Abstract
The resolution of ethical dilemmas often requires individuals to search for reasonable justifications to support their choices. Occasionally, such justifications must be made explicit to stakeholders inside or outside the organization. Other times, the justification for a decision will be known only by the decision-maker. In either case, the organizational code of conduct that governs the individual can play a vital role in providing guidelines about appropriate and inappropriate justifications. The present paper discusses the connections between organizational codes and employee justifications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L. R. Beach (1990) Image Theory: Decision Making in Personal and Organizational Contexts Wiley Chichester, UK
L. R. Beach (Eds) (1996) Decision Making in the Workplace: A Unified Perspective Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah NJ
L. R. Beach E. Strom (1989) ArticleTitle‘A Toadstool among the Mushrooms: Screening Decisions and Image Theory’s Compatibility Test Acta Psychologica 72 1–12 Occurrence HandleA1989AT80700001 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0001-6918(89)90047-4
R. E. Berenbeim (1999) Global Corporate Ethics Practices: A Developing Consensus The Conference Board New York
J. R. Boatright (2000) Ethics and the Conduct of Business Prentice-Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ
T. Connolly (1996) ‘Image Theory and Workplace Decisions: Challenges’ L. R. Beach (Eds) Decision Making in the Workplace: A Unified Perspective Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah, NJ
T. Donaldson L. E. Preston (1995) ArticleTitle‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications’ Academy of Management Review 20 65–91 Occurrence HandleA1995QF07900008
G. W. England (1967) ArticleTitle‘Personal Value Systems of American Managers’ Academy of Management Journal 10 53–68 Occurrence HandleA1967ZJ79400005
A. Etzioni (1988) The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics The Free Press New York
L. Festinger (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance Stanford University Press Stanford, CA
R. Folger R. Cropanzano (1998) Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management Sage Thousand Oaks, CA
R. Folger R. Cropanzano (2001) ‘Fairness Theory: Justice as Accountability’ J. Greenberg R. Cropanzano (Eds) Advances in Organizational Justice Stanford University Press Stanford, CA 1–55
R. E. Freeman (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach Pitman Boston
Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase it profits’, New York Times Magazine, 13 September 1970. Reprinted in T. Donaldson and P. Werhane (eds.), Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach, 2nd Edition. (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
Hartman, L. P. and G. Bucci: 1999, Some Implications of New Technology on Privacy in the Workplace’, Business and Society Review,Spring, 1.
O. Huber G. Seiser (2001) ArticleTitle‘Accounting and Convincing: The Effect of Two Types of Justification on the Decision Process’ Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 14 69–85 Occurrence Handle000166701700005 Occurrence Handle10.1002/1099-0771(200101)14:1<69::AID-BDM366>3.0.CO;2-T
I. L. Janis L. Mann (1977) Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice and Commitment Free Press New York
R Jackall (1988) Moral Mazes Oxford University Press New York
R. L. Keeney (1992) Value-focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
S. Kerr (1975) ArticleTitle‘On the Folly of Rewarding A While Hoping for B’ Academy of Management Journal 18 769–783 Occurrence HandleA1975AZ09400009
J. C. Lere B. R. Gaumnitz (2003) ArticleTitle‘The Impact of Codes of Ethics on Decision Making: Some Insights from Information Economics’ Journal of Business Ethics 48 365–379 Occurrence Handle000186843400005 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:BUSI.0000005747.37500.c8
J. S. Lerner P. E. Tetlock (1999) ArticleTitle‘Accounting for the Effects of Accountability’ Psychological Bulletin 125 255–275 Occurrence Handle000078980900006 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255
T. W. Loe L. Ferrell P. Mansfield (2000) ArticleTitle‘A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision Making in Business Journal of Business Ethics 25 185–204 Occurrence Handle000086116700001 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006083612239
J. McMackin P. Slovic (2000) ArticleTitle‘When does Explicit Justification Impair Decision Making?’ Applied Cognitive Psychology 14 527–541 Occurrence Handle000165546600003 Occurrence Handle10.1002/1099-0720(200011/12)14:6<527::AID-ACP671>3.0.CO;2-J
D. M. Messick A. E. Tenbrunsel (Eds) (1996) Codes of Conduct: Behavioral Research into Business Ethics Russell Sage Foundation New York
Montgomery, H.:1983, ‘Decision Rules and the Search for a Dominance Structure: Towards a Process Model of Decision Making, in P. Humphreys, O. Svenson, and A. Vari (eds.), Analyzing and Aiding Decision Processes (Amsterdam, North-Holland), pp. 343–369.
R E. Potter L. R. Beach (1994) ArticleTitle‘Imperfect Information in Pre-choice Screening of Options’ Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 59 313–329 Occurrence HandleA1994PC05600009 Occurrence Handle10.1006/obhd.1994.1062
C. A. Raiborn D. Payne (1990) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Codes of Conduct: A Collective Conscience and Continuum’ Journal of Business Ethics 9 879–889 Occurrence HandleA1990EF44100004 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00382911
B. R. Schlenker (1980) Impression Management: The Self-concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations Brooks/Cole Publishing Company Monterey CA
M. B. Scott S. M. Lyman (1968) ArticleTitle‘Accounts’ American Sociological Review 33 46–62 Occurrence HandleA1968ZA11300004
J. C. Shaw E. Wild J. A. Colquitt (2003) ArticleTitle‘To Justify or Excuse? A Meta-analytic Review of the Effects of Explanations Journal of Applied Psychology 88 444–458 Occurrence Handle000183031200007
B. H. Sheppard R. J. Lewicki J. W. Minton (1992) Organizational Justice: The Search for Fairness in the Workplace Lexington Books New York.
I. Simonson S. M. Nowlis (2000) ArticleTitle‘The Role of Explanations and Need for Uniqueness in Consumer Decision Making: Unconventional Choices Based on Reasons’ Journal of Consumer Research 27 49–64 Occurrence Handle000088151600005 Occurrence Handle10.1086/314308
L. K. Trevino (1986) ArticleTitle‘Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-situation Interactionist Model’ Academy of Management Review 11 IssueID3 601–617 Occurrence HandleA1986D008300008
L. R. Tucker V. Stathakopolous C. H. Patti (1999) ArticleTitle‘A Multidimensional Assessment of Ethical Codes: The Professional Business Association Perspective’ Journal of Business Ethics 19 287–300 Occurrence Handle000079724300005 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005805103665
A. Tversky E. Shafir (1992) ArticleTitle‘Choice Under Conflict: The Dynamics of Deferred Decision’ Psychological Science 3 358–361 Occurrence HandleA1992JW80100009
E. H. Zee Particlevan T. F. Paluchowski L. R. Beach (1992) ArticleTitle‘The Effects of Screening and Task Partitioning Upon Evaluations of Decision Options’ Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 5 1–23
C. Wiley (2000) ArticleTitle‘Ethical Standards for Human Resource Management Professionals: A Comparative Analysis of Five Major Codes’ Journal of Business Ethics 25 93–114 Occurrence Handle000085803200001 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006230214847
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Richard Coughlan is Associate Dean for Graduate and Executive Programs in the Robins School of Business at the University of Richmond, where he teaches courses on business ethics and negotiations. He earned both an MBA and a Ph.D. at the University of Arizona. His research on ethics and decision-making has been published in leading academic journals including Journal of Behavioral Decision Makingand Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coughlan, R. Codes, Values and Justifications in the Ethical Decision-Making Process. J Bus Ethics 59, 45–53 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3409-9
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3409-9