Abstract
In this article I address the question of whether corporations should be considered as part of the basic structure of society as defined in Rawls’s Theory of Justice. To do so, it becomes necessary to understand which institutions are crucial for defining Rawls’s basic structure of society. I will argue that a social ontology aimed at understanding how human institutions influence various aspects presupposed in Rawls’s basic structure of society can help addressing this topic. To do so, I shall draw upon the social ontology elaborated by Searle, who follows an approach that is particularly suitable for showing how Rawls’s basic structure of society already contains an institutional setting that must take corporations into account in its very formulation, due to the implications of the activities of the corporation for distributive justice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York: Macmillan.
Blanc, S., & Al-Amoudi, I. (2013). Corporate institutions in a weakened welfare state: A Rawlsian perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(4), 497–525.
Chandler, A. D. (1977). The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.
Faulkner, P. (2002). The human agent in behavioural finance: A Searlean perspective. Journal of Economic Methodology, 9(1), 31–52.
Fontrodona, J., & Sison, A. J. G. (2006). The nature of the firm, agency theory and shareholder theory: A critique from philosophical anthropology. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 33–42.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Freeman, R. E. (2002). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. In L. P. Hartman (Ed.), Perspectives in business ethics (pp. 171–181). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). ”The theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour”, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
Lawson, T. (1997). Economics and reality. London: Routledge.
Lawson, T. (2003). Reorienting economics. London: Routledge.
Lawson, T. (2009). The current economic crisis: Its nature and the course of academic economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(4), 759–777.
Lawson, T. (2012). Ontology and the study of social reality: Emergence, organisation, community, power, social relations, corporations, artefacts and money. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(2), 345–385.
Lawson, T. (2015). The nature of the firm and the peculiarities of the corporation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39(1), 1–32.
Lawson, T. (2016). Social positioning and the nature of money. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40(4), 961–996.
Martins, N. O. (2006). Capabilities as causal powers. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(5), 671–685.
Martins, N. O. (2007). Ethics, ontology and capabilities. Review of Political Economy, 19(1), 37–53.
Martins, N. O. (2009). Rules, social ontology and collective identity. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 39(3), 323–344.
Martins, N. O. (2011). Globalisation, inequality and the economic crisis. New Political Economy, 16(1), 1–18.
Néron, P.-Y. (2015). Rethinking the very idea of egalitarian markets and corporations: Why relationships might matter more than distribution. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(1), 93–124.
Norman, W. (2015). Rawls on markets and corporate governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(1), 29–64.
O’Neill, M. (2008). Three Rawlsian routes towards economic democracy. Revue de Philosophie Economique, 9(1), 29–55.
O’Neill, M., & Williamson, T. (2009). Property-owning democracy and the demand of justice. Living Reviews in Democracy, 1, 1–10.
Orts, E. W. (2013). Business persons: A legal theory of the firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 63(3), 79–91.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (1977). The basic structure as subject. American Philosophical Quarterly, 14(2), 159–165.
Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rawls, J. (1999). Collected papers. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Runde, J. (2002). Filling in the background. Journal of Economic Methodology, 9(1), 11–30.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper.
Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: The Free Press.
Searle, J. R. (2010). Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. K. (1982). Choice, welfare and measurement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sen, A. K. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. K. (2002). Rationality and freedom. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Sen, A. K. (2009). The idea of justice. London: Allen Lane.
Singer, A. (2015). There is no Rawlsian theory of corporate governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(1), 65–92.
Acknowledgments
For most helpful comments on an earlier version, I am most thankful to the editor and anonymous referees of this journal.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martins, N.O. Justice and the Social Ontology of the Corporation. J Bus Ethics 153, 17–28 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3360-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3360-y