Skip to main content
Log in

The arts and human nature: evolutionary aesthetics and the evolutionary status of art behaviours

Stephen Davies: The artful species: aesthetics, art, and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012

  • Published:
Biology & Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay reviews one of the most recent books in a trend of new publications proffering evolutionary theorising about aesthetics and the arts—themes within an increasing literature on aspects of human life and human nature in terms of evolutionary theory. Stephen Davies’ The Artful Species links some of our aesthetic sensibilities with our evolved human nature and critically surveys the interdisciplinary debate regarding the evolutionary status of the arts. Davies’ engaging and accessible writing succeeds in demonstrating the maturity and scope of the field and his critique is timely and unparalleled. A laudable effort, however it may have benefited from espousing a co-evolutionary model more explicitly. Moreover there may be reason to question the usefulness of the standard set of distinctions (‘adaptation’, ‘spandrel’, ‘technology’) that Davies appeals to.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Following Davies I use ‘ka’ throughout to denote ‘thousand years ago’ and ‘ma’ for ‘million years ago’.

  2. Adrian Currie initially suggested this to me.

  3. All page references throughout cite The Artful Species except where noted.

  4. Davies argues convincingly that some theorists have adopted too liberal—and others too restrictive—notions of the aesthetic for use in this field and consequently he implements a more moderate account: that aesthetic sensibilities target concepts like beauty and the sublime (aesthetic judgements are not merely any perceptually based judgement), yet they are free of much of the extra Kantian baggage traditionally associated with aesthetic experience by some philosophers.

  5. Much of the following discussion will apply equally to various sexual paradigms but the primary context, from an (hominin) evolutionary perspective, is heterosexual attraction.

  6. Davies defends the view that such evaluation can be genuinely aesthetic, see pp. 18–20.

  7. Ethnomusicologists have long celebrated hunting bows as musical instruments in contemporary hunter-gatherer societies such as the San (sometimes called ‘Bushmen’) and !Kung people, see for example Camp and Nettl (1955).

References

  • Bailey Martin (2013) Ice Age Lion Man is world’s earliest figurative sculpture. The Art Newspaper: http://www.theartnewspaper.com/articles/Ice-Age-iLion-Mani-is-worlds-earliest-figurative-sculpture/28595/. Accessed 14 Feb 2013

  • Boyd Brian (2009) On the origin of stories. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Calcott Brett (2009) Lineage explanations: explaining how biological mechanisms change. Br J Philos Sci 60(1):51–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camp Charles M, Nettl Bruno (1955) The musical bow in Southern Africa. Anthropos 50:65–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain Andrew T (2000) On the evolution of human aesthetic preferences. Assemblage 5: http://www.assemblage.group.shef.ac.uk/5/. Accessed 14 Feb 2013

  • Coe Kathryn (2003) The ancestress hypothesis. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  • Conard Nicholas J (2009) A female figurine from the basal aurignacian of hohle fels cave in southwestern Germany. Nature 459:248–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conard Nicholas J, Malina Maria, Münzel Susanne C (2009) New flutes document the earliest musical tradition in southwestern Germany. Nature 460:737–740

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Errico Francesco et al (2003) Archaeological evidence for the emergence of language, symbolism, and music—an alternative multidisciplinary perspective. J World Prehist 17(1):1–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dissanayake Ellen (1982) Aesthetic experience and human evolution. J Aesthet Art Crit 41(2):145–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton Denis (2009) The art instinct. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould Stephen Jay, Vrba Elizabeth (1982) Exaptation—a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8(1):4–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray Martin Paul (2010) Cave art and the evolution of the human mind. Victoria University of Wellington, MA thesis

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths Paul E (1990) Modularity, and the psychoevolutionary theory of emotion. Biol Philos 5(2):175–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henshilwood Christopher S, d’Errico Francesco, Watts Ian (2009) Engraved ochres from the middle stone age levels at Blombos Cave, South Africa. J Hum Evol 57(1):27–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honing Henkjan, Ploeger Annemie (2012) Cognition and the evolution of music: pitfalls and prospects. Top Cogn Sci 4(4):513–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffares Ben (2010) The co-evolution of tools and minds: cognition and material culture in the hominin lineage. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 9(4):503–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn Marek, Mithen Steven (1999) Handaxes: products of sexual selection. Antiquity 73:518–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawergren Bo (1988) The origin of musical instruments and sounds. Anthropos 83:31–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitin Daniel (2006) The world in six songs. Aurum Press, Great Britain

    Google Scholar 

  • McBrearty Sally, Stringer Chris (2007) Palaeoanthropology: the coast in colour. Nature 449:793–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe Viki (1988) Facial proportions, perceived age, and caregiving. In: Alley TR (ed) Social and applied aspects of perceiving faces. Hillsdale, Earlbaum, pp 89–95

    Google Scholar 

  • McGovern Patrick (2009) Uncorking the past: the quest for wine, beer and other alcoholic beverages. University of California Press, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller Geoffrey (2001) Aesthetic fitness: how sexual selection shaped artistic virtuosity as a fitness indicator and aesthetic preference as mate choice criteria. Bull Psychol Arts 2:20–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithen Steven (2005) The singing Neanderthals. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, Great Britain

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel Aniruddh (2010) Music, biological evolution, and the brain. In: Bailar M, Field C, Henry CJ (eds) Emerging disciplines. Rice University Press, Houston, pp 91–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike Alistair W G et al (2012) U-series dating of Palaeolithic art in 11 caves in Spain. Science 336(6087):1409–1413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skidelsky Edward (2010) The art instinct. Br J Aesthet 50(1):109–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny Kim (2012a) The evolved apprentice. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny Kim (2012b) Morality’s dark past. Anal Kritik 34(1):95–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiner Mary C (2010) Shell ornaments from the upper paleolithic through mesolithic layers of klissoura cave 1 by prosymna (Peloponese, Greece). Eurasian Prehist 7(2):287–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Verpooten Jan (2011) Brian Boyd’s evolutionary account of art: fiction or future. Biol Theory 6(2):176–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voland Eckart, Grammer Karl (eds) (2003) Evolutionary aesthetics. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallin Nils L, Merker Björn, Brown Steven (eds) (2000) The origins of music. MIT Press, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful for various suggestions from Stephen Davies, Kim Sterelny and Stuart Brock re earlier versions of the manuscript. I have also benefited from helpful discussions with Briar Prastiti, Adrian Currie and Kim Shaw-Williams.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton Killin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Killin, A. The arts and human nature: evolutionary aesthetics and the evolutionary status of art behaviours. Biol Philos 28, 703–718 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-013-9371-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-013-9371-5

Keywords

Navigation