Abstract
It is frequently observed in field experiments that the eddy covariance heat fluxes are systematically underestimated as compared to the available energy. The flux imbalance problem is investigated using the NCAR’s large-eddy simulation (LES) model imbedded with an online scheme to calculate Reynolds-averaged fluxes. A top–down and a bottom–up tracer are implemented into the LES model to quantify the influence of entrainment and bottom–up diffusion processes on flux imbalance. The results show that the flux imbalance follows a set of universal functions that capture the exponential decreasing dependence on u */w *, where u * and w * are friction velocity and the convective velocity scale, respectively, and an elliptic relationship to z/z i , where z i is the mixing-layer height. The source location in the boundary layer is an important factor controlling the imbalance magnitude and its horizontal and vertical distributions. The flux imbalance of heat and the bottom–up tracer is tightly related to turbulent coherent structures, whereas for the top–down diffusion, such relations are weak to nonexistent. Our results are broadly consistent with previous studies on the flux imbalance problem, suggesting that the published results are robust and are not artefacts of numerical schemes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Businger JA, Wyngaard JC, Izumi Y and Bradley EF (1971). Flux-profile relationships in the atmospheric surface layer. J Atmos Sci 28: 181–189
Davis KJ, Bakwin PS, Yi C, Berger BW, Zhao C, Teclaw RM and Isebrands JG (2003). The annual cycles of CO2 and H2O exchange over a northern mixed forest as observed from a very tall tower. Global Change Biol 9: 1278–1293
Deardorff JW (1980). Stratocumulus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 18: 495–527
Jonker HJJ, Duynkerke PG and Cuijpers JWM (1999). Mesoscale fluctuations in scalars generated by boundary layer convection. J Atmos Sci 56: 801–808
Kanda M, Inagaki A, Letzel MO, Raasch S and Watanabe T (2004). LES study of the energy imbalance problem with eddy covariance fluxes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 110: 381–404
Klemp JB and Durran DR (1983). An upper boundary condition permitting internal gravity wave radiation in numerical mesoscale models. Mon Wea Rev 111: 430–444
Lee X (1998). On micrometeorological observations of surface-air exchange over tall vegetation. Agric For Meteorol 91: 39–49
Lee X and Black TA (1993). Atmospheric turbulence within and above a Douglas-fir stand. Part 2: eddy fluxes of sensible heat and water vapor. BoundaryLayer Meteorol 64: 369–390
Leuning R (2004). Measurements of trace gas fluxes in the atmosphere using eddy covariance: WPL corrections revisited. In: Lee, X (eds) Handbook of micrometeorology: a guide for surface flux measurement and analysis, pp 119–132. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Mahrt L (1998). Flux sampling errors for aircraft and towers. J Atmos Oceanic Tech 15: 416–429
Moeng CH (1984). A large-eddy simulation model for the study of planetary boundary-layer turbulence. J Atmos Sci 41: 2052–2062
Patton EG, Sullivan PP and Moeng CH (2005). The influence of idealized heterologeneity on wet and dry planetary boundary layers coupled to the land surface. J Atmos Sci 62: 2078–2097
Piacsek SA and Williams GP (1970). Conservation properties of convection difference schemes. J Comput Phys 6: 392–405
Purnell DK (1976). Solution of the advective equation by upstream interpolation with cubic spline. Mon Wea Rev 104: 42–48
Raasch S and Etling D (1998). Modeling deep ocean convection: large eddy simulation in comparison with laboratory experiments. J Phys Oceanogr 28: 1786–1802
Raasch S and Schröter M (2001). PALM – a large eddy simulation model performing on massively parallel computers. Meteorol Z 10: 363–372
Steinfeld G, Letzel MO, Raasch S, Kanda M and Inagaki A (2007). Spatial representativeness of single tower measurements and the imbalance problem with eddy-covariance fluxes: results of a large-eddy simulation study. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 123: 77–98
Sullivan PP, McWilliams JC and Moeng CH (1996). A grid nesting method for large-eddy simulation of planetary boundary-layer flows. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 80: 167–202
Twine TE, Kustas WP, Norman JM, Cook DR, Houser PR, Meyers TP, Prueger JH, Starks PJ and Wesely ML (2000). Correcting eddy-covariance flux underestimates over a grassland. Agric For Meteorol 103: 279–300
Webb EK, Pearman GI and Leuning R (1980). Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapor transfer. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 106: 85–100
Wilson K, Goldstein A, Falge E, Aubinet M, Baldocchi D, Berbigier P, Bernhofer C, Ceulemans R, Dolman H, Field C, Grelle A, Ibrom A, Law BE, Kowalski A, Meyers T, Moncrieff J, Monson R, Oechel W, Tenhunen J, Valentini R and Verma S (2002). Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites. Agric For Meteorol 113: 223–243
Wyngaard JC and Brost RA (1984). Top-down and bottom–up diffusion of a scalar in the convective boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 41: 102–112
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, J., Lee, X. & Patton, E.G. A Modelling Study of Flux Imbalance and the Influence of Entrainment in the Convective Boundary Layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 127, 273–292 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-007-9254-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-007-9254-x