Skip to main content
Log in

Does Consumer Unethical Behavior Relate to Birthplace? Evidence from China

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between individual birthplace [rural birthplace (RB) and urban birthplace (UB)] and consumer unethical behavior (CUB). As a result, CUB is verified to closely relate to individual birthplace, and those new urban residents with RB are found to behave more ethically than the patrimonial urban residents with UB in CUB4 (“no harm/no foul”). This study also finds that the differentiation of CUB between two categories of consumers is correlated with the personal moral ideology or Machiavellianism (MA) functioning with varying degree, which idealism ideology is a main variable impacting on the unethical behaviors of the members born in the rural subculture while MA for those in the urban one. Additionally, the “no harm/no foul” (CUB4) and the “actively benefiting from a questionable action” (CUB3) in the list of CUBs are found to be more efficient in discriminating the two groups than the other two kinds, the “passively benefiting at the expense of others” (CUB2) and the “actively benefiting from an illegal activity” (CUB1). The results shed light on the roles of individual birthplace in influencing CUB and contribute to a better understanding on the effects of subculture on CUB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abbreviations

CEB:

Consumer ethical belief (the plural form is CEBs)

CES:

Consumer ethics scale

RB:

Rural birthplace

UB:

Urban birthplace

CUB:

Consumer unethical behavior, CUBs (the plural form) include four dimensions as following:

CUB4 :

No harm/no foul

CUB3 :

Actively benefiting from a questionable action

CUB2 :

Passively benefiting at the expense of others

CUB1 :

Actively benefiting from an illegal activity

RE:

Relativism ideology

ID:

Idealism ideology

MA:

Machiavellianism

References

  • Albers-Miller, N. D. (1999). Consumers misbehavior: Why people buy illicit goods. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16(3), 273–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Khatib, J. A., Robertson, C. J., & Lascu, D. N. (2004). Post-communist consumer ethics: The case of Romania. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Khatib, J. A., Vitell, S. J., & Rawwas, M. Y. A. (1997). Consumer ethics: A cross-cultural investigation. European Journal of Marketing, 31(11/12), 750–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Khatib, J. A., Vitell, S. J., Rexeisen, R., & Rawwas, M. (2005). Inter-country differences of consumer ethics in Arab countries. International Business Review, 14, 495–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babin, B. J., & Babin, L. A. (1996). Effect of moral cognitions and consumer emotions on shoplifting intentions. Psychology and Marketing, 13(8), 785–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeke, J. H. (1953). Economics and economic policy of dual societies, as exemplified by Indonesia. International Secretariat, IPR: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, D. J., Fawcett, J. K., & Lanasa, J. (1994). Business students ethical perceptions of retail situations: A microcultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(9), 667–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, F., & Wang, D. W. (2003). The movement of Chinese population in market mechanism: Statistics on the fifth national census. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 5, 11–19. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, A., Wong, S., & Leung, P. (1998). Ethical beliefs of Chinese consumers in Hong Kong. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(11), 1163–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. S., & Jia, H. M. (2004). Cultural Difference between the urban areas and the rural areas and significance of urban-rural integration. Market Forum, 2, 25–27. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiristie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D., Cox, A. D., & Moschis, G. P. (1990). When consumer behavior goes bad: An investigation of adolescent shoplifting. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erffmeyer, R. C., Keillor, B. D., & LeClair, D. T. (1999). An empirical investigation of Japanese consumer ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 18, 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fei, X. T. (1998). Reproductive institution in Peasant China. Beijing: Beijing University Press. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(1), 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. (1992). Judging the morality of business practices: The influence of personal moral philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(5/6), 461–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukukawa, K. (2002). Developing a framework for ethically questionable behavior in consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 41, 99–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukukawa, K. (2003). A theoretical review of business and consumer ethics research: Normative and descriptive approaches. The Marketing Review, 3, 381–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanno, D. M., & Violette, G. R. (1996). An analysis of moral and social influences on taxpayer behavior. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8, 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessing, D. J., Elffers, J., & Weigel, R. H. (1988). Exploring the limits of self reports and reasoned action: An investigation of the psychology of tax evasion behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(3), 405–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, E. (1991). Secular mortality and the dark side of consumer behavior. Advances in Consumer Research, 18, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1979). Value systems in 40 countries: Interpretation, validation, and consequences for theory. In L. H. Eckensberger, W. J. Lonner, & Y. H. Poortinga (Eds.), Cross-cultural contributions to psychology (pp. 398–407). Swets and Zeitlinger: Lisse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1983). The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14, 80–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D. D., & Sanders, G. (1990). Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across 20 cases. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 286–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (1993). The general theory of marketing ethics: A retrospective and recision. In N. C. Smith & J. A. Quelch (Eds.), Ethics in marketing (pp. 775–784). Homewood, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (2006). The general theory of marketing ethics: A revision and three questions. Journal of Macromarketing, 26, 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itagaki, Y. (2007). A review of the concept of the “dual economy”. The Developing Economies, 6(2), 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenhove, V. P., Vermeir, I., & Verniers, S. (2001). An empirical investigation of the relationships between ethical beliefs ethical ideology, political preference and need for closure. Journal of Business Ethics, 32, 347–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenhove, P. V., Wulf, K. D., & Steeenhaut, S. (2003). The relationship between consumers’ unethical behavior and customer loyalty in a retail environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior. Rinehart and Winston, NY: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasnovsky, T., & Lane, R. C. (1998). Shoplifting: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 3(3), 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, W. A. (1991). Theory of dual economy. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Economics Press. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Litton, R. (1998). Fraud and the insurance industry: Why don’t they do something about it, then? International Journal of Risk, Security and Crime Prevention, 36(3), 193–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z. Q., Zeng, F., & Su, C. (2009). Does relationship quality matter in consumer ethical decision making? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 483–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y. L. (2010). Peasant China: Study of post-earthbound society and new rural construction. Beijing: China Renmin University Press. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, T. (2007). Moral anomie of female college students. Journal of Youth Studies, 6, 7–10. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., & Hovecar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97(3), 562–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, W. J. (1994). Developing international direct marketing strategies with a consumer decision-making content analysis. Journal of Direct Marketing, 8(4), 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muncy, J. A., & Vitell, S. J. (1992). Consumer ethics: An investigation of the ethical beliefs of the final consumer. Journal of Business Research, 24, 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. H. (2007). The country and the city: Modernity and rural–urban distinctions in contemporary China. China Agricultural University Journal of Social Sciences Edition, 24(2), 43–67. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Polonsky, M. J., Brito, P. Q., Pinto, J., & Higgs-Kleyn, N. (2001). Consumer ethics in the European Union: A comparison of northern and southern views. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 117–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rallapalli, K. C., Vitell, S. J., Wiebe, F. A., & Barnes, J. H. (1994). Consumer ethical beliefs and personality traits: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(7), 487–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawwas, M. Y. A. (1996). Consumer ethics: An empirical investigation of the ethical beliefs of Austrian consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 1009–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawwas, M. Y. A. (2001). Culture, personality and morality: A typology of international consumers’ ethical beliefs. International Marketing Review, 18, 188–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawwas, M. Y. A., Patzer, G. L., & Klassen, M. L. (1995). Consumer ethics in cross-cultural settings: Entrepreneurial implications. European Journal of Marketing, 29(7), 62–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawwas, M. Y. A., Patzer, G. L., & Vitell, S. J. (1998). A cross-cultural investigation of the ethical values of consumers: The potential effect of war and civil disruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(4), 435–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawwas, M. Y. A., Swaidan, Z., & Oyman, M. (2005). Consumer ethics: A cross-cultural study of the ethical beliefs of Turkish and American consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 57, 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawwas, M. Y. A., Vitell, S. J., & Al-Khatib, J. A. (1994). Consumer ethics: The possible effects of terrorism and civil unrest on the ethical values of consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarwono, S. S., & Armstrong, W. (2001). Microcultural differences and perceived ethical problems: An international business perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(1), 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B. R., & Forsyth, D. R. (1977). On the ethics of psychological research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(4), 369–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenhaut, S. (2006). Towards a better understanding of unethical consumer behavior: The influence of individual characteristics, situational circumstances and emotional experiences in consumers’ ethical decision-making processes. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Ghent.

