Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rates of BRCA1/2 mutation testing among young survivors of breast cancer

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 27 July 2016

Abstract

Guidelines in the United States recommend consideration of testing for mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes for women diagnosed with breast cancer under age 45. Identification of mutations among survivors has implications for secondary prevention and familial risk reduction. Although only 10 % of breast cancers are diagnosed under age 45, there are approximately 2.8 million breast cancer survivors in the United States, such that the young survivor population likely numbers in the hundreds of thousands. However, little is known about genetic testing rates in this population. We assessed trends in BRCA1/2 testing among breast cancer survivors who were under age 45 at diagnosis and were treated from 2005 to 2012. Using insurance claims from a national database (MarketScan), we identified incident breast cancer cases among (1) women aged ≤40 and (2) women aged 41–45. We measured BRCA1/2 testing using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Among 26,985 patients analyzed, BRCA1/2 testing rates increased with each year of diagnosis from 2005 to 2012 (P < 0.001). However, among women treated in earlier years, testing rates did not approach those of patients treated later, even after extended follow-up (median time from surgery to testing among patients treated in 2005, not reached; median time to testing among patients treated in 2012, 0.2 months for women aged ≤40 and 1.0 month for women aged 41–45). Women aged 41–45 had lower rates than women aged ≤40 throughout the analysis period (P < 0.001 for each year). BRCA1/2 testing rates among young women with incident breast cancer increased substantially in the last decade. However, most survivors treated in earlier years have never been tested. Our results demonstrate a need to better incorporate genetic counseling into survivorship and primary care for this population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Foulkes WD (2008) Inherited susceptibility to common cancers. N Engl J Med 359:2143–2153. doi:10.1056/NEJMra0802968

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pharoah PDP, Antoniou A, Bobrow M et al (2002) Polygenic susceptibility to breast cancer and implications for prevention. Nat Genet 31:33–36. doi:10.1038/ng853

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Antoniou A, Pharoah PDP, Narod S et al (2003) Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet 72:1117–1130. doi:10.1086/375033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. National comprehensive cancer network. Genetic/familial high-risk screening: breast. Version 1.2001

  5. National comprehensive cancer network. Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian. Version 1.2005

  6. National comprehensive cancer network. Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian. Version 1.2009

  7. National comprehensive cancer network. Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian. Version 2.2014

  8. Levy DE, Byfield SD, Comstock CB et al (2011) Underutilization of BRCA1/2 testing to guide breast cancer treatment: black and Hispanic women particularly at risk. Genet Med 13:349–355. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182091ba4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. American Cancer Society (2015) Breast cancer key statistics. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/breastcancer/detailedguide/breast-cancer-key-statistics. Accessed 29 Nov 2015

  10. American Cancer Society (2015) American Cancer Society estimated new cases for the four major cancers by sex and age group. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@editorial/documents/document/acspc-044511.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2015

  11. Easton DF, Pharoah PDP, Antoniou AC et al (2015) Gene-panel sequencing and the prediction of breast-cancer risk. N Engl J Med 372:2243–2257. doi:10.1056/NEJMsr1501341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Phimister EG (2015) Curating the way to better determinants of genetic risk. N Engl J Med 372:2227–2228. doi:10.1056/NEJMe1506276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tung N, Battelli C, Allen B et al (2015) Frequency of mutations in individuals with breast cancer referred for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing using next-generation sequencing with a 25-gene panel. Cancer 121:25–33. doi:10.1002/cncr.29010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Desmond A, Kurian AW, Gabree M et al (2015) Clinical actionability of multigene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk assessment. JAMA Oncol 1:943–951. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Snyder CF, Frick KD, Peairs KS et al (2009) Comparing care for breast cancer survivors to non-cancer controls: a five-year longitudinal study. J Gen Intern Med 24:469–474. doi:10.1007/s11606-009-0903-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kwon JS, Gutierrez-Barrera AM, Young D et al (2010) Expanding the criteria for BRCA mutation testing in breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 28:4214–4220. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.28.0719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hansen L, Chang S (2011) White paper: health research data for the real world: the Thomson Reuters marketscan databases. Thomson Reuters, New York, p 32

    Google Scholar 

  18. Barcenas CH, Niu J, Zhang N et al (2014) Risk of hospitalization according to chemotherapy regimen in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 32:2010–2017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Nattinger AB, Laud PW, Bajorunaite R et al (2004) An algorithm for the use of Medicare claims data to identify women with incident breast cancer. Health Serv Res 39:1733–1749. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00315.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Giordano SH, Lin YL, Kuo YF et al (2012) Decline in the use of anthracyclines for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:2232–2239. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Gold HT, Do HT (2007) Evaluation of three algorithms to identify incident breast cancer in Medicare claims data. Health Serv Res 42:2056–2069. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00705.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). CMS manual system, pub 100-04 Medicare claims processing, transmittal 2639, change request 8162. Effective date January 1, 2013. https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Transmittals/Downloads/R2639CP.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2015

  23. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). CMS manual system, pub 100-04, Medicare claims processing. Transmittal 2423, change request 7751. Effective date: April 1, 2012. http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Transmittals/downloads/R2423CP.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2015

  24. Hall WJ, Wellner JA (1980) Confidence bands for a survival curve from censored data. Biometrika 67:133–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Anders CK, Johnson R, Litton J et al (2009) Breast cancer before age 40 years. Semin Oncol 36:237–249. doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2009.03.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Jóhannsson OT, Ranstam J, Borg A, Olsson H (1998) Survival of BRCA1 breast and ovarian cancer patients: a population-based study from southern Sweden. J Clin Oncol 16:397–404

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brekelmans CTM, Seynaeve C, Menke-Pluymers M et al (2006) Survival and prognostic factors in BRCA1-associated breast cancer. Ann Oncol 17:391–400. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdj095

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Verhoog LC, Brekelmans CTM, Seynaeve C et al (1998) Survival and tumour characteristics of breast-cancer patients with germline mutations of BRCA1. Lancet 351:316–321. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(97)07065-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rennert G, Bisland-Naggan S, Barnett-Griness O et al (2007) Clinical outcomes of breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med 357:115–123. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa070608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. El-Tamer M, Russo D, Troxel A et al (2004) Survival and recurrence after breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Ann Surg Oncol 11:157–164. doi:10.1245/ASO.2004.05.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bordeleau L, Panchal S, Goodwin P (2010) Prognosis of BRCA-associated breast cancer: a summary of evidence. Breast Cancer Res Treat 119:13–24. doi:10.1007/s10549-009-0566-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bayraktar S, Gutierrez-Barrera AM, Liu D et al (2011) Outcome of triple-negative breast cancer in patients with or without deleterious BRCA mutations. Breast Cancer Res Treat 130:145–153. doi:10.1007/s10549-011-1711-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2011, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2011/. Based on November 2013 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2014

  34. McCabe MS, Bhatia S, Oeffinger KC et al (2013) American society of clinical oncology statement: achieving high-quality cancer survivorship care. J Clin Oncol 31:631–640. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.46.6854

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Gnerlich JL, Deshpande AD, Jeffe DB et al (2011) Poorer survival outcomes for male breast cancer compared with female breast cancer may be attributable to in-stage migration. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1837–1844. doi:10.1245/s10434-010-1468-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gnerlich J, Jeffe DB, Deshpande AD et al (2007) Surgical removal of the primary tumor increases overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer: analysis of the 1988-2003 SEER data. Ann Surg Oncol 14:2187–2194. doi:10.1245/s10434-007-9438-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Duncan Family Institute, the Baker Institute for Health and Biosciences, and the Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas (Grant RP140020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth L. Kehl.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Kenneth L. Kehl declares that he has no conflict of interest. Chan Shen declares that she has no conflict of interest. Jennifer K. Litton declares that she has no conflict of interest. Banu Arun declares that she has no conflict of interest. Sharon H. Giordano declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. The MarketScan insurance claims data were fully de-identified prior to analysis, and the Institutional Review Board at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center exempted this study from review.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kehl, K.L., Shen, C., Litton, J.K. et al. Rates of BRCA1/2 mutation testing among young survivors of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 155, 165–173 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3658-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3658-y

Keywords

Navigation