Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 123, Issue 4, pp 687–706 | Cite as

Strategic Leadership of Corporate Sustainability

Article

Abstract

Strategic leadership and corporate sustainability have recently come together in conspicuously explicit fashion through the emergence of top management team (TMT) positions with dedicated corporate sustainability responsibilities. These TMT positions, commonly referred to as “Chief Sustainability Officers,” have found their way into the upper echelons of many of the world’s largest corporations alongside more traditional TMT positions including the CEO and CFO. We explore this phenomenon and consider the following two questions: Why are corporate sustainability positions being installed to the TMT?What effects do corporate sustainability TMT positions have at their organizations? We consider these questions through strategic leadership and neoinstitutional theoretical frameworks. Through the latter, we also engage with Weberian considerations of bureaucracy. We find that the reasons why corporate sustainability TMT positions are installed can be in response to a crisis at the corporation for which its legitimacy is challenged. We also find the corporate sustainability TMT position can be installed proactively in an effort to realize external opportunities that may have otherwise gone unrealized without concerted attention and coordination afforded by a strategic level position. Regarding effects, we determine the position can relate to the establishment of bureaucratic structures dedicated to corporate sustainability within the corporation through which formalized processes and key performance indicators to drive corporate sustainability performances are established. In the face of our finding that many corporate sustainability TMT positions are being removed despite having only relatively recently been introduced to their respective TMTs, we find that the successful implementation of bureaucratic machinery can help considerations to sustainability extend beyond the tenure of a corporate sustainability position within the TMT.

Keywords

Chief Sustainability Officer Strategic Leadership Corporate sustainability Top management team 

References

  1. Abrahamson, E. (1996). Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 254–285.Google Scholar
  2. Abrahamson, E., & Fairchild, G. (1999). Management fashion: Lifecycles, triggers, and collective learning processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 708–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 61–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arendt, L., Priem, R., & Ndofor, H. (2005). A CEO-adviser model of strategic decision making. Journal of Management, 31(5), 680–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balch, O. (2011). Chief sustainability officers: CSOs in the C-suite. The Ethical Corporation. April.Google Scholar
  6. Baron, J., & Beilby, W. (1986). The proliferation of job titles in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 561–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beauchamp, T. L., Bowie, N. E., & Arnold, D. G. (2009). Ethical theory and business (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Brubaker, R. (1991). The limits of rationality: An essay on the social and moral thought of Max Weber. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2007). Business research methods. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  10. Capriottia, P., & Morenob, A. (2007). Corporate citizenship and public relations: The importance and interactivity of social responsibility issues on corporate web sites. Public Relations Review, 33(1), 84–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carpenter, M. A. (2002). The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(3), 275–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749–778.Google Scholar
  13. Carpenter, M., & Reilly, G. (2006). Construct and construct measurement in upper echelons research. In D. Ketchen, D. Bergh, & D. Bergh (Eds.), Research methodology in strategy and management (Vol. 3). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  14. Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Casimir, G., & Dutilh, C. (2003). Sustainability: A gender studies perspective. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 27, 316–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Certo, S. T., Lester, R. H., Dalton, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2006). Top management teams, strategy, and financial performance: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 813–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chatterji, A., Levine, D., & Toffel, M. (2009). How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 18(1), 125–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2013). CSR as aspirational talk. Organization, 20(3), 372–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.Google Scholar
  22. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160. Google Scholar
  23. Du Gay, P. (2000). In praise of bureaucracy: Weber-organization-ethics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eisenberg, E. M. (1984). Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. European Commission. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011–2014 for corporate social responsibility. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  29. Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 484–503.Google Scholar
  30. Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D., & Cannella, A. (2009). Strategic leadership: theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Forbes. (2012). Profiles: Sandra lin. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from http://www.forbes.com/profile/sandra-lin/.
  32. Forbes. (2012). Ranking the world’s most sustainable companies. 24 January. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from http://www.forbes.com/sites/jacquelynsmith/2012/01/24/ranking-the-worlds-most-sustainable-companies.
  33. Ford. (2012). Press release: ford environment and safety chief sue cischke to retire after 35-year career; Robert Brown named her successor. Retrieved October 1, 2012, from http://media.ford.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=35731.
  34. Frankfurt, H. G. (2005). On bullshit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.Google Scholar
  36. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J., Wicks, A., Parmar, B., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Garrahan, M. (2007). Design not China blamed for toy recalls. Financial Times.Google Scholar
  38. Gephart, R. P, Jr. (1978). Status degradation and organizational succession: An ethnomethodological approach. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 553–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gond, J., & Crane, A. (2010). Corporate social performance disoriented: Saving the lost paradigm? Business and Society, 49(4), 677–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Goodpaster, K. E. (1991). Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1, 53–73.Google Scholar
  41. Gourji, L. (2008). Adding sustainability to the C-Suite. Corporate Board Member Magazine. Retrieved November 1, 2012, from www.boardmember.com/MagazineArticle_Details.aspx?id=417.
  42. Green, S. (1988). Strategy, organizational culture and symbolism. Long Range Planning, 21(4), 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Guthey, E. (2012). Fashions, trends, and the production of leadership. Presented at The Administrative Science Association of Canada, St. Johns, Newfoundland.Google Scholar
  44. Guthey, E., & Morsing, M.  (2013).  CSR and the mediated emergence of strategic ambiguity. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-2005-7.
  45. Haleblian, J., & Finikelstein, S. (1993). Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: the moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 844–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hambrick, D. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 659–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hambrick, D. C., & D’Aveni, R. A. (1992). Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies. Management Science, 38(10), 1445–1466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hambrick, D. C., & Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: a bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in organizational behavior.Google Scholar
  50. Hambrick, D., & Mason, P. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193–206.Google Scholar
  51. Hirsch, P. M., & Levin, D. Z. (1999). Umbrella advocates versus validity police: A life-cycle model. Organization Science, 10(2), 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Just Good Business. (2008). A special report on corporate social responsibility. The Economist. 19 January.Google Scholar
  53. Krishnan, H. A., & Park, D. (2005). A few good women: On top management teams. Journal of Business Research, 58(12), 1712–1720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lubin, D. A., & Esty, D. C. (2010). The sustainability imperative. Harvard Business Review, 88(5), 42–50.Google Scholar
  55. Lunheim, R. (2005). Confessions of a corporate window dresser (pp. 6–7). Summer: Leading Perspectives.Google Scholar
  56. Mærsk. (2012). Press release 7 August 2012: Changes in the HR organisation at A. P. Moller—Maersk. Retrieved October 1, 2012, from www.maerskpress.com/Latest-Press-Releases/changes-in-the-hr-organisation-at-a.p.-moller-maersk/s/0e168cd3-0b59-4ec3-b843-59313adbecb2.
