Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of a mixed solution of sodium hyaluronate and carboxymethyl cellulose on upper limb dysfunction after total mastectomy: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial

  • Clinical Trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 09 November 2012

Abstract

Restricted shoulder mobility is a major upper limb dysfunction related to lower quality of life and disability after breast cancer surgery. We hypothesized that sodium hyaluronate–carboxymethyl cellulose (HA–CMC) applied to the surface of the pectoralis major muscle after mastectomy would significantly reduce pain and improve range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder in breast cancer patients. We conducted a double-blind, randomized controlled study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of HA–CMC in the prevention of upper limb dysfunction after total mastectomy (TM). A total of 99 women with breast cancer were randomly assigned to one of two groups. In the HA–CMC group (n = 50), a mixed HA–CMC was applied to the surface of the pectoralis major and serratus anterior muscle after TM. In the control group (n = 49), TM was performed without the use of HA–CMC. The primary outcomes were ROM of the shoulder and motion-related pain assessed using a numeric rating scale measured before surgery (T0) and 3 (T1) and 6 months (T2) after surgery. Secondary outcomes included disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) and the pectoralis minor length test. Compared with the control group, the HA–CMC group showed greater reductions in postoperative restriction of total shoulder ROM (sum of flexion and horizontal abduction) at 3 months (10.20°, P = 0.004). Mean pain levels related to flexion and horizontal abduction were significantly lower in the HA–CMC group (−1.32 and −0.93, respectively, P < 0.05). The DASH score was lower (−4.94; P = 0.057) in the HA–CMC group at T2. No adverse effect was observed in either group. These results provide evidence that HA–CMC may provide pain relief and improve ROM of the shoulder without causing adverse effects. The effect on pectoralis tightness should be investigated in further studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smigal C, Jemal A, Ward E, Cokkinides V, Smith R, Howe HL, Thun M (2006) Trends in breast cancer by race and ethnicity: update 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 56:168–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hayes SC, Rye S, Battistutta D, DiSipio T, Newman B (2010) Upper-body morbidity following breast cancer treatment is common, may persist longer-term and adversely influences quality of life. Health Qual Life Outcomes 8:92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kwan W, Jackson J, Weir LM, Dingee C, McGregor G, Olivotto IA (2002) Chronic arm morbidity after curative breast cancer treatment: prevalence and impact on quality of life. J Clin Oncol 20:4242–4248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang EJ, Park WB, Seo KS, Kim SW, Heo CY, Lim JY (2010) Longitudinal change of treatment-related upper limb dysfunction and its impact on late dysfunction in breast cancer survivors: a prospective cohort study. J Surg Oncol 101:84–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheville AL, Tchou J (2007) Barriers to rehabilitation following surgery for primary breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 95:409–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stubblefield MD, Custodio CM (2006) Upper-extremity pain disorders in breast cancer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87:S96–S99 (quiz S100–S101)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Karki A, Simonen R, Malkia E, Selfe J (2005) Impairments, activity limitations and participation restrictions 6 and 12 months after breast cancer operation. J Rehabil Med 37:180–188

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Silen W, Matory W, Love S (1996) Atlas of techniques in breast surgery. Lippencott-Raven, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee SA, Kang JY, Kim YD, An AR, Kim SW, Kim YS, Lim JY (2010) Effects of a scapula-oriented shoulder exercise programme on upper limb dysfunction in breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Clin Rehabil 24:600–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shamley D, Srinaganathan R, Oskrochi R, Lascurain-Aguirrebena I, Sugden E (2009) Three-dimensional scapulothoracic motion following treatment for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 118:315–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reigle BS (2006) The prevention of disablement: a framework for the breast cancer trajectory. Rehabil Nurs 31:174–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Caban ME, Freeman JL, Zhang DD, Jansen C, Ostir G, Hatch SS, Goodwin JS (2006) The relationship between depressive symptoms and shoulder mobility among older women: assessment at one year after breast cancer diagnosis. Clin Rehabil 20:513–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Agrawal A, Ayantunde AA, Cheung KL (2006) Concepts of seroma formation and prevention in breast cancer surgery. ANZ J Surg 76:1088–1095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen SC, Chen MF (1999) Timing of shoulder exercise after modified radical mastectomy: a prospective study. Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi 22:37–43

