Skip to main content
Log in

The Multinational Corporation as a Political Actor: ‘Varieties of Capitalism’ Revisited

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper argues that the literature examining the role that MNCs play in ‘political CSR’—an emerging area of management research concern—can be enhanced by more a fulsome examination of the ‘varieties of capitalism’ that currently exist in the global economy. We argue that the willingness and capacity of a particular MNC to participate in governance activity—which we broadly equate to political CSR—are contingent, at least in part, upon the national systems of government-business relations present in its home market. We argue that the decisions MNCs make in terms of whether and how to participate in governance are predicated in part on the domestic system of business-government relations out of which they emerge. The paper then asserts that our current conceptions of political CSR are limited, because they do not take fully into account the increasingly important corporate form of statism, in which home governments maintain a large ownership position in the country’s MNCs, even as they expand abroad. We posit that a key question this reality poses is whether such companies will reinforce established patterns of ‘political CSR’, whether they will challenge those established patterns, or whether some mutual adaptation will occur. We conclude the article with some suggestions for how this question might be explored in future work by interested scholars.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The overall growth in international investment and production activity during the 1990s was impressive. Foreign direct investment inflow grew from approximately $200 billion (U.S.) in 1990 to a peak of approximately $1.5 trillion (U.S.) in 2000, a figure which dropped to just over $600 billion in 2001, due to the slowdown in the global economy. Cross-border merger and acquisition levels grew from a value of under $200 billion (U.S.) in 1990 to almost $1.2 trillion (U.S.) in 2000, once again dropping in 2001 to approximately $600 billion (U.S.). In terms of MNCs, there are approximately 65,000 MNCs that have about 850,000 affiliates abroad. Value-added by MNCs is estimated at $3.5 trillion and total sales at $18.5 trillion, which compares with world exports that measure $7.4 trillion. All statistics taken from United Nations, World Investment Report 2002: Transnational Corporations and Export Competitiveness, (New York: United Nations 2003), chapter 1.

  2. In the German system of corporate governance, the management board (the Vorstand) is entrusted with overseeing day–day operational issues, while the supervisory board (the Aufsichtsrat) overseas broad corporate impact across a variety of stakeholders. German domestic law stipulates that supervisory boards have clear representation from labour interests. In the Japanese case, boards of directors are large, feature heavy participation from centralized banks, and often have developed avenues for representation from outside suppliers and political interests.

References

  • Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2000). Hard and soft law in international governance. International Organization, 54(3), 421–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2009). Strengthening international regulation through transnational new governance. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 42, 501–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (2006). The political economy of growth: A critical survey of the recent literature. The World Bank Economic Review, 8(3), 351–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, J. E. (2006). International organizations then and now. The American Journal of International Law, 100(2), 324–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, J. (2004). The corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J., & Grosse, R. (1990). International business and governments: Issues and institutions. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

  • Bergsten, F. C., & Moran, T. H. (1978). American multinationals and American interests. Washington: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Harcour, Brace & World Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieling, J. J. (2007). The other side of the coin: Conceptualizing the relationship between business and the state in the age of globalization. Business and Politics, 9(3), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddewyn, J. J., & Brewer, T. L. (1994). International business behavior: New theoretical directions. The Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 119–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, M. D., Eichengreen, B., & Irwin, D. A. (1999). Is globalization today really different than a hundred years ago? Working paper No. 7195. National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Braithwaite, J., & Drahos, P. (2000). Global business regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branson, D. M. (1999). The very uncertain prospect of “global” convergence in corporate governance. Cornell International Law Journal, 34, 321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremmer, I. (2010). The end of the free market: Who wins the war between states and corporations?. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, T. (Ed.). (1985). Political risks in international business: New directions for research, management, and public policy. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büthe, T., & Mattli, W. (2011). The new global rulers. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, M. B. (2000). The role of law in international politics: Essays in international relations and international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashore, B., Auld, G., & Newsom, D. (2004). Governing through markets: Forest certification and the emergence of non-state authority. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. J. (1990). Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

  • Cioffi, J. W. (2010). Public law and private power. Cornell: Cornell University Press.

  • Clapp, J., & Fuchs, D. (2009). Corporate power in global agrifood governance. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffee, J. J, Jr. (1999). The future as history: The prospects for global convergence in corporate governance and its implications. Northwestern University Law Review, 93(3), 639–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, C. (2003). Private power and global authority: Transnational merchant law in the global political economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, C., Haufler, V., & Porter, T. (1999). Private authority and international affairs. Ithaca: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • DeSombre, E. (2000). Domestic sources of international environmental policy: Industry environmentalists and U.S. power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detomasi, D. D. (2008). The political roots of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 807–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. R. (2004). Globalization and corporate social responsibility: How non-governmental organizations influence labor and environmental codes of conduct. Management International Review, 44(Special Issue 2), 7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. D. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Addison Wesley Company.

  • Downs, E. (2010). Who’s afraid of China’s oil companies? In C. Pascual & J. Elkind (Eds.), Energy security: Economics, politics, strategies, and implications (pp. 73–104). Washington: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drezner, D. (2007). All politics is local. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., & Vieira, Jr. (2012). Striving for legitimacy through corporate social responsibility: Insights from oil companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 413–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, J. (2007). What are international institutions? International Studies Review, 9(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durham, J. B. (1999). Economic growth and political regimes. Journal of Economic Growth, 4, 81–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, L., & Lenway, S. (2001). Introduction to the symposium: The Janus face of globalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 383–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagre, N., & Wells, L. T, Jr. (1982). Bargaining power of multinationals and host governments. Journal of International Business Studies, 3, 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1993). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. R. (1989). Democracy and markets: The politics of mixed economies. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J. S. (2006). Global capitalism: Its fall and rise in the twentieth century. New York: Norton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, D., & Lederer, N. M. L. (2007). The power of business. Business and Politics, 9(3), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, R. (1987). The political economy of international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Gilpin, R. (2001). Global political economy: Understanding the international economic order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Globerman, S., & Shapiro, D. (2003). Governance infrastructure and U.S. foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1), 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes-Casseres, B. (1990). Firm ownership preferences and host government restrictions: An integrated approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(2), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J. N., & Roe, M. J. (2004). Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourevitch, P. A., & Shinn, J. (2005). Political power & corporate control: The new global politics of corporate governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Hall, R. B., & Biersteker, T. J. (2002). The emergence of private authority in global governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L. (2004). Capitalism at the crossroads. Upper Saddle River: Wharton Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haufler, V. (2010). Corporations in zones of conflict: Issues, actors, and institutions. In D. D. Avant, M. Finnemore, & S. K. Sell (Eds.), Who governs the globe?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, J. S., Jones, G., & Kaufmann, D. (2000). Seize the state, seize the day: State capture corruption, and influence in transition. World Bank: Policy Research Working paper No. 2444.

  • Hellman, J. S., Jones, G., Kaufmann, D., & Schankerman, M. (2000). Measuring governance, corruption, and state capture. The World Bank: Policy Research Working paper No. 2312.

  • Henisz, W. (2000). The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics and Politics, 12(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henisz, W. (2004). Political institutions and policy volatility. Economics and Politics, 16(1), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

  • Hu, J. (2005). Build towards a harmonious world of lasting peace and common prosperity. Speech delivered at the High-Level Plenary Meeting of the United Nations 60th session. New York (September 15). Quoted in Whelan 2012.

  • Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese miracle: The growth of industrial policy 1925–1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (1995). Japan, who governs?: The rise of the developmental state. New York: Norton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P. (1978). Between power and plenty: Foreign economic policies of advanced industrial states. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P. J. (1984). Corporatism and change: Austria, Switzerland, and the politics of industry (p. 27). Cornell: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world of political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O. (2002). Power and governance in a globalized world. London: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klare, M. T. (2007). Blood and oil: The dangers and consequences of America’s growing dependency on imported petroleum. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (2001). No logo. London: Flamingo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobrin, S. J. (1987). Testing the bargaining hypothesis in the manufacturing sector in developing countries. International Organization, 41(4), 609–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollman, K., & Prakash, A. (2001). Green by choice? Cross-national variations in firms’ responses to EMS-based environmental regimes, world politics, 53(3), 399–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten, D. (2001). When Corporation Rule the World. New York: Kumarian Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koremos, B., Lipson, C., & Snicdal, D. (2001). The rational design of international institutions. International Organization, 55(3), 761–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraakman, R. R., Davies, P., Hansmann, H., Hertig, G., Hopt, K. J., Kanda, H., & Rock, E. B. (2004). The anatomy of corporate law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Krasner, S. D. (1982). Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables. International Organization, 36, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2003). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambsdorff, L. (1999). Corruption in empirical research: A review. Working paper, Transparency International, Berlin, Germany.

  • Lazer, D. (2001). Regulatory interdependence and international governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 8, 477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecraw, D. (1984). Bargaining power, ownership, and profitability of transnational corporations in developing countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 15(1), 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, G. C. (1990). Comparative Business-Government Relations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, G. C., & Vogel, E. (1987). Ideology and national competitiveness: An analysis of nine countries. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T. (1969). The end of liberalism. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcel, V. (2006). Oil titans: National oil companies in the Middle East. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.

  • Martin, L. L., & Simmons, B. A. (1998). Theories and empirical studies of international institutions. International Organization, 52(4), 729–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, E. (1963). Interests, ideologies and the problem of stability and growth. American Economic Review, 53, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: towards an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30, 166–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 681–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, P. (1998). Corruption and the composition of government expenditure. Journal of Public Economics, 69, 263–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, Grant. (1966). Private power and american democracy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, J., Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (1998). Commentary on ‘corporate strategies and environmental regulations: An organizing framework’ by A. M. Rugman and A. Verbeke. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 377–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishkin, F. S. (2006). The next great globalization: How disadvantage nations can harness their financial systems to get rich. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitnick, B. M. (1980). The political economy of regulation. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, T. H. (1985). Multinational corporations: The political economy of foreign direct investment. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, D. D. (2004). The structure of regulatory competition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murtha, T., & Lenway, S. (1994). Country capabilities and the strategic state: How national political institutions affect multinational corporations’ strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, M. (2000). Contests for corporate control: Corporate governance and economic performance in the United States and Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. (2005). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Upper Saddle River: Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Doz, Y. L. (1987). The multinational mission: Balancing local demands and global vision. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinicke, W. (1998). Global public policy: Governing without government?. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (2000). Institutions for high-quality growth: What they are and how to acquire them. Studies in Comparative International Development, 35(5), 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriquez, P., Uhlenbruck, K., & Eden, L. (2005). Government corruption and the entry strategies of multinationals. The Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 383–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, M. J. (1994). Strong managers, weak owners: the political roots of American corporate finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Rosenau, J. S., & Czempiel, E. O. (1992). Governance without government: Order and change in world politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, G. A., & Palazzo, D. (2010). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors: Towards a new role of the TNC in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 505–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Matten, D. (2009) Introduction to the Special Issue: Globalization as a Challenge for Business Responsibilities. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(3), 327–347.

  • Shenkar, O., & Arikan, I. (2009). Business as international politics: Drawing insights from Nation-state to inter-firm alliances. Journal of Business and Politics, 11(4), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikkink, K. (1993). Human rights, principle-centered networks, and sovereignty in Latin America. International Organization, 47(3), 411–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, T. (2005). The new masters of capital: American bond rating agencies and the politics of creditworthiness. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, A. M. (2004). A new world order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soskice, D., & Hall, D. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Teegen, H., Doh, J. P., & Vachani, S. (2004). The importance of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in global governance and value creation: An international business research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 463–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyson, L. D. A. (1992). Who’s bashing whom? Trade conflict in high-technology industries. Washington: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2003). World Investment Report. Various years: 2002–2005. New York: United Nations Publishing.

  • Vernon, R. (1971). Sovereignty at bay. New York: Basic Books.

  • Van Oosterhout, J. H. (2010). The role of corporations in shaping the global rules of the game: In search of new foundations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(2), 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, D. G., Hults, D. R., & Thurber, M. C. (2012). Oil and governance: State-owned enterprises and the world energy supply. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vietor, R. H. K. (1984). Energy policy in America since 1945: A study of business-government relations (p. 8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, S. K. (1996). Free markets, more rules: Regulatory reform in advanced industrial countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

  • Vogel, D., & Kagan, R. A. (2004). Dynamics of regulatory change: How globalization affects national regulatory policies. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. (1998). The myth of the powerless state. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

  • Weiss, L. (Ed.). (2003). States in the global economy: Bringing domestic institutions back in. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, G. (2012). The political perspective of corporate social responsibility: A critical research agenda. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 709–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (1999). Governance in world affairs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Detomasi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Detomasi, D. The Multinational Corporation as a Political Actor: ‘Varieties of Capitalism’ Revisited. J Bus Ethics 128, 685–700 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2099-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2099-6

Keywords

Navigation