Abstract
We develop several critical concepts that should be considered when interpreting, modelling and designing future experiments for flows over sloping terrain. Vertical buoyancy fluxes in katabatic flows can be positive and a source of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) despite the statically stable, thermal stratification that drives these flows. This phenomenon occurs when the ratio of along-slope to slope-normal kinematic heat fluxes is greater than the cotangent of the slope angle, suggesting a critical value of slope-angle steepness found in earlier studies. We provide field-data-based evidence that the along-slope heat flux may dominate the variables in this inequality, and therefore in generating buoyant TKE production or suppression over a steep slope. These data show the along-slope heat flux can be more variable and significantly larger in magnitude than the slope-normal component. The gradient Richardson number does not include the effects of the along-slope buoyancy; furthermore, none of the canonical stability parameters can properly reflect the TKE redistribution from turbulent transport divergence and the sink of TKE in cases of counter-gradient momentum fluxes, which we frequently observe near the peak of the katabatic jet. In such cases, canonical stability parameters inadequately represent the physical mechanisms associated with stability. These results have broad implications related to accurately modelling turbulence and surface exchanges over sloping terrain and illustrate the need to more thoroughly investigate the along-slope heat flux and its drivers, the meaning and definitions of stability, and the effects of non-local turbulent transport.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arritt R, Pielke R (1986) Interactions of nocturnal slope flows with ambient winds. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 37(1):183–195
Axelsen S, van Dop H (2009a) Large-eddy simulation of katabatic winds. Part 1: comparison with observations. Acta Geophys 57(4):803–836
Axelsen S, van Dop H (2009b) Large-eddy simulation of katabatic winds. Part 2: sensitivity study and comparison with analytical models. Acta Geophys 57(4):837–856
Babić K, Bencetić Klaić Z, Večenaj Ž (2012) Determining a turbulence averaging time scale by Fourier analysis for the nocturnal boundary layer. Geofizika 29(1):35–51
Brutsaert W (1998) Land-surface water vapor and sensible heat flux: spatial variability, homogeneity, and measurement scales. Water Resour Res 34(10):2433–2442
Canuto V (2002) Critical Richardson numbers and gravity waves. Astron Astrophys 384(3):1119–1123
Catalano F, Cenedese A (2010) High-resolution numerical modeling of thermally driven slope winds in a valley with strong capping. J Appl Meteorol Clim 49(9):1859–1880
Denby B (1999) Second-order modelling of turbulence in katabatic flows. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 92(1):65–98
Fedorovich E, Shapiro A (2009) Structure of numerically simulated katabatic and anabatic flows along steep slopes. Acta Geophys 57(4):981–1010
Garratt JR (1992) The atmospheric boundary layer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 316 pp
Grachev AA, Andreas EL, Fairall CW, Guest PS, Persson POG (2013) The critical Richardson number and limits of applicability of local similarity theory in the stable boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 147(1):51–82
Grachev AA, Leo LS, Di Sabatino S, Fernando HJS, Pardyjak ER, Fairall CW (2016) Structure of turbulence in katabatic flows below and above the wind-speed maximum. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 159(3):469–494
Horst T, Doran J (1988) The turbulence structure of nocturnal slope flow. J Atmos Sci 45(4):605–616
Katul GG, Porporato A, Shah S, Bou-Zeid E (2014) Two phenomenological constants explain similarity laws in stably stratified turbulence. Phys Rev E 89(2):023,007
Łobocki L (2014) Surface-layer flux-gradient relationships over inclined terrain derived from a local equilibrium, turbulence closure model. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 150(3):469–483
Mahrt L (1982) Momentum balance of gravity flows. J Atmos Sci 39:2701–2711
Mahrt L (1986) On the shallow motion approximations. J Atmos Sci 43(10):1036–1044
Mutzner R, Calaf M, Tarolli P, Oldroyd H, Weijs S, Parlange M (2015) Controls on the diurnal streamflow cycles in two subbasins of an alpine headwater catchment. Water Resour Res 51(5):3403–3418
Nadeau DF, Pardyjak ER, Higgins CW, Parlange MB (2012) Similarity scaling over a steep alpine slope. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 147(3):401–419
Nadeau DF, Pardyjak ER, Higgins CW, Huwald H, Parlange MB (2013) Flow during the evening transition over steep alpine slopes. Q J R Meteorol Soc 139(672):607–624. doi:10.1002/qj.1985
Nieuwstadt F (1984) The turbulent structure of the stable, nocturnal boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 41(14):2202–2216
Oldroyd HJ, Katul G, Pardyjak ER, Parlange MB (2014) Momentum balance of katabatic flow on steep slopes covered with short vegetation. Geophys Res Lett 41(13):4761–4768
Oldroyd HJ, Pardyjak ER, Huwald H, Parlange MB (2016) Adapting tilt corrections and the governing flow equations for steep, fully three-dimensional, mountainous terrain. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 159(3):539–565
Poulos G, Zhong SS (2008) An observational history of small-scale katabatic winds in mid-latitudes. Geography Compass 2(6):1798–1821
Simoni S, Padoan S, Nadeau DF, Diebold M, Porporato A, Barrenetxea G, Ingelrest F, Vetterli M, Parlange MB (2011) Hydrologic response of an alpine watershed: application of a meteorological wireless sensor network to understand streamflow generation. Water Resour Res 47(10Z):W10524. doi:10.1029/2011WR010730
Skyllingstad E (2003) Large-eddy simulation of katabatic flows. Boundary-layer meteorology 106(2):217–243
Smeets C, Duynkerke P, Vugts H (1988) Turbulence characteristics of the stable boundary layer over a mid-latitude glacier. Part I: a combination of katabatic and large-scale forcing. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 87(1):117–145
Smeets C, Duynkerke P, Vugts H (2000) Turbulence characteristics of the stable boundary layer over a mid-latitude glacier. Part II: pure katabatic forcing conditions. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 97(1):73–107
Smith C, Skyllingstad E (2005) Numerical simulation of katabatic flow with changing slope angle. Mon Weather Rev 133(11):3065–3080
Stull R (1988) An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Kluwer Academic publishers, Dordrecht, 666 pp
Sun J (2007) Tilt corrections over complex terrain and their implication for CO2 transport. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 124(2):143–159
Vickers D, Mahrt L (2003) The cospectral gap and turbulent flux calculations. J Atmos Ocean Technol 20(5):660–672
Vickers D, Mahrt L (2006) A solution for flux contamination by mesoscale motions with very weak turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 118(3):431–447
Wyngaard J, Coté O, Izumi Y (1971) Local free convection, similarity, and the budgets of shear stress and heat flux. J Atmos Sci 28(7):1171–1182
Zhong S, Whiteman C (2008) Downslope flows on a low-angle slope and their interactions with valley inversions. Part II: numerical modeling. J Appl Meteorol Clim 47(7):2039–2057
Acknowledgments
This research was primarily funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF-200021-134892) and the Competence Center for Environmental Sustainability (CCES-SwissEx) of the ETH domain. This work was partially supported by the United States Office of Naval Research Award #N00014–11–1–0709, the National Science Foundation Division of Environmental Biology Grant # DEB-1440409 and the NSERC Discovery Grant. The authors wish to thank Dr. Andrey A. Grachev, Dr. Daniel F. Nadeau and Dr. Larry Mahrt for helpful discussions. Thanks go also to our colleagues from the EFLUM laboratory for outstanding assistance in the Val Ferret field campaigns, and special thanks to the Commune d’Orsières for general logistical support for field campaigns in Val Ferret. We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers, whose comments have helped to improve our manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oldroyd, H.J., Pardyjak, E.R., Higgins, C.W. et al. Buoyant Turbulent Kinetic Energy Production in Steep-Slope Katabatic Flow. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 161, 405–416 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0184-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0184-3