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lotze MT, Duncan MA, Gerber LH, Woltering EA, Rosenberg SA (1981) Early versus delayed shoulder motion following axillary dissection: a randomized prospective study. Ann Surg 193:288–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shamley DR, Barker K, Simonite V, Beardshaw A (2005) Delayed versus immediate exercises following surgery for breast cancer: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 90:263–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hagberg L, Gerdin B (1992) Sodium hyaluronate as an adjunct in adhesion prevention after flexor tendon surgery in rabbits. J Hand Surg Am 17:935–941

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tuncay I, Ozbek H, Atik B, Ozen S, Akpinar F (2002) Effects of hyaluronic acid on postoperative adhesion of tendo calcaneus surgery: an experimental study in rats. J Foot Ankle Surg 41:104–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fujii S, Shimada H, Ike H, Kunisaki C, Ohki S, Ichikawa Y, Ohta M, Yamagishi S, Osada S (2009) Reduction of postoperative abdominal adhesion and ileus by a bioresorbable membrane. Hepatogastroenterology 56:725–728

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mais V, Bracco GL, Litta P, Gargiulo T, Melis GB (2006) Reduction of postoperative adhesions with an auto-crosslinked hyaluronan gel in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery: a blinded, controlled, randomized, multicentre study. Hum Reprod 21:1248–1254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim JH, Lee JH, Yoon JH, Chang JH, Bae JH, Kim KS (2007) Antiadhesive effect of the mixed solution of sodium hyaluronate and sodium carboxymethylcellulose after endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol 21:95–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lew DH, Yoon JH, Hong JW, Tark KC (2010) Efficacy of antiadhesion barrier solution on periimplant capsule formation in a white rat model. Ann Plast Surg 65:254–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Park JS, Cha SJ, Kim BG, Choi YS, Kwon GY, Kang H, An SS (2011) An assessment of the effects of a hyaluronan-based solution on reduction of postsurgical adhesion formation in rats: a comparative study of hyaluronan-based solution and two film barriers. J Surg Res 168:49–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. (2000) World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 284:3043–3045

  25. Gagliese L, Weizblit N, Ellis W, Chan VW (2005) The measurement of postoperative pain: a comparison of intensity scales in younger and older surgical patients. Pain 117:412–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Komiyama O, De Laat A (2005) Tactile and pain thresholds in the intra- and extra-oral regions of symptom-free subjects. Pain 115:308–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Thomas-Maclean RL, Hack T, Kwan W, Towers A, Miedema B, Tilley A (2008) Arm morbidity and disability after breast cancer: new directions for care. Oncol Nurs Forum 35:65–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lewis JS, Valentine RE (2007) The pectoralis minor length test: a study of the intra-rater reliability and diagnostic accuracy in subjects with and without shoulder symptoms. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 8:64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C (1996) Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 29:602–608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee JY, Lim JY, Oh JH, Ko YM (2008) Cross-cultural adaptation and clinical evaluation of a Korean version of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand outcome questionnaire (K-DASH). J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:570–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sahrmann S (2002) Diagnosis and treatment of movement impairment syndromes. Mosby, London

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ko E, Han W, Cho J, Lee JW, Kang SY, Jung SY, Kim EK, Hwang KT, Noh DY (2009) Fibrin glue reduces the duration of lymphatic drainage after lumpectomy and level II or III axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer: a prospective randomized trial. J Korean Med Sci 24:92–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schimizzi AL, Massie JB, Murphy M, Perry A, Kim CW, Garfin SR, Akeson WH (2006) High-molecular-weight hyaluronan inhibits macrophage proliferation and cytokine release in the early wound of a preclinical postlaminectomy rat model. Spine J 6:550–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu Y, Skardal A, Shu XZ, Prestwich GD (2008) Prevention of peritendinous adhesions using a hyaluronan-derived hydrogel film following partial-thickness flexor tendon injury. J Orthop Res 26:562–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Menderes A, Mola F, Tayfur V, Vayvada H, Barutcu A (2004) Prevention of peritendinous adhesions following flexor tendon injury with SEPRAFILM. Ann Plast Surg 53:560–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Shibata Y, Midorikawa K, Emoto G, Naito M (2001) Clinical evaluation of sodium hyaluronate for the treatment of patients with rotator cuff tear. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10:209–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Moskowitz RW, Blaine TA (2005) An overview of treatment options for persistent shoulder pain. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 34:10–15

    Google Scholar 

  38. Oh CH, Oh JH, Kim SH, Cho JH, Yoon JP, Kim JY (2011) Effectiveness of subacromial anti-adhesive agent injection after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: prospective randomized comparison study. Clin Orthop Surg 3:55–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hayes S, Battistutta D, Newman B (2005) Objective and subjective upper body function six months following diagnosis of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 94:1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kaya T, Karatepe AG, Gunaydn R, Yetis H, Uslu A (2010) Disability and health-related quality of life after breast cancer surgery: relation to impairments. South Med J 103:37–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cinar N, Seckin U, Keskin D, Bodur H, Bozkurt B, Cengiz O (2008) The effectiveness of early rehabilitation in patients with modified radical mastectomy. Cancer Nurs 31:160–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Barnes CJ, Van Steyn SJ, Fischer RA (2001) The effects of age, sex, and shoulder dominance on range of motion of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10:242–246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Connell DA, Potter HG, Sherman MF, Wickiewicz TL (1999) Injuries of the pectoralis major muscle: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 210:785–791

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Petilon J, Carr DR, Sekiya JK, Unger DV (2005) Pectoralis major muscle injuries: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13:59–68

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Randal J (1998) Post-mastectomy pain found to be common: treatment options sparse, but growing. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:731–732

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rietman JS, Dijkstra PU, Debreczeni R, Geertzen JH, Robinson DP, De Vries J (2004) Impairments, disabilities and health related quality of life after treatment for breast cancer: a follow-up study 2.7 years after surgery. Disabil Rehabil 26:78–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Perkins FM, Kehlet H (2000) Chronic pain as an outcome of surgery. A review of predictive factors. Anesthesiology 93:1123–1133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kudel I, Edwards RR, Kozachik S, Block BM, Agarwal S, Heinberg LJ, Haythornthwaite J, Raja SN (2007) Predictors and consequences of multiple persistent postmastectomy pains. J Pain Symptom Manage 34:619–627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Cummings M (2003) Myofascial pain from pectoralis major following trans-axillary surgery. Acupunct Med 21:105–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, Beaton D, Cleeland CS, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Kerns RD, Ader DN, Brandenburg N, Burke LB, Cella D, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dimitrova R, Dionne R, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Katz NP, Kehlet H, Kramer LD, Manning DC, McCormick C, McDermott MP, McQuay HJ, Patel S, Porter L, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Rauschkolb C, Revicki DA, Rothman M, Schmader KE, Stacey BR, Stauffer JW, von Stein T, White RE, Witter J, Zavisic S (2008) Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain 9:105–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM (2001) Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 94:149–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bird SB, Dickson EW (2001) Clinically significant changes in pain along the visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med 38:639–643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Cepeda MS, Africano JM, Polo R, Alcala R, Carr DB (2003) What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain? Pain 105:151–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Box RC, Reul-Hirche HM, Bullock-Saxton JE, Furnival CM (2002) Shoulder movement after breast cancer surgery: results of a randomised controlled study of postoperative physiotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 75:35–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Morimoto T, Tamura A, Ichihara T, Minakawa T, Kuwamura Y, Miki Y, Sasa M (2003) Evaluation of a new rehabilitation program for postoperative patients with breast cancer. Nurs Health Sci 5:275–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Jarvinen TA, Jarvinen TL, Kaariainen M, Kalimo H, Jarvinen M (2005) Muscle injuries: biology and treatment. Am J Sports Med 33:745–764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The grants from Hanmi Pharmaceutical, Seoul, Korea covered the cost of the vials of Guardix® used in this study. The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea

    Eun Joo Yang, Eunyoung Kang, Jin Youn Jang, Dongwon Kim, Cha Kyong Yom, Jae-Young Lim & Sung-Won Kim

Authors
  1. Eun Joo Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eunyoung Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jin Youn Jang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dongwon Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cha Kyong Yom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jae-Young Lim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sung-Won Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sung-Won Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, E.J., Kang, E., Jang, J.Y. et al. Effect of a mixed solution of sodium hyaluronate and carboxymethyl cellulose on upper limb dysfunction after total mastectomy: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 136, 187–194 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2272-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2272-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation