Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcome of triple-negative breast cancer in patients with or without deleterious BRCA mutations

  • Clinical trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

More than 75% of breast cancers that develop in BRCA1 mutation carriers are triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC). The aim of this study was to compare the recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in high-risk patients with TNBC with and without deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations. A total of 227 women with TNBC who were referred for genetic counseling and underwent BRCA genetic testing between 1997 and 2010 were included in the study. The relationships between clinical variables and outcomes were evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models. Of 227 high-risk women with TNBC, 50% (n = 114) tested positive for BRCA1/2 mutations. Age, race, and tumor characteristics did not differ between BRCA non-carriers and carriers. At a median follow-up of 3.4 years, the 5-year RFS rates were 74 and 81% (P = 0.21), and 5-year OS rates were 85 and 93% in BRCA non-carriers and BRCA carriers, respectively (P = 0.11). In a multivariate model, after adjusting for age and disease stage, BRCA carriers tended to have a decreased risk of recurrence (HR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.38–1.19; P = 0.17) or death (HR = 0.51; 95% CI:0.23–1.17; P = 0.11) compared to non-carriers. Our data indicate a 50% prevalence of deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations in high-risk women diagnosed with TNBC. Overall prognosis of TNBC in BRCA carriers and non-carriers is not significantly different within the first 5 years following an initial diagnosis. Further studies need to evaluate whether different therapies will change the outcome in these subgroups of TNBC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA, Pollack JR, Ross DT, Johnsen H, Akslen LA, Fluge O, Pergamenschikov A, Williams C, Zhu SX, Lonning PE, Borresen-Dale AL, Brown PO, Botstein D (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406:747–752

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Ellis IO (2008) Basal-like breast cancer: a critical review. J Clin Oncol 26:2568–2581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bertucci F, Finetti P, Cervera N, Esterni B, Hermitte F, Viens P, Birnbaum D (2008) How basal are triple-negative breast cancers? Int J Cancer 123:236–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Foulkes WD, Stefansson IM, Chappuis PO, Begin LR, Goffin JR, Wong N, Trudel M, Akslen LA (2003) Germline BRCA1 mutations and a basal epithelial phenotype in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1482–1485

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lakhani SR, Reis-Filho JS, Fulford L, Penault-Llorca F, van der Vijver M, Parry S, Bishop T et al (2005) Prediction of BRCA1 status in patients with breast cancer using estrogen receptor and basal phenotype. Clin Cancer Res 11:5175–5180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, Hastie T, Marron JS et al (2003) Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8418–8423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Reis-Filho JS, Tutt AN (2008) Triple negative tumours: a critical review. Histopathology 52:108–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nicoletto MO, Donach M, De Nicolo A, Artioli G, Banna G, Monfardini S (2001) BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 mutations as prognostic factors in clinical practice and genetic counselling. Cancer Treat Rev 27:295–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Robson ME, Chappuis PO, Satagopan J, Wong N, Boyd J, Goffin JR, Hudis C, Roberge D, Norton L, Begin LR, Offit K, Foulkes WD (2004) A combined analysis of outcome following breast cancer: differences in survival based on BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation status and administration of adjuvant treatment. Breast Cancer Res 6:R8–R17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rennert G, Bisland-Naggan S, Barnett-Griness O, Bar-Joseph N, Zhang S, Rennert HS, Narod SA (2007) Clinical outcomes of breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med 357:115–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Foulkes WD, Metcalfe K, Sun P, Hanna WM, Lynch HT, Ghadirian P, Tung N, Olopade OI, Weber BL, McLennan J, Olivotto IA, Begin LR, Narod SA (2004) Estrogen receptor status in BRCA1- and BRCA2-related breast cancer: the influence of age, grade, and histological type. Clin Cancer Res 10:2029–2034

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Turner N, Tutt A, Ashworth A (2004) Hallmarks of ‘BRCAness’ in sporadic cancers. Nat Rev Cancer 4:814–819

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Singletary SE, Greene FL (2003) Revision of breast cancer staging: the 6th edition of the TNM Classification. Semin Surg Oncol 21:53–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Black MM, Speer FD (1957) Nuclear structure in cancer tissues. Surg Gynecol Obstet 105:97–102

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chang J, Hilsenbeck SG, Sng JH, Wong J, Ragu GC (2001) Pathological features and BRCA1 mutation screening in premenopausal breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 7:1739–1742

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Haffty BG, Yang Q, Reiss M, Kearney T, Higgins SA, Weidhaas J, Harris L, Hait W, Toppmeyer D (2006) Locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed triple negative early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:5652–5657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lidereau R, Eisinger F, Champeme MH, Nogues C, Bieche I, Birnbaum D, Pallud C, Jacquemier J, Sobol H (2000) Major improvement in the efficacy of BRCA1 mutation screening using morphoclinical features of breast cancer. Cancer Res 60:1206–1210

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Young SR, Pilarski RT, Donenberg T, Shapiro C, Hammond LS, Miller J, Brooks KA, Cohen S, Tenenholz B, Desai D, Zandvakili I, Royer R, Li S, Narod SA (2009) The prevalence of BRCA1 mutations among young women with triple-negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer 9:86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kandel MJ, Stadler ZK, Masciari S et al (2006) Prevalence of BRCA1 mutations in triple negative breast cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol I 24:18S

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Timms KM, Liu S, Chen H, Litton JK, Potter J, Lanchbury JS, Stemke-Hale K, Hennessy BT, Arun BK, Hortobagyi GN, Do KA, Mills GB, Meric-Bernstam F (2011) Incidence and outcome of BRCA mutations in unselected patients with triple receptor-negative breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 17:1082–1089

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kwon JS, Gutierrez-Barrera AM, Young D, Sun CC, Daniels MS, Lu KH, Arun B (2010) Expanding the criteria for BRCA mutation testing in breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 28:4214–4220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Oncology. (2011) NCCNNGi: genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian version 1

  23. Tischkowitz M, Brunet JS, Begin LR, Huntsman DG, Cheang MC, Akslen LA, Nielsen TO, Foulkes WD (2007) Use of immunohistochemical markers can refine prognosis in triple negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer 7:134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheang MC, Voduc D, Bajdik C, Leung S, McKinney S, Chia SK, Perou CM, Nielsen TO (2008) Basal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value than triple-negative phenotype. Clin Cancer Res 14:1368–1376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA, Lickley LA, Rawlinson E, Sun P, Narod SA (2007) Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 13:4429–4434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, Andre F, Tordai A, Mejia JA, Symmans WF, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Hennessy B, Green M, Cristofanilli M, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L (2008) Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:1275–1281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kennedy RDQJ, Johnston PH, Harkin DP (2002) BRCA1: mechanisms of inactivation and implications for management of patients. Lancet 360:1007–1014

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Verhoog LC, Seynaeve C, Dahmen G, van Geel AN, Bartels CC et al (1999) Survival in hereditary breast cancer associated with germline mutations of BRCA2. J Clin Oncol 17:3396–3402

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Brekelmans CT, Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Seynaeve C, vd Ouweland A, Menke-Pluymers MB, Bartels CC et al (2007) Tumour characteristics, survival and prognostic factors of hereditary breast cancer from BRCA2-, BRCA1- and non-BRCA1/2 families as compared to sporadic breast cancer cases. B Eur J Cancer 43:867–876

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kriege M, Seynaeve C, Meijers-Heijboer H, Collee JM, Menke-Pluymers MB, Bartels CC et al (2008) Distant disease-free interval, site of first relapse and post-relapse survival in B. Breast Cancer Res Treat 111:303–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bonadona V, Dossart MS, Voirin N, Sinilnikova OM, Mignotte H, Mathevet P, Bremond A, Treilleux I, Martin A, Romestaing P et al (2007) Prognosis of early-onset breast cancer based on BRCA1/2 mutation status in a French population-based cohort and review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 101:233–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bordeleau L, Panchal S, Goodwin P (2010) Prognosis of BRCA-associated breast cancer: a summary of evidence. Breast Cancer Res Treat 119:13–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Robson M, Lewin D, Federici M, Satagopan J, Bogolminy F, Heerdt A, Borgen P, McCormick B, Hudis C, Norton L, Boyd J, Offit K (1999) Breast conservation therapy for invasive breast cancer in Ashkenazi women with BRCA gene founder mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:2112–2117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Chappuis PO, Kaputa L, Bégin LR, Wong N, Brunet JS, Narod SA, Slingerland J, Foulkes WD (2000) Germline BRCA1/2 mutations and p27 (Kip1) protein levels independently predict outcome after breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:4045–4052

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Ansquer Y, Dreyfus H, Gautier C, Gauthier-Villars M, Bourstyn E, Clough KB, Magdelenat H, Pouillart P, Vincent-Salomon A, Fourquet A, for the Institute Curie Breast Cancer Group, Asselian B (2000) Familial invasive breast cancer: worse outcome related to BRCA1 mutations. J Clin Oncol 18:4053–4059

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Moller P, Evans DG, Reis MM, Gregory H, Anderson E, Maehle L, Lalloo F, Howell A, Apold J, Clark N, Lucassen A, Steel CM (2007) Surveillance for familial breast cancer: differences in outcome according to BRCA mutation status. Int J Cancer 121:1017–1020

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee EH, Park SK, Park B, Kim SW, Lee MH, Ahn SH, Son BH, Yoo KY, Kang D (2010) Effect of BRCA1/2 mutation on short-term and long-term breast cancer survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 122:11–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Cortesi L, Masini C, Cirilli C, Medici V, Marchi I, Cavazzini G, Pasini G, Turchetti D, Federico M (2010) Favourable ten-year overall survival in a Caucasian population with high probability of hereditary breast cancer. BMC Cancer 10:90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lee LJ, Alexander B, Schnitt SJ, Comander A, Gallagher B, Garber JE, Tung N (2011) Clinical outcome of triple negative breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers and noncarriers. Cancer 117:3093–3100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Colleoni M, Cole BF, Viale G, Regan MM, Price KN, Maiorano E, Mastropasqua MG, Crivellari D, Gelber RD, Goldhirsch A, Coates AS, Gusterson BA (2010) Classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil chemotherapy is more effective in triple-negative, node-negative breast cancer: results from two randomized trials of adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:2966–2973

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L, Gatti L, Moore DT, Collichio F, Ollila DW, Sartor CI, Graham ML, Perou CM (2007) The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res 13:2329–2334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Arun B, Bayraktar S, Liu DD, Gutierrez-Barrera AM, Atchley D, Pusztai L, Litton J, Valero V, Meric-Bernstam F, Hortobagyi GN, Albarracin C (2011) Response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer in BRCA mutation carriers and non-carriers: a single institution experience. J Clin Oncol (in press)

  43. Hayes DF, Thor AD, Dressler LG, Weaver D, Edgerton S, Cowan D, Broadwater G, Goldstein LJ, Martino S, Ingle JN, Henderson IC, Norton L, Winer EP, Hudis CA, Ellis MJ, Berry DA (2007) HER2 and response to paclitaxel in node-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 357:1496–1506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ellis P, Barrett-Lee P, Johnson L, Cameron D, Wardley A, O’Reilly S, Verrill M, Smith I, Yarnold J et al (2009) Sequential docetaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer (TACT): an open-label, phase III, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 373:1681–1692

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Farmer H, McCabe N, Lord CJ, Tutt AN, Johnson DA, Richardson TB, Santarosa M, Dillon KJ, Hickson I, Knights C, Martin NM, Jackson SP, Smith GC, Ashworth A (2005) Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature 434:917–921

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Bryant HE, Schultz N, Thomas HD, Parker KM, Flower D, Lopez E, Kyle S, Meuth M, Curtin NJ, Helleday T (2005) Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase. Nature 434:913–917

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. McCabe N, Turner NC, Lord CJ, Kluzek K, Bialkowska A, Swift S, Giavara S, O’Connor MJ, Tutt AN, Zdzienicka MZ, Smith GC, Ashworth A (2006) Deficiency in the repair of DNA damage by homologous recombination and sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition. Cancer Res 66:8109–8115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Abbott DW, Freeman ML, Holt JT (1998) Double-strand break repair deficiency and radiation sensitivity in BRCA2 mutant cancer cells. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:978–985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Husain A, He G, Venkatraman ES, Spriggs DR (1998) BRCA1 up-regulation is associated with repair-mediated resistance to cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II). Cancer Res 58:1120–1123

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Bhattacharyya A, Ear US, Koller BH, Weichselbaum RR, Bishop DK (2000) The breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 is required for subnuclear assembly of Rad51 and survival following treatment with the DNA cross-linking agent cisplatin. J Biol Chem 275:23899–23903

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Ren Q, Potoczek MB, Krajewski S, Krajewska M, Basu A, Haldar S, Reed JC, Turner BC (2001) Transcriptional regulation of the Bcl-2 gene by wild type BRCA1 is important in regulating response to DNA damage-induced apoptosis (abstract). Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 42:2991

    Google Scholar 

  52. Eisen A, Lubinski J, Klijn J, Moller P, Lynch HT, Offit K, Weber B, Rebbeck T, Neuhausen SL, Ghadirian P, Foulkes WD, Gershoni-Baruch R, Friedman E, Rennert G, Wagner T, Isaacs C, Kim-Sing C, Ainsworth P, Sun P, Narod SA (2005) Breast cancer risk following bilateral oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: an international case–control study. J Clin Oncol 23:7491–7496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Rebbeck TR, Lynch HT, Neuhausen SL, Narod SA, Van’t Veer L, Garber JE, Evans G, Isaacs C, Daly MB, Matloff E, Olopade OI, Weber BL (2002) Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med 346:1616–1622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Struewing JP, Watson P, Easton DF, Ponder BA, Lynch HT, Tucker MA (1995) Prophylactic oophorectomy in inherited breast/ovarian cancer families. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (17):33–35

  55. Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Singer CF, Evans DG, Lynch HT, Isaacs C, Garber JE, Neuhausen SL, Matloff E, Eeles R et al (2010) Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality. JAMA 304:967–975

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhang XT, Kang LG, Ding L, Vranic S, Gatalica Z, Wang ZY (2011) A positive feedback loop of ER-alpha36/EGFR promotes malignant growth of ER-negative breast cancer cells. Oncogene 30:770–780

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Kauff ND, Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Robson ME, Lee J, Garber JE, Isaacs C, Evans DG, Lynch H, Eeles RA, Neuhausen SL, Daly MB, Matloff E, Blum JL, Sabbatini P, Barakat RR, Hudis C, Norton L, Offit K, Rebbeck TR (2008) Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for the prevention of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast and gynecologic cancer: a multicenter, prospective study. J Clin Oncol 26:1331–1337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Rutter JL, Wacholder S, Chetrit A, Lubin F, Menczer J, Ebbers S, Tucker MA, Struewing JP, Hartge P (2003) Gynecologic surgeries and risk of ovarian cancer in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 Ashkenazi founder mutations: an Israeli population-based case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1072–1078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Partially funded by the Lynne Cohen Breast and Ovarian Cancer Project, Texas Business Women Funding, and the Nellie B. Connally Breast Cancer Research Fund.

Conflict of interest

Authors have no financial interest to declare

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Banu K. Arun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bayraktar, S., Gutierrez-Barrera, A.M., Liu, D. et al. Outcome of triple-negative breast cancer in patients with or without deleterious BRCA mutations. Breast Cancer Res Treat 130, 145–153 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1711-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1711-z

Keywords

Navigation