Abstract
At the top of the planetary boundary layer, the entrainment of air, which incorporates dry and warm air from the free troposphere into the boundary layer, is a key process for exchanges with the free troposphere since it controls the growth of the boundary layer. Here, we focus on the semi-arid boundary layer where the entrainment process is analyzed using aircraft observations collected during the African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis experiment and large-eddy simulations. The role of the entrainment is specifically enhanced in this region where very large gradients at the planetary boundary-layer top can be found due to the presence of the moist, cold monsoon flow on which the dry, warm Harmattan flow is superimposed. A first large-eddy simulation is designed based on aircraft observations of 5 June 2006 during the transition period between dry conditions and the active monsoon phase. The simulation reproduces the boundary-layer development and dynamics observed on this day. From this specific case, sensitivity tests are carried out to cover a range of conditions observed during seven other flights made in the same transition period in order to describe the entrainment processes in detail. The combination of large-eddy simulations and observations allows us to test the parametrization of entrainment in a mixed-layer model with zero-order and first-order approximations for the entrainment zone. The latter representation of the entrainment zone gives a better fit with the conditions encountered in the Sahelian boundary layer during the transition period because large entrainment thicknesses are observed. The sensitivity study also provides an opportunity to highlight the contribution of shear stress and scalar jumps at the top of the boundary layer in the entrainment process, and to test a relevant parametrization published in the recent literature for a mixed-layer model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agusti-Panareda A, Beljaars A, Ahlgrimm M, Balsamo G, Bock O, Forbes R, Ghelli F, Guichard A, Kohler M, Meynadier R, Morcrette JJ (2010) The ECMWF re-analysis for the AMMA observational campaign. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 136: 1457–1472
Angevine W (2008) Transitional, entraining, cloudy, and coastal boundary layers. Acta Geophys 56: 2–20. doi:10.2478/s11600-007-0035-1
Angevine WM, White AB, Avery SK (1994) Boundary-layer depth and entrainment zone characterization with a boundary-layer profiler. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 68: 375–385
Canut G, Lothon M, Lohou F, Saïd F (2010) Observation of entrainment at the interface between monsoon flow and Saharan Air Layer. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 136: 34–46
Conzemius RJ, Fedorovich E (2006a) Dynamics of sheared convective boundary layer entrainment. Part I: methodology background and large-eddy simulations. J Atmos Sci 63: 1151–1178
Conzemius RJ, Fedorovich E (2006b) Dynamics of sheared convective boundary layer entrainment. Part II: evaluation of bulk model predictions of entrainment flux. J Atmos Sci 63: 1179–1199
Conzemius RJ, Fedorovich E (2007) Bulk models of the sheared convective boundary layer: evaluation through large eddy simulations. J Atmos Sci 64: 786–807
Couvreux F, Guichard F, Redelsperger JL, Kiemle C, Masson V, Lafore JP, Flamant C (2005) Water-vapour variability within a convective boundary-layer assessed by large-eddy simulations and IHOP-2002 observations. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 131: 2665–2693
Couvreux F, Guichard F, Redelsperger JL, Masson V (2007) Negative water vapour skewness and dry tongues in the convective boundary layer: observations and LES budget analysis. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 123: 269–294
Couvreux F, Guichard F, Bock O, Campistron B, Lafore J, Redelsperger JL (2010) Synoptic variability of the monsoon flux over west Africa prior to the onset. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 136: 169–173
Cuxart J, Bougeault P, Redelsperger JL (2000) A turbulence scheme allowing for mesoscale and large-eddy simulations. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 26: 1–30
Driedonks AGM (1982) Models and observations of the growth of the atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 23: 283–306
Faloona I, Lenschow DH, Stevens B, Campos T, Blomquist B, Thornton D, Bandy A, Gerber H, Van Zanten M (2005) Observations of entrainment in eastern Pacific marine stratocumulus using three conserved scalars. J Atmos Sci 62: 3268–3285
Fedorovich E, Conzemius R (2008) Effects of wind shear on the atmospheric convective boundary-layer structure and evolution. Acta Geophys 56: 114–141
Fedorovich E, Conzemius R, Mironov D (2004) Convective entrainment into a shear-free, linearly stratified atmosphere: bulk models reevaluated through large eddy simulations. J Atmos Sci 61: 281–295
Garratt JR (1992) The atmospheric boundary layer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 316
Grossman RL, Nimal G (1995) Moisture flux and mixing processes in the daytime continental convective boundary layer. J Geophys Res 100: 25665–25674
Gryning SE, Batcharova E (1990) Analytical model for the growth of the coastal internal boundary layer during onshore flow. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 116: 187–203
Kalapureddy M, Lothon M, Campistron B, Lohou F, Saïd F (2010) Wind profiler analysis of the African Easterly Jet in relation with the boundary layer and the Saharan Heat-Low. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 136: 141–158
Kawa SR, Pearson J (1989) An observational study of stratocumulus entrainment and thermodynamics. J Atmos Sci 46: 2649–2661
Kim S, Park S, Moeng CH (2003) Entrainment processes in the convective boundary layer with varying wind shear. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 108: 221–245
Kim SW, Park SU, Pino D, Vilà-Gueraude Arellano J (2006) Parameterization of entrainment in a sheared convective boundary layer using a first-order jump model. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 120: 445–475
Lafore JP, Stein J, Asencio N, Bougeault P, Ducrocq V, Duron J, Fischer C, Héreil P, Mascart P, Redelsperger JL, Richard E, Vilà-Guerau de Arellano J (1998) The Meso-NH atmospheric simulation system. Part I: adiabatic formulation and control simulations. Ann Geophys 109: 16–90
Lebel T, Parker DJ, Flamant C, Bourlès B, Marticorena B, Mougin C, Peugeot E, Diedhiou A, Haywood JM, Ngamini JB, Polcher J, Redelsperger JL, Thorncroft CD (2010) The AMMA field campaigns: multiscale and multidisciplinary observations in the West African region. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 136: 8–33
Lenschow DH, Krummel PB, Siems ST (1999) Measuring entrainment, divergence and vorticity on the mesoscale from aircraft. J Atmos Ocean Technol 16: 1384–1400
Lilly DK (1968) Models of cloudy-topped mixed layers under a strong inversion. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 94: 292–309
Lohou F, Saïd F, Lothon M, Durand P, Serça D (2010) Impact of the boundary-layer processes on surface turbulence characteristics in the frame of the west african monsoon. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 136: 1–23
Lothon M, Couvreux F, Donier S, Guichard F, Lacarrère P, Noilhan J, Saïd F (2007) Impact of the coherent eddies on airborne measurements of vertical turbulent fluxes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 124
Lothon M, Saïd F, Lohou F, Campistron B (2008) Observation of the diurnal cycle in the low troposphere of West Africa. Mon Weather Rev 136
Mahrt L. (1991) Boundary-layer moisture regimes. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 117: 151–176
Pino D, Vilà-Guerau de Arellano J (2008) Effects of shear in the convective boundary layer: analysis of the turbulent kinetic energy budget. Acta Geophys 56: 167–193
Pino D, Vilà-Guerau de Arellano J, Duynkerke PG (2003) The contribution of shear to the evolution of a convective boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 60: 1913–1926
Pino D, Vilà-Gueraude Arellano J, Kim S-W (2006) Representing sheared convective boundary layer zero- and first-order-jump mixed-layer models: Large-eddy simulation verification. J Appl Meterol Clim 45: 1224–1243
Redelsperger JL, Sommeria G (1982) Method of representing the turbulence at scales inferior to the grid in a three-dimensional model of cloud convecion. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 21: 509–530
Saïd F, Canut G, Durand M, Lothon P, Lohou F (2010) Seasonal evolution of boundary-layer turbulence measured by aircraft during the AMMA 2006 special observation period. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 136: 47–65
Sorbjan Z (1996) Effects caused by varying the strength of the capping inversion based on a large eddy simulation model of the shear-free convective boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 53: 2015–2024
Sorbjan Z (2004) Large-eddy simulations of the baroclinic mixed layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 112: 57–80
Stull RB (1976) The energetics of entrainment across a density interface. J Atmos Sci 33: 1260–1267
Stull RB (1988) An introduction to boundary layer meteorology, new edition, 1999. Kluwer, Dordrecht, p 666
Sullivan PP, Moeng C-H, Stevens B, Lenschow DH, Mayor SD (1998) Structure of the entrainment zone capping the convective atmospheric boundary layer. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 55: 3042–3064
Sun J, Xu Q (2009) Parameterization of sheared convective entrainment in the first-order jump model: evaluation through large-eddy simulation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 132: 279–288
Sun J, Yuan W (2008) Effect of the entrainment flux ratio on the relationship between entrainment rate and convective Richardson number. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 126: 237–247
Tennekes H (1973) A model for the dynamics of the inversion above a convective boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 30: 538–567
Tennekes H, Driedonks AGM (1981) Basic entrainment equations for the atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 20: 515–531. doi:10.1007/BF00122299
Turner D, Wagner E, Wulfmeyer V, Pal S, Larry K (2010) Raman lidar observations of water vapor mixing ratio turbulence profiles in the convective boundary layer. Oral presentation, International symposium for the advanced of boundary layer remote sensing, 28–30 June 2010, Paris
Van Zanten MC, Duynkerke P, Cuijpers J (1999) Entrainment parameterization in convective boundary layers. J Atmos Sci 56: 813–828
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Canut, G., Couvreux, F., Lothon, M. et al. Observations and Large-Eddy Simulations of Entrainment in the Sheared Sahelian Boundary Layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 142, 79–101 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-011-9661-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-011-9661-x