Abstract
In our research, we examine the efforts made by Latin American business schools in the last decade to deliver a value-based education. We carry out a survey with a sample of faculty members and program directors from the whole region. We find that societal demands influenced the direction of managerial education toward values and social responsibility, changing contents and teaching methodologies in the process. Our research shows that the teaching of value-based contents—social responsibility, business ethics and environmental sustainability—has gained ground in the region in the last decade, and that the emphasis on value-based contents goes hand-in-hand with a more intensive use of active learning methodologies—the case method in particular. From the perspective of respondents, the emphasis on active learning seems to correlate positively with observed changes in students’ civility.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The petrolão (“big oily”) scandal, around Petrobras diversion of payments to the Worker's Party and its allies, put various business tycoons in jail and ended up engulfing President Dilma Rousseff. It later came to light that Odebretch, the country's biggest construction company, had paid nothing less than $ 788 millions in bribes to officials in 11 countries—most of them Latin Americans. It became evident that this was far from an isolated bad judgment call by a few “bad apples”. On the contrary, corruption was embedded in company structure and regular operations: its “Division of Structured Operations”, according to the US Department of Justice, “effectively functioned as a stand-alone bribe department”.
Director: Srikant Datar (Harvard Business School). Coordinators: Raquel Galindo-Dorado (IAP, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid), Gustavo Herrero (HBS Latin America Research Center), María Helena Jaén (IESA), Francisco de Asís Martínez-Jerez (Harvard Business School).
CENTRUM, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (Peru), ESPAE-ESPOL (Ecuador), Fundaçao Getùlio Vargas (Brazil), Fundaçao Dom Cabral (Brazil), Harvard Business School (USA), IAE Business School (Argentina), Instituto de Desarrollo Empresarial (Ecuador), IEEM, Universidad de Montevideo (Uruguay), IESA (Venezuela), INALDE, Universidad de la Sabana (Colombia), INCAE (Nicaragua-Costa Rica), Insper (Brazil), Instituto Panamericano de Alta Dirección de Empresa (Mexico), Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (Mexico), Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (Mexico), Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (Colombia), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (Chile), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez (Chile), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain), Universidad de los Andes (Colombia), Universidad de Palermo (Argentina), Universidad de San Andrés (Argentina), Universidad del Desarrollo (Chile), Universidad del Externado de Colombia (Colombia), Universidad del Pacífico (Peru), Universidad del Rosario (Colombia), Universidad Torcuato Di Tella (Argentina), Universidade de São Paulo (Brazil).
The research was funded by the 28 participating schools or partners´ schools. The Colloquium on Rethinking Graduate Management Education in Latin America was co-funded by HBS and participating schools.
Multilatinas are Latin American-based multinational firms, or more precisely, “firms that leveraged domestic positions to expand their operations throughout Latin America” (Casanovas et al. 2009, p. 2).
Per the Free Dictionary, the term “well-rounded” stands for something that is “developed and well-balanced in a range or variety of aspects.” In the context of managerial education, it has been used to describe programs that go beyond the transmission of knowledge “in traditional subjects, such as finance, strategy, operations and the like”. Matt Symonds, “Trying to Create a Well-Rounded M.B.A.” Forbes, April 12th, 2009.
These three terms (sustainability, social responsibility, and business ethics) have been shaped in different fields by different scholarly traditions. While in their original formulations, they were defined narrowly, in the last years they have converged and overlapped. Thus, sustainability has ceased to be understood only in terms of the environment and is now understood by many to encompass the social and environmental domains. The same could be said of the CSR and business ethics literatures: they both have credible claims to include the other two domains. To prevent confusions, in this paper we shall only use those terms in their narrow meanings.
Together they represent what is informally known as the “triple crown.” Wikipedia, “The triple accreditation.” Available at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_accreditation, accessed on Nov 29, 2016.
Headquartered in Santiago, Chile, it features a region-wide monthly edition and regularly updated articles online, as well as country-specific editions in Chile, Brazil, Ecuador and Mexico. Available at http://www.worldcrunch.com/source-partner/america-economia-2.html, accessed on Nov 10, 2016.
We used non-parametric analysis instead of Anova due to variance heterogeneity and sample sizes.
Abbreviations
- AACSB:
-
The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business
- AMBA:
-
The Association of MBAs
- CLADEA:
-
Latin American Council of Business Schools or Consejo Latinoamericano de Escuelas de Administración in Spanish
- CR:
-
Corporate responsibility
- CSR:
-
Corporate social responsibility
- EFMD:
-
The European foundation for management development
- EQUIS:
-
EFMD quality improvement system
- PBL:
-
Problem-based learning
- PRME:
-
Principles for responsible management education
- SEE:
-
Social, environmental and ethical
- SH:
-
Stakeholders
- UNDP:
-
United Nations Development Programme
- US:
-
United States
References
Adams, C. A., Heijltjes, M. G., Jack, G., Marjoribanks, T., & Powell, M. (2011). The development of leaders able to respond to climate change and sustainability challenges. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 2(1), 165–171. doi:10.1108/20408021111162191.
Aquino Alves, M., Reficco, E., & Arroyo, J. (2014). Perspectives on the situation and a projection of corporate social responsibility in Latin America. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 54(1), 10–11. doi:10.1590/S0034-759020140102.
Barber, R. B. (1999). The discourse of civility. In S. L. Elkin & K. E. Sotan (Eds.), Citizen competence and democratic institutions (pp. 39–47). University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
Barnes, L. B., Christensen, C. R., & Hansen, A. J. (1994). Teaching and the case method: Text, cases, and readings (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Bejan, T. M. (2011). “The bond of civility”: Roger Williams on toleration and its limits. History of European Ideas, 37(4), 409–420. doi:10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2011.03.003.
Bieger, T. (2011). Business schools—from career training centers towards enablers of CSR: A new vision for teaching at business schools. In M. Morsing & A. S. Rovira (Eds.), Business schools and their contribution to society (p. 280). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd. doi:10.4135/9781446250822.
Brunner, J. J., & Miranda, D. A. (2016). Educación Superior en Iberoamérica Informe 2016. Santiago, Chile: Centro Interuniversitario de Desarrollo (CINDA).
Carter, S. L. (1998). Civility: Manners, morals, and the etiquette of democracy. New York, N.Y.: Basic Books.
Casanovas, L., Fraser, M., Hoeber, H., Golstein, A., Godinho, M. M., Molina, R., et al. (2009). From Multilatinas to Global Latinas The New Latin American Multinationals, 4–234.
Christensen, C. R. (1991). Premises and practices of discussion teaching. In A. Sweet, D. A. Garvin, & C. R. Christensen (Eds.), Education for judgment: The artistry of discussion leadership (pp. 23–33). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Christensen, L., Peirce, E., Hartman, L. P., Hoffman, W. M., & Carrier, J. (2007). Ethics, CSR, and sustainability education in the financial times top 50 global business schools: Baseline data and future research directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(4), 347–368. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9211-5.
Clegg, S. R., & Ross-Smith, A. (2003). Revising the boundaries: Management education and learning in a postpositivist world. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2(1), 85–98. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2003.9324049.
Collins, D., & Wartick, S. (1995). Business and society/business ethics courses: Twenty years at the crossroads. Business and Society, 34(1), 51–89.
Collins, D., Weber, J., & Zambrano, R. (2014). Teaching business ethics online: Perspectives on course design, delivery, student engagement, and assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(3), 513–529. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1932-7.
Considine, C., & Dean, T. (2003). Active learning in distance education. In Proceedings of the 2003 American society for engineering education annual conference and exposition. Nashville, Tennessee.
Cornelius, N., Wallace, J., & Tassabehji, R. (2007). An analysis of corporate social responsibility, corporate identity and ethics teaching in business schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 117–135. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9271-6.
Coutinho de Arruda, M. C. (1997). Business ethics in Latin America. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(14), 1597–1603.
Datar, S. M., Garvin, D. A., & Cullen, P. G. (2010). Rethinking the MBA: Business education at a crossroads. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business Press.
Datar, S., Garvin, D., & Cullen, P. (2011). Rethinking the MBA: Business education at a crossroads. Journal of Management Development, 30(5), 451–462. doi:10.1108/02621711111132966.
Datar, S., Herrero, G., Galindo, R., Jaén, M. H., & Martínez-Jerez, F. A. (2013). Rethinking Graduate Management Education in Latin America, Compendium of Data Analysis and Conclusions (No. Unpublished manuscript). Boston, MA.
Dewey, J. (1930). Democracy and education: An introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York, N.Y.: Macmillan Co.
Díaz Barriga, F. (2003). Cognición situada y estrategias para el aprendizaje significativo. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 5(2), 1–13.
Elmore, R. F. (1991). Foreword. In A. Sweet, D. A. Garvin, & C. R. Christensen (Eds.), Education for judgment: The artistry of discussion leadership (pp. ix–xix). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Falkenberg, L., & Woiceshyn, J. (2008). Enhancing business ethics: Using cases to teach moral reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(3), 213–217. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9381-9.
Forni, P. M. (2003). Choosing civility: The twenty-five rules of considerate conduct (Vol. 2003). New York, N.Y.: St. Martin’s Press.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Garvin, D. (1991). Learning and teaching. In C. R. Christensen, D. A. Garvin, & A. Sweet (Eds.), Education for Judgment: The artistry of discussion leadership (p. 312). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75–91.
Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad of practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Mangement Review, 21, 13–47.
GlobeScan. (2013). Rethinking consumption: Consumers and the future of sustainability. http://www.globescan.com/component/edocman/?view=document&id=46&Itemid=591. Accessed 1 July 2017.
Harris, G. (2003). Civility: How it fosters better communities (vol. 0). The Americas Group.
Hartman, E. M. (2006). Can we teach character? An Aristotelian answer. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(1), 68–81. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2006.20388386.
Holland, D., & Albrecht, C. (2013). The worldwide academic field of business ethics: Scholars’ perceptions of the most important issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(4), 777–788. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1718-y.
Hulsart, R., & Mccarthy, V. (2011). Why the free market must be an ethical market: The role of business schools in moral education. New York: Edwin Mellen Pr.
Jaén, M. H. (2013). Accreditation: How to get it right. EFMD Global Focus, 7(3), 40–43.
Jaén, M. H., Reficco, E., & Ossa, M. (2014). Can civility be taught to Latin-American MBAs? Implications of case-method use for the development of civic behaviour in managerial education. Management Decision. doi:10.1108/MD-08-2013-0424.
Khurana, R. (2007). From higher aims to hired hands: The social transformation of American business schools and the unfulfilled promise of management as a profession. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Learning in doing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lawton, A., & Páez, I. (2015). Developing a framework for ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(3), 639–649. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2244-2.
Levine, P. (2010). Teaching and learning civility. New Directions for Higher Education, 2010(152), 11–17. doi:10.1002/he.407.
Mayer, D. M., Aquino, K., Greenbaum, R. L., & Kuenzi, M. (2012). Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 151–171. doi:10.5465/amj.2008.0276.
Murphy, P. R., & Boatright, J. R. (1994). Assessing the effectiveness of instruction in business ethics: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Education for Business, 69(6), 326.
Pezoa Bissières, Á., & Riumalló Herl, M. P. (2012). Survey of teaching, training, and research in the field of economic and business ethics in Latin America. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(S1), 43–50. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1261-2.
Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. (2004). The business school “business”: Some lessons from the US experience. Journal of Management Studies, 41(8), 1501–1520. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00484.x.
Phillips, J. M. (2005). Strategies for active learning in online continuing education. Journal of continuing education in nursing, 36(2), 77–83.
Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Rasche, A., Gilbert, D. U., & Schedel, I. (2013). Cross-disciplinary ethics education in MBA programs: Rhetoric or reality? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(1), 71–85. doi:10.5465/aml6.2011.0016A.
Reficco, E., & Jaén, M. H. (2012). Enseñanza de la Responsabilidad Social Empresarial y la metodología de aprendizaje centrada en el participante. In I. Licha (Ed.), Enseñanaza de la RSE. Retos de las Universidades en Iberoamérica (pp. 307–322). Buenos Aires: Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo; Random House.
Reficco, E., & Jaén, M. H. (2015). Case method use in shaping well-rounded Latin American MBAs. Journal of Business Research, 68, 2540–2551. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.027.
Rubin, R. S., & Dierdorff, E. C. (2013). Building a better MBA: From a decade of critique toward a decennium of creation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(1), 125–141. doi:10.5465/amle.2012.0217.
Rucht, D. (2011). Civil society and civility in twentieth-century theorising. European Review of History: Revue europeenne d’histoire, 18(3), 387–407. doi:10.1080/13507486.2011.574680.
Souryal, S. (2011). The truth revealed: civility—The mother of all virtues. In S. Souryal (Ed.), Ethics in criminal justice (5th ed., pp. 449–480). Boston: Anderson Publishing Ltd.
The Economist. (2017). Odebrecht scandal puts a spotlight on corruption. The economist intelligence unit.
Vygotski, L., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Waples, E. P., Antes, A. L., Murphy, S. T., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. D. (2008). A meta-analytic investigation of business ethics instruction. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 133–151. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9875-0.
Williams, S. D., & Dewett, T. (2005). Yes, you can teach business ethics: A review and research agenda. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 12(2), 109–120.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reficco, E., Jaén, M.H. & Trujillo, C. Beyond Knowledge: A Study of Latin American Business Schools’ Efforts to Deliver a Value-Based Education. J Bus Ethics 156, 857–874 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3634-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3634-z