Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ecology-Driven Real Options: An Investment Framework for Incorporating Uncertainties in the Context of the Natural Environment

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of uncertainty within an organization’s environment features prominently in the business ethics and management literature, but how corporate investment decisions should proceed in the face of uncertainties relating to the natural environment is less discussed. From the perspective of ecological economics, the salience of ecology-induced issues challenges management to address new types of uncertainties. These pertain to constraints within the natural environment as well as to institutional action aimed at conserving the natural environment. We derive six areas of ecology-induced uncertainties and propose ecology-driven real options as a conceptual approach for systematically incorporating these uncertainties into strategic management. We combine our results in an integrative investment framework and illustrate its application with the case of carbon constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adner, R., & Levinthal, D.A. (2004). What is not a real option: Considering boundaries for the application of real options to business strategy. Academy of Management Review, 29(1), 74–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amram, M., & Kulatilaka, N. 1999. Real options: Managing Strategic Investment in an Uncertain World. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aragon-Correa, J.A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkisson, A.: 2007, ‹Global Warming is an Ethical Issue’, http://www.earthcharterinaction.org/climate/2007/10/global_warming_is_an_ethical_i.html. Accessed 26 Sept 2008

  • Baecker, P., & Hommel, U. 2004. ‹25 Years Real Option Approach to Investment Valuation: Review and Assessment’. in: T. Dangl, M. Kopel and W. Kuersten (eds.). Real Options. Gabler: Wiesbaden, pp. 1-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, E.: 1998, ‹Intertemporal Pricing of Sulfur Dioxide Allowances’, Working paper, MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Massachusetts

  • Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736. doi:10.2307/1556363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benford, R.D., & Snow, D.A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973). Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. The Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 637–654. doi:10.1086/260062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, W., R. Bradley, D. Bunn, C. Clarke, T. Wilson and M. Yang: 2007, ‹Investment risks under uncertain climate change policy’, Energy Policy 35(11), 5766-5773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borison, A. (2005). ‹Real Options Analysis: Where Are the Emperor’s Clothes?’. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 17(2), 17–31. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6622.2005.00029.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, B.K., Dess, G.G., & Rasheed, A.M.A. (1993). Divergence between Archival and Perceptual Measures of the Environment - Causes and Consequences. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 204–226. doi:10.2307/258758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brach, M.A. 2003, Real Options in Practice (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchko, A. A.: 1994, ‹Conceptualization and Measurement of Environmental Uncertainty – An Assessment of the Miles and Snow Perceived Environmental Uncertainty Scale. Academy of Management Journal, 37(2), 410–425. doi:10.2307/256836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, T., & Hoffmann, V.H. (2007). Emerging carbon constraints for corporate risk management. Ecological Economics, 62(3-4), 518–528. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G., & Heal, G. 1998. ‹Global Environmental Risks’. in G. Chichilnisky, G. Heal and A. Vercelli (eds.), Sustainability: dynamics and uncertainty. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choren: 2006, ‹The Company Story: Yesterday – Today – Tomorrow’, http://www.choren.com. Accessed 7 March 2007

  • Clark, W.C. 1986. ‹Sustainable development of the biosphere: themes for a research program’. in W. C. Clark and R. E. Munn (eds.). Sustainable development of the biosphere. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, pp. 1-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, R., & Deyes, K. 2002. ‹Estimating the Social Cost of Carbon Emissions’. London: Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemen, R. 1996, Making Hard Decisions – An introduction to Decision Analysis (2nd ed.) (Duxbury Press, Belmont).

    Google Scholar 

  • Common, M., & Stagl, S. 2005, Ecological Economics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, T., & Antikarov, V. 2001, Real Options: A practitioner’s guide. Texere, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, T., & Keenan, P. (1998). Making real options real. The McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 128–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormen, T., Leiserson, C., Rivest, R., & Stein, C. 2001. Introduction to Algorithms (2nd ed.) MIT Press, McGraw-Hill, Cambridge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, P., Van De Putte, A., & Romani, M. (2005). Three decades of scenario planning in Shell. California Management Review, 48(1), 92–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortazar, G., E. S. Schwartz and M. Salinas: 1998, ‹Evaluating Environmental Investments: A real options approach’, Management Science 44(8), 1059-1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., Daly, H.E., & Bartholomew, J.A. 1991. ‹Goals, Agenda, and Policy Recommendations for Ecological Economics’, in R. Costanza (eds.) Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability. Columbia University Press: New York, pp. 1-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., & Matten, D. 2007. Business ethics (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F., & Evan, W.M. (1984). Organizational Innovation and Performance - the Problem of Organizational Lag. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 392–409. doi:10.2307/2393031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, J., & Lewis, S. (2003). CSR in stakeholder expectations: And their implication for company strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2), 185–193. doi:10.1023/A:1023399732720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Tienne, K.B., & Lewis, L.W. (2005). The pragmatic and ethical barriers to corporate social responsibility disclosure: The Nike Case. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(4), 359–376. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-0869-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited - Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A.K., & Pindyck, R.S. 1994, Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A.K., & Pindyck, R.S. (1995). The Options Approach to Capital-Investment. Harvard Business Review, 73(3), 105–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T.W. 1999. Ties that bind: a social contracts approach to business ethics. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst & Young and Oxford Analytica: 2008, Strategic Business Risk: Insurance 2008. EYGM Limited

