Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Axillary Recurrence After a Negative Sentinel NodeBiopsy for Breast Cancer: Incidence and Clinical Significance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) carries the inherent risk of approximately 5% false-negative sampling. Undetected tumor-positive nodes of clinical importance are those that lead to axillary recurrence. This survey aims at clarifying the extent of this problem in current practice and literature.

Methods

In a regional teaching hospital, 696 consecutive breast cancer patients underwent SLNB between January 1998 and July 2003, and data were entered in a prospective database. PubMed and the Cochrane library were searched for a systematic review of the literature. Thirteen studies dealt with the follow-up of a cohort of sentinel lymph node (SLN)-negative patients or presented a case report.

Results

The SLN identification rate was 97.1%. The SLN was tumor free in 439 (65%) of the 676 patients. After a median follow-up of 26 months, axillary recurrence was detected in 2 of 439 patients 4 and 27 months after the SLNB. The incidence of clinically apparent false-negative SLNB is .46%. The systematic review resulted in 3184 SLNB-negative patients with a median follow-up of 25 months. Axillary recurrence occurred in eight patients after a median of 21 months. The axillary recurrence rate in the literature is .25%. One third of these patients present with synchronous systemic metastases.

Conclusions

Axillary recurrences after a negative SLNB occur, but at a much lower rate than would be expected on the basis of historical figures and the false-negative SLN findings. The natural history of axillary relapse after negative SLNB resembles the locoregional recurrence of breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B Fisher M Bauer DL Wickerham et al. (1983) ArticleTitleRelation of number of positive axillary nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary breast cancer. An NSABP update Cancer 52 1551–7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL2c%2FgtFyhtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle6352003

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. AE Giuliano RC Jones M Brennan R Statman (1997) ArticleTitleSentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancer J Clin Oncol 15 2345–50 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2szjvFGmsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9196149

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. AE Giuliano PS Dale RR Turner et al. (1995) ArticleTitleImproved axillary staging of breast cancer with sentinel lymphadenectomy Ann Surg 222 394–9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2Mvgsl2ksw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle7677468

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. RR Turner DW Ollila DL Krasne AE Giuliano (1997) ArticleTitleHistopathologic validation of the sentinel lymph node hypothesis for breast carcinoma Ann Surg 226 271–6 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199709000-00006 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2svnvFymsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9339933

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. U Veronesi (1999) ArticleTitleThe sentinel node and breast cancer Br J Surg 86 1–2 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7kvFGqtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10027351

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. U Veronesi G Paganelli V Galimberti et al. (1997) ArticleTitleSentinel-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes Lancet 349 1864–7 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(97)01004-0 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2szmtVOqtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9217757

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. U Veronesi G Paganelli G Viale et al. (2003) ArticleTitleA randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer N Engl J Med 349 546–53 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMoa012782 Occurrence Handle12904519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. BJ O’Hea AD Hill AM El Shirbiny et al. (1998) ArticleTitleSentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: initial experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center J Am Coll Surg 186 423–7 Occurrence Handle9544956

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. MT Nano J Kollias G Farshid PG Gill M Bochner (2002) ArticleTitleClinical impact of false-negative sentinel node biopsy in primary breast cancer Br J Surg 89 1430–4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38njt1antA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12390387

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. D Krag D Weaver T Ashikaga et al. (1998) ArticleTitleThe sentinel node in breast cancer—a multicenter validation study N Engl J Med 339 941–6 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199810013391401 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvhvVKntg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9753708

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. B Chua IA Olivotto JC Donald et al. (2003) ArticleTitleOutcomes of sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer in British Columbia, 1996 to 2001 Am J Surg 185 118–26 Occurrence Handle12559440

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. L Bergkvist J Frisell G Liljegren et al. (2001) ArticleTitleMulticentre study of detection and false-negative rates in sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer Br J Surg 88 1644–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mnptlantg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11736980

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. DM Miltenburg C Miller TB Karamlou FC Brunicardi (1999) ArticleTitleMeta-analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer J Surg Res 84 138–42 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ovVWlsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10357910

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. SH Estourgie OE Nieweg EJ Rutgers BB Kroon (2003) ArticleTitleWhat is a false-negative result for sentinel node procedures in breast cancer? J Surg Oncol 82 141–2 Occurrence Handle10.1002/jso.10215 Occurrence Handle12619054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. AC Voogd JW Coebergh OJ Repelaer-van-Driel et al. (2000) ArticleTitleThe risk of nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with clinically negative lymph nodes: a population-based analysis Breast Cancer Res Treat 62 63–9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvkt1Snsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10989986

