Skip to main content
Log in

An Assessment of Eddy-Covariance-Based Surface Fluxes Above an Evaporating Heated Surface Under Fair-Weather Daytime Conditions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Above an evaporating heated surface under fair-weather daytime conditions, the cospectra between the vertical velocity component, temperature, and water-vapour mixing ratio should be positive. We have applied a multi-resolution technique to a 3.64-h long, 10-Hz time series centred at midday for 16 fair-weather days at a mid-latitude site during spring to measure the averaging period τc at which the crossover from the domain of the three positive cospectra to a mixed-sign domain occurs. The τc values broadly range from 9 to 42 min, with 13 of the 16 days having values less than 30 min. When mesoscale circulations induced by surface heterogeneity are likely to be present, the vertical heat (or moisture) flux computed with the conventional averaging period of 30 min τ30 is as large (or small) as 1.09 (or 0.78) times that using τc. However, on 14 (or 13) days, the vertical heat (or moisture) fluxes using the period τc are explained by those calculated with the period τ30 within a difference range of ± 1%. The insignificant difference is due to the insensitivity of the fluxes to the averaging period at scales larger than approximately 7 min. Therefore, despite a broad range of τc values, the 30-min-averaged surface fluxes can be treated as the required turbulent fluxes. Although this finding is not robust, given that data were collected at one location over 16 days, it supports the use of 30-min-averaged surfaces fluxes, particularly for the composite midday fluxes on fair-weather days.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alekseychik P, Mammarella I, Karpov D, Dengel S, Terentieva I, Sabrekov A, Glagolev M, Lapshina E (2017) Net ecosystem exchange and energy fluxes measured with the eddy covariance technique in a western Siberian bog. Atmos Chem Phys 17:9333–9345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arya PS (1989) Introduction to micrometeorology. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubinet M, Vesala T, Papale D (2012) Eddy covariance: a practical guide to measurement and data analysis. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Charuchittipan D, Babel W, Mauder M, Leps JP, Foken T (2014) Extension of the averaging time in eddy-covariance measurements and its effect on the energy balance closure. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 152:303–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Roode SR, Duynkerke PG, Jonker HJJ (2004) Large-eddy simulation: how large is large enough? J Atmos Sci 61:403–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desjardins RL, Macpherson JI, Schuepp PH, Karanja F (1989) An evaluation of aircraft flux measurements of CO2, water vapor and sensible heat. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 47:55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnigan JJ, Clement R, Malhi Y, Leuning R, Cleugh HA (2003) A re-evaluation of long-term flux measurement techniques part I: averaging and coordinate rotation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 107:1–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foken T, Wimmer MF, Thomas C, Liebethal C (2006) Some aspects of the energy balance closure problem. Atmos Chem Phys 6:4395–4402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillemet B, Isaka H, Mascart P (1983) Molecular dissipation of turbulent fluctuations in the convective mixed layer part I: height variations of dissipation rates. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 27:141–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartogensis OK, De Bruin HAR (2005) Monin–Obukhov similarity functions of the structure parameter of temperature and turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate in the stable boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 116:253–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell JF, Mahrt L (1997) Multiresolution flux decomposition. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 83:117–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt JCR, Kaimal JC, Gaynor JE (1985) Some observations of turbulence structure in stable layers. Q J R Meteorol Soc 111:793–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igarashi Y, Kumagai T, Yoshifuji N, Sato T, Tanaka N, Tanaka K, Suzuki M, Tantasirin C (2015) Environmental control of canopy stomatal conductance in a tropical deciduous forest in northern Thailand. Agric For Meteorol 202:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonker HJJ, Duynkerke PG, Cuijpers JWM (1999) Mesoscale fluctuations in scalars generated by boundary layer convection. J Atmos Sci 56:801–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaimal JC (1978) Horizontal velocity spectra in an unstable surface layer. J Atmos Sci 35:18–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaimal JC, Businger JA (1963) A continuous wave sonic anemometer-thermometer. J Appl Meteorol 2:156–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaimal JC, Finnigan JJ (1994) Atmospheric boundary layer flows. Oxford University Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaimal JC, Gaynor JE (1983) The Boulder Atmospheric Observatory. J Clim Appl Meteorol 22:863–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaimal JC, Gaynor G (1991) Another look at sonic thermometry. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 56:401–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaimal JC, Eversole RA, Lenschow DH, Stankov BB, Kahn PH, Businger JA (1982) Spectral characteristics of the convective boundary-layer over uneven terrain. J Atmos Sci 39:1098–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang SL (2016) Regional Bowen ratio controls on afternoon moist convection: a large eddy simulation study. J Geophys Res 121:14056–14083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang SL, Bryan GH (2011) A large-eddy simulation study of moist convection initiation over heterogeneous surface fluxes. Mon Weather Rev 139:2901–2917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang SL, Ryu JH (2016) Response of moist convection to multi-scale surface flux heterogeneity. Q J R Meteorol Soc 142:2180–2193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang SL, Davis KJ, LeMone M (2007) Observations of the ABL structures over a heterogeneous land surface during IHOP_2002. J Hydrometeorol 8:221–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lareau NP, Crosman E, Whiteman CD, Horel JD, Hoch SW, Brown WOJ, Horst TW (2013) The persistent cold-air pool study. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 94:51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee X, Massman W, Law B (2006) Handbook of micrometeorology: a guide for surface flux measurement and analysis. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundquist JK et al (2017) Assessing state-of-the-art capabilities for probing the atmospheric boundary layer: the XPIA field campaign. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 98:289–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Feng Q, Su Y, Yu T, Jin H (2017) Forest evapotranspiration and energy flux partitioning based on eddy covariance methods in an arid desert region of northwest China. Adv Meteorol 2017:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahrt L (1991) Boundary-layer moisture regimes. Q J R Meteorol Soc 117:151–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahrt L (1998) Flux sampling errors for aircraft and towers. J Atmos Ocean Technol 15:416–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahrt L (2010) Computing turbulent fluxes near the surface: needed improvements. Agric For Meteorol 150:501–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao J et al (2018) Southeast atmosphere studies: learning from model-observation syntheses. Atmos Chem Phys 18:2615–2651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger M, Holmes H (2008) Time scales in the unstable atmospheric surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 126:29–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeng CH, LeMone MA, Khairoutdinov MF, Krueger SK, Bogenschutz PA, Randall DA (2009) The tropical marine boundary layer under a deep convection system: a large-eddy simulation study. J Adv Model Earth Syst 1:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsso EO, Sahlee E, Rutgersson A (2014) Turbulent momentum flux characterization using extended multiresolution analysis. Q J R Meteorol Soc 140:1715–1728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oncley SP, Businger JA, Friehe CA, Larue JC, Itsweire EC, Chang SS (1990) Surface-layer profiles and turbulence measurements over uniform land under near-neutral conditions. In: Proceedings of 9th symposium on boundary layer and turbulence, Roskilde, Denmark. American Meteorological Society, Boston, pp 237–240

  • Roth M, Oke TR, Steyn DG (1989) Velocity and temperature spectra and cospectra in an unstable suburban atmosphere. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 47:309–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stull RB (1988) An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vickers D, Mahrt L (1997) Quality control and flux sampling problems for tower and aircraft data. J Atmos Ocean Technol 14:512–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickers D, Mahrt L (2003) The cospectral gap and turbulent flux calculations. J Atmos Ocean Technol 20(5):660–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weckwerth TM et al (2004) An overview of the international H2O Project (IHOP_2002) and some preliminary highlights. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 85:253–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilczak JM, Parson DB, Koch SE, Moore JA, LeMone MA, Demoz BD, Flamant C, Geerts B, Wang J, Feltz WF (2001) Sonic anemometer tilt correction algorithms. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 99:127–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyngaard JC, Pennell WT, Lenschow DH, LeMone MA (1978) The temperature-humidity covariance budget in the convective boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 35:47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Tian F, Hu H, Yang P (2014) A comparison of methods for determining field evapotranspiration: photosynthesis system, sap flow, and eddy covariance. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18:1053–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Ahang H, Cai X, Song Y, Sun J (2016) Contribution of low-frequency motions to sensible heat fluxes over urban and suburban areas. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 161:183–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Z, Zhiqiu G, Li Dan, Xueyan B, Chunxia L, Fei L (2013) Scalar flux-gradient relationships under unstable conditions over water in coastal regions. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 148:495–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou B, Simon JS, Chow FK (2014) The convective boundary layer in the terra incognita. J Atmos Sci 71:2545–2563

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grand funded by the Korea government Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (No. NRF-2018R1A2B6008631). The author also thanks those who collected the surface dataset at the Boulder Atmospheric Observatory (BAO) site during the XPIA field campaign.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Song-Lak Kang.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Non-stationarity Ratio

Some readers may be concerned about the non-stationarity of the 3.64-h long (217 10-Hz data points) time series, since stationarity is a necessary condition to estimate ensemble-averaged fluxes satisfying the surface energy balance. However, we focus on the measurement of the cut-off time scale that separates turbulent eddies from significant non-turbulent physical processes.

For each day, the 217 10-Hz data points are partitioned into 215-point (about 0.91 h) records, where the number of records (I) is 217−15 = 22 and each record is further divided into J segments. In fact, depending on the segment length τ, the number of segments varies. For example, the number of 214-point (about 27.3 min) segments is two in a 215-point record.

For each day of the 16 fair-weather days, with four 215-point records, we compute the non-stationarity ratio (NR) of Mahrt (1998),

$$ N\!R \equiv \frac{{\sigma_{btw} }}{R\!E}, $$
(17)

and the random error

$$ R\!E = \frac{{\sigma_{wi} }}{\sqrt J }. $$
(18)

In Eq. 18, the within-record standard deviation σwi of the flux for the ith record is computed as

$$ \sigma_{wi} \left( i \right) = \sqrt {\frac{1}{J - 1}\mathop \sum \limits_{j = 1}^{J} \left[ {F\left( {i,j} \right) - \bar{F}\left( i \right)} \right]^{2} } , $$
(19)

where F(i, j) is the heat or moisture flux for the jth segment of the ith record, and \( \bar{F}\left( i \right) \) is the average of the segment fluxes for the ith record. In Eq. 17, the between-record standard deviation σbtw of the flux is

$$ \sigma_{btw} = \sqrt {\frac{1}{I - 1}\mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{I} \left( {\bar{F}\left( i \right) - \bar{F}} \right)^{2} } , $$
(20)

where \( \bar{F} \) is the segment flux averaged over all of the segments and records.

Figure 6 presents the computed NR values as a function of segment length τ (211 ≤ τ ≤ 214 in 10-Hz data points; \( 3.4 \le \tau \le 27.3 \) min) for each day. The NR value increases to slightly larger than four with τ = 13.7 min on 31 March 2015. However, except for this case, the other values are all smaller than four and further, most values are smaller than two. Mahrt (1998) states that when NR < 2, the residuals of the surface energy budget are less than 20%, but rapidly grow to about 40% and 80% when NR = 3 and 6, respectively.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Nonstationary ratio (NR) for each day of the 16 fair-weather days with four 0.91-h records obtained from the 3.64-h time series centred at midday

Appendix 2: Cospectra as Functions of the Normalized Frequency

In the literature, numerous studies (e.g., Kaimal 1978; Roth et al. 1989; Kaimal and Finnigan 1994) present cospectra as a function of the normalized frequency f ≡ 2πz/τV, where V is the wind speed, and z is the measurement height, where z = 5 m above ground level here. Our purpose is to investigate whether the 30-min-averaged surface fluxes are appropriate to be treated as turbulent fluxes. Thus, in Fig. 4, the composite cospectra are obtained as a function of the averaging time scale τ.

For the comparison with previous studies, we present the cospectra as a function of the normalized frequency f. As demonstrated in Table 1, the wind speed V averaged over the 3.64-h period centred at the midday varies for each day. With a higher (or lower) mean wind speed, the normalized frequency becomes relatively lower (or higher). For example, on 16 March 2015 when the mean wind speed of 3.82 m s−1 is the strongest, the cospectra are shifted into the lowest frequency range from 8.2 × 10−1 to 1.3 × 10−5. In contrast, on 11 May 2015, when the mean wind speed of 0.96 m s−1 is the weakest, the cospectra into the highest frequency range from 3.3 × 100 to 5 × 10−5. Thus, the composite cospectra over the 16 days are obtained from the highest f of 3.3 × 100 on 16 March to the lowest f of 5 × 10−5 on 11 May. The composite cospectra of wT and wr normalized with the heat and moisture fluxes both have the cospectral peak at f = 1.3 × 10−2. The spectral peak of the w component is located at 5 × 10−2, and the peaks of T and r at 5 × 10−5. Compared with previous studies (e.g., Kaimal 1978; Roth et al. 1989; Kaimal and Finnigan 1994), the cospectral peaks of ww, wT, and wr are located within the reference ranges, although the spectral peak of the w component is slightly shifted to a higher frequency. In addition, in Fig. 7c, the spectra of T and r have the mesoscale spectral peak at the lowest frequency of f = 5 × 10−5, but the turbulence peak at f = 1 × 10−2, which also matches results of Kaimal and Finnigan (1994).

Fig. 7
figure 7

As Fig. 4 but as a function of the normalized frequency f ≡ 2πz/τM, where z is the measurement height of 5 m, M the wind speed averaged over the 3.64-h period centred at the midday for each day of the 16 fair-weather days (Table 1), and τ is the averaging period. At each value of f from \( 3.3 \times 10^{0} \left( {{\text{the highest }}\,f\, {\text{on }}\,11\, {\text{May}}} \right) \) to \( 5 \times 10^{ - 5} \left( {{\text{the lowest }}\,f\, {\text{on }}\,16\, {\text{March}}} \right) \), the standard deviation range of the cospectra over the 16 days is marked with colour shading

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, SL. An Assessment of Eddy-Covariance-Based Surface Fluxes Above an Evaporating Heated Surface Under Fair-Weather Daytime Conditions. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 171, 79–99 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-018-0412-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-018-0412-0

Keywords

Navigation