  • Ferrell, O.C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. 2002, Business Ethics. Ethical Decision Making and Cases (5th ed.) (Hoghton Mifflin, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1962, Capitalism and Freedom (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, T.M. 1966, Business Ethics (Meredith Publishing Company, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, E., & Mele, D.N. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1-2), 51–71. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin, T.N., Kennelly, J.J., & Krause, T.S. (1995). Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development - Implications for Management Theory and Research. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 874–907. doi:10.2307/258959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C.R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022–1054. doi:10.2307/259163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C.R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58–80. doi:10.2307/3069285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D.C., Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A.C. (2005). Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 472–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannigan, J. 2006, Environmental Sociology (Vol. 2) (Routledge, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S.L. (1995). A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014. doi:10.2307/258963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S.L., & Milstein, M.B. (1999). Global sustainability and the creative destruction of industries. Sloan Management Review, 41(1), 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal, G. 1998. ‹Interpreting Sustainability’. in G. Chichilnisky, G. Heal and A. Vercelli (eds.). Sustainability: dynamics and uncertainty, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A.J., & Hitt, M.A. (1999). Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 825–842. doi:10.2307/259357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, R., R. Bezdek and R. Wendling: 2005, Peaking of World Oil Production: Impacts, Mitigation, and Risk Management. DOE NETL

  • Hoffman, A.J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351–371. doi:10.2307/257008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hourcade, J. C., D. Demailly, K. Neuhoff and M. Sato: 2007, ‹Differentiation and Dynamics of EU ETS Industrial Competitiveness Impacts’, Climate Strategies Report

  • Husted, B.W. (2005). Risk management, real options, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(2), 175–183. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-3777-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B.W., & Allen, D.B. (2007). Corporate social strategy in multinational enterprises: Antecedents and value creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 345–361. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9511-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC.2007, Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M.: 1991, ‹Ethical Decision-Making by Individuals in Organizations – an Issue-Contingent Model’, Academy of Management Review 16(2), 366–395. doi:10.2307/258867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1995). Avoiding Ecological Surprise - Lessons from Long-Standing Communities. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 961–985. doi:10.2307/258962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knouse, S.B., & Giacalone, R.A. (1992). Ethical Decision-Making in Business - Behavioral Issues and Concerns. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(5-6), 369–377. doi:10.1007/BF00870549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuik, O. (2003). Climate Change Policies, Energy Security and Carbon Dependency. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 3, 221–242. doi:10.1023/B:INEA.0000005625.44125.54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurikka, H. and T. Koljonen: 2006, ‹Emissions Trading and Investment Decisions in the Power Sector—A Case Study in Finland’, Energy Policy 34(9), 1063-1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, A.T., Weber, J., & Post, J.E. 2005. Business and Society: Stakeholder Relations, Ethics, Public Policy (11th ed.) (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Menestrel, M., van den Hove, S., & de Bettignies, H.C. (2002). Processes and consequences in business ethical dilemmas: The oil industry and climate change. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(3), 251–266. doi:10.1023/A:1021237629938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepoutre, J., Dentchev, N.A., & Heene, A. (2007). Dealing with uncertainties when governing CSR policies. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(4), 391–408. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9214-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, T. T., C. C. Ko and H. N. Yeh: 2007, ‹Applying Real Options in Investment Decisions Relating to Environmental Pollution’, Energy Policy 35(4), 2426-2432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, S.F., & Sheu, H.J. (2007). Is corporate sustainability a value-increasing strategy for business? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 345–358. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00565.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luehrman, T.A. (1998). Investment opportunities as real options: Getting started on the numbers. Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 51–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDevitt, R., Giapponi, C., & Tromley, C. (2007). A model of ethical decision making: The integration of process and content. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(2), 219–229. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9202-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W.W. 1972, The Limits to Growth (Universe Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Shamsie, J. (1999). Strategic responses to three kinds of uncertainty: Product line simplicity at the Hollywood film studios. Journal of Management, 25(1), 97–116. doi:10.1177/014920639902500105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, F.J. (1987). 3 Types of Perceived Uncertainty About the Environment - State, Effect, and Response Uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 133–143. doi:10.2307/257999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, N. (1994). Ethics in Organizations - A Framework for Theory and Research. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(8), 581–596. doi:10.1007/BF00871806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilles, D.: 2006, ‹Process Heat and Steam Alternatives Rising’, Ethanol Producer Magazine, http://www.ethanolproducer.com. Accessed 30 March 2007

  • Nordhaus, W. D.: 2006, ‹The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change’, NBER Working Paper No. W12741, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge

  • Oliver, C. (1992). The Antecedents of Deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13(4), 563–588. doi:10.1177/017084069201300403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1997). Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 697–713. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199710)18:9<697::AID-SMJ909>3.0.CO;2-C.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Point Carbon. (2008). Data. Trading Carbon, 02(03), 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polletta, F., & Jasper, J.M. (2001). Collective identity and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 283–305. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and Competitive - Ending the Stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. 1984, Order out of Chaos: Man’s new dialogue with Nature (Bantam Books, Toronto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, J.: 2007, ‹Problems of Pitching Cleaner Cars to the Unconverted’, Financial Times (North American Edition) Jan, 30 (London)

  • Rugman, A.M., & Verbeke, A. (1998). Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: an organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 363–375. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199804)19:4<363::AID-SMJ974>3.0.CO;2-H.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadorsky, P. (1999). Oil price shocks and stock market activity. Energy Economics, 21(5), 449–469. doi:10.1016/S0140-9883(99)00020-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saling, P.: 2002, ‹Life Cycle Management, Eco-efficiency Analysis by BASF: The Method’, http://corporate.basf.com. Accessed 30 March 2007

  • Schwartz, P. (2007). Investing in global security. Harvard Business Review, 85(10), 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. 2001, Institutions and Organizations (2nd ed.) (Sage Publications, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, F.C., & Fox, P.G. 1937, Business Ethics. Studies in fair Competition (D. Appleton-Century Company, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shell: 2006, ‹Shell Hydrogen’, http://www.shell.com. Accessed 25 Oct 2006

  • Shrivastava, P. (1995). Environmental Technologies and Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 183–200. doi:10.1002/smj.4250160923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sijm, J. P. M., S. J. A. Bakker, Y. Chen, H. W. Harmsen and W. Lise: 2005, CO2 price dynamics: The implications of EU emissions trading for the price of electricity (Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands,, Petten).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smircich, L., & Stubbart, C. (1985). Strategic Management in an Enacted World. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 724–736. doi:10.2307/258041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanwick, P.A., & Stanwick, S.D. 2009, Understanding Business Ethics. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starik, M. (1995). Should Trees Have Managerial Standing - toward Stakeholder Status for Nonhuman Nature. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(3), 207–217. doi:10.1007/BF00881435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. 2006, The Economics of Climate Change – The Stern Review (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.D. 1967, Organizations in action (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tol, R.S.J. (2003). Is the uncertainty about climate change too large for expected cost-benefit analysis? Climatic Change, 56(3), 265–289. doi:10.1023/A:1021753906949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L.K. (1986). Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations - a Person-Situation Interactionist Model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617. doi:10.2307/258313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L.K., & Youngblood, S.A. (1990). Bad Apples in Bad Barrels - a Causal-Analysis of Ethical Decision-Making Behavior. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(4), 378–385. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.4.378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis, L. (1988). A Conceptual Options Framework for Capital Budgeting. Advances in Futures and Options Research, 3, 145–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis, L. 1995, Real options in capital investment: Models, strategies, and applications (Praeger, Westport & London).

    Google Scholar 

  • van Marrewijk, M., & Werre, M. (2003). Multiple levels of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2), 107–119. doi:10.1023/A:1023383229086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, M.J. 1999, Leadership and the New Science: Discovering Order in a Chaotic World (Vol. 2) (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Winn, M., and M. Kirchgeorg: 2005, ‹The Siesta is over: A Rude Awakening from Sustainability Myopia’, in S.␣Sharma and M. Starik (eds.), Research in Corporate Sustainability, Volume 3, Strategic Capabilities and Competitiveness (Elgar, Northampton), pp. 232-258

  • Yang, M., W. Blyth, R. Bradley, D. Bunn, C. Clarke and T. Wilson: 2008, ‹Evaluating the power investment options with uncertainty in climate policy’, Energy Economics 30(4), 1933-1950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadek, S. (2004). The path to corporate responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 82(12), 125–132.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Timo Busch & Volker H. Hoffmann

Authors
  1. Timo Busch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Volker H. Hoffmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timo Busch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Busch, T., Hoffmann, V.H. Ecology-Driven Real Options: An Investment Framework for Incorporating Uncertainties in the Context of the Natural Environment. J Bus Ethics 90, 295–310 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0043-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0043-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation