Skip to main content
Log in

Ductal carcinoma in situ and cause-specific mortality among younger and older postmenopausal women: the Women’s Health Initiative

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Whether DCIS is associated with higher breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality is unclear with few studies in older women. Therefore, we examined DCIS and breast cancer-specific, cardiovascular (CVD)-specific, and all-cause mortality among Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) Clinical Trial participants overall and by age (< 70 versus ≥ 70 years).

Methods

Of 68,132 WHI participants, included were 781 postmenopausal women with incident DCIS and 781 matched controls. Serial screening mammography was mandated with high adherence. DCIS cases were confirmed by central medical record review. Adjusted multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Kaplan Meier (KM) plots were used to assess 10-year and 20-year mortality rates.

Results

After 20.3 years total, and 13.2 years median post-diagnosis follow-up, compared to controls, DCIS was associated with higher breast cancer-specific mortality (HR 3.29; CI = 1.32–8.22, P = 0.01). The absolute difference in 20-year breast cancer mortality was 1.2% without DCIS and 3.4% after DCIS, log-rank P = 0.026. Findings were similar by age (< 70 versus ≥ 70 years) with no interaction (P interaction = 0.80). Incident DCIS was not associated with CVD-specific mortality (HR 0.77; CI-0.54-1.09, P = 0.14) or with all-cause mortality (HR 0.96; CI = 0.80–1.16, P = 0.68) with similar findings by age.

Conclusions

In postmenopausal women, incident DCIS was associated with over three-fold higher breast cancer-specific mortality, with similar findings in younger and older postmenopausal women. These finding suggest caution in using age to adjust DCIS clinical management or research strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The following data will be made available beginning 1 July 2025: the identified participant data and data dictionary (information about data sharing for the Women’s Health Initiative can be found at: www.WHI.orgy/researchers/data/Documents/WHI%20 Data%20 Sharing%20 Statement.pdf. For these analyses, data will be publicly available two years after publication of this article. The following supporting documents are available: statistical/analytical and informed consent form (www.whi.org/researchers/studydoc/SitePages/Protocol%20 and% 20Consents.aspx).

Prior Presentation: Some of the findings were presented on March 18, 2021, at the Virtual St Gallen Breast Cancer Meeting.

Additional contributions: We thank the WHI investigators, staff, and the trial participants for their outstanding dedication and commitment. Program Office: Jacques Roscoe, Shari Ludlum, Dale Burden, Joan McGowan, Leslie Ford, and Nancy Geller (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD) Clinical Coordinating Center: Garnet Anderson, Ross Prentice, Andrea LaCroix, and Charles Kopperberg (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA) Investigators and Academic Centers: JoAnn E. Manson (Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA); Barbara V. Howard (MedStar Health Research Institute/Howard University, Washington, DC); Marcia L. Stefanick (Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford, CA); Rebecca Jackson (The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH); Cynthia A. Thompson (University of Arizona, Tucson/Phoenix, AZ); Jean Wactawski-Wende (University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY); Marian Limacher (University of Florida, Gainesville/Jacksonville, FL); Robert Wallace (University of Iowa, Iowa City/Davenport, IA); Lewis Kuller (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA); Rowan T. Chlebowski (The Lundquist Institute, Torrance, CA), and Sally Shumaker (Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC).

A full list of all the investigators who have contributed to WHI science can be retrieved: https://www.whi.org/researchers/Documents%20%20Write%20a%20Paper/WHI%20Investigator %20Long%20List.pdf.

References

  1. Brinton LA, Sherman ME, Carreon JD et al (2008) Recent trends in breast cancer among younger women in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:1643–1648

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Berkman A, B FC, Ades PA et al (2014) Racial differences in breast cancer, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality among women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 148:407–413

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. He W, Sofie Lindstrom L, Hall P et al (2017) Cause-specific mortality in women with breast cancer in situ. Int J Cancer 140:2414–2421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schonberg MA, Marcantonio ER, Ngo L et al (2011) Causes of death and relative survival of older women after a breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 29:1570–1577

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Dignam JJ, Huang L, Ries L et al (2009) Estimating breast cancer-specific and other-cause mortality in clinical trial and population-based cancer registry cohorts. Cancer 115:5272–5283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Boekel NB, Schaapveld M, Gietema JA et al (2014) Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality after treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju156

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Elshof LE, Schmidt MK, Rutgers EJT et al (2018) Cause-specific mortality in a Population-based Cohort of 9799 women treated for Ductal Carcinoma in situ. Ann Surg 267:952–958

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alvarado R, Lari SA, Roses RE et al (2012) Biology, treatment, and outcome in very young and older women with DCIS. Ann Surg Oncol 19:3777–3784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jenkins EO, Deal AM, Anders CK et al (2014) Age-specific changes in intrinsic breast cancer subtypes: a focus on older women. Oncologist 19:1076–1083

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson GL, Manson J, Wallace R et al (2003) Implementation of the women’s Health Initiative study design. Ann Epidemiol 13:S5–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Prentice RL, Caan B, Chlebowski RT et al (2006) Low-fat dietary pattern and risk of invasive breast cancer: the women’s Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification Trial. JAMA 295:629–642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chlebowski RT, Aragaki AK, Anderson GL et al (2020) Dietary Modification and Breast Cancer Mortality: Long-Term Follow-Up of the Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Trial. J Clin Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.00435

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Chlebowski RT, Kuller LH, Prentice RL et al (2009) Breast cancer after use of estrogen plus progestin in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 360:573–587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Chlebowski RT, Anderson GL, Aragaki AK et al (2020) Association of menopausal hormone therapy with breast cancer incidence and mortality during long-term follow-up of the women’s health initiative randomized clinical trials. JAMA 324:369–380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ho DE, Imai K, King G et al (2011) MatchIt: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. J Stat Softw 42:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rich-Edwards JW, Corsano KA, Stampfer MJ (1994) Test of the national death index and equifax nationwide death search. Am J Epidemiol 140:1016–1019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hwang ES, Solin L (2020) De-escalation of locoregional therapy in low-risk disease for DCIS and early-stage invasive cancer. J Clin Oncol 38:2230–2239

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Mannu GS, Wang Z, Broggio J et al (2020) Invasive breast cancer and breast cancer mortality after ductal carcinoma in situ in women attending for breast screening in England, 1988–2014: population based observational cohort study. BMJ 369:m1570

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Giannakeas V, Sopik V, Narod SA (2020) Association of a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ with death from breast cancer. JAMA Netw Open 3:e2017124

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Piccart MJ, Hilbers FS, Bliss JM et al (2020) Road map to safe and well-designed de-escalation trials of systemic adjuvant therapy for solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 38:4120–4129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Visvanathan K, Fabian CJ, Bantug E et al (2019) Use of endocrine therapy for breast cancer risk reduction: ASCO clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 37:3152–3165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Garcia-Albeniz X, Hernan MA, Logan RW et al (2020) Continuation of annual screening mammography and breast cancer mortality in women older Than 70 years. Ann Intern Med 172:381–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Squeo G, Malpass JK, Meneveau M et al (2020) Long-term impact of CALGB 9343 on radiation utilization. J Surg Res 256:577–583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hughes KS, Schnaper LA, Bellon JR et al (2013) Lumpectomy plus tamoxifen with or without irradiation in women age 70 years or older with early breast cancer: long-term follow-up of CALGB 9343. J Clin Oncol 31:2382–2387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Gradishar WJ, Moran MS, Abraham J et al (2022) Breast cancer, version 3.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 20:691–722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Narod SA, Iqbal J, Giannakeas V et al (2015) Breast cancer mortality after a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ. JAMA Oncol 1:888–896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N et al (1999) Tamoxifen in treatment of intraductal breast cancer: national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project B-24 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 353:1993–2000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative, Correa C, McGale P et al (2010) Overview of the randomized trials of radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010:162–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McCormick B, Winter KA, Woodward W et al (2021) Randomized phase III trial evaluating radiation following surgical excision for good-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: long-term report from nrg oncology/RTOG 9804. J Clin Oncol 39:3574–3582

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Liveringhouse CL, Washington IR, Diaz R et al (2021) Genomically guided breast radiation therapy: a review of the current data and future directions. Adv Radiat Oncol 6:100731

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wapnir IL, Dignam JJ, Fisher B et al (2011) Long-term outcomes of invasive ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after lumpectomy in NSABP B-17 and B-24 randomized clinical trials for DCIS. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:478–488

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Cuzick J, Sestak I, Pinder SE et al (2011) Effect of tamoxifen and radiotherapy in women with locally excised ductal carcinoma in situ: long-term results from the UK/ANZ DCIS trial. Lancet Oncol 12:21–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Forbes JF, Sestak I, Howell A et al (2016) Anastrozole versus tamoxifen for the prevention of locoregional and contralateral breast cancer in postmenopausal women with locally excised ductal carcinoma in situ (IBIS-II DCIS): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 387:866–873

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Margolese RG, Cecchini RS, Julian TB et al (2016) Anastrozole versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with ductal carcinoma in situ undergoing lumpectomy plus radiotherapy (NSABP B-35): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial. Lancet 387:849–856

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Howard BV, Manson JE, Stefanick ML et al (2006) Low-fat dietary pattern and weight change over 7 years: the women’s Health Initiative Dietary Modification Trial. JAMA 295:39–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The WHI program is supported by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services through contracts N01WH22110, 24152, 32100-2, 32105-6, 32108-9, 32111-13, 32115, 32118–32119, 32122, 42107-26, 42129-32, and 44221. HHSN268201600003C, HHSN268201600004C and R25CA203650 also partially supported the development of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KP wrote the analysis proposal and initial draft of the report. KP, RC, and RAN had full access to study data and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the analysis. RAN undertook the statistical analysis. All authors including KP, RTC, RN, LK, JEMo, MSS, TER, RP, JEMa, DL, MM, and JWW provided critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content. RTC, MSS, JW, JEMa, TER, and DL collected the data and obtained study funding.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rowan T. Chlebowski.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr Chlebowski is a consultant for Novartis, AstraZeneca, Pfizer and UpToDate. No other author reported conflicts.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, K., Nelson, R.A., Chlebowski, R.T. et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ and cause-specific mortality among younger and older postmenopausal women: the Women’s Health Initiative. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07327-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07327-5

Keywords

Navigation