Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Male breast cancer: a closer look at patient and tumor characteristics and factors that affect survival using the National Cancer Database

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To comprehensively describe the tumor and clinical characteristics of breast cancer in a cohort of male patients and to assess the factors that affect survival.

Background

Much of the standard care of male breast cancer is based on the diagnosis and treatment strategies of female breast cancer. However, important clinical differences between the two have been elucidated, which suggests the need for unique attention to male breast cancer.

Methods

We evaluated the records of male patients who were diagnosed with breast cancer between 2004 and 2015 using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Data obtained were demographic characteristics, clinical and tumor data, type of therapy, as well as survival data. We used descriptive statistics to characterize our study population. We then performed a survival and Cox proportional hazards analysis.

Results

We identified 16,498 patients (median age: 63 years). Several treatment modalities were used, of which surgery was the most common (14,882 [90.4%]). The total follow-up time was 13 years (156 months). Five-year survival was 77.7% (95% CI 76.9–78.4) and 10-year survival was 60.7%. In a Cox proportional hazards model, mastectomy was associated with the greatest survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.49; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

We report what is to our knowledge the largest national population-based cohort of male breast cancer patients. Importantly, our data suggests that similar to female patients, several treatment modalities are significantly associated with improved survival in male patients, particularly surgery. Increasing age, black race, government insurance, more comorbidities, and higher tumor stages are associated with decreased survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ottini L (2014) Male breast cancer: a rare disease that might uncover underlying pathways of breast cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 14(10):643–644. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Speirs V, Shaaban AM (2009) The rising incidence of male breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 115(2):429–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-0053-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stang A, Thomssen C (2008) Decline in breast cancer incidence in the United States: What about male breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat 112(3):595–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9882-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sarmiento S, McColl M, Habibi M (2019) The management of male breast cancer. In: Cameron JL (ed) Current surgical therapy, 13th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fentiman IS, Tirelli U, Monfardini S et al (1990) Cancer in the elderly: why so badly treated? Lancet 335(8696):1020–1022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rizzolo P, Silvestri V, Tommasi S et al (2013) Male breast cancer: genetics, epigenetics, and ethical aspects. Ann Oncol 24(suppl 8):viii75–viii82. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Korde LA, Zujewski JA, Kamin L et al (2010) Multidisciplinary meeting on male breast cancer: summary and research recommendations. J Clin Oncol 28(12):2114–2122. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.5729

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Henriques Abreu M, Emia Afonso N, Henriques Abreu P et al (2016) Male breast cancer: looking for better prognostic subgroups. Breast. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2015.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Miao H, Verkooijen HM, Chia K-S et al (2011) Incidence and outcome of male breast cancer: an international population-based study. J Clin Oncol 29(33):4381–4386. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.36.8902

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Serdy KM, Leone JP, Dabbs DJ, Bhargava R (2017) Male breast cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 147(1):aqw207. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqw207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. El-Tamer MB, Komenaka IK, Troxel A et al (2004) Men with breast cancer have better disease-specific survival than women. Arch Surg 139(10):1079. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.10.1079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Iorfida M, Bagnardi V, Rotmensz N et al (2014) Outcome of male breast cancer: a matched single-institution series. Clin Breast Cancer 14(5):371–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2014.02.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu X-F, Feng W-L, Miao L-L, Chen B, Yang H-J, Yang H-J (2013) The prognostic significance of molecular subtype for male breast cancer: a 10-year retrospective study. The Breast 22:824–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2013.02.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Polverini AC, Nelson RA, Marcinkowski E et al (2016) Time to treatment: measuring quality breast cancer care. Ann Surg Oncol 23(10):3392–3402. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5486-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Greif JM, Pezzi CM, Klimberg VS, Bailey L, Zuraek M (2012) Gender differences in breast cancer: analysis of 13,000 breast cancers in men from the national cancer data base. Ann Surg Oncol 19(10):3199–3204. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2479-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Giordano SH, Cohen DS, Buzdar AU, Perkins G, Hortobagyi GN (2004) Breast carcinoma in men. Cancer 101(1):51–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fields EC, DeWitt P, Fisher CM, Rabinovitch R (2013) Management of male breast cancer in the united states: a surveillance, epidemiology and end results analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol 87(4):747–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJROBP.2013.07.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Losurdo A, Rota S, Gullo G et al (2017) Controversies in clinicopathological characteristics and treatment strategies of male breast cancer: a review of the literature. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 113:283–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CRITREVONC.2017.03.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Patten DK, Sharifi LK, Fazel M (2013) New approaches in the management of male breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 13(5):309–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLBC.2013.04.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chia S, Bryce C, Gelmon K (2005) The 2000 EBCTCG overview: a widening gap. Lancet 365(9472):1665–1666. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66524-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ragaz J, Jackson SM, Le N et al (1997) Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in node-positive premenopausal women with breast cancer. N Engl J Med 337(14):956–962. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199710023371402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Overgaard M, Hansen PS, Overgaard J et al (1997) Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 337(14):949–955. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199710023371401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (1992) Systemic treatment of early breast cancer by hormonal, cytotoxic, or immune therapy: 133 randomised trials involving 31 000 recurrences and 24 000 deaths among 75 000 women. Lancet 339(8784):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(92)90139-T

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jabo B, Lin AC, Aljehani MA et al (2018) Impact of breast reconstruction on time to definitive surgical treatment, adjuvant therapy, and breast cancer outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 25(10):3096–3105. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6663-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Eriksson L, Bergh J, Humphreys K, Wärnberg F, Törnberg S, Czene K (2018) Time from breast cancer diagnosis to therapeutic surgery and breast cancer prognosis: a population-based cohort study. Int J Cancer 143(5):1093–1104. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mansfield SA, Abdel-Rasoul M, Terando AM, Agnese DM (2017) Timing of breast cancer surgery-how much does it matter? Breast J 23(4):444–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bleicher RJ, Ruth K, Sigurdson ER et al (2016) Time to surgery and breast cancer survival in the United States. JAMA Oncol 2(3):330. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.4508

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehran Habibi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) is a joint project of the Commission on Cancer (CoC) of the American College of Surgeons and the American Cancer Society. The CoC’s NCDB and the hospitals participating in the CoC NCDB are the source of the de-identified data used in this report. They have not verified the data and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis or the conclusions derived by the authors.

Ethical approval

De-identified data from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB; see title page); IRB review not required. This study conforms to the Declaration of Helsinki ethical principles for medical research.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sarmiento, S., McColl, M., Musavi, L. et al. Male breast cancer: a closer look at patient and tumor characteristics and factors that affect survival using the National Cancer Database. Breast Cancer Res Treat 180, 471–479 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05556-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05556-y

Keywords

Navigation