Abstract
Academic interest in corporate social responsibility (CSR) can be traced back to the 1930s. Since then an impressive body of empirical data and theory-building has been amassed, mainly located in the fields of management studies and business ethics. One of the most noteworthy recent conceptual contributions to the scholarship is Midttun’s (Corporate Governance 5(3):159–174, 2005) CSR-oriented embedded relational model of societal governance. It re-conceptualises the relationships between the state, business, and civil society. Other scholars (In Albareda et al. Corporate Governance 6(4):386–400, 2006; Business Ethics: A European Review 17(4):347–363, 2008; Lozano et al., Governments and Corporate Social Responsibility, 2008) have recently successfully used the model as the basis for their analytical framework for researching CSR activities in a large number of western European countries. While this research offers valuable insights into how CSR is operationalised, it also suffers from a number of significant limitations. To develop a stronger analytical framework with which to explore CSR, this article draws more deeply on political science literature concerned with governance and public policy analysis. This represents the main purpose of this article. In addition, this article also addresses a second and more modest aim: to reflect on the ways in which relational governance-inspired frameworks could be adapted and applied to politico-economic systems where state-industry-third sector relations differ from those found in North America and Western Europe. Both lines of argument are illustrated using vignettes from a case study of the Evenkia Hydro-Electric Station building project in the Russian Federation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
On average the interviews lasted an hour each. All interviews, with exception of those with SNC-Lavalin representatives, were audio-recorded.
The name “Plotina.net” is half-pun, with “plotina” meaning “dam” and “net” meaning “no” in Russian.
References
Acutt, J. N., Medina-Ross, V., & O’Riordan, T. (2004). Perspectives on corporate social responsibility in the chemical sector: A comparative analysis of the Mexican and South African cases. Natural Resources Forum, 28, 302–316.
Adger, W. M., Brown, K., Fairbrass, J., Jordan, A., Paavola, J., Rosendo, S., et al. (2003). Governance for sustainability: Towards a ‘thick’ analysis of environmental decision-making. Environment and Planning A, 35, 1095–1110.
Albareda, L., Tencati, A., Lozano, J. M., & Perini, F. (2006). The government’s role in promoting corporate responsibility: A comparative analysis of Italy and UK from the relational state perspective. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 386–400.
Albareda, L., Lozano, J. M., Tencati, A., Midttun, A., & Perini, F. (2008). The changing role of governments in corporate social responsibility: Drivers and responses. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(4), 347–363.
Alford, R., & Friedland, R. (1985). Power of theory: Capitalism, the state and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Antal, A. B., & Sobczak, A. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in France. A mix of national traditions and International Influences. Business and Society, 46(1), 9–32.
Coen, D. (2007). Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(3), 333–345.
Coen, D., & Richardson, J. J. (2009). Lobbying the European Union. Institutions, actors, and issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Collingwood, V. (2006). Non-governmental organisations, power and legitimacy in international society. Review of International Studies, 32, 439–454.
European Commission. (2002, July 2). Communication from the commission concerning corporate social responsibility: A business contribution to sustainable development. COM(2002) 347 final. Brussels: European Commission.
Fairbrass, J. (2003). The Europeanization of business interest representation: UK and French firms compared. Comparative European Politics, 1(3), 313–334.
Fairbrass, J. (2006). Organized interests. In I. Bache & A. Jordan (Eds.), The Europeanization of british politics (pp. 135–151). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fairbrass, J. (2011). Exploring corporate social responsibility policy in the European Union: A discursive institutionalist analysis. Journal of Common Market Studies (on-line publication under ‘earlyview’ on the JCMS website January 2011; Final publication Issue 5, September 2011).
Fairbrass, J., & Jordan, A. (2004). Environmental policy: A case of multi-level governance in the European Union? In M. Flinders & I. Bache (Eds.), Themes and issues in multi-level governance (pp. 147–164). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gray, P. A. (2005). The predicament of Chukotka’s indigenous movement: Post-Soviet activism in the Russian far north. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Habisch, A., Jonker, J., Wegner, M., & Schmidpeter, R. (Eds.). (2005). Corporate social responsibility across Europe. Springer: Berlin.
Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism. The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hirst, P. (2000). Democracy and governance. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance. Authority, steering and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kohler-Koch, B., & Rittberger, B. (2006). Review article: the “governance turn” in EU studies. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44, 27–49.
Krasnoyarsk Scientist. (2008, August). Interview with authors. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk Scientist.
Kuznetsov, A., Kuznetsova, O., & Warren, R. (2009). CSR and the legitimacy of business in transition economies: The case of Russia. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(1), 37–45.
Lewicka-Strzalecka, A. (2006). Opportunities and limitations of CSR in the postcommunist countries: Polish case. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 440–448.
Lozano, J. M., Albareda, L., Ysa, T., Roscher, H., & Marcuccio, M. (2008). Governments and corporate social responsibility. Palgrave: Basingstoke.
Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. Macmillan: London.
Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view. Palgrave: Basingstoke.
Mazey, S., & Richardson, J. J. (Eds.). (1993). Lobbying in the European Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mendoza, X. (1991). Algunas reflexiones acera de la ‘transicion al mercado’ de los servicos sociales. Paper presented at Jornades Public-Privat i Benestar Social, Barcelona.
Mendoza, X. (1996). Las transformaciones del; sector public en las sociedades avanzandas. Del estado del bienestar al estado relacional. Papers de Formacio, 23. Diputacio de Barcelona.
Midtuun, A. (2004). Realigning business, government and civil society: the C(S)R model compared to the (neo)liberal and welfare state models. Paper presented at the 3rd Colloquium of the European Academy of Business, Ghent.
Midttun, A. (2005). Policy making and the role of government: Realigning business, government and civil society. Corporate Governance, 5(3), 159–174.
Moon, J. (2004). Government as driver of corporate social responsibility. International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility Research Paper Series, University of Nottingham, No.20-2004.
Moon, J. (2005). United Kingdom. An Explicit model of business society relations. In A. Habisch, J. Jonker, M. Wegner, & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility across Europe. Springer: Berlin.
Özcan, G. B. (2006). A critical analysis of decentralisation and economic development: The Turkish case. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24(1), 117–138.
Peters, G., & Pierre, J. (2001). Developments in intergovernmental relations: Towards multi-level governance. Policy & Politics, 29(2), 131–135.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
Pierre, J. (Ed.). (2000). Debating governance. Authority, steering and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pierre, J., & Peters, G. (2000). Governance, politics and the state. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Rasell, M. (2009). Neoliberalism and the North: The transformation of social policy in Russia’s northern periphery. Polar Geography, 32(3–4), 91–109.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (2000). Governance and public administration. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance. Authority, steering and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ruzza, C. (2010). Identifying uncivil society in Europe: Towards a new politics of the enemy? In L. Ulrike & H.-J. Trenz (Eds.), The new politics of European civil society. London: Routledge.
Schmidt, V. A. (2002). The futures of capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Turner, R. K., & Fairbrass, J. (2001). Sustainable development policy in the United Kingdom. Milieu, 16(3), 107–123.
Visser, W., Matten, D., Pohl, M., & Tolhurst, N. (Eds.). (2007). The A to Z of corporate social responsibility. Chichester: Wiley.
Warleigh, A., & Fairbrass, J. (Eds.). (2002). Influence and interests in the European Union: The New politics of persuasion and advocacy. London: Europa Press.
World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2002). The business case for sustainable development: Making a Difference towards the Johannesburg summit 2002 and beyond. Geneva: World Business Council for Sustainable Development.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. The Brundtland Report. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fairbrass, J., Zueva-Owens, A. Conceptualising Corporate Social Responsibility: ‘Relational Governance’ Assessed, Augmented, and Adapted. J Bus Ethics 105, 321–335 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0968-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0968-9