  57. Marrewijk, M. V. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2/3), 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mattel. (2011). Mattel Inc. Q4 2010 Earnings Call. 2 February 2011. Transcripts provided by Factset-callstreet.Google Scholar
  59. Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. McNulty, E. & Davis, R. (2010). Should the C-suite have a “green” suite? Harvard Business School. December.Google Scholar
  61. Menz, M. (2012). Functional top management team members: A review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(1), 45–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Menz, M., & Scheef, C. (forthcoming). Chief strategy officers: Contingency analysis of their presence in top management teams. Strategic Management Journal. doi 10.1002/smj.2104.
  63. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  65. Moon, J., Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2005). Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15, 427–451. Google Scholar
  66. Newmont Mining. (2011). Press release: Newmont appoints gary goldberg as executive vice president and chief operating officer; brian hill appointed executive vice president of sustainability and external affairs. Retrieved October 1, 2012, from http://www.newmont.com/our-investors/press-releases/2011/10102011.
  67. New York Times. (2011). Business background defines chief of staff. 6 January. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/07/us/politics/07daley.html?_r=0.
  68. Nokia. (2008). Press release 15 August 2008. Esko Aho to join Nokia on November 1, 2008: Veli Sundbäck to retire at the end of May, 2009. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from http://presse.nokia.fr/2008/08/15/esko-aho-to-join-nokia-on-november-1-2008-veli-sundback-to-retire-at-the-end-of-may-2009.
  69. Nokia. (2012). Press release 30 May 2012. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from http://press.nokia.com/2012/05/30/esko-aho-to-join-harvard-university-as-senior-fellow.
  70. Park, H., Russell, C., & Lee, J. (2007). National culture and environmental sustainability: A cross-national analysis. Journal of Economics and Finance, 31(1), 104–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pettigrew, A. (1992). On studying managerial elites. Strategic Management Journal. Special Issue: Fundamental Themes in Strategy Process Research, 13(Winter), 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pfeffer, J. (1981). Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. Research in Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pless, N. M., Maak, T., & Waldman, D. A. (2012). Different approaches toward doing the right thing: Mapping the responsibility orientations of leaders. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(4), 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Quinn, D. P., & Jones, T. M. (1995). An agent morality view of business policy. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 22–42.Google Scholar
  75. Resolve. (2013). Board of directors biography: David A. Baker. Retrieved April 1, 2013, from http://www.resolv.org/blog/boardofdirectors/dave-baker.
  76. Rigby, D., & Tager, S. (2008). Learning the advantages of sustainable growth. Strategy and Leadership, 36(4), 24–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Senate Committee on Appropriations. (2007). Testimony of Robert A. Eckert. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mattel, Inc. Submitted to the Senate Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government. Washington, DC 12 September 2007. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from www.appropriations.senate.gov.
  78. Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P, Jr., O’Bannon, D. P., & Scully, J. A. (1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 412–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(7), 569–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Storebrand. (2012). Storebrand 2011 annual report. Retrieved October 15, 2012, from http://www.storebrand.no/site/stb.nsf/2011AnnualIndex.html.
  81. Strand, R. (2011). Exploring the role of leadership in corporate social responsibility: A review. Journal of Leadership, Accountability, and Ethics, 8(4), 84–96.Google Scholar
  82. Strand, R. (2013). The chief officer of corporate social responsibility: A study of its presence in top management teams. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(4), 721–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Strang, D., & Baron, J. N. (1990). Categorical imperatives: the structure of job titles in California state agencies. American Sociological Review, 55, 479–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.Google Scholar
  85. Tagesson, T., Blank, V., Broberg, P., & Collin, S. (2009). What explains the extent and content of social and environmental disclosures on corporate web sites: A study of social and environmental reporting in Swedish listed corporations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(6), 352–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tiessen, J. H. (2004). Multinational multilingualism on the internet: The use of Japanese on corporate web sites. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 21(2), 180–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. United Parcel Service (UPS). (2010). Press release 20 December 2012. Bob Stoffel retiring after 35 years of service. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from http://www.pressroom.ups.com/Press+Releases/Archive/2010/Q4/Bob+Stoffel+Retiring+After+35+Years+of+Service.
  88. Watson, T. J. (2006). Organising and managing work: Organisational, managerial and strategic behaviour in theory and practice (2nd ed.). London: Financial Times: Prentice Hall, Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  89. Watson, T. J. (2010). Critical social science, pragmatism and the realities of HRM. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(6), 915–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Weaver, G. R., Trevino, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 539–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Weber, M. (1958). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (T. Parsons, Trans.). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  92. Weber, M. (1978). Bureaucracy. In G. Roth & C. Wittich (Eds.), Economy and society (Vol. 2). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  93. Weinreb Group. (2011). CSO back story: How chief sustainability officers reached the C-suite. September 2011. Retrieved December 15, 2012, from http://weinrebgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/CSO-Back-Story-by-Weinreb-Group.pdf.
  94. West, C. T., & Schwenk, C. R. (1996). Top management team strategic consensus, demographic homogeneity and firm performance: A report of resounding nonfindings. Strategic Management Journal, 17(7), 571–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 91–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Xylem. (2013). Water advisory board biography: Roberta Bowman. Retrieved April 1, 2013, from http://www.xyleminc.com/en-us/about-us/water-advisory-board/Pages/Roberta-B.-Bowman.aspx.
  97. Zorn, D. (2004). Here a chief, there a chief: The rise of the CFO in the American firm. American Sociological Review, 69(3), 345–364.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Copenhagen Business SchoolFrederiksbergDenmark

Personalised recommendations