Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Accuracy and reliability of sentinel node biopsy in patients with breast cancer. Single centre study with long term follow-up

  • Clinical trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The aim of our study is to evaluate the frequency of false-negative (FN) sentinel node procedures in patients with breast cancer. A total of 791 breast cancer patients underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy at our institution between July 1997 and February 2005. A 2-day protocol was used to localise the sentinel node with the injection of 99mTc-nanocolloid. There were two phases in the study: the learning phase (50 patients) and the application phase (741 patients). In the learning phase, a complete lymphadenectomy was always performed. In the application phase, sentinel nodes were studied postoperatively with breast cancer and lymphadenectomy was performed when considered warranted by the pathological postoperative results. The median follow-up duration in the 741 patients studied during the application phase was 32.3 months (range 6–72 months). In this phase a total of 787 sentinel nodes (719 axillary and 68 intramammary chain) were obtained (range 0–5 per patient, mean 1.01), with 153 (41 with micrometastasis) positive sentinel nodes. We observed a total of three FN SLN results (0.5%). All three presented as an axillary recurrence into 24 months from operation. After a median follow-up of 32.3 months we observed only three clinical recurrences among 741 patients. Our results indicate that the sentinel node protocol can give an adequate local control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van der Vegt B, Doting MH, Jager PL, Wesseling J, de Vries J, Axillary recurrence after sentinel lymph node biopsy Eur J Surg Oncol 30:715–720, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Langer I, Marti WR, Guller U, et al. Axillary recurrence rate in breast cancer patients with negative sentinel lymph node (SLN) or SLN micrometastases: prospective analysis of 150 patients after SLN biopsy Ann Surg 241:152–158, 2005

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Reitsamer R, Peintinger F, Prokop E, Menzel C, Cimpoca W, Rettenbacher L, Sentinel lymph node biopsy alone without axillary lymph node dissection–follow up of sentinel lymph node negative breast cancer patients Eur J Surg Oncol 29: 221–223, 2003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Reitsamer R, Peintinger F, Prokop E, Rettenbacher L, Menzel C, 200 Sentinel lymph node biopsies without axillary lymph node dissection – no axillary recurrences after a 3-year follow-up Br J Cancer 90: 1551–1554, 2004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Luini A, Galimberti V, Gatti G, et al. The sentinel node biopsy after previous breast surgery: preliminary results on 543 patients treated at the European Institute of Oncology Breast Cancer Res Treat 89: 159–163, 2005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Feggi L, Basaglia E, Corcione S, et al. An original approach in the diagnosis of early breast cancer: use of the same radiopharmaceutical for both non-palpable lesions and sentinel node localisation Eur J Nucl Med 28: 1589–1596, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Allweis TM, Badriyyah M, Bar Ad V, Cohen T, Freund HR, Current controversies in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer Breast 12: 163–171, 2003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bergkvist L, Frisell J.: Multicentre validation study of sentinel node biopsy for staging in breast cancer. Br J Surg DOI:10.1002/bjs.5052, 2005

  9. Torrenga H, Meijer S, Fabry H, van der Sijp J, Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients: triple technique as a routine procedure Ann Surg Oncol 11: 231S–235S, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chung MA, Steinhoff MM, Cady B, Clinical axillary recurrence in breast cancer patients after a negative sentinel node biopsy Am J Surg 184: 310–314, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Smidt ML, Janssen CM, Kuster DM, Bruggink ED, Strobbe LJ, Axillary recurrence after a negative sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer: incidence and clinical significance Ann Surg Oncol 12:29–33, 2005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Naik AM, Fey J, Gemignani M, et al. The risk of axillary relapse after sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer is comparable with that of axillary lymph node dissection: a follow-up study of 4008 procedures Ann Surg 240: 462–468, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Badgwell BD, Povoski SP, Abdessalam SF, et al. Patterns of recurrence after sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer Ann Surg Oncol 10: 376–380, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Roumen RM, Kuijt GP, Liem IH, van Beek MW, Treatment of 100 patients with sentinel node-negative breast cancer without further axillary dissection Br J Surg 88:1639–1643, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Blanchard DK, Donohue JH, Reynolds C, Grant CS, Relapse and morbidity in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy alone or with axillary dissection for breast cancer Arch Surg 38: 482–487, 2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Janssen CMM, Smidt ML, Bruggink EDM, et al. Axillary recurrences after negative sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer: incidence and clinical significance Ann Surg Oncol 11: S76, 2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer N Engl J Med 349: 546–553, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Giuliano AE, Haigh PI, Brennan MB, et al. Prospective observational study of sentinel lymphadenectomy without further axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node-negative breast cancer J Clin Oncol 18: 2553–2559, 2000

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schrenk P, Hatzl-Griesenhofer M, Shamiyeh A, Waynad W, Follow-up of sentinel node negative breast cancer patients without axillary lymph node dissection J Surg Oncol 77: 165–170, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dessureault S, Dupont E, Shons A, et al. Early results of breast cancer lymphatic mapping from the H. Lee Moffit Cancer Center: no axillary recurrences in breast cancer patients after a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy Breast Cancer Res Treat 64:26, 2000

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Estourgie SH, Nieweg OE, Valdes-Olmos RA, et al. Eight false negative sentinel node procedures in breast cancer: what went wrong? Eur J Surg Oncol 29: 336–340, 2003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Miltenburg DM, Miller C, Karamlou TB, Brunicardi FC, Meta-analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer J Surg Res 84: 138–142, 1999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sachdev U, Murphy K, Derzie A, Jaffer S, Bleiweiss IJ, Brower S, Predictors of nonsentinel nodes mestastasis in breast cancer patients Am J Surg 183: 213–217, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Quan ML, McCready D, Temple WJ, McKinnon JG, Biology of lymphatic metastases in breast cancer: lessons learned from sentinel node biopsy Ann Surg Oncol 9: 467–471, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Derossis AM, Fey J, Yeung H, et al. A trend analysis of the relative value of blue dye and isotope localization in 2000 consecutive cases of sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer J Am Coll Surg 193: 473–478, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fraile M, Solá M, Vidal-Sicart S, Solsona J, Martín J, Revisión sistemática de la literatura científica sobre la técnica del ganglio centinela en el cáncer de mama Rev de Senología y Patología Malaria 16: 16–30, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chua B, Ung O, Boyages J, Competing considerations in regional nodal treatment for early breast cancer Breast J 8:15–22, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Newman LA, Hunt KK, Buchholz T, et al. Presentation, management and outcome of axillary recurrence from breast cancer Am J Surg 180: 252–256, 2000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgical, Anaesthesiological and Radiological Sciences, Section of General Surgery, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy

    P. Carcoforo, D. Sortini, G. Soliani, E. Basaglia & A. Liboni

  2. Department of Radiology, Unit of Nuclear Medicine, Sant’Anna Hospital, Ferrara, Italy

    L. Feggi

Authors
  1. P. Carcoforo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Sortini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Soliani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. Basaglia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. L. Feggi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A. Liboni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Sortini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carcoforo, P., Sortini, D., Soliani, G. et al. Accuracy and reliability of sentinel node biopsy in patients with breast cancer. Single centre study with long term follow-up. Breast Cancer Res Treat 95, 111–116 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-005-9052-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-005-9052-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation