klugman, J. (2015). Exploring women’s agency and empowerment in developing countries: Where do we stand? Feminist Economics, 22(1), 237–263.
Hennessy, R., & Ingraham, C. (1997). Materialist feminism: A reader in class, difference, and women’s lives. New York: Routledge.
Hill, E. (2010). Worker identity, agency and economic development: Women’s empowerment in the Indian informal economy. New York: Routledge.
Hodzic, S. (2014). Feminist bastards: Towards a posthumanist critique of NGOization. In V. Bernal & I. Grewal (Eds.), Theorizing NGOs: States, feminisms, and neoliberalism (pp. 221–247). Durham: Duke University Press.
ILO. (2013). Women and men in the informal economy: A statistical picture second edition. Geneva: International Labour Office.
ILO. (2017). Pakistan’s hidden workers: Wages and conditions of home-based workers and the informal economy. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Jad, I. (2007). NGOs: Between buzzwords and social movements. Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 622–629.
Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464.
Kabeer, N. (2008). Mainstreaming gender in social protection for the informal economy. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
Kabeer, N., Milward, K., & Sudarshan, R. (2013). Organizing women workers in the informal economy. Gender and Development, 21(2), 249–263.
Karim, L. (2014). The paradigmatic case of Bangladesh in a global perspective. In L Fernandes (Ed.), Routledge handbook of gender in South Asia (pp. 260–274). NewYork: Routledge.
Khattak, S. (2010). Women in local government: The Pakistan experience. IDS Bulletin, 41(5), 52–61.
Kohli, A. (1987). State and redistributive development in India. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
Kudva, N. (2005). Strong states, strong NGOs. In R. Ray & M. F. Katzenstein (Eds.), Social movements in India: Poverty, power, and politics (pp. 233–266). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Landry, D., & Maclean, G. (1993). Materialist feminisms. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Lindell, I. (2011). The contested spatialities of transnational activism: Gendered gatekeeping and gender struggles in an African association of informal workers. Global Networks, 11(2), 222–241.
Mohanty, C. T. (1988). Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review, 30, 61–88.
Prieto-Carron, M. (2008). Women workers, industrialization, global supply chains and corporate codes of conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 5–7.
Prugl, E. (1999). What is a worker? Gender, global restructuring, and the ILO convention on homework. In M. Meyer & E. Prugl (Eds.), Gender politics in global governance. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Razavi, S. (2008). The gendered impacts of liberalization: Towards “embedded liberalization”? London: Routledge.
Razavi, S., & Pearson, R. (2004). Globalization, export-oriented employment and social policy: Gendered connections. In R. Pearson, S. Razavi & C. Danloy (Eds.), Globalization, export oriented employment and social policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Roberts, A. (2016). Feminist historical materialist and critical theory. In J. Steans & D. Tepe-Belfrage (Eds.), Handbook on gender in world politics (pp. 24–32). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Roberts, A. (2017). Gendered states of punishment and welfare: Feminist political economy, primitive accumulation, and the law. London: Routledge.
Rosa, K. (1994). The conditions and organizational activities of women in free trade zones: Malaysia, Philippines and Sri Lanka, 1970–1990. In S. Rowbotham & S. Miller (Eds.), Dignity and daily bread: New forms of economic organizing among poor women in the third world and first. London: Routledge.
Roy, S. (2011). Politics, passion and professionalization in contemporary Indian feminism. Sociology, 45(4), 587–602.
Roy, S. (2015). The Indian women’s movement: Within and beyond NGOization. Journal of South Asian Development, 10(1), 96–117.
Sayeed, A., & Vanek, J. (2013). Home-based workers in Pakistan: Statistics and trends. WIEGO. http://www.wiego.org/publications/home-based-workers-pakistan-statistics-and-trends.
Schuller, M. (2009). Gluing globalization: NGOs as intermediaries in Haiti. PoLAR, 32(1), 84–104.
Scott, A. M. (1986). Women and industrialization: Examining the ‘female marginalization’ thesis. Journal of Development Studies 22(4): 649–680.
Sen, A. (1985). Well-being, agency: The Dewey lectures 1984. Journal of Philosophy 82(4): 169–221.
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Can the subaltern speak? Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Standing, G. (1999). Global feminization through flexible labor: A theme revisited. World Development, 27(3), 583–602.
Thompson, E. P. (1994). Making history: Writings on history and culture. New York: New York Press.
Tilly, C., Agarwala, R., Mosoetsa, S., Ngai, P., Salas, C., & Sheikh, H. (2013). Final report: Informal worker organizing as a strategy for improving subcontracted work in the textile and apparel industries of Brazil, South Africa, India and China. Los Angeles: Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, University of California.
Tinsman, H. (2000). Reviving feminist materialism: Gender and neoliberalism in Pinochet’s Chile. Signs, 26(1), 145–188.
Toor, S. (2014). ‘The political economy of moral regulation’ in Pakistan: Religion, gender and class in postcolonial context. In L. Fernandes (Ed.), Handbook of gender in South Asia. London: Routledge.
Weidenbaum, M. (2009). Who will guard the guardians? The social responsibility of NGOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 145–155.
Wicke, J. (1994). Celebrity material: Materialist feminism and the culture of celebrity. South Atlantic Quarterly, 93(4), 751–778.
Yin, R. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Zaman, M. (2008). Women, Muslim culture and the development discourse: The case of poor Pakistani women. Islamic Studies 47, 349–366.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the section editor and three anonymous reviewers for excellent suggestions that greatly strengthened this essay. The authors are also grateful to Francoise Carre, Saba Gul Khattak, Chris Bonner and Cynthia Enloe for their careful reading and comments on early drafts of this essay.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individuals that were part of this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zulfiqar, G.M., Khan, M. NGO-Led Organizing and Pakistan’s Homeworkers: A Materialist Feminist Analysis of Collective Agency. J Bus Ethics 162, 1–14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3988-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3988-x