  • Steenhaut, S., & Kenhove, P. V. (2006). An empirical investigation of the relationships among a consumer’s personal values. Ethical ideology and ethical beliefs. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaidan, Z., Rawwas, M. Y. A., & Al-Khatib, J. A. (2004). Consumer ethics: Moral ideologies and ethical beliefs of a micro-culture in the US. International Business Review, 13, 749–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaidan, Z., Vitell, S. J., & Rawwas, M. Y. A. (2003). Consumer ethics: Determinants of ethical beliefs of African Americans. Journal of Business Ethics, 46, 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaidan, Z., Vitell, S. J., Rose, G. M., & Gilbert, F. W. (2006). Consumer ethics: The role of acculturation in US immigrant populations. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2009). Faking it: Personality and individual difference predictors of willingness to buy counterfeit goods. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38, 820–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tat, P. K. (1981). Minority student perceptions of the ethics of marketing practices, In Southern marketing association proceedings (pp. 214–216).

  • Tennyson, S. (1997). Economic institutions and individual ethics: A study of consumer attitudes toward insurance fraud. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 32, 247–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, K., & Keep, B. (2002). Customer fraud and business responses: Let the marketer beware. Westport, CT: Quorum Books, Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, Z. L., & Zhao, B. C. (2007). Consumer ethics: An empirical investigation of the ethical beliefs in Mainland China. In 2007 14th International conference on management science and engineering, Harbin, China (pp. 1472–1480).

  • Todaro, M. P. (1992). Economy development and the third world. Beijing: China Economic Publishing House. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J. (2003). Consumer ethics research: Review synthesis and suggestions for the future. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., Lumpkin, J. R., & Rawwas, M. Y. A. (1991). Consumer ethics: An investigation of the ethical beliefs of the ethical beliefs of elderly consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(5), 365–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., & Muncy, J. A. (1992). Consumer ethics: An empirical investigation of factors influencing ethical judgments of the final consume. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(8), 585–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., Paolillo, J. G. P., & Singh, J. J. (2006). The role of money and religiosity in determining consumers’ ethical beliefs. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., Singhapakdi, A., & Thomas, J. (2001). Consumer ethics: An application and empirical testing of the Hunt–Vitell theory of ethics. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(2), 153–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X. L. (2007). Cultural clash and socialization of university students from rural areas. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Social Science Edition), 7(6), 117–120. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, N. (2001). Investigation and analysis of moral and psychological quality for rural young people under process of Zhusanjiao countryside merging into an organic whole to towns and cities. Rural Economy, 4, 12–13. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, B. (2002). The investigation on the difference of family education between countryside and urban areas in underdeveloped ones. Journal of Yanbei Normal University, 18(3), 11–15. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z. (2007). Living in the blade: An explanation for rural migrant workers’ deviant behaviors. Unpublished master dissertation, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China (in Chinese).

  • Yang, X., & Tian, Y. (2007). Influence of rural traditional culture to the development of sports among peasants. Journal of Shandong Institute of Physical Education and Sports, 23(3), 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, F., & Gan, B. (2007). The effects of consumer ethical beliefs and relationship quality on consumers’ unethical behavior. Economic Management, 29(18), 33–39. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, R. (2005). How to bridge the cultural gap between the rural areas and the urban areas. Theoretical Booklet, 12, 57–58. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., & Zheng, X. (2002). A comparative research on adolescent’s modernity in personality between town and countryside. Journal of Psychological Development and Education, 3, 6–11. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, B. C. (2008). A research on consumer ethics in Mainland China with sociality views. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (in Chinese).

  • Zhao, B. C. (2009). Relationship between consumer ethics and social rewards–punishments in Mainland China. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 3, 52–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, B. C. (2011). The relationship between consumers’ ethical beliefs and their birthplace: An empirical investigation in the rural–urban dual society of China. Management World, 1, 92–100. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, S. Y. (2007). Urban–rural differentiation: Measure, cause and countermeasure. Journal of Guangxi University (Philosophy and Social Science), 29(1), 33–37. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The project was supported by the Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research of Central Colleges, South-Central University for Nationalities, under Grant CSY11008.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to BaoChun Zhao.

Appendix

Appendix

List of Scale Items

CUB scale (based on: Vitell and Muncy 1992 ; Rawwas 1996 ; Kenhove et al. 2003 ; Liu et al. 2009 )

In store A, I would or I have engaged in behavior which involved …

Actively benefiting from an illegal activity

  1. 1.

    Changing price tags on merchandise in store A.

  2. 2.

    Put merchandise into your own pocket without paying for it in store A.

  3. 3.

    Giving misleading price information to a clerk for an item without price tag in store A.

  4. 4.

    Returning damaged merchandise to store A when the damage is your own fault.

Passively benefiting at the expense of others

  1. 5.

    Getting too much change and not saying anything in store A.

  2. 6.

    Not saying anything when the server miscalculates the bill in your favor in store A.

  3. 7.

    Seeing someone stealing something and not reporting it to the store personnel.

Actively benefiting from deceptive or questionable practices

  1. 8.

    Using an expired coupon for merchandise.

  2. 9.

    Damaging merchandise by accident in store A but doing nothing about it.

  3. 10.

    Returning merchandise to store A by claiming that it was a gift when it was not.

No harm/no foul

  1. 11.

    Trying on different clothes and consciously not returning them to where they belong but leaving them in the fitting cubicle.

  2. 12.

    Returning merchandise to store A after trying it.

  3. 13.

    Spending over an hour trying on different dresses but not purchasing any in store A.

Ethics Position Questionnaire (EPQ) (Forsyth 1980 )

Relativism

  1. 1.

    There are no ethical principles that are so important that they should be a part of any code of conduct.

  2. 2.

    What is ethical varies from one situation and society to another.

  3. 3.

    Moral standards should be seen as being individualistic; what one person considers to be moral may be judged to be immoral by another person.

  4. 4.

    Different types of morality cannot be compared as to “rightness”.

  5. 5.

    What is right for everyone can never be resolved since what is moral or immoral is up to the individual.

  6. 6.

    Moral standards are simply personal rules which indicate how a person should behave, and are not to be applied in making judgments of others.

  7. 7.

    Ethical considerations in interpersonal relations are so complex that individuals should be allowed to formulate their own individual codes.

  8. 8.

    Rigidly codifying an ethical position that prevents certain types of action stand in the way of better human relations and adjustment.

  9. 9.

    No rule concerning lying can be formulated whether a lie is permissible or not permissible totally depends on the situation.

  10. 10.

    Whether a lie is judged to be moral or immoral depends on the circumstances surrounding the action.

Idealism

  1. 1.

    A person should make certain that their actions never intentionally harm another even to a small degree.

  2. 2.

    Risks to another should never be tolerated, irrespective of how small the risks might be.

  3. 3.

    The existence of potential harm to others is always wrong, irrespective of the benefits to be gained.

  4. 4.

    One should never psychologically or physically harm another.

  5. 5.

    One should not perform an action which might in any way threaten the dignity and welfare of another individual.

  6. 6.

    If an action could harm an innocent other, then it should not be done.

  7. 7.

    Deciding whether or not to perform an act by balancing the positive consequences of the act against the negative consequences of the act is immoral.

  8. 8.

    The dignity and welfare of people should be the most important concern in any society.

  9. 9.

    It is never necessary to sacrifice the welfare of others.

  10. 10.

    Moral actions are those which closely match ideals of the most “perfect” action.

MACH IV scale (Chiristie and Geis 1970 )

  1. 1.

    Never tell anyone the real reason you did something unless it is useful to do so.

  2. 2.

    The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear.

  3. 3.

    One should take action only when sure it is morally right.

  4. 4.

    Most people are basically good and kind.

  5. 5.

    It is safest to assume that all people have a vicious streak and it will come out when given the chance.

  6. 6.

    Honesty is the best policy in all cases.

  7. 7.

    There is no excuse for lying to someone else.

  8. 8.

    Generally speaking, people will not work hard unless they are forced to do so.

  9. 9.

    All in all, it is better to be humble and honest than to be important and dishonest.

  10. 10.

    When you ask someone to do something for you, it is best to give the real reasons for wanting it rather than giving reasons which carry more weight.

  11. 11.

    People who get ahead in the world lead clean, moral lives.

  12. 12.

    Anyone who completely trusts others is asking for big trouble.

  13. 13.

    The biggest difference between criminals and others is that the criminals are stupid enough I to get caught.

  14. 14.

    Most people are brave.

  15. 15.

    It is wise to flatter important people.

  16. 16.

    It is possible to be good in all respects.

  17. 17.

    Barnum was wrong when he said that there is a sucker born every minute.

  18. 18.

    It is hard to get ahead without cutting corners.

  19. 19.

    People suffering from incurable diseases should have the choice of being put to death painlessly.

  20. 20.

    Most people forget more easily the death of their father than the loss of their property.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, B., Xu, S. Does Consumer Unethical Behavior Relate to Birthplace? Evidence from China. J Bus Ethics 113, 475–488 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1317-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1317-3

Keywords

Navigation