Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 267–276 | Cite as

Getting (even more) serious about similarity

  • Wendy S. ParkerEmail author


This paper critically examines Weisberg’s weighted feature matching account of model-world similarity. A number of concerns are raised, including that Weisberg provides an account of what underlies scientific judgments of relative similarity, when what is desired is an account of the sorts of model-target similarities that are necessary or sufficient for achieving particular types of modeling goal. Other concerns relate to the details of the account, in particular to the content of feature sets, the nature of shared features and the assumed independence of feature weightings.


Similarity Models Weisberg 


  1. Cartwright N (1983) How the laws of physics lie. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Contessa G (2006) Scientific representation, similarity and prediction. Accessed 27 Nov 2012
  3. Giere RN (1988) Explaining science: a cognitive approach. Chicago University Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Godfrey-Smith P (2006) The strategy of model-based science. Biol Philos 21:725–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Teller P (2001) Twilight of the perfect model model. Erkenntnis 55:393–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Weisberg M (2012) Getting serious about similarity. Philos Sci 79:785–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Weisberg M (2013) Simulation and Similiarity. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyDurham UniversityDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations