Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A simple unified theory for flow in the canopy and roughness sublayer

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mean flow profile within and above a tall canopy is well known to violate the standard boundary-layer flux–gradient relationships. Here we present a theory for the flow profile that is comprised of a canopy model coupled to a modified surface-layer model. The coupling between the two components and the modifications to the surface-layer profiles are formulated through the mixing layer analogy for the flow at a canopy top. This analogy provides an additional length scale—the vorticity thickness—upon which the flow just above the canopy, within the so-called roughness sublayer, depends. A natural form for the vertical profiles within the roughness sublayer follows that overcomes problems with many earlier forms in the literature. Predictions of the mean flow profiles are shown to match observations over a range of canopy types and stabilities.

The unified theory predicts that key parameters, such as the displacement height and roughness length, have a significant dependence on the boundary-layer stability. Assuming one of these parameters a priori leads to the incorrect variation with stability of the others and incorrect predictions of the mean wind speed profile. The roughness sublayer has a greater impact on the mean wind speed in stable than unstable conditions. The presence of a roughness sublayer also allows the surface to exert a greater drag on the boundary layer for an equivalent value of the near-surface wind speed than would otherwise occur. This characteristic would alter predictions of the evolution of the boundary layer and surface states if included within numerical weather prediction models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayotte KW, Finnigan JJ, Raupach MR (1999) A second-order closure for neutrally stratified vegetative canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 90:189–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldocchi D, Finnigan J, Wilson K, Paw UKT, Falge E (2000) On measuring net ecosystem carbon exchange over tall vegetation on complex terrain. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 96:257–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belcher SE, Jerram N, Hunt JCR (2003) Adjustment of a turbulent boundary layer to a canopy of roughness elements. J Fluid Mech 488:369–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm M, Finnigan JJ, Raupach MR (2000) Dispersive fluxes and canopy flows: Just how important are they? In: Proceedings of the 24th conference on agricultural and forest meteorology. Amer Meteorol Soc Davis CA pp 106–107

  • Brunet Y, Irvine IR (2000) The control of coherent eddies in vegetation canopies: Streamwise structure spacing, canopy shear scale and atmopsheric stability. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 94:139–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cellier P, Brunet Y (1992) Flux–gradient relationships above tall plant canopies. Agric For Meteorol 58:93–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen F, Schwerdtfeger P (1989) Flux–gradient relationships for momentum and heat over a rough natural surface. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 115:335–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cionco RM (1965) A mathematical model for air flow in a vegetative canopy. J Appl Meteorol 4:517–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan IR (1968) Mass, heat and momentum exchange between stands of plants and their atmospheric environment. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 94:523–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnigan JJ (1985) Turbulent transport in flexible canopies. In: Hutchison BA, Hicks BB (eds) The forest-atmosphere interaction. Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlanbs, pp 443–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnigan JJ (2000) Turbulence in plant canopies. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 32:519–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnigan J (2004) Advection and modelling. In: Lee X, Massman W, Law B (eds): Handbook of micrometeorology. A guide for surface flux measurement and analysis, vol 29 of Atmospheric and oceanographic sciences library. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Chapt. 10, pp 209–244

  • Finnigan JJ, Brunet Y (1995) Turbulent airflow in forests on flat and hilly terrain. In: Coutt MP, Grace J (eds): Wind and trees. Cambridge University Press, UK, pp 3–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnigan JJ, Leuning R (2000) Long term measurements-coordinate systems and averaging. In: Proceedings of the international workshop for advanced flux network and flux evaluation pp 51–56

  • Finnigan JJ, Clement R, Malhi Y, Leuning R, Cleugh HA (2003) A re-evaluation of long-term flux measurement techniques. Part I: Averaging and coordinate rotation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 107:1–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnigan JJ, Belcher SE (2004) Flow over a hill covered with a plant canopy. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 130:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnigan JJ, Shaw RH (2000) A wind tunnel study of air flow in waving-wheat: An EOF analysis of the structure of the large-eddy motion. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 96:211–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garratt JR (1980) Surface influence on vertical profiles in the atmospheric near-surface layer. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 106:803–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garratt JR (1983) Surface influence upon vertical profiles in the nocturnal boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 26:69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garratt JR (1992) The atmospheric boundary layer. Cambridge University Press, UK, 316 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Graefe J (2004) Roughness layer corrections with emphasis on SVAT model applications. Agric For Meteorol 124:237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoerner SF (ed) (1965) Fluid-dynamic drag: practical information on aerodynamic drag and hydrodynamic resistance, Chapt. II–VI, pp 2-1–6–20

  • Högström U (1996) Review of some basic characteristics of the atmospheric surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 78:215–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue E (1963) On the turbulent structure of airflow within crop canopies. J Meteorol Soc Japan 41:317–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson PS (1981) On the displacement height in the logarithmic velocity profile. J Fluid Mech 111:15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kader BA, Yaglom AM (1990) Mean field and fluctuating moments in unstably stratified turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 212:637–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katul GG, Albertson JD (1998) An investigation of higher-order closure models for a forested canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 89:47–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katul G, Hsieh C-I, Kuhn G, Ellsworth D, Nie D (1997) Turbulent eddy motion at the forest- atmosphere interface. J Geophys Res 102(D12):13409–13421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katul GG, Mahrt L, Poggi D, Sanz C (2004) One- and two-equation models for canopy turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 113:81–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee X (2003) Fetch and footprint of turbulent fluxes over vegetative stands with elevated sources. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 107:561–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuning R, Cleugh HA, Zegelin SJ, Hughes D (2005) Carbon and water fluxes over a temperate Eucalyptus forest and a tropical wet/dry savanna in Australia: measurements and comparison with MODIS remote sensing estimates. Agric For Meteorol 129:151–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mölder M, Grelle A, Lindroth A, Halldin S (1999) Flux-profile relationships over a boreal forest—roughness sublayer corrections. Agric For Meteorol 98–99:645–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwstadt FTM (1984) The turbulent structure of the stable, nocturnal boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 41:2202–2216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Physick WL, Garratt JR (1995) Incorporation of a high-roughness lower boundary into a mesoscale model for studies of dry deposition over complex terrain. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 74:55–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poggi D, Katul GG, Albertson JD (2004a) A note on the contribution of dispersive fluxes to momentum transfer within canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 111:615–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poggi D, Porporato A, Ridolfi L, Albertson JD, Katul GG (2004b) The effect of vegetation density on canopy sub-layer influence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 111:565–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rannik Ü, Markkanen T, Raittila J, Hari P, Vesala T (2003) Turbulence statistics inside and over forest: Influence on footprint prediction. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 109:163–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach MR (1989) A practical Lagrangian method for relating scalar concentrations to source distributions in vegetation canopies. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 115:609–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach MR (1992) Drag and drag partition on rough surfaces. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 60:375–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach MR (1994) Simplified expressions for vegetation roughness length and zero-plane displacement as functions of canopy height and area index. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 71:211–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach MR, Thom AS (1981) Turbulence in and above plant canopies. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 13:97–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach MR, Shaw RH (1982) Averaging procedures for flow within vegetation canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 22:79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach MR, Finnigan JJ, Brunet Y (1996) Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: The mixing layer analogy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 78:351–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seginer I (1974) Aerodynamic roughness of vegetated surfaces. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 5:383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw RH, Den Hartog G, Neumann HH (1988) Influence of foliar density and thermal stability in profiles of Reynolds stress and turbulence intensity in a deciduous forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 45:391–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw RH, Finnigan JJ, Patton EG, Fitzmaurice L (2006) Eddy structure near the plant interface. In: Proceedings of the 17th symposium on boundary layers and turbulenceAmer Meteorol Soc, San Diego, CA, J2.1

  • Simpson IJ, Thurtell GW, Neumann HH, Den Hartog G, Edwards GC (1998) The validity of similarity theory in the roughness sublayer above forests. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 87:69–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennekes H, Lumley JL (1972) A first course in turbulence, Chapt. 1&2. The MIT Press. pp 1–58

  • Thom AS, Stewart JB, Oliver HR, Gash JHC (1975) Comparison of aerodynamic and energy budget estimates of fluxes over a pine forest. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 101:93–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesson K, Katul GG, Siqueira M (2003) Quantifying organization of atmospheric turbulent eddy motion using non-linear time series analysis. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 106:507–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson NR, Shaw RH (1977) A higher order closure model for canopy flow. J Appl Meteorol 16: 1198–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Canberra, Australia

    Ian N. Harman & John J. Finnigan

Authors
  1. Ian N. Harman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John J. Finnigan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian N. Harman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harman, I.N., Finnigan, J.J. A simple unified theory for flow in the canopy and roughness sublayer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 123, 339–363 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9145-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9145-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation