Abstract
Purpose. To evaluate the influence of distinct clinicopathological parameters on ultrasound criteria for ductal invasive breast cancer.
Patients and methods. The hardcopy prints of 337 ductal invasive breast cancers were analyzed. Ten ultrasound criteria (shape, orientation, echogenicity, echo pattern, calcifications, margin, margin contour, lesion boundary, surrounding tissue, and posterior acoustic features) were defined and correlated to age, tumor size, axillary lymph node status, and histological grading in a multivariate analysis.
Results. Tumors in women ≤50 years displayed more often an indistinct margin (p = 0.003) and an enhanced/indifferent posterior ultrasound transmission (p = 0.008). Tumors in an advanced T-stage showed more frequently an irregular shape ( p = 0.006), an orientation parallel to the skin ( p = 0.01), hypoechogenicity ( p < 0.0001), and less often calcifications ( p = 0.002). A positive axillary lymph node status was significantly correlated to oval/round shape ( p = 0.004), hyper-/isoechogenicity ( p = 0.001), and a homogeneous echo pattern ( p = 0.002). Grading showed no correlation to the examined ultrasound criteria.
Conclusion. Breast ultrasound criteria, which are used to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions, are influenced by age, size and lymph node status. These clinical conditions should be considered in the ultrasound diagnosis of breast lesions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
HM Zonderland EG Coerkamp J Hermans MJ Vijver Particlevan de AE Voorthuisen Particlevan (1999) ArticleTitleDiagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography Radiology 213 IssueID2 413–422 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FhvV2iug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10551221
TM Kolb J Lichy JH Newhouse (1998) ArticleTitleOccult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US–diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics Radiology 207 IssueID1 191–199 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7ptFeqsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9530316
P Skaane K Engedal (1998) ArticleTitleAnalysis of sonographic features in the differentiation of fibroadenoma and invasive ductal carcinoma AJR Am J Roentgenol 170 IssueID1 109–114 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FosFKlug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9423610
EB Mendelson WA Berg CR Merritt (2001) ArticleTitleToward a standardized breast ultrasound lexicon, BIRADS: ultrasound Semin Roentgenol 36 IssueID3 217–225 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FisFWksg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11475068
P Skaane K Engedal A Skjennald (1997) ArticleTitleInterobserver variation in the interpretation of breast imaging. Comparison of mammography, ultrasonography, and both combined in the interpretation of palpable noncalcified breast masses. Acta Radiol 38 IssueID4 Pt 1 497–502 Occurrence Handle10.3109/02841859709174375 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2szot1KlsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9240666
JA Baker PJ Kornguth MS Soo R Walsh P Mengoni (1999) ArticleTitleSonography of solid breast lesions: observer variability of lesion description and assessment AJR Am J Roentgenol 172 IssueID6 1621–1625 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3nslyjtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10350302
G Clark (2000) Prognostic and predictive factors JRLM Harris M Morrow CK Osborne (Eds) Diseases of the Breast EditionNumber2 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia 489–514
(ACR) ACoR: ACR BIRADS®-Ultrasound. In: ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, Breast Imaging Atlas. Reston, VA, American Collage of Radiology, 2003.
InstitutionalAuthorNameWHO (1981) Histological Typing of Breast Tumours EditionNumber2 WHO Geneva
HJG Bloom WW Richardson (1957) ArticleTitleHistological grading and prognosis in breast cancer. A study of 1409 cases in which 359 have been followed for 15 years Brit J Cancer 11 359–377 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaG1c%2Fkt1Gmtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle13499785
ID Fleming JSE Cooper (1997) AJCC Cancer Staging Manual EditionNumber5 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Philadelphia, PA
G Rahbar AC Sie GC Hansen JS Prince ML Melany HE Reynolds VP Jackson JW Sayre LW Bassett (1999) ArticleTitleBenign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation Radiology 213 IssueID3 889–894 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2Fls1Ontg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10580971
TC Chao YF Lo SC Chen MF Chen (1999) ArticleTitleProspective sonographic study of 3093 breast tumors J Ultrasound Med 18 IssueID5 363–370 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ls12ntQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10327015
HM Zonderland J Hermans EG Coerkamp (2000) ArticleTitleUltrasound variables and their prognostic value in a population of 1103 patients with 272 breast cancers Eur Radiol 10 IssueID10 1562–1568 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3crgtVOitQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11044925
KL Marquet M Wolter S Handt W Rath R Stressig P Kozlowski A Funk (2002) ArticleTitleCriteria of dignity in ultrasound mammography using a 10-MHz-transducer, also with regard to tumor size Ultraschall Med 23 IssueID6 383–387 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2FgvVeqtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12514754
PM Lamb NM Perry SJ Vinnicombe CA Wells (2000) ArticleTitleCorrelation between ultrasound characteristics, mammographic findings and histological grade in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast Clin Radiol 55 IssueID1 40–44 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7hslKnsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10650109
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Watermann, D.O., Tempfer, C.B., Hefler, L.A. et al. Ultrasound criteria for ductal invasive breast cancer are modified by age, tumor size, and axillary lymph node status. Breast Cancer Res Treat 89, 127–133 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-004-1478-6
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-004-1478-6