Skip to main content
Log in

Learning and the biology of consciousness: a commentary on Birch, Ginsburg, and Jablonka

  • Published:
Biology & Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Reply to this article was published on 13 October 2021

The Original Article was published on 03 December 2020

Abstract

Birch, Ginsburg, and Jablonka suggest that Unlimited Associative Learning is a “transition marker” in the evolutionary process that produced consciousness, and organizes research by tying together a range of “hallmarks” of consciousness. I argue that the features they recognize as “hallmarks” are indeed important in the evolution of consciousness, but UAL may have a more limited role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The first paper in the series is Ginsburg and Jablonka 2007; see the references in the target article for the ones that followed.

References

  • Birch J, Ginsburg S, Jablonka E (2020) Unlimited associative learning and the origins of consciousness: a primer and some predictions. Biol Philos 35:56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett DC (1995) Darwin’s dangerous idea: evolution and the meanings of life. Touchstone, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg TE, Mallatt J (2016) The ancient origins of consciousness: how the brain created experience. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gánti T (2003) The principles of life, with a commentary by James Griesemer and Eörs Szathmáry. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg S, Jablonka E (2007) The transition to experiencing: I. Limited learning and limited experiencing. Biol Theory 2:218–230. https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2007.2.3.218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg S, Jablonka E (2019) The evolution of the sensitive soul: learning and the origins of consciousness. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith P (2016) Other minds: the octopus, the sea, and the birth of consciousness. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Szathmáry E (1995) The major transitions in evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotnick R, Dornbos S, Chen J (2010) Information landscapes and sensory ecology of the Cambrian radiation. Paleobiology 36(2):303–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Godfrey-Smith.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Godfrey-Smith, P. Learning and the biology of consciousness: a commentary on Birch, Ginsburg, and Jablonka. Biol Philos 36, 44 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-021-09820-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-021-09820-3

Keywords

Navigation