Skip to main content
Log in

Cross-Domain Effects of Ethical Leadership on Employee Family and Life Satisfaction: the Moderating Role of Family-Supportive Supervisor Behaviors

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drawing on the work–family enrichment theory, the present study investigates the cross-domain effects of ethical leadership on employees’ family and life satisfaction. Moreover, it focuses on the mediating role of work–family enrichment (WFE) and the moderated mediation process of family-supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSB) underlying the relationship between ethical leadership and employees’ family and life satisfaction. Using a sample of 371 employees and their immediate supervisors in China, we found that WFE mediated the relationship between ethical leadership and employee-rated and supervisor-rated family and life satisfaction. Moreover, FSSB positively moderated the relationship between ethical leadership and WFE, such that the relationship was strengthened when FSSB were higher. Furthermore, the mediations of WFE between ethical leadership and employee-rated and supervisor-rated family and life satisfaction were also positively moderated by FSSB, such that the indirect effects were stronger when FSSB were higher. The theoretical and managerial implications of our findings are further discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We appreciate the anonymous reviewer’s concern regarding the measurement of a 6-item questionnaire which was adopted from a 15-item ethical leadership questionnaire (Yukl et al. 2013). To address this concern, we conducted a supplemental analysis to examine the validity of the six-item scale. Specifically, we distributed questionnaires containing 15 items to 70 MBA students (full-time employees) in a prestigious Chinese business school and 58 questionnaires were valid. The results revealed that the Cronbach’s alpha of the 6-item and 15-item scales were 0.93 and 0.95, respectively, and the correlation between these two scales was 0.95 (p < .001). Thus, we concluded that the 6-item scale captured the essentials of the 15-item scale and the 6-item scale was valid.

Abbreviations

FSSB:

Family-supportive supervisor behaviors

WFE:

Work–family enrichment

CMB:

Common method bias

ICC:

Intra-class correlations

CFA:

Confirmatory factor analysis

References

  • Aryee, S., Fields, D., & Luk, V. (1999). A cross-cultural test of a model of the work–family interface. Journal of Management, 25(4), 491–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Au, K., & Kwan, H. K. (2009). Start-up capital and Chinese entrepreneurs: The role of family. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(4), 889–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avey, J. B., Wernsing, T. S., & Palanski, M. E. (2012). Exploring the process of ethical leadership: The mediating role of employee voice and psychological ownership. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedi, A., Alpaslan, C. M., & Green, S. (2015). A meta-analytic review of ethical leadership outcomes and moderators. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2625-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beutell, N. J., & Wittig-Berman, U. (2008). Work–family conflict and work–family synergy for generation X, baby boomers, and matures: Generational differences, predictors, and satisfaction outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(5), 507–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouckenooghe, D., Zafar, A., & Raja, U. (2015). How ethical leadership shapes employees’ job performance: The mediating roles of goal congruence and psychological capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(2), 251–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. Handbook of Cross-cultural Psychology, 2(2), 349–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, D. S., Grzywacz, J. G., & Zivnuska, S. (2009). Is work–family balance more than conflict and enrichment? Human Relations, 62, 1459–1486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, D. S., Hunter, E. M., Ferguson, M., & Whitten, D. (2014). Work–family enrichment and satisfaction mediating processes and relative impact of originating and receiving domains. Journal of Management, 40(3), 845–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Wayne, J. H., & Grzywacz, J. G. (2006). Measuring the positive side of the work–family interface: Development and validation of a work–family enrichment scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(1), 131–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, M. D., & Jones, W. H. (1992). The family satisfaction scale. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 20(2), 71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X. P., Eberly, M. B., Chiang, T. J., Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2014). Affective trust in chinese leaders linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. Journal of Management, 40(3), 796–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crain, T. L., Hammer, L. B., Bodner, T., Kossek, E. E., Moen, P., Lilienthal, R., et al. (2014). Work–family conflict, family-supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSB), and sleep outcomes. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(2), 155–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouter, A. C. (1984). Spillover from family to work: The neglected side of the work–family interface. Human Relations, 37, 425–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. D. (2009). The science of well-being. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. D., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 497–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. D., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 178–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan, B., Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., & Mansfield, L. R. (2012). Whistle while you work a review of the life satisfaction literature. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1038–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui, & E. Weldon (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese context (pp. 84–131). London: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. T., Heinen, B. A., & Langkamer, K. L. (2007). Work and family satisfaction and conflict: A meta-analysis of cross-domain relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 57–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2005). Life satisfaction set point: stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 158–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work–family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grzywacz, J. G. (2002). Toward a theory of workfamily enrichment. Paper presented at the 34th annual Theory Construction and Research Methodology Workshop, Houston, TX.

  • Grzywacz, J. G., & Butler, A. B. (2005). The impact of job characteristics on work-to-family facilitation: testing a theory and distinguishing a construct. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10(2), 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-sem: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, L. B., Kossek, E. E., Anger, W. K., Bodner, T., & Zimmerman, K. L. (2011). Clarifying work–family intervention processes: The roles of work–family conflict and family-supportive supervisor behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 134–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, L. B., Kossek, E. E., Bodner, T., & Crain, T. (2013). Measurement development and validation of the Family Supportive Supervisor Behavior Short-Form (FSSB-SF). Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(3), 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, L. B., Kossek, E. E., Yragui, N., Bodner, T., & Hanson, G. (2009). Development and validation of a multidimensional scale of family-supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSB). Journal of Management, 35, 837–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, L. B., Kossek, E. E., Zimmerman, K., & Daniels, R. (2007). Clarifying the construct of family-supportive supervisory behaviors (FSSB): A multilevel perspective. In P. L. Perrewé & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Exploring the work and non-work interface. Research in occupational stress and well-being (Vol. 6, pp. 165–204). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, S. D., Alge, B. J., Brown, M. E., Jackson, C. L., & Dunford, B. B. (2013). Ethical leadership: Assessing the value of a multifoci social exchange perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(3), 435–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, G. C., Hammer, L. B., & Colton, C. L. (2006). Development and validation of a multidimensional scale of perceived work–family positive spillover. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(3), 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacmar, K. M., Crawford, W. S., Carlson, D. S., Ferguson, M., & Whitten, D. (2014). A short and valid measure of work–family enrichment. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(1), 32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossek, E. E., Pichler, S., Bodner, T., & Hammer, L. B. (2011). Workplace social support and work–family conflict: A meta-analysis clarifying the influence of general and work–family-specific supervisor and organizational support. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 289–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Xu, J., Tu, Y., & Lu, X. (2014). Ethical leadership and subordinates’ occupational well-being: A multi-level examination in China. Social Indicators Research, 116(3), 823–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, Y., Liu, X. Y., Kwan, H. K., & Li, J. (2015). Work–family effects of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(3), 535–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Kwan, H. K., Fu, P. P., & Mao, Y. (2013). Ethical leadership and job performance in China: The roles of workplace friendships and traditionality. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(4), 564–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loi, R., Lam, L. W., Ngo, H. Y., & Cheong, S. I. (2015). Exchange mechanisms between ethical leadership and affective commitment. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(6), 645–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2012). Estimating the reliability of single-item life satisfaction measures: Results from four national panel studies. Social Indicators Research, 105(3), 323–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchese, M. C., Bassham, G., & Ryan, J. (2002). Work–family conflict: A virtue ethics analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 40(2), 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R. A., Mills, M. J., Trout, R. C., & English, L. (2014). Family-supportive supervisor behaviors, work engagement, and subjective well-being: A contextually dependent mediated process. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(2), 168–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, D. M., Aquino, K., Greenbaum, R. L., & Kuenzi, M. (2012). Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. B. (2009). How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, J. S., Kotrba, L. M., Mitchelson, J. K., Clark, M. A., & Baltes, B. B. (2011). Antecedents of work–family conflict: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(5), 689–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M. J., Matthews, R. A., Henning, J. B., & Woo, V. A. (2014). Family-supportive organizations and supervisors: how do they influence employee outcomes and for whom? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(12), 1763–1785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muse, L. A., & Pichler, S. (2011). A comparison of types of support for lower-skill workers: Evidence for the importance of family supportive supervisors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(3), 653–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odle-Dusseau, H. N., Britt, T. W., & Greene-Shortridge, T. M. (2012). Organizational work–family resources as predictors of job performance and attitudes: The process of work–family conflict and enrichment. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(1), 28–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastoriza, D., & Ariño, M. A. (2013). Does the ethical leadership of supervisors generate internal social capital? Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. (2008). Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34(3), 566–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piccolo, R. F., Greenbaum, R., Hartog, D. N. D., & Folger, R. (2010). The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2–3), 259–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shockley, K. M., & Singla, N. (2011). Reconsidering work—family interactions and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 37(3), 861–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, R. R., Wang, M., & Tetrick, L. E. (2013). Research methods in occupational health psychology. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. A., & Prottas, D. J. (2005). Relationships among organizational family support, job autonomy, perceived control, and employee well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10(4), 100–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, Y., & Lu, X. (2016). Do ethical leaders give followers the confidence to go the extra mile? The moderating role of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(1), 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, Y., & Zhang, S. (2015). Loneliness and subjective well-being among Chinese undergraduates: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Social Indicators Research, 124(3), 963–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voydanoff, P. (2004). The effects of work demands and resources on work-to-family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(2), 398–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, J. H., Casper, W. J., Matthews, R. A., & Allen, T. D. (2013). Family-supportive organization perceptions and organizational commitment: The mediating role of work–family conflict and enrichment and partner attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4), 606–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, J. H., Musisca, N., & Fleeson, W. (2004). Considering the role of personality in the work–family experience: Relationships of the big five to work–family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 108–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L. Z., Kwan, H. K., Liu, J., & Resick, C. J. (2012). Work-to-family spillover effects of abusive supervision. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(7), 714–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. F. (1988). Familism and development: An examination of the role of family in contemporary China Mainland, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. In D. Sinha & H. S. R. Kao (Eds.), Social values and development: Asian perspectives (pp. 93–123). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. (2014). Does ethical leadership lead to happy workers? A study on the impact of ethical leadership, subjective well-being, and life happiness in the Chinese culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(3), 513–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G., Mahsud, R., Hassan, S., & Prussia, G. E. (2013). An improved measure of ethical leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 20(1), 38–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., Kwan, H. K., Everett, A. M., & Jian, Z. (2012). Servant leadership, organizational identification, and work-to-family enrichment: The moderating role of work climate for sharing family concerns. Human Resource Management, 51(5), 747–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 71402127; 71372125) and 2014–2015 International Scholar Exchange Fellowship program of Korea Foundation for Advanced Studies. We also thank Professor Xiaohua Wang from Renmin University of China for his insightful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yidong Tu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, S., Tu, Y. Cross-Domain Effects of Ethical Leadership on Employee Family and Life Satisfaction: the Moderating Role of Family-Supportive Supervisor Behaviors. J Bus Ethics 152, 1085–1097 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3306-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3306-4

Keywords

Navigation