Skip to main content
Log in

The Long-Term Sustenance of Sustainability Practices in MNCs: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective of the Role of R&D and Internationalization

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What allows MNCs to maintain their sustainability practices over the long-term? This is an important but under-examined question. To address this question, we investigate both the development and sustenance of sustainability practices. We use the dynamic capabilities perspective, rooted in resource-based view literature, as the theoretical basis. We argue that MNCs that simultaneously pursue both higher R&D intensity and higher internationalization are more capable of developing and maintaining sustainability practices. We test our hypotheses using longitudinal panel data from 1989 to 2009. Results suggest that MNCs that have a combination of both high R&D intensity and high internationalization are (i) likely to develop more sustainability practices and (ii) are likely to maintain more of those practices over a long-term. As a corollary, MNCs that have a combination of both low R&D and low internationalization usually (i) end up developing little or no sustainability practices and (ii) find it difficult to sustain whatever little sustainability practices they might have developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ameer, R., & Othman, R. (2012). Sustainability practices and corporate financial performance: A study based on the top global corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, T., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2009). Ecology-driven real options: An investment framework for incorporating uncertainties in the context of the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, S. (2009). The influence of national culture and institutional voids on family ownership of large firms: A country level empirical study. Journal of International Management, 15(1), 32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, S., & Whitten, D. (2011). The sidelining of top IT executives in the governance of outsourcing: Antecedents, power struggles, and consequences. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58(4), 799–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, S., Whitten, D., & Green, K. W. (2008). Understanding service quality and relationship quality in IS outsourcing: Client orientation & promotion, project management effectiveness, and the task-technology-structure fit. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(2), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B.-L. (2007). Multiple BGPs in a growth model with habit persistence. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 39(1), 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Lange, D. E. (2010). Research companion to green international management studies: A guide for future research, collaboration and review writing. Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Ceballos, J., Aragón-Correa, J. A., Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., & Rueda-Manzanares, A. (2011). The effect of internal barriers on the connection between stakeholder integration and proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 281–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, K. W., Chakrabarty, S., & Whitten, D. (2007). Organisational culture of customer care: Market orientation and service quality. International Journal of Services and Standards, 3(2), 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L. (1997). Beyond greening: Strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E. (1997). Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The Case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 339–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Bierman, L., Uhlenbruck, K., & Shimizu, K. (2006). The importance of resources in the internationalization of professional service firms: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1137–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, T., & Bansal, P. (2007). How standard is standardized MNC global environmental communication? Journal of Business Ethics, 71(2), 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2007). Corporate social strategy in multinational enterprises: Antecedents and value creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 345–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, P. (2003). A guide to econometrics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. D., & Whybark, C. (1999). The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 599–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. (2001). Expected returns and habit persistence. Review of Financial Studies, 14(3), 861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, M., Garcia, A., & Rodriguez, L. (2007). Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the Dow Jones sustainability index. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(3), 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. (2004). International diversification and firm performance: The S-curve hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 598–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. (2000). Dynamic capabilities in international expansion. Journal of World Business, 35(4), 355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, A. A., & Fremeth, A. R. (2009). Green management matters regardless. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. R. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 56–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, R. C., & Galan, J. I. (2010). The effect of R&D intensity on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 407–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapienza, H. J., Autio, E., George, G., & Zahra, S. A. (2006). A capabilities perspective on the effects of early internationalization on firm survival and growth. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 914–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdelhan, A. (2010). A habit-based explanation of the exchange rate risk premium. The Journal of Finance, 65(1), 123–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M. (2010). Corporate social performance and innovation with high social benefits: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 581–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, D., Chakrabarty, S., & Wakefield, R. (2010). The strategic choice to continue outsourcing, switch vendors, or backsource: Do swithcing costs matter? Information & Management, 47(3), 167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zardkoohi, A., Bierman, L., Panina, D., & Chakrabarty, S. (2011). Revisiting a proposed definition of professional service firms. Academy of Management Review, 36(1, dialogue), 180–184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subrata Chakrabarty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chakrabarty, S., Wang, L. The Long-Term Sustenance of Sustainability Practices in MNCs: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective of the Role of R&D and Internationalization. J Bus Ethics 110, 205–217 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1422-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1422-3

Keywords

Navigation