Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Immediate breast reconstruction in locally advanced breast cancer: is it safe?

  • Review
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) following mastectomy remains controversial for locally advanced breast cancer over concerns regarding recurrence and complications which may delay adjuvant therapies. This study aimed to compare the oncologic outcomes and surgical safety of IBR following mastectomy with mastectomy alone (MA) for locally advanced breast cancer.

Methods

All patients treated at the Providence Breast Center between 2012 and 2017 for biopsy-proven locally advanced breast cancer, AJCC (8th edition) clinical stages (IIB–IIIC), were included. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary outcomes included recurrence rate, adjuvant therapy use, and reoperation.

Results

267 patients (112 IBR, 155 MA) were included. On average, IBR patients were younger (48.82 years vs 61.42 years, P < 0.001). Median study follow-up was 50.7 months. OS was higher among IBR patients (86.6% vs 73.5%, P < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found in DSS (87.5% vs 84.5%, P = 0.34), DFS (79.5% vs 78.7%, P = 0.55), local recurrence (0% vs 1.9%, P = 0.194), adjuvant therapy use (95.5% vs 91.6%, P = 0.155), or reoperation (1.8% vs 1.3%, P = 0.559).

Conclusion

IBR is a safe option for patients with locally advanced breast cancer and does not negatively impact survival, cancer recurrence rates, and use of adjuvant therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data were retrieved from a prospectively maintained hospital database.

Code availability

Analysis was performed using R and RStudio.

References

  1. Newman LA, Kuerer HM, Hunt KK et al (1999) Feasibility of immediate breast reconstruction for locally advanced breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 6:671–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-999-0671-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Foster RD, Esserman LJ, Anthony JP et al (2002) Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective cohort study for the treatment of advanced stages of breast carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 9:462–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang P, Li C, Wu C et al (2017) Comparison of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy and mastectomy alone for breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:285–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mousa M, Barnea Y, Arad U et al (2018) Association between postoperative complications after immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction and oncologic outcome. Clin Breast Cancer 18:e699–e702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2017.11.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Styblo TM, Lewis MM, Carlson GW et al (1996) Immediate breast reconstruction for stage III breast cancer using transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap. Ann Surg Oncol 3:375–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02305667

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lim W, Ko B, Kim H et al (2010) Oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy followed by immediate reconstruction for locally advanced breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 102:39–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Crisera CA, Chang EI, Da Lio AL et al (2011) Immediate free flap reconstruction for advanced-stage breast cancer: is it safe? Plast Reconstr Surg 128:32–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182174119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stevens LA, McGrath MH, Druss RG et al (1984) The psychological impact of immediate breast reconstruction for women with early breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 73:619–628. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198404000-00018

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen W, Lv X, Xu X et al (2018) Meta-analysis for psychological impact of breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer 25:464–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-018-0846-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Elder EE, Brandberg Y, Björklund T et al (2005) Quality of life and patient satisfaction in breast cancer patients after immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. Breast 14:201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2004.10.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gieni M, Avram R, Dickson L et al (2012) Local breast cancer recurrence after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast 21:230–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2011.12.013

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang M, Chen H, Wu K et al (2019) Post-mastectomy immediate breast reconstruction is oncologically safe in well-selected T4 locally advanced breast cancer: a large population-based study and matched case-control analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 176(2):337–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05240-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Foster RD, Hansen SL, Esserman LJ et al (2005) Safety of immediate transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous breast reconstruction for patients with locally advanced disease. Arch Surg 140:196–200. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.140.2.196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sandelin K, Wickman M, Billgren AM (2004) Oncological outcome after immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer: a long-term study. Breast 13:210–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2003.10.010

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Singletary SE (1996) Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: the MD Anderson Cancer Center experience. Ann Surg Oncol 3:411–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02305673

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Giacalone PL, Rathat G, Daures JP et al (2010) New concept for immediate breast reconstruction for invasive cancers: feasibility, oncological safety and esthetic outcome of post-neoadjuvant therapy immediate breast reconstruction versus delayed breast reconstruction: a prospective pilot study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 122:439–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-0951-7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Langstein HN, Cheng M, Singletary ES et al (2003) Breast cancer recurrence after immediate reconstruction: patterns and significance. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:712–720. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000041441.42563.95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Platt J, Baxter N, Zhong T (2011) Breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer. Can Med Assoc J 183:2109–2116. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.110513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cortina CS, Bergom CR, Kijack J et al (2021) Postmastectomy breast reconstruction in women aged 70 and older: an analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Surgery 170(1):30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2021.03.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Allweis TM, Boisvert ME, Otero SE et al (2002) Immediate reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer does not prolong the time to starting adjuvant chemotherapy. Am J Surg 183:218–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00793-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gibreel WO, Day CN, Hoskin TL et al (2017) Mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for cancer in the elderly: a national cancer data base study. J Am Coll Surg 224(5):895–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sultan MR, Smith ML, Estabrook A et al (1997) Immediate breast reconstruction in patients with locally advanced disease. Ann Plast Surg 38:345–351. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199704000-00007

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Taylor CW, Horgan K, Dodwell D (2005) Oncological aspects of breast reconstruction. Breast 14:118–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2004.08.006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahmad A (2013) Pathways to breast cancer recurrence. ISRN Oncol 2013:290568. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/290568

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the physicians in the Department of Surgery at Providence Health Care for their input in this study.

Funding

The authors received no funding for the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by KT, JSP, LC, CM, and MZ. The first draft of the manuscript was written by KT and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Warburton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no proprietary or commercial interest in any product mentioned or concept discussed in this article.

Ethical approval

Approved by the University of British Columbia and Providence Health Care research ethics boards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taqi, K., Pao, JS., Chen, L. et al. Immediate breast reconstruction in locally advanced breast cancer: is it safe?. Breast Cancer Res Treat 190, 175–182 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06366-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06366-6

Keywords

Navigation