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. M Greco R Agresti N Cascinelli et al. (2000) ArticleTitleBreast cancer patients treated without axillary surgery: clinical implications and biologic analysis Ann Surg 232 1–7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czitVCrtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10862188

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. B Fisher C Redmond ER Fisher et al. (1985) ArticleTitleTen-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing radical mastectomy and total mastectomy with or without radiation N Engl J Med 312 674–81 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM198503143121102 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL2M7jslOitQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle3883168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. R Rouzier JM Extra J Klijanienko et al. (2002) ArticleTitleIncidence and prognostic significance of complete axillary downstaging after primary chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with T1 to T3 tumors and cytologically proven axillary metastatic lymph nodes J Clin Oncol 20 5–10

    Google Scholar 

  19. P Schrenk M Hatzl-Griesenhofer A Shamiyeh W Waynad (2001) ArticleTitleFollow-up of sentinel node negative breast cancer patients without axillary lymph node dissection J Surg Oncol 77 165–70 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mvgt1Gqtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11455552

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. LA Newman KK Hunt T Buchholz et al. (2000) ArticleTitlePresentation, management and outcome of axillary recurrence from breast cancer Am J Surg 180 252–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7gt1Kktw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11113430

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. RJ Salmon TH Bouillet JS Lewis KB Clough (2002) ArticleTitleRecurrence in the axilla after sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer Eur J Surg Oncol 28 199 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD387lt1aqsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11884060

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. DK Blanchard JH Donohue C Reynolds CS Grant (2003) ArticleTitleRelapse and morbidity in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy alone or with axillary dissection for breast cancer Arch Surg 138 482–7 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.138.5.482 Occurrence Handle12742949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. J Loza F Colo J Nadal M Viniegra R Chacon (2002) ArticleTitleAxillary recurrence after sentinel node biopsy for operable breast cancer Eur J Surg Oncol 28 897–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38jhvFCgsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12481793

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. MA Chung MM Steinhoff B Cady (2002) ArticleTitleClinical axillary recurrence in breast cancer patients after a negative sentinel node biopsy Am J Surg 184 310–4 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00956-X Occurrence Handle12383890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. RM Roumen GP Kuijt IH Liem MW van Beek (2001) ArticleTitleTreatment of 100 patients with sentinel node-negative breast cancer without further axillary dissection Br J Surg 88 1639–43 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01935.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnptVGmtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11736979

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. SH Estourgie OE Nieweg RA Valdes-Olmos et al. (2003) ArticleTitleEight false negative sentinel node procedures in breast cancer: what went wrong? Eur J Surg Oncol 29 336–40 Occurrence Handle10.1053/ejso.2002.1379 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3nvFCjsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12711286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. TW Yen GN Mann TJ Lawton RB Livingston BO Anderson (2003) ArticleTitleAn axillary recurrence of breast cancer following a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy Breast J 9 234–6 Occurrence Handle12752634

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. R Reitsamer F Peintinger E Prokop et al. (2003) ArticleTitleSentinel lymph node biopsy alone without axillary lymph node dissection—follow up of sentinel lymph node negative breast cancer patients Eur J Surg Oncol 29 221–3 Occurrence Handle10.1053/ejso.2002.1320 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s7kt1agsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12657230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. BD Badgwell SP Povoski SF Abdessalam et al. (2003) ArticleTitlePatterns of recurrence after sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer Ann Surg Oncol 10 376–80 Occurrence Handle12734085

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. AE Giuliano PI Haigh MB Brennan et al. (2000) ArticleTitleProspective observational study of sentinel lymphadenectomy without further axillary dissection in patients with sentinel node-negative breast cancer J Clin Oncol 18 2553–9 Occurrence Handle10893286 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czlt1Snug%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. S Dessureault E Dupont A Shons et al. (2000) ArticleTitleEarly results of breast cancer lymphatic mapping from the H. Lee Moffit Cancer Center: no axillary recurrences in breast cancer patients after a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy Breast Cancer Res Treat 64 26

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marjolein L. Smidt MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smidt, M.L., Janssen, C.M.M., Kuster, D.M. et al. Axillary Recurrence After a Negative Sentinel NodeBiopsy for Breast Cancer: Incidence and Clinical Significance. Ann Surg Oncol 12, 29–33 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-004-1166-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-004-1166-0

Keywords

Navigation