Skip to main content

Seeking Legitimacy Through CSR: Institutional Pressures and Corporate Responses of Multinationals in Sri Lanka

Journal of Business Ethics volume 136, pages 503–522 (2016)Cite this article

Abstract

Arguably, the corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices of multinational enterprises (MNEs) are influenced by a wide range of both internal and external factors. Perhaps, most critical among the exogenous forces operating on MNEs are those exerted by state and other key institutional actors in host countries. Crucially, academic research conducted to date offers little data about how MNEs use their CSR activities to strategically manage their relationship with those actors in order to gain legitimisation advantages in host countries. This paper addresses that gap by exploring interactions between external institutional pressures and firm-level CSR activities, which take the form of community initiatives, to examine how MNEs develop their legitimacy-seeking policies and practices. In focusing on a developing country, Sri Lanka, this paper provides valuable insights into how MNEs instrumentally utilise community initiatives in a country where relationship-building with governmental and other powerful non-governmental actors can be vitally important for the long-term viability of the business. Drawing on neo-institutional theory and CSR literature, this paper examines and contributes to the embryonic but emerging debate about the instrumental and political implications of CSR. The evidence presented and discussed here reveals the extent to which, and the reasons why, MNEs engage in complex legitimacy-seeking relationships with Sri Lankan host institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. The National Chamber of Commerce of Sri Lanka’s ‘Business Excellence Awards’ are designed to recognise local enterprises who have built sustainable market competitiveness (i.e. sustainable growth) together with CSR.

  2. The Ceylon Chamber of Commerce’s annual award scheme for the ‘Ten Best Corporate Citizens’ raises awareness about CSR and encourages the adoption of CSR practices among companies in Sri Lanka.

  3. The MDGs established quantitative benchmarks to halve extreme poverty in all its forms in the world through the achievement of eight goals consisting of eradicating extreme poverty and hunger, achieving universal primary education, promoting gender equality and empower women, reducing child mortality, improving maternal health, combating HIV/AIDS and other diseases, ensuring environmental sustainability and developing a global partnership for development (UN 2009).

  4. The term can be translated as meaning ‘prosperity’.

  5. In 2006, the government enacted a Tobacco Control Act in 2006 for comprehensive tobacco control and established the National Alcohol and Tobacco Authority (NATA) to implement the Act (NATA 2010), and the price of tobacco products are decided in conjunction with the Ministry of Finance in Sri Lanka, making it 100 % price controlled.

  6. As the domestic milk production only constitutes about 17 % of the requirement of the market, the rest is imported, import taxes are imposed and Full Cream Milk Powder is specified as an essential commodity by the Minister of Trade, Commerce & Consumer Affairs Section 18 of the Consumer Affairs Authority Act No. 09 of 2003 and the prices of FMCP products are determined by the Consumer Affairs Authority (CAA, 2010)

Abbreviations

CSR:

Corporate social responsibility

GOSL:

Government of Sri Lanka

MNE:

Multinational enterprise

SADP:

Sustainable Agricultural Development Project

SLA:

Sri Lanka Apparel

References

  • ACCA. (2005). A survey of environmental and social disclosures in the annual reports of the Top 100 Sri Lankan companies. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Association of Chartered Certified Accountants.

  • ACCA. (2007). ACCA Sri Lanka Awards for Sustainability Reporting. Retrieved May 01, 2007, from http://www.accaglobal.com/publicinterest/activities/subjects/sustainability/awards/slera/sl_05archive/.

  • Amran, A., & Haniffa, R. (2011). Evidence in development of sustainability reporting: a case of a developing country. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(3), 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amran, A., & Siti-Nabiha, A. K. (2009). Corporate social reporting in Malaysia: A case of mimicking the West or succumbing to local pressure. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(3), 358–375.

  • Aneez, S., & Sirilal, R. (2011). Sri Lanka’s asset acquisition act constitutional-court, Reuters. Retrieved April 06, 2014, from http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/08/srilanka-acquisition-idUSL4E7M81JE20111108.

  • Arendt, S., & Brettel, M. (2010). Understanding the influence of corporate social responsibility on corporate identity, image, and firm performance. Management Decision, 48(10), 1469–1492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1, 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barin Cruz, L., & Boehe, D. M. (2010). How do leading retail MNCs leverage CSR globally? Insights from Brazil. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D. P. (2001). Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10(1), 7–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBC. (2013). Sri Lanka: Country Profile. Retrieved November 15, 2013, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-11999611.

  • Beddewela, E., & Herzig, C. (2013). Corporate social reporting by MNCs’ subsidiaries in Sri Lanka. Accounting Forum, 37(2), 135–149.

  • Blasco, M., & Zalner, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Mexico and France: Exploring the role of normative institutions. Business and Society, 49(2), 216–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boddewyn, J. J. (2012). Beyond ‘The evolving discipline of public affairs’. Journal of Public Affairs, 12(1), 98–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2004). The development of corporate charitable contributions in the UK: a stakeholder analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 41(8), 1411–1434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2005). Corporate reputation and philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1), 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2005). Corporate reputation and an insurance motivation for corporate social investment. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 20, 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CAA. (2010). The Consumer Affairs Authority Act. Consumer Affairs Authority. Retrieved January 10, 2010 from http://www.caa.gov.lk/.

  • Campbell, J., Eden, L., & Miller, S. R. (2012). Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in host countries: Does distance matter? Journal of International Business Studies, 43(1), 84–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castello, I., & Lozano, J. (2011). Searching for new forms of legitimacy through corporate responsibility rhetoric. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 11–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBSL. (2010). Sri Lanka socio-economic data 2010. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Central Bank of Sri Lanka.

    Google Scholar 

  • CCC. (2008). Voluntary Agenda for Responsible Business—Ceylon Chamber of Commerce. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Ceylon Chamber of Commerce.  

  • CCC. (2010). Best corporate citizen awards—2010. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Ceylon Chamber of Commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2007). CSR Agendas for Asia. Corporate Social: Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14, 183–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemens, B., & Douglas, T. J. (2006). Does coercion drive firms to adopt `voluntary’ green initiatives? Relationships among coercion, superior firm resources, and voluntary green initiatives. Journal of Business Research, 59(4), 483–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, T. B., & Chien, P. M. (2011). Sponsorship portfolio as a brand-image creation strategy. Journal of Business Research, 64(2), 142–149.

  • De Gilder, D., Schuyt, T. N. M., & Breedijk, M. (2005). Effects of an employee volunteering program on the work force: The ABN-AMRO case. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(2), 143–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detomasi, D. A. (2007). The multinational corporation and global governance: Modelling global public policy networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(3), 321–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Maggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organisational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.

  • Drahos, P., & Braithwaite, J. (2001). The globalisation of regulation. Journal of Political Philosophy, 9(1), 103–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., & Vieira, E. T, Jr. (2012). Striving for legitimacy through corporate social responsibility: Insights from oil companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 413–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EFC. (2009). The Employers Federation of Ceylon—About Us. Employers Federation of Ceylon. Retrieved March 10, 2009 from http://www.employers.lk/about-us/history-andstructure.

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbrass, J. (2011). ‘Exploring corporate social responsibility policy in the European Union: A discursive institutionalist analysis’. Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(5), 949–970.

  • Fairbrass, J., & Zueva-Owens, A. (2012). ‘Conceptualising corporate social responsibility: ‘Relational governance’ assessed, augmented, and adapted’. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(3), 321–335.

  • Feng, T., & Wang, G. (2010). How private enterprises establish organizational legitimacy in China’s transitional economy. The Journal of Management Development, 29(4), 377–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, M. (2014). Fonterra’s behaviour top news in Sri Lanka. Retrieved April 08, 2014, from http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/farming/dairy/9030054/Fonterras-behaviour-top-news-in-Sri-Lanka.

  • Fielding, N. G. (2002). Automating the Ineffable: qualitative software and the meaning of qualitative research. In T. May (Ed.), Qualitative research in action. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2002). An introduction to qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fooks, G., Gilmore, A., Collin, J., Holden, C., & Lee, K. (2013). The limits of corporate social responsibility: techniques of neutralization, stakeholder management and political CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 283–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fransen, L. (2013). The embeddedness of responsible business practice: Exploring the interaction between national-institutional environments and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(2), 213–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach (1st ed.). Massachusetts: Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geppert, M., Matten, D., & Williams, K. (2003). Change management in MNCs: How global convergence intertwines with national diversities. Human Relations, 56(7), 807–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gjolberg, M. (2009). The origin of corporate social responsibility: global forces or national legacies? Socio-Economic Review, 7, 605–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOSL. (2013). Mahinda Chintana—A brighter future. Retrieved November 20, 2013, from http://www.priu.gov.lk/mahindachinthana/mahinda_chintana_brighter_future_eng.pdf.

  • Grayson, D. (1993). CCI: The strategic management tool. Management Development Review, 6(3), 3–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R. (2009). The ethical rational of business for the poor—Integrating the concepts bottom of the pyramid, sustainable development, and corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(3), 313–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, R., & Acutt, N. (2010). How should civil society (and the government) respond to ‘corporate social responsibility’? A critique of business motivations and the potential for partnerships. Development Southern Africa, 20(2), 255–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemphill, T. (2004). Monitoring global corporate citizenship: industry self-regulation at a crossroads. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 14, 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillenbrand, C., & Money, K. (2007). Corporate responsibility and corporate reputation: Two separate concepts or two sides of the same coin? Corporate Reputation Review, 10(4), 261–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtbrügge, D., & Berg, N. (2004). How multinational corporations deal with their socio-political stakeholders: An empirical study in Asia, Europe, and the US. Asian Business & Management, 3(3), 299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, B., C, & Sirilal, R. (2011). Sri Lanka Central Bank: Takeover bill not expropriation Reuters. Retrieved November 15, 2013, from http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/17/srilanka-acquisition-idUSL3E7MH0N420111117.

  • Husted, B. (2001). Toward a model of corporate social strategy formulation. Paper presented at the Social Issues in Management Division, Academy of Management.

  • Husted, B., & Allen, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: strategic and institutional approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 838–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B., & Allen, D. (2007). Strategic corporate social responsibility and value creation among large firms lessons from the Spanish experience. Long Range Planning, 40(6), 594–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B., & Salazar, J. (2006). Taking friedman seriously: maximizing profits and social performance. The Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, R. W., & Frazier, K. B. (1980). Environmental performance and corporate disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(2), 614–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, G., & Apostolakou, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in western europe: An institutional mirror or substitute? Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 371–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, P. D., & Zandbergen, P. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. The Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 1015–1052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, W. Q., Douglas, T. J., & Kutan, A. M. (2008). Institutional antecedents of corporate governance legitimacy. Journal of Management, 34(4), 765–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirinde, C. (2012). Cigarette packs to depict graphic anti-smoking messages. Retrieved April 09, 2014, from http://www.sundaytimes.lk/120902/news/cigarette-packs-to-depict-graphic-anti-smoking-messages-10664.html.

  • Kolk, A., Hong, P., & Van Dolen, W. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in china: an analysis of domestic and foreign retailers’ sustainability dimensions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(5), 298–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. (2010). Power, Institutions and Organizations. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: California.

    Google Scholar 

  • LBO. (2010). Acting Responsible, Retrieved 07/04/2014 from http://www.lankabusinessonline.com/print//82993312.

  • LBO. (2011). Sri Lanka cement crisis continues amid price controls. Retrieved April 09, 2014, from http://www.lankabusinessonline.com/news/sri-lanka-cement-crisis-continues-amid-price-controls/252790437.

  • LBO. (2012). Sri Lanka hikes prices of cement, poultry. Retrieved April 09, 2014, from http://www.lankabusinessonline.com/news/sri-lanka-hikes-prices-of-cement,-poultry/2128435409.

  • Leung, K., Bhagat, R. S., Buchan, N. R., Erez, M., & Gibson, C. B. (2005). Culture and international business: recent advances and their implications for future research. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(4), 357–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lévy, B. (2005). Global competition and economic development: key governance issues. Competitiveness Review, 15(2), 130–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LMD. (2008). Sri Lanka’s the most respected entities, August 2008, Lanka Management Digest.

  • Mason, C., Kirkbride, J., & Bryde, D. (2007). From stakeholders to institutions: the changing face of social enterprise governance theory. Management Decision, 45(2), 284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. The Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, M., & Salih, M. (2006). Sri Lanka: Business as an agent for peace: International alert Sri Lanka Program Policy Brief No 1. Colombo: International Alert-Sri Lanka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendis, S., & Edirisinghe, J. (2014). Milk powder imports and government policy: The case of Sri Lanka. Journal of Agriculture Economics and Rural Development, 2(3), 86–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzies, J. L., & Orr, S. (2010). The impact of political behaviours on internationalisation. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 3(1), 24–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1983). Institutionalized organisations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In J. W. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), Organisational environments: Ritual and rationality. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1983). Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government. In J. W. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), Organisational environments: Ritual and rationality. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (2008). The ongoing legitimacy project: corporate philanthropy as protective strategy. European Management Review, 5(3), 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, A. (2006). Global corporate social responsibilities management in MNCs. Journal of Business Strategies, 23(1), 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondejar, R., & Zhao, H. (2013). Antecedents to government relationship building and the institutional contingencies in a transition economy. Management International Review, 53(4), 579–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthuri, (2008). Participation and accountability in corporate community involvement programmes: A research agenda. Community Development Journal, 43(2), 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NATA. (2010). Welcome to NATA. National Authority on Tobacco & Alcohol. Retrieved January 01, 2010 from http://www.nata.gov.lk/.

  • Navarro, P. (1988). Why do corporations give to charity? The Journal of Business, 61(1), 65–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCCSL (2010). The National Business Excellence Awards 2010. Retrieved 15 November 15, 2010, from http://www.nccsl.lk/national-business-excellence-awards-2010.

  • NCED. (2008). Time bound delivery: The NCED concept. Colombo, Sri Lanka: National Council for Economic Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. The Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G., & Richter, U. (2005). CSR business as usual? The case of the tobacco industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 387–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. (2002). Towards an institution-based view of business strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2), 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M., Wang, D., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: a focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 920–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1978). Organisational design. Arlignton Heights, IL: A. H. M. Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polishchuk, L. (2009). Corporate social responsibility or government regulation: An analysis of institutional choice. Problems of Economic Transition, 52(8), 73–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 20, 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., & Di Maggio, P. J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organisational analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajapakse, B. (2009). Sustainable reporting practices of corporate sector in Sri Lanka accounting research series-2. Colombo: Centre for Accounting Research–University of Colombo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, P., Siegel, D. S., Hillman, A., & Eden, L. (2006). Three lenses on the multinational enterprise: politics, corruption, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 733–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, D. A., & Berry, M. A. (2000). Environmental citizenship in multinational corporations: Social responsibility and sustainable development. European Management Journal, 18(1), 70–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiia, D. H., Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2003). Philanthropy as strategy when corporate charity “Begins at Home”. Business and Society, 42, 169–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors: toward a new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 505–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Matten, D. (2009). Introduction to the special issue: Globalization as a challenge for business responsibilities. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(3), 327–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seitanidi, M. M., & Crane, A. (2009). Implementing CSR through partnerships: Understanding the selection design and institutionalisation of non profit-business partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 413–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seitanidi, M. M., & Ryan, A. (2007). A critical review of forms of corporate community involvement: from philanthropy to partnerships. International Journal of Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 12(3), 247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selekler-Goksen, N. N., & Yildirim-Oktem, O. (2009). Countervailing institutional forces: corporate governance in Turkish family business groups. Journal of Management and Governance, 13(3), 193–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2005). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, C. J., & Becker-Olsen, K. L. (2006). Achieving marketing objectives through social sponsorships. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 154–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SLA. (2013). Sri Lanka Apparel—Garments without guilt. Retrieved April 01, 2013, from http://gwg.garmentswithoutguilt.com/.

  • Sonpar, K., Pazzaglia, F., & Kornijenko, J. (2009). The Paradox and constraints of legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L. (1996). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, J., & He, J. (2010). Does giving lead to getting? Evidence from Chinese private enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempel, A., & Walgenbach, P. (2007). Global Standardization of organizational forms and management practices? What new institutionalism and the business-systems approach can learn from each other. The Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trullen, J., & Stevenson, W. B. (2006). Strategy and legitimacy: Pharmaceutical companies’ reaction to the HIV crisis. Business and Society, 45, 178–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2009). The Millennium Development Goals Report. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved January 20, 2010, from http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/MDG_Report_2009_ENG.pdf.

  • United States Foreign Commercial Service. (2012). Doing Business in Sri Lanka: 2012 A Country Commercial Guide for U.S. Companies. Washington, DC. Retrieved May 01, 2013, from http://www.buyusainfo.net/docs/x_3917615.pdf.

  • Valente, M., & Crane, A. (2010). Public responsibility and private enterprise in developing countries. California Management Review, 52(3), 52–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallentin, S., & Murillo, D. (2012). Governmentality and the politics of CSR. Organization, 19(6), 825–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veser, M. (2004). The influence of culture on stakeholder management: Social policy implementation in multinational corporations. Business and Society, 43(4), 426–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S., & Boyle, M. (1995). The dynamics of change in corporate community relations. California Management Review, 37, 125–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. The Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 758–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartick, S. L., & Mahon, J. F. (1994). Toward a substantive definition of the corporate issue construct: A review and synthesis of the literature. Business and Society, 33(3), 293–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X., & Rivers, C. (2009). Antecedents of CSR practices in MNCs’ subsidiaries: A stakeholder and institutional perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zappala, G. (2004). Corporate citizenship and human resource management: A new tool or a missed opportunity? Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 42(2), 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, M. (2012). CSR-based political legitimacy strategy: Managing the state by doing good in China and Russia. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(4), 439–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, HD1 3DH, UK

    Eshani Beddewela

  2. Norwich Business School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK

    Jenny Fairbrass

Authors
  1. Eshani Beddewela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jenny Fairbrass
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenny Fairbrass.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beddewela, E., Fairbrass, J. Seeking Legitimacy Through CSR: Institutional Pressures and Corporate Responses of Multinationals in Sri Lanka. J Bus Ethics 136, 503–522 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2478-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2478-z

Keywords

  • Corporate social responsibility
  • Community initiatives
  • Developing country
  • Government
  • Political behaviour
  • Legitimacy
  • Multinational enterprises